The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A self-administered screener for migraine in primary care: The ID Migraine™ validation study
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Migraine is a highly prevalent and disabling illness that remains substantially undiagnosed in primary care. Because of the potential value of a screening tool, the current study was designed to establish the validity and reliability of a brief, self-administered migraine screener in patients with headache complaints in the primary care setting. METHODS: A total of 563 patients presenting for routine primary care appointments and reporting headaches in the past 3 months completed a self-administered migraine screener. All patients were then referred for an independent diagnostic evaluation by a headache expert, of whom 451 (80%) completed a full evaluation. Migraine diagnosis was assigned based on International Headache Society criteria after completing a semi-structured diagnostic interview. RESULTS: Of nine diagnostic screening questions, a three-item subset of disability, nausea, and sensitivity to light provided optimum performance, with a sensitivity of 0.81 (95% CI, 0.77 to 0.85), a specificity of 0.75 (95% CI, 0.64 to 0.84), and positive predictive value of 0.93 (95% CI, 89.9 to 95.8). Test-retest reliability was good, with a kappa of 0.68 (95% CI, 0.54 to 0.82). The sensitivity and specificity of the three-item migraine screener was similar regardless of sex, age, presence of other comorbid headaches, or previous diagnostic status. CONCLUSIONS: The three-item ID Migraine migraine screener was found to be a valid and reliable screening instrument for migraine headaches. Its ease of use and operating characteristics suggest that it could significantly improve migraine recognition in primary care.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical Data
Landis, J. R., & Koch, G. G. (1977) · Biometrics · doi:10.2307/2529310 · Cited by 81,148
Spitzer, R. L. (1999) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.282.18.1737 · Cited by 9,802
Prevalence and Burden of Migraine in the United States: Data From the American Migraine Study II
Lipton, R. B., Stewart, W. F., Diamond, S., Diamond, M. L., & Reed, M. (2001) · Headache: The Journal of Head and Face Pain · doi:10.1046/j.1526-4610.2001.041007646.x · Cited by 2,268
Self-citationDevelopment and Validation of the Migraine‐Specific Quality of Life Questionnaire
Jhingran, P., Osterhaus, J. T., Miller, D. W., Lee, J. T., & Kirchdoerfer, L. (1998) · Headache: The Journal of Head and Face Pain · doi:10.1046/j.1526-4610.1998.3804295.x · Cited by 252
Research works printed but not linked: 50
- 10.1001/jama.1992.03480010072027 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1177/033310240102100708 · DOI
- 10.1212/WNL.58.6.885 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1001/jama.1989.03420150061038 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1212/WNL.44.12_Suppl_10.S24 · DOI
- 10.1212/WNL.50.6.1741 · DOI
- 10.1001/archneur.57.3.418 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1212/WNL.55.5.629 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1001/archinte.159.8.813 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1212/WNL.55.5.624 · DOI · Paper page
- Osterhaus JT Gutterman DL Plachetka JR. Health care resource and lost labor costs of migraine headache in the US. Pharmacoeconomics 1992;2:67–76. · DOI
- 10.1046/j.1526-4610.2001.041007646.x · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1111/j.1526-4610.1992.hed3205223.x · DOI
- 10.1177/106002809402800518 · DOI
- Rapoport AM, Adelman JU. Cost of migraine management: a pharmacoeconomic overview. Am J Manag Care . 1998; 4: 531–545.
- 10.1093/fampra/19.3.297 · DOI
- 10.1136/jnnp.68.2.202 · DOI
- 10.1046/j.1526-4610.1998.3802087.x · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1177/135581969800300405 · DOI
- Lipton RB, Goadsby PJ, Sawyer JPC, et al. Migraine: diagnosis and assessment of disability. Rev Contemp Pharmacother . 2000; 11: 63–67.
- MacGregor EA. The doctor and the migraine patient: improving compliance. Neurology . 1997; 48 (suppl 3): S16–S20.
- 10.1212/WNL.55.6.754 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1111/j.1526-4610.1991.hed3105290.x · DOI
- 10.1590/S0004-282X1997000300003 · DOI
- 10.1177/0333102493013S1211 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1468-2982.1992.00369.x · DOI
- 10.1046/j.1468-2982.1994.1404280.x · DOI
- 10.1046/j.1468-2982.1998.1806342.x · DOI
- 10.1046/j.1526-4610.2002.02174.x · DOI
- 10.1046/j.1468-2982.1988.0801001.x · DOI
- Taylor K, Couch J, Schultz J, Denaro J, Kelly M, Harrison W. Prevalence and impact of migraine in primary care. Headache . 2000; 40: 434.
- 10.1212/WNL.47.1.52 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1046/j.1468-2982.1999.019002107.x · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1212/WNL.53.5.988 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/S0304-3959(00)00305-5 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1212/WNL.56.suppl_1.S20 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1046/j.1468-2982.1999.019005497.x · DOI
- 10.1212/WNL.44.5.837 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1111/j.1526-4610.1995.hed3509534.x · DOI
- 10.1016/S1076-6332(96)80451-X · DOI
- 10.2105/AJPH.67.12.1188 · DOI
- Kraemer H. Evaluating medical tests. Objective and quantitative guidelines. Thousand Oaks CA: Sage Publications 1992.
- 10.1001/archinte.1992.00400180125021 · DOI
- 10.1001/jama.1989.03430070055030 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1046/j.1468-2982.1994.1402107.x · DOI
- 10.1046/j.1464-410X.1997.00130.x · DOI
- 10.7326/0003-4819-132-10-200005160-00009 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/S0002-8703(99)70020-7 · DOI
- 10.1046/j.1468-2982.1994.1401016.x · DOI
- 10.1046/j.1526-4610.2001.111006343.x · DOI · Paper page
Cited by
Kessler, R. C., & Üstün, T. B. (2004) · International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research · doi:10.1002/mpr.168 · Cited by 4,771
Prevalence of headache in Europe: a review for the Eurolight project
Stovner, L. J., & Andree, C. (2010) · The Journal of Headache and Pain · doi:10.1007/s10194-010-0217-0 · Cited by 580
Migraines and meditation: does spirituality matter?
Wachholtz, A. B., & Pargament, K. I. (2008) · Journal of Behavioral Medicine · doi:10.1007/s10865-008-9159-2 · Cited by 233
Stovner, L. J., Al Jumah, M., Birbeck, G. L., Gururaj, G., Jensen, R., Katsarava, Z., Queiroz, L. P., Scher, A. I., Tekle-Haimanot, R., Wang, S.-J., et al. (2014) · The Journal of Headache and Pain · doi:10.1186/1129-2377-15-5 · Cited by 203
Ramasubbu, R., Taylor, V. H., Samaan, Z., Sockalingham, S., Li, M., Patten, S., Rodin, G., Schaffer, A., Beaulieu, S., & McIntyre, R. S. (2012) · Annals of Clinical Psychiatry · doi:10.1177/104012371202400110 · Cited by 206
Metadata
- Authors
- Lipton, R. B., Dodick, D., Sadovsky, R., Kolodner, K., Endicott, J., Hettiarachchi, J., & Harrison, W.
- Venue
- Neurology
- Published
- 2003-08-12
- Volume
- 61
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 375-382
- ISSN
- 0028-3878 (ISSN-L)
- 1526-632X
- OpenAlex
- W2036612444
- Cited by
- 610
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 9.15
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A self-administered screener for migraine in primary care: The ID Migraine™ validation study. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1212/01.wnl.0000078940.53438.83
- The paper
- Lipton, R. B., Dodick, D., Sadovsky, R., Kolodner, K., Endicott, J., Hettiarachchi, J., & Harrison, W. (2003). A self-administered screener for migraine in primary care: The ID Migraine™ validation study. Neurology. https://doi.org/10.1212/01.wnl.0000078940.53438.83
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.