Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 610

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A self-administered screener for migraine in primary care: The ID Migraine™ validation study

Lipton, R.B., Dodick, D., Sadovsky, R., Kolodner, K., Endicott, J., Hettiarachchi, J., Harrison, W.·2003·Neurology
DOI 10.1212/01.wnl.0000078940.53438.83
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Migraine is a highly prevalent and disabling illness that remains substantially undiagnosed in primary care. Because of the potential value of a screening tool, the current study was designed to establish the validity and reliability of a brief, self-administered migraine screener in patients with headache complaints in the primary care setting. METHODS: A total of 563 patients presenting for routine primary care appointments and reporting headaches in the past 3 months completed a self-administered migraine screener. All patients were then referred for an independent diagnostic evaluation by a headache expert, of whom 451 (80%) completed a full evaluation. Migraine diagnosis was assigned based on International Headache Society criteria after completing a semi-structured diagnostic interview. RESULTS: Of nine diagnostic screening questions, a three-item subset of disability, nausea, and sensitivity to light provided optimum performance, with a sensitivity of 0.81 (95% CI, 0.77 to 0.85), a specificity of 0.75 (95% CI, 0.64 to 0.84), and positive predictive value of 0.93 (95% CI, 89.9 to 95.8). Test-retest reliability was good, with a kappa of 0.68 (95% CI, 0.54 to 0.82). The sensitivity and specificity of the three-item migraine screener was similar regardless of sex, age, presence of other comorbid headaches, or previous diagnostic status. CONCLUSIONS: The three-item ID Migraine migraine screener was found to be a valid and reliable screening instrument for migraine headaches. Its ease of use and operating characteristics suggest that it could significantly improve migraine recognition in primary care.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1212/01.wnl.0000078940.53438.83

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 4 references

Research works printed but not linked: 50

  1. 10.1001/jama.1992.03480010072027 · DOI · Paper page
  2. 10.1177/033310240102100708 · DOI
  3. 10.1212/WNL.58.6.885 · DOI · Paper page
  4. 10.1001/jama.1989.03420150061038 · DOI · Paper page
  5. 10.1212/WNL.44.12_Suppl_10.S24 · DOI
  6. 10.1212/WNL.50.6.1741 · DOI
  7. 10.1001/archneur.57.3.418 · DOI · Paper page
  8. 10.1212/WNL.55.5.629 · DOI · Paper page
  9. 10.1001/archinte.159.8.813 · DOI · Paper page
  10. 10.1212/WNL.55.5.624 · DOI · Paper page
  11. Osterhaus JT Gutterman DL Plachetka JR. Health care resource and lost labor costs of migraine headache in the US. Pharmacoeconomics 1992;2:67–76. · DOI
  12. 10.1046/j.1526-4610.2001.041007646.x · DOI · Paper page
  13. 10.1111/j.1526-4610.1992.hed3205223.x · DOI
  14. 10.1177/106002809402800518 · DOI
  15. Rapoport AM, Adelman JU. Cost of migraine management: a pharmacoeconomic overview. Am J Manag Care . 1998; 4: 531–545.
  16. 10.1093/fampra/19.3.297 · DOI
  17. 10.1136/jnnp.68.2.202 · DOI
  18. 10.1046/j.1526-4610.1998.3802087.x · DOI · Paper page
  19. 10.1177/135581969800300405 · DOI
  20. Lipton RB, Goadsby PJ, Sawyer JPC, et al. Migraine: diagnosis and assessment of disability. Rev Contemp Pharmacother . 2000; 11: 63–67.
  21. MacGregor EA. The doctor and the migraine patient: improving compliance. Neurology . 1997; 48 (suppl 3): S16–S20.
  22. 10.1212/WNL.55.6.754 · DOI · Paper page
  23. 10.1111/j.1526-4610.1991.hed3105290.x · DOI
  24. 10.1590/S0004-282X1997000300003 · DOI
  25. 10.1177/0333102493013S1211 · DOI
  26. 10.1111/j.1468-2982.1992.00369.x · DOI
  27. 10.1046/j.1468-2982.1994.1404280.x · DOI
  28. 10.1046/j.1468-2982.1998.1806342.x · DOI
  29. 10.1046/j.1526-4610.2002.02174.x · DOI
  30. 10.1046/j.1468-2982.1988.0801001.x · DOI
  31. Taylor K, Couch J, Schultz J, Denaro J, Kelly M, Harrison W. Prevalence and impact of migraine in primary care. Headache . 2000; 40: 434.
  32. 10.1212/WNL.47.1.52 · DOI · Paper page
  33. 10.1046/j.1468-2982.1999.019002107.x · DOI · Paper page
  34. 10.1212/WNL.53.5.988 · DOI · Paper page
  35. 10.1016/S0304-3959(00)00305-5 · DOI · Paper page
  36. 10.1212/WNL.56.suppl_1.S20 · DOI · Paper page
  37. 10.1046/j.1468-2982.1999.019005497.x · DOI
  38. 10.1212/WNL.44.5.837 · DOI · Paper page
  39. 10.1111/j.1526-4610.1995.hed3509534.x · DOI
  40. 10.1016/S1076-6332(96)80451-X · DOI
  41. 10.2105/AJPH.67.12.1188 · DOI
  42. Kraemer H. Evaluating medical tests. Objective and quantitative guidelines. Thousand Oaks CA: Sage Publications 1992.
  43. 10.1001/archinte.1992.00400180125021 · DOI
  44. 10.1001/jama.1989.03430070055030 · DOI · Paper page
  45. 10.1046/j.1468-2982.1994.1402107.x · DOI
  46. 10.1046/j.1464-410X.1997.00130.x · DOI
  47. 10.7326/0003-4819-132-10-200005160-00009 · DOI · Paper page
  48. 10.1016/S0002-8703(99)70020-7 · DOI
  49. 10.1046/j.1468-2982.1994.1401016.x · DOI
  50. 10.1046/j.1526-4610.2001.111006343.x · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Lipton, R. B., Dodick, D., Sadovsky, R., Kolodner, K., Endicott, J., Hettiarachchi, J., & Harrison, W.
Venue
Neurology
Publisher
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
Published
2003-08-12
Volume
61
Issue
3
Pages
375-382
ISSN
  • 0028-3878 (ISSN-L)
  • 1526-632X
DOI
10.1212/01.wnl.0000078940.53438.83
OpenAlex
W2036612444
Cited by
610
References
4
FWCI
9.15
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.