Cited by 75Palliative Care and End-of-Life IssuesAmyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis ResearchNursing care and research

Disparities in perceptions of distress and burden in ALS patients and family caregivers

Adelman, E. E., Albert, S. M., Rabkin, J. G., Del Bene, M. L., Tider, T., O’Sullivan, I.·2004·Neurology

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To examine agreement between end-stage ALS patients and their family caregivers on indicators of physical and psychological status at the end of life. METHODS: Patient-caregiver pairs completed monthly interviews in patient homes. Patients were asked to rate their current pain, energy, suffering, depression, control over ALS, optimism, interest in hastened death, weariness from ALS, will to live, and how burdened they thought caregivers were on Visual Analogue Scales. Caregivers completed identical ratings of patients as well as a measure of their own burden. Both independently completed the ALS Functional Rating Scale-Rev. (ALSFRS-R), a measure of patient disability and physical function. RESULTS: A total of 69 patient-caregiver pairs participated. For measures of physical function, kappa ranged from 0.49 to 0.83, indicating moderate to excellent agreement. Patient and caregiver composite ALSFRS-R scores were highly correlated (r = 0.92, p < 0.001). Agreement between patients and caregivers was high for ratings of patient pain, control over ALS, optimism, and will to live, and this level of agreement remained high over multiple assessments. In pairwise analyses, caregivers rated patients as having less energy, greater suffering, and greater weariness than patients indicated for themselves, whereas patients rated caregivers as more burdened than caregivers reported for themselves. CONCLUSIONS: Caregivers can accurately report information about a patient's physical function at the end of life. However, patients and caregivers each overestimated the psychosocial impact of the disease on the other.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1212/01.wnl.0000125180.04000.a4

Cites

11 of 11 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Adelman, E. E., Albert, S. M., Rabkin, J. G., Del Bene, M. L., Tider, T., & O’Sullivan, I.
Affiliations
  • Northwestern University (US)
  • From the Feinberg School of Medicine (E.E. Adelman), Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, Gertrude H. Sergievsky Center (Dr. Albert, T. Tider and I. O’Sullivan), Department of Neurology and Eleanor and Lou Gehrig MDA/ALS Center (Dr. Albert, M.L. Del Bene), and Department of Psychiatry (Dr. Rabkin), Columbia University, New York.
Venue
Neurology
Published
2004-05-25
Volume
62
Issue
10
Pages
1766-1770
ISSN
  • 0028-3878 (ISSN-L)
  • 1526-632X
OpenAlex
W2109976578
Cited by
75
References
11
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 4
FWCI
7.13
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Neurology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Mental Health (MH62200, R01MH062200)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Research
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Pharmacy › Nursing care and research
Keywords
amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, end-of-life care, patient-caregiver agreement, caregiver burden, patient distress, suffering, depression, ALSFRS-R, physical function, psychosocial impact
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis, Attitude to Health, Culture, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Pain Measurement, Patients, Quality of Life, Regression Analysis, Sampling Studies, Socioeconomic Factors, Stress, Psychological, Terminal Care, Caregivers

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review