Cited by 256Nursing care and researchAmyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis ResearchFamily Caregiving in Mental Illness

A longitudinal study on quality of life and depression in ALS patient–caregiver couples

Gauthier, A., Vignola, A., Calvo, A., Cavallo, E., Moglia, C., Sellitti, L., Mutani, R., Chiò, A.·2007·Neurology

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the modification of quality of life (QoL) and depression in a series of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) patient-caregiver couples during a period of 9 months and compare them to patients' ALS Functional Rating Scale (ALS-FRS). METHODS: Depression was assessed with Zung Depression Scale (ZDS) and QoL with McGill Quality of Life Questionnaire (MQoL). Caregivers' burden was assessed with Caregiver Burden Inventory (CBI), and patients' feeling to be a burden with the Self-Perceived Burden Scale (SPBS). RESULTS: Thirty-one ALS patient-caregiver couples were interviewed at baseline and after 9 months. The mean ALS-FRS score was 28.7 (SD 7) at baseline and 24.1 (6.9) at the second interview (p = 0.0001). Patients' mean MQoL score slightly increased from 6.8 (1.6) to 7 (1.1) (p = 0.07); their ZDS score slightly increased (43.2 [8.7] at baseline and 45.7 [9.3] at the second interview) but they remained in the not depressed range. Caregivers' mean MQoL score slightly decreased, and their mean ZDS increased from 38.9 (8.1) to 42.2 (8.7) (p = 0.02). The mean CBI score increased from 50.3 (17.6) to 55.8 (16.4) (p = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS: We found a substantial steadiness of quality of life and depression in patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis over a 9-month period, vs a significant increase of burden and depression of their caregivers.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1212/01.wnl.0000257093.53430.a8

Cites

27 of 27 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gauthier, A., Vignola, A., Calvo, A., Cavallo, E., Moglia, C., Sellitti, L., Mutani, R., & Chiò, A.
Affiliations
  • University of Turin (IT)
  • From the Department of Neuroscienze, University of Torino, Italy.
Venue
Neurology
Published
2007-03-20
Volume
68
Issue
12
Pages
923-926
ISSN
  • 0028-3878 (ISSN-L)
  • 1526-632X
OpenAlex
W2011506008
Cited by
256
References
27
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 23 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 19 · 2014: 17 · 2013: 13 · 2012: 17
FWCI
38.28
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Neurology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Institutional Research Information System University of Turin (University of Turin) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Pharmacy › Nursing care and research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Family Caregiving in Mental Illness
Keywords
amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, quality of life, depression, caregiver burden, self-perceived burden, functional decline, longitudinal change
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Psychological, Aged, Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis, Attitude to Death, Depression, Disability Evaluation, Female, Humans, Longitudinal Studies, Male, Middle Aged, Quality of Life, Caregivers, Cost of Illness, Disease Progression

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review