Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 290

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Quantitative measurement of pain sensation in patients with Parkinson disease

Djaldetti, R., Shifrin, A., Rogowski, Z., Sprecher, E., Melamed, E., Yarnitsky, D.·2004·Neurology

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Pain is common in patients with Parkinson disease (PD) and can precede the diagnosis of the disease. Experimental studies and clinical evidence indicate involvement of basal ganglia and dopaminergic pathways in central pain processing. OBJECTIVE: To quantitatively assess and compare pain perception in patients with unilateral PD with and without pain and in patients with response fluctuations. METHODS: Thirty-six patients with PD (mean age, 61.8 +/- 11.2 years) with predominantly unilateral disease, 15 patients with response fluctuations (mean age, 65.3 +/- 10.4 years), and 28 age-matched healthy control subjects participated in the study. Subjective pain was assessed using the visual analog scale with von Frey filaments for tactile thresholds and contact thermode for warm sensation (WS) and heat pain thresholds (HPTs). RESULTS: Tactile and WS thresholds did not differ between patients in both patient groups and control subjects nor between sides. HPT was lower in patients with PD who experienced pain (n = 21) compared with those who did not (42.6 +/- 3.0 degrees C vs 45.6 +/- 2.8 degrees C; p < 0.01) and those who experienced pain in the more affected side (41.4 +/- 2.6 degrees C vs 43.7 +/- 3.3 degrees C; p < 0.0001). In patients with fluctuations there were no side differences in WS and HPT or between "on" and "off" periods. CONCLUSION: Endogenous pain in patients with Parkinson disease is accompanied by increased sensitivity to some painful stimuli, suggesting that basal ganglia abnormality also involves pain encoding.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1212/01.wnl.0000130455.38550.9d

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 3 references

Cited by

See all 290

Metadata

Authors
Djaldetti, R., Shifrin, A., Rogowski, Z., Sprecher, E., Melamed, E., & Yarnitsky, D.
Venue
Neurology
Published
2004-06-22
Volume
62
Issue
12
Pages
2171-2175
ISSN
  • 0028-3878 (ISSN-L)
  • 1526-632X
OpenAlex
W2002289659
Cited by
290
References
3
FWCI
7.17
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Quantitative measurement of pain sensation in patients with Parkinson disease. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1212/01.wnl.0000130455.38550.9d
The paper
Djaldetti, R., Shifrin, A., Rogowski, Z., Sprecher, E., Melamed, E., & Yarnitsky, D. (2004). Quantitative measurement of pain sensation in patients with Parkinson disease. Neurology. https://doi.org/10.1212/01.wnl.0000130455.38550.9d

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.