Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 296

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 30 of the 30 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Gray and white matter brain atrophy and neuropsychological impairment in multiple sclerosis

Sanfilipo, Michael P., Benedict, Ralph H.B., Weinstock-Guttman, Bianca, Bakshi, Rohit·2006·Neurology

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The relationship of gray and white matter atrophy in multiple sclerosis (MS) to neuropsychological and neuropsychiatric impairment has not been examined. METHODS: In 40 patients with MS and 15 age-/sex-matched normal controls, the authors used SPM99 to obtain whole brain normalized volumes of gray and white matter, as well as measured conventional lesion burden (total T1 hypointense and FLAIR hyperintense lesion volume). The whole brain segmentation was corrected for misclassification related to MS brain lesions. To compare the effects of gray matter, white matter, and lesion volumes with respect to brain-behavior relationships, the MS group (disease duration = 11.2 +/- 8.8 years; EDSS score = 3.3 +/- 1.9) underwent neuropsychological assessment, and was compared to a separate, larger group of age-/sex-matched normal controls (n = 83). RESULTS: The MS group had smaller gray (p = 0.009) and white matter volume (p = 0.018), impaired cognitive performance (verbal memory, visual memory, processing speed, and working memory) (all p < 0.0001), and greater neuropsychiatric symptoms (depression, p < 0.0001; dysphoria, p < 0.0001; irritability, p < 0.0001; anxiety, p < 0.0001; euphoria, p = 0.006; agitation, p = 0.02; apathy, p = 0.02; and disinhibition, p = 0.11) vs controls. Hierarchical stepwise regression analysis revealed that whole gray and white matter volumes accounted for greater variance than lesion burden in explaining cognitive performance and neuropsychiatric symptoms. White matter volume was the best predictor of mental processing speed and working memory, whereas gray matter volume predicted verbal memory, euphoria, and disinhibition. CONCLUSION: Both gray and white brain matter atrophy contribute to neuropsychological deficits in multiple sclerosis.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1212/01.wnl.0000201238.93586.d9

Cites

30 of 30 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 30 references

Cited by

See all 296

Metadata

Authors
Sanfilipo, M. P., Benedict, R. H. B., Weinstock-Guttman, B., & Bakshi, R.
Venue
Neurology
Published
2006-03-14
Volume
66
Issue
5
Pages
685-692
ISSN
  • 0028-3878 (ISSN-L)
  • 1526-632X
OpenAlex
W2029898151
Cited by
296
References
30
FWCI
12.91
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Gray and white matter brain atrophy and neuropsychological impairment in multiple sclerosis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1212/01.wnl.0000201238.93586.d9
The paper
Sanfilipo, M. P., Benedict, R. H. B., Weinstock-Guttman, B., & Bakshi, R. (2006). Gray and white matter brain atrophy and neuropsychological impairment in multiple sclerosis. Neurology. https://doi.org/10.1212/01.wnl.0000201238.93586.d9

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.