Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 298

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Optical coherence tomography and disease subtype in multiple sclerosis

Pulicken, M., Gordon-Lipkin, E., Balcer, L. J., Frohman, E., Cutter, G., Calabresi, P. A.·2007·Neurology

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To examine retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) thickness, macular volumes (MV), and visual acuity in multiple sclerosis (MS) eyes, with and without history of acute optic neuritis (ON). METHODS: RNFL thickness was measured in 326 MS and 94 control eyes using optical coherence tomography (OCT). MV and vision testing were done in a subset of the cohort. MS subtype was classified as relapsing-remitting (RRMS, n = 135), primary progressive (PPMS, n = 12), and secondary progressive (SPMS, n = 16). RESULTS: MS ON eyes had decreased RNFL thickness (84.2 microm) compared to controls (102.7 microm) (p < 0.0001). Unaffected fellow eyes of MS ON eyes (93.9 microm) (p < 0.01) and patients with MS with no history of ON (95.9 microm) (p < 0.05) also had decreased RNFL. RRMS (94.4 microm) (p < 0.001), PPMS (88.9 microm) (p < 0.01), and SPMS (81.8 microm) (p < 0.0001) (adjusted for age and duration of disease) had decreased RNFL compared to controls. There were significant differences in RNFL thickness within quadrants of peripapillary retina comparing relapsing to progressive MS subtypes. MV was decreased in MS ON eyes (6.2 mm(3)) (p < 0.0001) and SPMS subjects (6.2 mm(3)) (p < 0.05) compared to controls (6.8 mm(3)). CONCLUSION: Retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) is significantly decreased in multiple sclerosis (MS) optic neuritis (ON) eyes, unaffected fellow eyes of patients with MS ON, and MS eyes not affected by ON in our cohort. Macular volumes (MV) showed a significant decrease in MS ON eyes. Progressive MS cases showed more marked decreases in RNFL and MV than relapsing-remitting MS. OCT is a promising tool to detect subclinical changes in RNFL and MV in patients with MS and should be examined in longitudinal studies as a potential biomarker of retinal pathology in MS.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1212/01.wnl.0000294876.49861.dc

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 3 references

Cited by

See all 298

Metadata

Authors
Pulicken, M., Gordon-Lipkin, E., Balcer, L. J., Frohman, E., Cutter, G., & Calabresi, P. A.
Venue
Neurology
Published
2007-11-27
Volume
69
Issue
22
Pages
2085-2092
ISSN
  • 0028-3878 (ISSN-L)
  • 1526-632X
OpenAlex
W2121568944
Cited by
298
References
3
FWCI
15.33
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Optical coherence tomography and disease subtype in multiple sclerosis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1212/01.wnl.0000294876.49861.dc
The paper
Pulicken, M., Gordon-Lipkin, E., Balcer, L. J., Frohman, E., Cutter, G., & Calabresi, P. A. (2007). Optical coherence tomography and disease subtype in multiple sclerosis. Neurology. https://doi.org/10.1212/01.wnl.0000294876.49861.dc

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.