Cited by 25Dementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchAlzheimer's disease research and treatmentsAmyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Research

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 8 of the 8 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Age-at-Onset and APOE -Related Heterogeneity in Pathologically Confirmed Sporadic Alzheimer Disease

Open access

Abstract

Objective To characterize age-related clinical heterogeneity in Alzheimer disease (AD) and determine whether it is modified by APOE genotype or concomitant non-AD pathology, we analyzed data from 1,750 patients with sporadic, pathologically confirmed severe AD. Methods In this retrospective cohort study, regression and mixed effects models assessed effects of estimated age at onset, APOE genotype, and their interaction on standardized clinical, cognitive, and pathologic outcome measures from the National Alzheimer's Coordinating Center database. Results A bimodal distribution of age at onset frequency in APOE ε4− cases showed best separation at age 63. Using this age cutoff, cases were grouped as ε4− early-onset AD (EOAD) (n = 169), ε4+ EOAD (n = 273), ε4− late-onset AD (LOAD) (n = 511), and ε4+ LOAD (n = 797). Patients with EOAD were more likely than patients with LOAD to present with noncognitive behavioral or motor symptoms or nonmemory cognitive complaints, and had more executive dysfunction, but less language impairment on objective cognitive testing. Age at onset and ε4− genotype were independently associated with lower baseline Mini-Mental State Examination scores and greater functional impairment and patients with EOAD had faster cognitive and functional decline than patients with LOAD regardless of APOE genotype. Patients with EOAD were more likely than patients with LOAD to receive a non-AD clinical diagnosis even though they were more likely to have pure AD without concomitant vascular or other non-AD neurodegenerative pathology. Conclusions Early-onset sporadic AD is associated with a greater likelihood of an atypical, non-memory-dominant clinical presentation, especially in the absence of the APOE ε4 allele, which may lead to misattribution to non-AD underlying pathology. AD= : Alzheimer disease; ADC= : Alzheimer's Disease Center; CBD= : corticobasal degeneration; CDR= : Clinical Dementia Rating; CDR-SOB= : Clinical Dementia Rating sum of boxes; CI= : confidence interval; EOAD= : early-onset Alzheimer disease; FAQ= : Functional Assessment Questionnaire; FTD= : frontotemporal dementia; FTLD= : frontotemporal lobar degeneration; GDS= : Geriatric Depression Scale; LATE= : limbic-predominant age-related TDP-43 encephalopathy; LBD= : Lewy body disease; LOAD= : late-onset Alzheimer disease; MCI= : mild cognitive impairment; MMSE= : Mini-Mental State Examination; MTL= : medial temporal lobe; NACC= : National Alzheimer's Coordinating Center; NPI= : Neuropsychiatric Inventory; OR= : odds ratio; PPA= : primary progressive aphasia; PSP= : progressive supranuclear palsy; TBI= : traumatic brain injury; UDS= : National Alzheimer's Coordinating Center Uniform Data Set

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1212/wnl.0000000000011772

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 8 references

Research works printed but not linked: 40

  1. 10.1001/archneur.1976.00500040001001 · DOI
  2. 10.1016/S1474-4422(10)70306-9 · DOI
  3. 10.1016/j.ncl.2017.01.005 · DOI
  4. 10.1212/WNL.44.7.1215 · DOI · Paper page
  5. 10.1111/j.1532-5415.1987.tb01315.x · DOI
  6. 10.1186/s13195-017-0294-2 · DOI
  7. 10.3233/JAD-170841 · DOI
  8. 10.1016/j.jalz.2014.12.007 · DOI
  9. 10.3233/JAD-2010-1337 · DOI · Paper page
  10. 10.1016/S1474-4422(10)70159-9 · DOI
  11. 10.1177/1533317512454711 · DOI
  12. 10.1212/01.wnl.0000320506.79811.da · DOI
  13. 10.1016/S1474-4422(11)70289-7 · DOI
  14. 10.1016/j.jalz.2017.01.014 · DOI · Paper page
  15. 10.1212/01.WNL.0000140289.18472.15 · DOI
  16. 10.1001/archneur.56.10.1233 · DOI
  17. 10.1093/brain/awv191 · DOI · Paper page
  18. 10.1093/braincomms/fcaa068 · DOI · Paper page
  19. 10.1016/j.jalz.2016.01.010 · DOI
  20. Beekly DL, Ramos EM, van Belle G, et al. The National Alzheimer's Coordinating Center (NACC) database: an Alzheimer disease database. Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord 2004;18:270–277.
  21. 10.1016/S0197-4580(97)00057-2 · DOI · Paper page
  22. 10.1007/s00415-012-6481-y · DOI
  23. 10.1093/jnen/nly049 · DOI · Paper page
  24. 10.1093/brain/awz099 · DOI · Paper page
  25. 10.1097/01.wad.0000213865.09806.92 · DOI · Paper page
  26. 10.1097/WAD.0b013e318191c7dd · DOI
  27. 10.18637/jss.v032.i06 · DOI
  28. 10.18637/jss.v070.i01 · DOI
  29. 10.1002/acn3.50936 · DOI
  30. 10.1159/000109800 · DOI
  31. 10.1007/s00401-013-1154-1 · DOI
  32. 10.1212/WNL.0000000000002175 · DOI · Paper page
  33. 10.1212/WNL.0000000000006212 · DOI · Paper page
  34. 10.1126/science.8346443 · DOI · Paper page
  35. 10.1016/S1474-4422(18)30053-X · DOI
  36. 10.1007/s00401-020-02211-0 · DOI
  37. 10.1007/s00401-019-02036-6 · DOI · Paper page
  38. 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2017.11.002 · DOI
  39. 10.3233/JAD-131880 · DOI · Paper page
  40. 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2018.11.015 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 25

Metadata

Authors
Smirnov, D. S., Galasko, D., Hiniker, A., Edland, S. D., & Salmon, D. P.
Affiliations
University of California San Diego (US)
Venue
Neurology
Published
2021-05-04
Volume
96
Issue
18
Pages
e2272-e2283
ISSN
  • 0028-3878 (ISSN-L)
  • 1526-632X
OpenAlex
W3138717070
Cited by
25
References
8
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 3
FWCI
3.33
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Neurology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (5p30ag062428-02)
  • National Institute on Aging (P30AG053760, P30AG010129, P30AG010133, P30-AG062428, P30AG049638, P30AG028383, P30AG012300, P50AG005133, U01AG016976, P50AG005138, P30AG010124, P50AG016573, P50AG047366, P30AG008017, P30AG010161, F30AG063440, P30AG008051, P50AG008702, P30AG035982, P50AG005681, P50AG005142, P50AG047270, P30AG019610, P50AG005146, P30AG013846, P50AG005136, P30AG013854, P50AG025688, P50AG047266, P30AG062429, P30AG066444, P30AG062422, P30AG066509, P30AG062715, P30AG062421, P30AG066511, P50AG023501)
  • National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (K08NS090633)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Clinical Neurology › Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Research
Keywords
APOE ε4, age of onset, clinical heterogeneity, early-onset Alzheimer's disease, late-onset Alzheimer's disease, atypical presentation, executive dysfunction, cognitive decline, functional decline, misdiagnosis, vascular pathology
MeSH terms
Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Alzheimer Disease, Apolipoproteins E, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Retrospective Studies, Age of Onset, Genetic Heterogeneity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review