The DOI matches its Crossref record; 34 of the 34 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Default mode network connectivity in stable vs progressive mild cognitive impairment
Open accessAbstract
OBJECTIVE: Dysfunction of the default mode network (DMN) has been identified in prior cross-sectional fMRI studies of Alzheimer disease (AD) and mild cognitive impairment (MCI); however, no studies have examined its utility in predicting future cognitive decline. METHODS: fMRI scans during a face-name memory task were acquired from a cohort of 68 subjects (25 normal control, 31 MCI, and 12 AD). Subjects with MCI were followed for 2.4 years (±0.8) to determine progression to AD. Maps of DMN connectivity were compared with a template DMN map constructed from elderly normal controls to obtain goodness-of-fit (GOF) indices of DMN expression. Indices were compared between groups and correlated with cognitive decline. RESULTS: GOF indices were highest in normal controls, intermediate in MCI, and lowest in AD (p < 0.0001). In a predictive model (that included baseline GOF indices, age, education, Mini-Mental State Examination score, and an index of DMN gray matter volume), the effect of GOF index on progression from MCI to dementia was significant. In MCI, baseline GOF indices were correlated with change from baseline in functional status (Clinical Dementia Rating-sum of boxes) (r = -0.40, p < 0.04). However, there was no additional predictive value for DMN connectivity when baseline delayed recall was included in the models. CONCLUSIONS: fMRI connectivity indices distinguish patients with MCI who undergo cognitive decline and conversion to AD from those who remain stable over a 2- to 3-year follow-up period. Our data support the notion of different functional brain connectivity endophenotypes for "early" vs "late" MCI, which are associated with different baseline memory scores and different rates of progression and conversion.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Advances in functional and structural MR image analysis and implementation as FSL
Smith, S. M., Jenkinson, M., Woolrich, M. W., Beckmann, C. F., Behrens, T. E. J., Johansen-Berg, H., Bannister, P. R., De Luca, M., Drobnjak, I., Flitney, D. E., et al. (2004) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2004.07.051 · Cited by 13,630
Jenkinson, M., Bannister, P., Brady, M., & Smith, S. (2002) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1006/nimg.2002.1132 · Cited by 11,888
Fast robust automated brain extraction
Smith, S. M. (2002) · Human Brain Mapping · doi:10.1002/hbm.10062 · Cited by 10,496
The Brain's Default Network: Anatomy, Function, and Relevance to Disease
Buckner, R. L., Andrews‐Hanna, J. R., & Schacter, D. L. (2008) · Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1196/annals.1440.011 · Cited by 9,761
Voxel-Based Morphometry—The Methods
Ashburner, J., & Friston, K. J. (2000) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1006/nimg.2000.0582 · Cited by 8,676
Zhang, Y., Brady, M., & Smith, S. (2001) · IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging · doi:10.1109/42.906424 · Cited by 6,982
A global optimisation method for robust affine registration of brain images
Jenkinson, M., & Smith, S. (2001) · Medical Image Analysis · doi:10.1016/s1361-8415(01)00036-6 · Cited by 6,872
A Voxel-Based Morphometric Study of Ageing in 465 Normal Adult Human Brains
Good, C. D., Johnsrude, I. S., Ashburner, J., Henson, R. N. A., Friston, K. J., & Frackowiak, R. S. J. (2001) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1006/nimg.2001.0786 · Cited by 4,561
Greicius, M. D., Srivastava, G., Reiss, A. L., & Menon, V. (2004) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0308627101 · Cited by 3,684
Statistical Parametric Mapping: The Analysis of Functional Brain Images
Penny, W. D., Friston, K. J., Ashburner, J., Kiebel, S. J., & Thomas, N. (2007) · UCL Discovery (University College London) · Cited by 3,339
Cited by
The cognitive neuroscience of ageing
Grady, C. (2012) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn3256 · Cited by 1,286
The Evolution of Preclinical Alzheimer’s Disease: Implications for Prevention Trials
Sperling, R., Mormino, E., & Johnson, K. (2014) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2014.10.038 · Cited by 725
Brier, M. R., Thomas, J. B., Snyder, A. Z., Benzinger, T. L., Zhang, D., Raichle, M. E., Holtzman, D. M., Morris, J. C., & Ances, B. M. (2012) · Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.5698-11.2012 · Cited by 595
Functional brain connectivity using fMRI in aging and Alzheimer’s disease
Dennis, E. L., & Thompson, P. M. (2014) · Neuropsychology Review · doi:10.1007/s11065-014-9249-6 · Cited by 583
Functional connectivity tracks clinical deterioration in Alzheimer's disease
Damoiseaux, J. S., Prater, K. E., Miller, B. L., & Greicius, M. D. (2012) · Neurobiology of Aging · doi:10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2011.06.024 · Cited by 506
Metadata
- Authors
- Petrella, J. R., Sheldon, F. C., Prince, S. E., Calhoun, V. D., & Doraiswamy, P. M.
- Venue
- Neurology
- Published
- 2011-02-08
- Volume
- 76
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 511-517
- ISSN
- 0028-3878 (ISSN-L)
- 1526-632X
- OpenAlex
- W2085032083
- Cited by
- 296
- References
- 34
- FWCI
- 20.29
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Default mode network connectivity in stable vs progressive mild cognitive impairment. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1212/wnl.0b013e31820af94e
- The paper
- Petrella, J. R., Sheldon, F. C., Prince, S. E., Calhoun, V. D., & Doraiswamy, P. M. (2011). Default mode network connectivity in stable vs progressive mild cognitive impairment. Neurology. https://doi.org/10.1212/wnl.0b013e31820af94e
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.