Cited by 323Vestibular and auditory disordersCardiovascular Syncope and Autonomic DisordersPsychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments

Phobic postural vertigo

Brandt, Thomas·1996·Neurology

Abstract

Phobic postural vertigo (PPV) (Brandt and Dieterich 1986; Brandt 1996) has been described as a syndrome that is distinguishable from panic disorder, agoraphobia, and the pseudo-agoraphobia syndrome “space phobia” (Marks 1981). Since we began diagnosing it as a clinical entity, PPV has become the second-most common cause of vertigo in our dizziness unit (p. 23). Closely connected with gait and posture, PPV is characterised by a combination of non-rotational vertigo with subjective postural imbalance and unsteadiness, normal neuro-otological tests, and phobic avoidance behaviour mainly in patients with an obsessive-compulsive personality. The monosymptomatic subjective disturbance of balance manifests with superimposed attacks that occur with and without recognisable provoking factors in one and the same patient. The patient experiences them with and without accompanying excess anxiety, misleading both patient and physician to make a false diagnosis of organic disease. Although an association of PPV with anxiety disorders is evident, not all patients present with symptoms of anxiety or panic during attacks of vertigo. However, most patients develop a disabling “phobic/avoidance pattern” (Kapfhammer et al. 1997). These patients contact neurologists or otolaryngologists first and foremost and not psychiatrists or psychotherapists, since their prevailing complaint is distressing postural imbalance and vertigo.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1212/wnl.46.6.1515

Cites

51 of 51 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 52 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Brandt, T.
Affiliations
LMU Klinikum (DE)
Corresponding author
Brandt, Thomas
Venue
Neurology
Published
1996-06
Volume
46
Issue
6
Pages
1515-1519
ISSN
  • 0028-3878 (ISSN-L)
  • 1526-632X
OpenAlex
W2162266658
Cited by
323
References
52
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 20 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 23 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 16 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 17 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 12
FWCI
2.47
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Neurology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Vestibular and auditory disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Cardiovascular Syncope and Autonomic Disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments
Keywords
phobic postural vertigo, postural imbalance, phobic avoidance, obsessive-compulsive personality, anxiety disorders, dizziness, misdiagnosis, gait and posture
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Agoraphobia, Behavior Therapy, Diagnosis, Differential, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Models, Neurological, Motion Perception, Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder, Otolithic Membrane, Phobic Disorders, Posture, Psychophysiologic Disorders, Schizophrenia, Vertigo, Vestibule, Labyrinth, Panic Disorder

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review