Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 187

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Pathologic damage in MS assessed by diffusion-weighted and magnetization transfer MRI

Cercignani, M., Iannucci, G., Rocca, M.A., Comi, G., Horsfield, M.A., Filippi, M.·2000·Neurology

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare diffusion characteristics of MS lesions, normal-appearing white matter (NAWM) from patients, and normal white matter from control subjects, and to investigate the correlations between the magnetization transfer ratio (MTR) and a directionally averaged tissue water diffusion coefficient (D) in patients. BACKGROUND: MS and other pathologic processes that modify tissue integrity can result in abnormal diffusion of water molecules detectable by diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI). METHODS: Conventional dual-echo and DWI scans were obtained from 35 patients with relapsing-remitting MS and 24 healthy control subjects. MT scans were also obtained from the patients. After coregistration of all scans, MTR and D values from MS lesions and NAWM in different regions were marked using the dual-echo scans as a reference. D values from the same brain regions in control subjects were acquired. Histograms of MTR and D were also produced. RESULTS: Patients with MS had significantly higher D values in all the areas studied. Moreover, histogram metrics (peak height, peak site, and average D) from patients were substantially different from those of control subjects. In patients, average lesion D and MTR were markedly different from those in the NAWM. There was an inverse correlation between average lesion MTR and D inside lesions, whereas no correlation was found for average MTR and D taken from the histograms. CONCLUSIONS: DWI detects severe tissue disruption inside lesions and subtle widespread abnormalities in NAWM in patients with relapsing-remitting MS. MT and DWI may provide information about different aspects of brain pathology in MS.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1212/wnl.54.5.1139

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 5 references

Cited by

See all 187

Metadata

Authors
Cercignani, M., Iannucci, G., Rocca, M. A., Comi, G., Horsfield, M. A., & Filippi, M.
Venue
Neurology
Published
2000-03-14
Volume
54
Issue
5
Pages
1139-1144
ISSN
  • 0028-3878 (ISSN-L)
  • 1526-632X
OpenAlex
W1999210265
Cited by
187
References
5
FWCI
23.53
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Pathologic damage in MS assessed by diffusion-weighted and magnetization transfer MRI. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1212/wnl.54.5.1139
The paper
Cercignani, M., Iannucci, G., Rocca, M. A., Comi, G., Horsfield, M. A., & Filippi, M. (2000). Pathologic damage in MS assessed by diffusion-weighted and magnetization transfer MRI. Neurology. https://doi.org/10.1212/wnl.54.5.1139

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.