Cited by 91Dementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchGeriatric Care and Nursing HomesPalliative Care and End-of-Life Issues

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Gender differences in predictors of mortality in nursing home residents with AD

Abstract

Objective To evaluate whether the excess mortality in men with AD can be explained by a gender difference in the predictors of mortality. Methods The authors studied 2,838 men and 6,385 women over 65 years of age with AD admitted, between 1992 and 1995, to 1 of nearly 1,500 nursing homes in five U.S. states (Kansas, Maine, Mississippi, New York, and South Dakota). Resident level data including sociodemographic characteristics, dementia severity, measures of physical disability, comorbidity, and other clinical variables were collected with the Minimum Data Set. Information on death was derived through linkage to Medicare enrollment files; the median follow-up was 23 months. Baseline characteristics were used to predict age at time of death in Cox proportional hazard models. Results Men with AD had an increased risk of mortality relative to women, adjusted for differences in the distribution of age and race. The most important predictors of death in men were those related to the disease itself. These were the severity of dementia and the occurrence of episodes of delirium. Instead, death among women was associated with measures of disability, namely, impairment in performing the activities of daily living, presence of pressure sores, malnutrition, and comorbidity. Conclusion These data suggest that the underlying mechanisms for AD may be different in men and women. Future studies of survival and progression of AD need to examine men and women separately.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1212/wnl.56.5.650

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 40

  1. 10.1212/WNL.55.2.198 · DOI
  2. 10.1212/WNL.54.11.2072 · DOI · Paper page
  3. 10.1212/WNL.42.1.115 · DOI · Paper page
  4. 10.1212/WNL.48.1.132 · DOI · Paper page
  5. 10.1212/WNL.47.2.433 · DOI
  6. 10.1093/geronj/47.2.M28 · DOI
  7. 10.1001/jama.279.21.1689 · DOI
  8. 10.1212/WNL.46.3.656 · DOI
  9. 10.1001/jama.1997.03540340040030 · DOI · Paper page
  10. 10.1001/archneur.1993.00540070069018 · DOI
  11. 10.1212/WNL.44.1.90 · DOI
  12. 10.1212/WNL.48.6.1511 · DOI
  13. 10.1001/archneur.1994.00540240057016 · DOI
  14. 10.1001/archneur.1997.00550190066016 · DOI
  15. 10.1097/00005650-199802000-00006 · DOI
  16. Minimum Data Set Plus Training Manual Eliot Press Natick MA 1991.
  17. 10.1093/geronj/49.4.M174 · DOI
  18. Mor V, Branco K, Fleishman J, et al. The structure of social engagement among nursing home residents. J Gerontol . 1995; 50: P 1–P8.
  19. Hartmaier SL, Sloane PD, Guess HA, et al. Validation of the Minimum Data Set Cognitive Performance Scale: agreement with the Mini-Mental State Examination. J Gerontol . 1995; 50: M128–M133.
  20. Bernabei R Gambassi G Lapane K et al. Management of pain in elderly patients with cancer. JAMA 1998;279:1877–1882. · DOI
  21. 10.1093/ajcn/66.4.787 · DOI
  22. 10.1111/j.1532-5415.1993.tb07302.x · DOI
  23. 10.1212/WNL.46.3.641 · DOI · Paper page
  24. Rao VS van-Duijn CM Connor-Lacke L et al. Multiple etiologies for Alzheimer disease are revealed by segregation analysis. Am J Hum Genet 1994;55:991–1000.
  25. 10.1001/archneur.55.2.169 · DOI
  26. 10.1126/science.278.5337.412 · DOI · Paper page
  27. 10.1038/nm0498-447 · DOI
  28. 10.1176/jnp.8.2.211 · DOI
  29. 10.1212/WNL.46.6.1580 · DOI
  30. 10.1212/WNL.50.3.669 · DOI
  31. 10.1001/archneur.1995.00540290057018 · DOI
  32. 10.1111/j.1600-0447.1991.tb03144.x · DOI
  33. 10.1001/archneur.1996.00550050066025 · DOI
  34. 10.1111/j.1532-5415.1993.tb06697.x · DOI
  35. 10.1111/j.1532-5415.1996.tb01447.x · DOI
  36. 10.1212/WNL.45.2.299 · DOI
  37. 10.1111/j.1532-5415.1988.tb01778.x · DOI
  38. 10.1136/bmj.316.7145.1673 · DOI
  39. 10.1016/S1047-2797(96)00065-8 · DOI
  40. 10.1136/jnnp.64.1.18 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Lapane, K. L., Gambassi, G., Landi, F., Sgadari, A., Mor, V., & Bernabei, R.
Affiliations
Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore (IT)
Venue
Neurology
Published
2001-03-13
Volume
56
Issue
5
Pages
650-654
ISSN
  • 0028-3878 (ISSN-L)
  • 1526-632X
OpenAlex
W2053821187
Cited by
91
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 4
FWCI
4.08
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Neurology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Geriatrics and Gerontology › Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
Keywords
Alzheimer's disease, gender differences, mortality, nursing home residents, dementia severity, delirium, activities of daily living, pressure ulcers, malnutrition, comorbidities, sex differences in disease progression
MeSH terms
Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Alzheimer Disease, Female, Humans, Male, Nursing Homes, Predictive Value of Tests, Sex Characteristics, Sex Distribution

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review