Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 555

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 29 of the 29 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Transcranial Magnetic Resonance Imaging– Guided Focused Ultrasound Surgery of Brain Tumors: Initial Findings in 3 Patients

Open access
McDannold, Nathan, Clement, Greg T., Black, Peter, Jolesz, Ferenc, Hynynen, Kullervo·2010·Neurosurgery

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: This work evaluated the clinical feasibility of transcranial magnetic resonance imaging-guided focused ultrasound surgery. METHODS: Transcranial magnetic resonance imaging-guided focused ultrasound surgery offers a potential noninvasive alternative to surgical resection. The method combines a hemispherical phased-array transducer and patient-specific treatment planning based on acoustic models with feedback control based on magnetic resonance temperature imaging to overcome the effects of the cranium and allow for controlled and precise thermal ablation in the brain. In initial trials in 3 glioblastoma patients, multiple focused ultrasound exposures were applied up to the maximum acoustic power available. Offline analysis of the magnetic resonance temperature images evaluated the temperature changes at the focus and brain surface. RESULTS: We found that it was possible to focus an ultrasound beam transcranially into the brain and to visualize the heating with magnetic resonance temperature imaging. Although we were limited by the device power available at the time and thus seemed to not achieve thermal coagulation, extrapolation of the temperature measurements at the focus and on the brain surface suggests that thermal ablation will be possible with this device without overheating the brain surface, with some possible limitation on the treatment envelope. CONCLUSION: Although significant hurdles remain, these findings are a major step forward in producing a completely noninvasive alternative to surgical resection for brain disorders.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1227/01.neu.0000360379.95800.2f

Cites

29 of 29 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 29 references

Cited by

See all 555

Metadata

Authors
McDannold, N., Clement, G. T., Black, P., Jolesz, F., & Hynynen, K.
Venue
Neurosurgery
Published
2010-02
Volume
66
Issue
2
Pages
323-332
ISSN
0148-396X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2025191689
Cited by
555
References
29
FWCI
25.12
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Transcranial Magnetic Resonance Imaging– Guided Focused Ultrasound Surgery of Brain Tumors: Initial Findings in 3 Patients. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1227/01.neu.0000360379.95800.2f
The paper
McDannold, N., Clement, G. T., Black, P., Jolesz, F., & Hynynen, K. (2010). Transcranial Magnetic Resonance Imaging– Guided Focused Ultrasound Surgery of Brain Tumors: Initial Findings in 3 Patients. Neurosurgery. https://doi.org/10.1227/01.neu.0000360379.95800.2f

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.