Cited by 15Neurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanismsMicrotubule and mitosis dynamicsDevelopmental Biology and Gene Regulation

p600 regulates spindle orientation in apical neural progenitors and contributes to neurogenesis in the developing neocortex

Open access
Belzil, Camille, Asada, Naoyuki, Ishiguro, Kei-ichiro, Nakaya, Takeo, Parsons, Kari, Pendolino, Valentina, Neumayer, Gernot, Mapelli, Marina +3 more·2014·Biology Open

Abstract

Apical neural progenitors (aNPs) drive neurogenesis by means of a program consisting of self-proliferative and neurogenic divisions. The balance between these two manners of division sustains the pool of apical progenitors into late neurogenesis, thereby ensuring their availability to populate the brain with terminal cell types. Using knockout and in utero electroporation mouse models, we report a key role for the microtubule-associated protein 600 (p600) in the regulation of spindle orientation in aNPs, a cellular event that has been associated with cell fate and neurogenesis. We find that p600 interacts directly with the neurogenic protein Ndel1 and that aNPs knockout for p600, depleted of p600 by shRNA or expressing a Ndel1-binding p600 fragment all display randomized spindle orientation. Depletion of p600 by shRNA or expression of the Ndel1-binding p600 fragment also results in a decreased number of Pax6-positive aNPs and an increased number of Tbr2-positive basal progenitors destined to become neurons. These Pax6-positive aNPs display a tilted mitotic spindle. In mice wherein p600 is ablated in progenitors, the production of neurons is significantly impaired and this defect is associated with microcephaly. We propose a working model in which p600 controls spindle orientation in aNPs and discuss its implication for neurogenesis.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1242/bio.20147807

Cites

45 of 45 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Loss of the mouse ortholog of UBR4, called p600, in the developing brain impairs neurogenesis, resulting in microcephaly.

    “Loss of the mouse ortholog (called p600) in the developing brain impairs neurogenesis, resulting in microcephaly [27].”

    From Neandertal Introgression Sheds Light on Modern Human Endocranial Globularity (2019) · cites this paper as [27]

    The Results section reports reduced Tuj-1 staining in p600SC−/− microcephalic brains and says this suggests decreased neurogenesis. The Discussion links reduced neuron production and microcephaly, but calls the evidence circumstantial and says microcephaly may have several causes. The claim states the causal link more definitively than the paper does. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Belzil, C., Asada, N., Ishiguro, K.-I., Nakaya, T., Parsons, K., Pendolino, V., Neumayer, G., Mapelli, M., Nakatani, Y., Sanada, K., & Nguyen, M. D.
Affiliations
  • University of Calgary (CA)
  • Molecular Genetics Research Laboratory, Graduate School of Science, The University of Tokyo (JP)
  • Dana-Farber Cancer Institute (US)
  • European Institute of Oncology (IT)
Corresponding author
  • Sanada, Kamon
  • Nguyen, Minh Dang
Venue
Biology Open
Published
2014-05-08
Volume
3
Issue
6
Pages
475-485
ISSN
2046-6390 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2138890989
Cited by
15
References
45
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2014: 2
FWCI
0.58
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Biology Open (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
  • Libraries and Cultural Resources (University of Calgary) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
Funders
  • University of Calgary
  • Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology
  • Daiichi-Sankyo
  • Ministero della Salute
  • Associazione Italiana per la Ricerca sul Cancro
  • Alberta Innovates
  • Canadian Institutes of Health Research
  • Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (26640005)
  • National Cancer Institute
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Developmental Neuroscience › Neurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Microtubule and mitosis dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Developmental Biology and Gene Regulation
Keywords
P600, spindle orientation, neurogenesis, neocortex development, Ndel1, microtubule-associated proteins, mitotic spindle, basal progenitors, Pax6, Tbr2, microcephaly, cell fate determination

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review