The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Neural tube closure requires Dishevelled-dependent convergent extension of the midline
Abstract
In Xenopus, Dishevelled (Xdsh) signaling is required for both neural tube closure and neural convergent extension, but the connection between these two morphogenetic processes remains unclear. Indeed normal neurulation requires several different cell polarity decisions, any of which may require Xdsh signaling. In this paper we address two issues: (1) which aspects of normal neurulation require Xdsh function; and (2) what role convergent extension plays in the closure of the neural tube. We show that Xdsh signaling is not required for neural fold elevation, medial movement or fusion. Disruption of Xdsh signaling therefore provides a specific tool for uncoupling convergent extension from other processes of neurulation. Using disruption of Xdsh signaling, we demonstrate that convergent extension is crucial to tube closure. Targeted injection revealed that Xdsh function was required specifically in the midline for normal neural tube closure. We suggest that the inherent movement of the neural folds can accomplish only a finite amount of medial progress and that convergent extension of the midline is necessary to reduce the distance between the nascent neural folds, allowing them to meet and fuse. Similar results with Xenopus strabismus implicate the planar cell polarity (PCP) signaling cascade in neural convergent extension and tube closure. Together, these data demonstrate that PCP-mediated convergent extension movements are crucial to proper vertebrate neurulation.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Kibar, Z., Vogan, K. J., Groulx, N., Justice, M. J., Underhill, D. A., & Gros, P. (2001) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/90081 · Cited by 504
Rothbächer, U., Laurent, M. N., Deardorff, M. A., Klein, P. S., Cho, K. W. Y., & Fraser, S. E. (2000) · The EMBO Journal · doi:10.1093/emboj/19.5.1010 · Cited by 299
Cited by
Planar cell polarity in development and disease
Butler, M. T., & Wallingford, J. B. (2017) · Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology · doi:10.1038/nrm.2017.11 · Cited by 580
Self-citationWNTS in the vertebrate nervous system: from patterning to neuronal connectivity
Ciani, L., & Salinas, P. C. (2005) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn1665 · Cited by 543
The developmental biology of Dishevelled: an enigmatic protein governing cell fate and cell polarity
Wallingford, J. B., & Habas, R. (2005) · Development · doi:10.1242/dev.02068 · Cited by 509
Self-citationHamblet, N. S., Lijam, N., Ruiz-Lozano, P., Wang, J., Yang, Y., Luo, Z., Mei, L., Chien, K. R., Sussman, D. J., & Wynshaw-Boris, A. (2002) · Development · doi:10.1242/dev.00164 · Cited by 441
Park, T. J., Haigo, S. L., & Wallingford, J. B. (2006) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/ng1753 · Cited by 389
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Wallingford, J. B., & Harland, R. M.
- Venue
- Development
- Publisher
- The Company of Biologists
- Published
- 2002-12-15
- Volume
- 129
- Issue
- 24
- Pages
- 5815-5825
- ISSN
- 0950-1991 (ISSN-L)
- 1477-9129
- OpenAlex
- W2106174831
- Cited by
- 359
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 6.91
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.