The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Zebrafish fgf24 functions with fgf8 to promote posterior mesodermal development
Abstract
Fibroblast growth factor (Fgf) signaling plays an important role during development of posterior mesoderm in vertebrate embryos. Blocking Fgf signaling by expressing a dominant-negative Fgf receptor inhibits posterior mesoderm development. In mice, Fgf8 appears to be the principal ligand required for mesodermal development, as mouse Fgf8 mutants do not form mesoderm. In zebrafish, Fgf8 is encoded by the acerebellarlocus, and, similar to its mouse otholog, is expressed in early mesodermal precursors during gastrulation. However, zebrafish fgf8 mutants have only mild defects in posterior mesodermal development, suggesting that it is not the only Fgf ligand involved in the development of this tissue. We report here the identification of an fgf8-related gene in zebrafish, fgf24, that is co-expressed with fgf8 in mesodermal precursors during gastrulation. Using morpholino-based gene inactivation, we have analyzed the function of fgf24 during development. We found that inhibiting fgf24 function alone has no affect on the formation of posterior mesoderm. Conversely, inhibiting fgf24 function in embryos mutant for fgf8 blocks the formation of most posterior mesoderm. Thus, fgf8 and fgf24 are together required to promote posterior mesodermal development. We provide both phenotypic and genetic evidence that these Fgf signaling components interact with no tailand spadetail, two zebrafish T-box transcription factors that are required for the development of all posterior mesoderm. Last, we show that fgf24 is expressed in early fin bud mesenchyme and that inhibiting fgf24 function results in viable fish that lack pectoral fins.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
FGF5 as a regulator of the hair growth cycle: Evidence from targeted and spontaneous mutations
Hébert, J. M., Rosenquist, T., Götz, J., & Martin, G. R. (1994) · Cell · doi:10.1016/0092-8674(94)90276-3 · Cited by 589
The development of the paired fins in the zebrafish (Danio rerio).
Grandel, H., & Schulte-Merker, S. (1998) · Mechanisms of Development · doi:10.1016/s0925-4773(98)00176-2 · Cited by 267
Cited by
Fibroblast Growth Factor Signaling during Early Vertebrate Development
Böttcher, R. T., & Niehrs, C. (2005) · Endocrine Reviews · doi:10.1210/er.2003-0040 · Cited by 540
Zebrafish as a model for infectious disease and immune function
Sullivan, C., & Kim, C. H. (2008) · Fish & Shellfish Immunology · doi:10.1016/j.fsi.2008.05.005 · Cited by 296
Fgf signaling is required for photoreceptor maintenance in the adult zebrafish retina
Hochmann, S., Kaslin, J., Hans, S., Weber, A., Machate, A., Geffarth, M., Funk, R. H. W., & Brand, M. (2012) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0030365 · Cited by 62
Spatiotemporal resolution of the Ntla transcriptome in axial mesoderm development
Shestopalov, I. A., Pitt, C. L. W., & Chen, J. K. (2012) · Nature Chemical Biology · doi:10.1038/nchembio.772 · Cited by 42
Stem sarcopterygians have primitive polybasal fin articulation
Zhu, M., & Yu, X. (2009) · Biology Letters · doi:10.1098/rsbl.2008.0784 · Cited by 42
Metadata
- Authors
- Draper, B. W., Stock, D. W., & Kimmel, C. B.
- Venue
- Development
- Publisher
- The Company of Biologists
- Published
- 2003-10-01
- Volume
- 130
- Issue
- 19
- Pages
- 4639-4654
- ISSN
- 0950-1991 (ISSN-L)
- 1477-9129
- OpenAlex
- W2086029024
- Cited by
- 189
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 6.43
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.