Cited by 94Developmental Biology and Gene RegulationPluripotent Stem Cells ResearchCongenital heart defects research

Sequential allocation and global pattern of movement of the definitive endoderm in the mouse embryo during gastrulation

Tam, Patrick P. L., Khoo, Poh-Lynn, Lewis, Samara L., Bildsoe, Heidi, Wong, Nicole, Tsang, Tania E., Gad, Jacqueline M., Robb, Lorraine·2007·Development

Abstract

During mouse gastrulation, endoderm cells of the dorsal foregut are recruited ahead of the ventral foregut and move to the anterior region of the embryo via different routes. Precursors of the anterior-most part of the foregut and those of the mid- and hind-gut are allocated to the endoderm of the mid-streak-stage embryo, whereas the precursors of the rest of the foregut are recruited at later stages of gastrulation. Loss of Mixl1 function results in reduced recruitment of the definitive endoderm, and causes cells in the endoderm to remain stationary during gastrulation. The observation that the endoderm cells are inherently unable to move despite the expansion of the mesoderm in the Mixl1-null mutant suggests that the movement of the endoderm and the mesoderm is driven independently of one another.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1242/dev.02724

Cites

38 of 38 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Pyy's early regionalized expression within definitive endoderm reflects an early specification of cell fate along both the anterior-posterior and lateral-medial axis of the embryonic gut.

    “Its early regionalized expression within DE reflects an early specification of cell fate along both the anterior-posterior and lateral-medial axis of the embryonic gut [6,45].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Tam, P. P. L. and Gad, J. M. (2004). Gastrulation of the mouse embryo. In Gastrulation (ed. C. D. Stern), pp. 223-262. Cold Spring Harbor, NY:Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Tam, P. P. L., Khoo, P.-L., Lewis, S. L., Bildsoe, H., Wong, N., Tsang, T. E., Gad, J. M., & Robb, L.
Affiliations
  • The University of Sydney (AU)
  • Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research (AU)
Venue
Development
Published
2007-01-15
Volume
134
Issue
2
Pages
251-260
ISSN
  • 0950-1991 (ISSN-L)
  • 1477-9129
OpenAlex
W2079010176
Cited by
94
References
38
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 8
FWCI
3.94
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Development (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Developmental Biology and Gene Regulation
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Pluripotent Stem Cells Research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Congenital heart defects research
Keywords
definitive endoderm, gastrulation, foregut, Mixl1, mouse embryo
MeSH terms
Animals, Cell Movement, Digestive System, Endoderm, Female, Gastrula, Mice, Transgenic, Pregnancy, Cell Transplantation, Mice, Knockout, Homeodomain Proteins, Gene Expression Regulation, Developmental, Body Patterning, Mice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review