The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The regenerative capacity of the zebrafish heart is dependent on TGFβ signaling
Abstract
Mammals respond to a myocardial infarction by irreversible scar formation. By contrast, zebrafish are able to resolve the scar and to regenerate functional cardiac muscle. It is not known how opposing cellular responses of fibrosis and new myocardium formation are spatially and temporally coordinated during heart regeneration in zebrafish. Here, we report that the balance between the reparative and regenerative processes is achieved through Smad3-dependent TGFβ signaling. The type I receptor alk5b (tgfbr1b) is expressed in both fibrotic and cardiac cells of the injured heart. TGFβ ligands are locally induced following cryoinjury and activate the signaling pathway both in the infarct area and in cardiomyocytes in the vicinity of the trauma zone. Inhibition of the relevant type I receptors with the specific chemical inhibitor SB431542 qualitatively altered the infarct tissue and completely abolished heart regeneration. We show that transient scar formation is an essential step to maintain robustness of the damaged ventricular wall prior to cardiomyocyte replacement. Taking advantage of the reversible action of the inhibitor, we dissected the multifunctional role of TGFβ signaling into three crucial processes: collagen-rich scar deposition, Tenascin C-associated tissue remodeling at the infarct-myocardium interface, and cardiomyocyte proliferation. Thus, TGFβ signaling orchestrates the beneficial interplay between scar-based repair and cardiomyocyte-based regeneration to achieve complete heart regeneration.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Zebrafish heart regeneration occurs by cardiomyocyte dedifferentiation and proliferation
Jopling, C., Sleep, E., Raya, M., Martí, M., Raya, A., & Belmonte, J. C. I. (2010) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature08899 · Cited by 1,333
Cited by
Frangogiannis, N. G. (2021) · Cardiovascular Research · doi:10.1093/cvr/cvaa324 · Cited by 1,229
The zebrafish as a model for complex tissue regeneration
Gemberling, M., Bailey, T. J., Hyde, D. R., & Poss, K. D. (2013) · Trends in Genetics · doi:10.1016/j.tig.2013.07.003 · Cited by 566
Use of Zebrafish in Drug Discovery Toxicology
Cassar, S., Adatto, I., Freeman, J. L., Gamse, J. T., Iturria, I., Lawrence, C., Muriana, A., Peterson, R. T., Van Cruchten, S., & Zon, L. I. (2020) · Chemical Research in Toxicology · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrestox.9b00335 · Cited by 561
Gemberling, M., Karra, R., Dickson, A. L., & Poss, K. D. (2015) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.05871 · Cited by 302
Mechanisms of Cardiac Regeneration
Uygur, A., & Lee, R. T. (2016) · Developmental Cell · doi:10.1016/j.devcel.2016.01.018 · Cited by 286
Notch signaling regulates cardiomyocyte proliferation during zebrafish heart regeneration
Zhao, L., Borikova, A. L., Ben-Yair, R., Guner-Ataman, B., MacRae, C. A., Lee, R. T., Burns, C. G., & Burns, C. E. (2014) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1311705111 · Cited by 255
Cardiac Fibroblasts and the Extracellular Matrix in Regenerative and Nonregenerative Hearts
Hortells, L., Johansen, A. K. Z., & Yutzey, K. E. (2019) · Journal of Cardiovascular Development and Disease · doi:10.3390/jcdd6030029 · Cited by 79
Widjaja, A. A., Viswanathan, S., Wei Ting, J. G., Tan, J., Shekeran, S. G., Carling, D., Lim, W.-W., & Cook, S. A. (2022) · iScience · doi:10.1016/j.isci.2022.104806 · Cited by 45
Metadata
- Authors
- Chablais, F., & Jaźwińska, A.
- Venue
- Development
- Publisher
- The Company of Biologists
- Published
- 2012-06-01
- Volume
- 139
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 1921-1930
- ISSN
- 0950-1991 (ISSN-L)
- 1477-9129
- OpenAlex
- W1967966713
- Cited by
- 241
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 5.34
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.