The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Spatial response to fibroblast growth factor signalling in Xenopus embryos
Abstract
We have examined the spatial pattern of activation of the extracellular signal-regulated protein kinase (ERK) during Xenopus development, and show that it closely resembles the expression of various fibroblast growth factors (FGFs). Until the tailbud stage of development, all ERK activation domains are sensitive to the dominant negative FGF receptor, showing that activation is generated by endogenous FGF signalling. ERK is not activated by application of other growth factors like BMP4 or activin, nor is endogenous activation blocked by the respective dominant negative receptors. This shows that various domains of FGF expression, including the periblastoporal region and the midbrain-hindbrain boundary, are also sites of FGF signalling in vivo. Wounding induces a transient (<60 minutes) activation of ERK which is not significantly reduced by the dominant negative FGF receptor. An artificial FGF source, created by injection of eFGF mRNA into cleavage stage embryos, provokes ERK activation outside of its injection site over a range of several cell diameters. The range and extent of ERK activation outside the source region is unchanged by co-injection of a dominant negative form of Ras, which blocks ERK-activation within the source. This suggests that FGF protein can diffuse over several cell diameters.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Fibroblast Growth Factor Signaling during Early Vertebrate Development
Böttcher, R. T., & Niehrs, C. (2005) · Endocrine Reviews · doi:10.1210/er.2003-0040 · Cited by 540
Signal transduction of bone morphogenetic protein receptors
Nohe, A. (2004) · Cellular Signalling · doi:10.1016/j.cellsig.2003.08.011 · Cited by 514
Neural induction: old problem, new findings, yet more questions
Stern, C. D. (2005) · Development · doi:10.1242/dev.01794 · Cited by 421
Spatial and temporal patterns of ERK signaling during mouse embryogenesis
Corson, L. B., Yamanaka, Y., Lai, K.-M. V., & Rossant, J. (2003) · Development · doi:10.1242/dev.00669 · Cited by 390
Biological Physics of the Developing Embryo
Forgacs, G., & Newman, S. A. (2005) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511755576 · Cited by 339
Regulation of Snail transcription during epithelial to mesenchymal transition of tumor cells
Barberà, M. J., Puig, I., Domínguez, D., Julien-Grille, S., Guaita-Esteruelas, S., Peiró, S., Baulida, J., Francí, C., Dedhar, S., Larue, L., et al. (2004) · Oncogene · doi:10.1038/sj.onc.1207990 · Cited by 337
Fgf/MAPK signalling is a crucial positional cue in somite boundary formation
Sawada, A., Shinya, M., Jiang, Y.-J., Kawakami, A., Kuroiwa, A., & Takeda, H. (2001) · Development · doi:10.1242/dev.128.23.4873 · Cited by 304
β-catenin, MAPK and Smad signaling during early Xenopus development
Schohl, A., & Fagotto, F. (2002) · Development · doi:10.1242/dev.129.1.37 · Cited by 269
Endogenous patterns of TGFβ superfamily signaling during early Xenopus development
Faure, S., Lee, M. A., Keller, T., Dijke, P. T., & Whitman, M. (2000) · Development · doi:10.1242/dev.127.13.2917 · Cited by 257
Cordero-Espinoza, L., Dowbaj, A. M., Kohler, T. N., Strauss, B., Sarlidou, O., Belenguer, G., Pacini, C., Martins, N. P., Dobie, R., Wilson-Kanamori, J. R., et al. (2021) · Cell Stem Cell · doi:10.1016/j.stem.2021.07.002 · Cited by 74
Mechanisms of FGF gradient formation during embryogenesis
Balasubramanian, R., & Zhang, X. (2016) · Seminars in Cell & Developmental Biology · doi:10.1016/j.semcdb.2015.10.004 · Cited by 56
Metadata
- Authors
- Christen, B., & Slack, J. M. W.
- Venue
- Development
- Publisher
- The Company of Biologists
- Published
- 1999-01-01
- Volume
- 126
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 119-125
- ISSN
- 0950-1991 (ISSN-L)
- 1477-9129
- OpenAlex
- W2189540589
- Cited by
- 167
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 4.35
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.