Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 167

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Spatial response to fibroblast growth factor signalling in Xenopus embryos

Christen, B., Slack, J. M. W.·1999·Development

Abstract

We have examined the spatial pattern of activation of the extracellular signal-regulated protein kinase (ERK) during Xenopus development, and show that it closely resembles the expression of various fibroblast growth factors (FGFs). Until the tailbud stage of development, all ERK activation domains are sensitive to the dominant negative FGF receptor, showing that activation is generated by endogenous FGF signalling. ERK is not activated by application of other growth factors like BMP4 or activin, nor is endogenous activation blocked by the respective dominant negative receptors. This shows that various domains of FGF expression, including the periblastoporal region and the midbrain-hindbrain boundary, are also sites of FGF signalling in vivo. Wounding induces a transient (<60 minutes) activation of ERK which is not significantly reduced by the dominant negative FGF receptor. An artificial FGF source, created by injection of eFGF mRNA into cleavage stage embryos, provokes ERK activation outside of its injection site over a range of several cell diameters. The range and extent of ERK activation outside the source region is unchanged by co-injection of a dominant negative form of Ras, which blocks ERK-activation within the source. This suggests that FGF protein can diffuse over several cell diameters.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1242/dev.126.1.119

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Christen, B., & Slack, J. M. W.
Venue
Development
Published
1999-01-01
Volume
126
Issue
1
Pages
119-125
ISSN
  • 0950-1991 (ISSN-L)
  • 1477-9129
OpenAlex
W2189540589
Cited by
167
References
0
FWCI
4.35
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.