Cited by 819melanin and skin pigmentationDevelopmental Biology and Gene RegulationZebrafish Biomedical Research Applications

nacre encodes a zebrafish microphthalmia-related protein that regulates neural-crest-derived pigment cell fate

Open access
Lister, James A., Robertson, Christie P., Lepage, Thierry, Johnson, Stephen L., Raible, David W.·1999·Development

Abstract

We report the isolation and identification of a new mutation affecting pigment cell fate in the zebrafish neural crest. Homozygous nacre (nacw2) mutants lack melanophores throughout development but have increased numbers of iridophores. The non-crest-derived retinal pigment epithelium is normal, suggesting that the mutation does not affect pigment synthesis per se. Expression of early melanoblast markers is absent in nacre mutants and transplant experiments suggested a cell-autonomous function in melanophores. We show that nacw2 is a mutation in a zebrafish gene encoding a basic helix-loop-helix/leucine zipper transcription factor related to microphthalmia (Mitf), a gene known to be required for development of eye and crest pigment cells in the mouse. Transient expression of the wild-type nacre gene restored melanophore development in nacre−/− embryos. Furthermore, misexpression of nacre induced the formation of ectopic melanized cells and caused defects in eye development in wild-type and mutant embryos. These results demonstrate that melanophore development in fish and mammals shares a dependence on the nacre/Mitf transcription factor, but that proper development of the retinal pigment epithelium in the fish is not nacre-dependent, suggesting an evolutionary divergence in the function of this gene.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1242/dev.126.17.3757

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • nacre harbors an inactivating mutation of the mitfa gene, rendering the fish devoid of pigmented melanocytes.

    “For example, the zebrafish nacre (nac) mutant harbors an an inactivating mutation in the mitfa gene and are devoid of nearly all embryonic and adult melanophores (Lister et al., 1999), emphasizing the key role of this transcription factor as a master regulator of this cell type.”
  • Common strategies to reduce zebrafish skin pigmentation can be grouped into two categories: chemical compounds interfering with melanin synthesis, most popularly PTU, and pigmentation mutants.

    “Common strategies to reduce zebrafish skin pigmentation can be grouped in two categories: 1) use of chemical compounds interfering with the synthesis of melanin, the most popular one being 1-phenyl-2-thiourea (PTU)8; 2) use of pigmentation mutants in which genes controlling either pigment formation, chromatophore formation or interactions between chromatophores have been inactivated469.”

    From A crystal-clear zebrafish for in vivo imaging (2016) · cites this paper as [9]

  • The nacre mutation does not affect the population of cells forming the retinal pigment epithelium, so this structure is still pigmented in the nacre single mutant.

    “Since the nacre mutation does not affect the population of cells forming the RPE, this structure is still pigmented in this single mutant.”

    From A crystal-clear zebrafish for in vivo imaging (2016) · cites this paper as [9]

  • The nacre mutant lacks all melanophores due to a mutation in the mitfa gene.

    “The nacrew2/w2 mutant lacks all melanophores due to a mutation in the mitfa gene9.”

    From A crystal-clear zebrafish for in vivo imaging (2016) · cites this paper as [9]

  • The combinatorial crystal mutant (albb4/b4;nacrew2/w2;roya9/a9) was generated by sequentially crossbreeding three single mutant strains: nacrew2/w2, roya9/a9 and albb4/b4.

    “The combinatorial crystal mutant (albb4/b4;nacrew2/w2;roya9/a9) was generated by sequentially crossbreeding three different single mutant strains, namely nacrew2/w2 (ref. 9), roya9/a9 (ref. 4) and albb4/b4 (ref. 18) mutants.”

    From A crystal-clear zebrafish for in vivo imaging (2016) · cites this paper as [9]

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lister, J. A., Robertson, C. P., Lepage, T., Johnson, S. L., & Raible, D. W.
Affiliations
  • University of Washington (US)
  • Washington University in St. Louis (US)
Venue
Development
Published
1999-09-01
Volume
126
Issue
17
Pages
3757-3767
ISSN
  • 0950-1991 (ISSN-L)
  • 1477-9129
OpenAlex
W2153649171
Cited by
819
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 35 · 2025: 32 · 2024: 39 · 2023: 38 · 2022: 39 · 2021: 52 · 2020: 40 · 2019: 49 · 2018: 39 · 2017: 40 · 2016: 45 · 2015: 27 · 2014: 28 · 2013: 48 · 2012: 29
FWCI
4.45
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Development (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (R01NS057220)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › melanin and skin pigmentation
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Developmental Biology and Gene Regulation
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Zebrafish Biomedical Research Applications
Keywords
MITF, microphthalmia-associated transcription factor, neural crest, iridophores, retinal pigment epithelium, melanoblasts, bHLH transcription factors, eye development
MeSH terms
Amino Acid Sequence, Animals, Base Sequence, DNA-Binding Proteins, Melanophores, Molecular Sequence Data, Mutation, Neural Crest, Phenotype, Pigment Epithelium of Eye, Species Specificity, Transcription Factors, Zebrafish, Leucine Zippers, Sequence Homology, Amino Acid, In Situ Hybridization, DNA Primers, Helix-Loop-Helix Motifs, Codon, Terminator, Gene Expression Regulation, Developmental, Zebrafish Proteins, Mice, Microphthalmia-Associated Transcription Factor

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review