The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
nos-1 and nos-2, two genes related to Drosophila nanos, regulate primordial germ cell development and survival in Caenorhabditis elegans
Abstract
In Drosophila, the posterior determinant nanos is required for embryonic patterning and for primordial germ cell (PGC) development. We have identified three genes in Caenorhabditis elegans that contain a putative zinc-binding domain similar to the one found in nanos, and show that two of these genes function during PGC development. Like Drosophila nanos, C. elegans nos-1 and nos-2 are not generally required for PGC fate specification, but instead regulate specific aspects of PGC development. nos-2 is expressed in PGCs around the time of gastrulation from a maternal RNA associated with P granules, and is required for the efficient incorporation of PGCs into the somatic gonad. nos-1 is expressed in PGCs after gastrulation, and is required redundantly with nos-2 to prevent PGCs from dividing in starved animals and to maintain germ cell viability during larval development. In the absence of nos-1 and nos-2, germ cells cease proliferation at the end of the second larval stage, and die in a manner that is partially dependent on the apoptosis gene ced-4. Our results also indicate that putative RNA-binding proteins related to Drosophila Pumilio are required for the same PGC processes as nos-1 and nos-2. These studies demonstrate that evolutionarily distant organisms utilize conserved factors to regulate early germ cell development and survival, and that these factors include members of the nanos and pumilio gene families.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Potent and specific genetic interference by double-stranded RNA in Caenorhabditis elegans
Fire, A., Xu, S., Montgomery, M. K., Kostas, S. A., Driver, S. E., & Mello, C. C. (1998) · Nature · doi:10.1038/35888 · Cited by 15,429
The embryonic cell lineage of the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans
Sulston, J. E., Schierenberg, E., White, J. G., & Thomson, J. N. (1983) · Developmental Biology · doi:10.1016/0012-1606(83)90201-4 · Cited by 4,199
Genetic control of programmed cell death in the nematode C. elegans
Ellis, H. (1986) · Cell · doi:10.1016/0092-8674(86)90004-8 · Cited by 1,828
Cited by
A PUF family portrait: 3′UTR regulation as a way of life
Wickens, M., Bernstein, D. S., Kimble, J., & Parker, R. (2002) · Trends in Genetics · doi:10.1016/s0168-9525(01)02616-6 · Cited by 615
A zebrafish nanos-related gene is essential for the development of primordial germ cells
Köprunner, M., Thisse, C., Thisse, B., & Raz, E. (2001) · Genes & Development · doi:10.1101/gad.212401 · Cited by 508
Pathway to Totipotency: Lessons from Germ Cells
Seydoux, G., & Braun, R. E. (2006) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2006.11.016 · Cited by 395
Self-citationTenenhaus, C., Subramaniam, K., Dunn, M. A., & Seydoux, G. (2001) · Genes & Development · doi:10.1101/gad.876201 · Cited by 357
Self-citationA C. elegans LSD1 Demethylase Contributes to Germline Immortality by Reprogramming Epigenetic Memory
Katz, D. J., Edwards, T. M., Reinke, V., & Kelly, W. G. (2009) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2009.02.015 · Cited by 344
Metadata
- Authors
- Subramaniam, K., & Seydoux, G.
- Venue
- Development
- Publisher
- The Company of Biologists
- Published
- 1999-11-01
- Volume
- 126
- Issue
- 21
- Pages
- 4861-4871
- ISSN
- 0950-1991 (ISSN-L)
- 1477-9129
- OpenAlex
- W2104377074
- Cited by
- 321
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 4.78
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.