Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 223

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Whisker growth after removal of the dermal papilla and lengths of follicle in the hooded rat

Oliver, R. F.·1966·Development

Abstract

The arrangement and mode of growth of the major vibrissae on the upper lip of the hooded rat has been studied. There was an antero-posterior gradation in rates of growth and club lengths produced in each of the vertical rows. The longest vibrissae were produced at the fastest rate in the larger follicles in the posterior vertical rows. There was a similar antero-posterior gradation in the times for a phase of growth throughout each of the vertical rows. There are no overall waves of growth on the upper lip; phases of growth are entered into by the vertical rows individually. The suggestion is made that the above behaviour may be related to the mode of development of the vibrissae in the embryo. A method has been described for the removal of the dermal papilla in situ and the removal of dermal papillae and various lengths of whisker root (‘root ends’) have been performed to determine the effects of these operations on whisker growth. After removal of dermal papillae, all 18 follicles produced generations of whiskers; 15 of these follicles produced vibrissae of normal or nearly normal length. After removal of root ends, whiskers of shorter than normal length were produced from 28 out of 37 follicles. Conclusive evidence was obtained that generations of vibrissae can be produced after complete removal of the dermal papilla. The degree of regeneration, as expressed by the length of post-operative whiskers produced, was apparently dependent on the amount of proximal follicle root removed.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1242/dev.15.3.331

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Oliver, R. F.
Venue
Development
Published
1966-06-01
Volume
15
Issue
3
Pages
331-347
ISSN
  • 0950-1991 (ISSN-L)
  • 1477-9129
OpenAlex
W4301017676
Cited by
223
References
0
FWCI
9.96
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.