Cited by 343Single-cell and spatial transcriptomicsGenomics and Phylogenetic StudiesMolecular Biology Techniques and Applications

Psychrophilic proteases dramatically reduce single cell RNA-seq artifacts: A molecular atlas of kidney development

Open access
Adam, Mike, Potter, Andrew S., Potter, S. Steven·2017·Development

Abstract

Single-cell RNA-seq is a powerful technique. Nevertheless, there are important limitations, including the technical challenges of breaking down an organ or tissue into a single-cell suspension. Invariably, this has required enzymatic incubation at 37°C, which can be expected to result in artifactual changes in gene expression patterns. Here, we describe a dissociation method that uses a protease with high activity in the cold, purified from a psychrophilic microorganism. The entire procedure is carried out at 6°C or colder, at which temperature mammalian transcriptional machinery is largely inactive, thereby effectively 'freezing in' the in vivo gene expression patterns. To test this method, we carried out RNA-seq on 20,424 single cells from postnatal day 1 mouse kidneys, comparing the results of the psychrophilic protease method with procedures using 37°C incubation. We show that the cold protease method provides a great reduction in gene expression artifacts. In addition, the results produce a single-cell resolution gene expression atlas of the newborn mouse kidney, an interesting time in development when mature nephrons are present yet nephrogenesis remains extremely active.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1242/dev.151142

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Adam, M., Potter, A. S., & Potter, S. S.
Affiliations
Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center (US)
Corresponding author
Adam, Mike
Venue
Development
Published
2017-01-01
Volume
144
Issue
19
Pages
3625-3632
ISSN
  • 0950-1991 (ISSN-L)
  • 1477-9129
OpenAlex
W2752378502
Cited by
343
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 14 · 2025: 33 · 2024: 44 · 2023: 46 · 2022: 44 · 2021: 55 · 2020: 41 · 2019: 41 · 2018: 23 · 2017: 2
FWCI
11.96
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Development (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
Funders
National Institutes of Health (UO1DK107350)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Single-cell and spatial transcriptomics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology Techniques and Applications
Keywords
tissue dissociation, kidney development
MeSH terms
Animals, Kidney, Kidney Tubules, Proximal, Peptide Hydrolases, Temperature, Time Factors, Artifacts, Stromal Cells, Sequence Analysis, RNA, Gene Expression Regulation, Developmental, Gene Expression Profiling, Organogenesis, Mice, Single-Cell Analysis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review