Systematic assessment of tissue dissociation and storage biases in single-cell and single-nucleus RNA-seq workflows
Open accessPublished version of a preprint
Abstract
Background: Single-cell RNA sequencing has been widely adopted to estimate the cellular composition of heterogeneous tissues and obtain transcriptional profiles of individual cells. Multiple approaches for optimal sample dissociation and storage of single cells have been proposed as have single-nuclei profiling methods. What has been lacking is a systematic comparison of their relative biases and benefits. Results: Here, we compare gene expression and cellular composition of single-cell suspensions prepared from adult mouse kidney using two tissue dissociation protocols. For each sample, we also compare fresh cells to cryopreserved and methanol-fixed cells. Lastly, we compare this single-cell data to that generated using three single-nucleus RNA sequencing workflows. Our data confirms prior reports that digestion on ice avoids the stress response observed with 37 °C dissociation. It also reveals cell types more abundant either in the cold or warm dissociations that may represent populations that require gentler or harsher conditions to be released intact. For cell storage, cryopreservation of dissociated cells results in a major loss of epithelial cell types; in contrast, methanol fixation maintains the cellular composition but suffers from ambient RNA leakage. Finally, cell type composition differences are observed between single-cell and single-nucleus RNA sequencing libraries. In particular, we note an underrepresentation of T, B, and NK lymphocytes in the single-nucleus libraries. Conclusions: Systematic comparison of recovered cell types and their transcriptional profiles across the workflows has highlighted protocol-specific biases and thus enables researchers starting single-cell experiments to make an informed choice.
AI snapshot
Written from the paper’s full text.
TL;DR
This study systematically compares tissue dissociation, cell preservation, and single-cell versus single-nucleus RNA-seq workflows in adult mouse kidney, using 77,656 single-cell, 98,303 single-nucleus, and 15 bulk RNA-seq profiles. It finds protocol-specific biases: warm dissociation induces stress genes and depletes sensitive cell types, cryopreservation loses epithelial cells, methanol fixation preserves composition but causes ambient RNA leakage, and snRNA-seq underrepresents T, B, and NK lymphocytes.
Key findings
- Warm dissociation induced a stress response: bulk RNA-seq found 71 genes higher in warm-dissociated kidneys versus 5 in cold-dissociated kidneys (logFC > 2, FDR < 0.05), and scRNA-seq found 64 genes higher in warm-dissociated libraries in at least one cell type versus 20 in cold-dissociated libraries. Stress scores were significantly high in 8 of 14 cell types in warm-dissociated samples.
- Cell composition differed by dissociation protocol: podocytes were 0.03% in warm-dissociated samples versus 2.78% in cold-dissociated samples; aLOH cells were 4.99% versus 2.52%, and PT cells were 71.36% versus 63.34% in warm versus cold, respectively.
- Cryopreservation severely depleted epithelial cells: PT cells were 63.12% and 70.86% in fresh cold- and warm-dissociated samples but only 0.31% and 0.57% in cryopreserved samples; a repeat experiment showed PT at 55.55% fresh versus 7.65% cryopreserved. Only ~30% of cryopreserved cells were recovered, while methanol fixation better preserved composition but showed ambient RNA leakage.
- Single-nucleus libraries underdetected immune cells: immune cells averaged 0.73% in snRNA-seq versus 6.03% in scRNA-seq; T, B, and NK cells were not detected in snRNA-seq, and podocytes were 0.7% in snRNA-seq versus 3.28% in scRNA-seq. snRNA-seq detected more genes per nucleus (median 1819) than scRNA-seq per cell (median 981).
Methods
- Adult mouse kidneys were used: male C57BL/6J mice (19 weeks) for the first dissociation/preservation series, and male Balb/c (18 weeks) or female Balb/c (15 weeks) mice for later scRNA-seq versus snRNA-seq comparisons, with biological triplicates.
- Workflows compared two dissociation protocols (37 °C Miltenyi Multi Tissue Dissociation Kit 2 versus cold-active *Bacillus licheniformis* protease on ice), two preservation methods (methanol fixation and cryopreservation), and three single-nuclei isolation protocols (SN_FANS_3x500g, SN_FANS_1x2000g, SN_sucrose), plus bulk RNA-seq of intact and dissociated kidney.
- Libraries were profiled with 10x Genomics Chromium scRNA-seq/snRNA-seq and bulk RNA-seq; analyses included Cell Ranger, EmptyDrops, Seurat, scMatch annotation, edgeR/GeTMM, BSEQ-sc deconvolution, a 17-gene stress score, and Seurat cell-cycle scoring. Data are available at GSE141115.
Limitations
- Stated in the paper: bulk RNA-seq deconvolution is sensitive to the input marker gene list, may overlook rare and novel cell types, and cell abundance estimates from bulk data are influenced by both cell number and relative mRNA content; the authors note they lack a definitive “ground truth” for cell composition and did not use in vitro cell mixtures or spiking because these do not represent dissociation from solid tissue.
- Stated in the paper: flow cytometry still requires dissociation, and ISH/IHC/spatial methods only give proportions for sections examined rather than whole-organ estimates; a classifier able to distinguish mitotic cells from early G1 and late G2 is needed to fully dissect cell-cycle biases in snRNA-seq.
- Evident from the text: findings are restricted to adult mouse kidney, specific mouse strains/sexes, selected 10x chemistries, and particular dissociation, preservation, and nuclei-isolation protocols, so generalization to other tissues, species, or protocols is not established; some analyses excluded low-abundance cell types such as podocytes and transitional cells, and red blood cell depletion was not applied.
Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
0 of 9 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged
- Findingown data
Differential expression analysis identified 64 genes more highly expressed in warm-dissociated libraries in at least one cell type.
“Differential expression analysis identified 64 genes more highly expressed in warm-dissociated libraries in at least one cell type (Fig. 2b, Additional file 4)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Cells such as those of the ascending loop of Henle (aLOH) and proximal tubule (PT) were more abundant in warm-dissociated samples (aLOH 4.99% vs. 2.52% in cold, PT 71.36% vs. 63.34% in cold).
“we identified cells such as those of the ascending loop of Henle (aLOH) and proximal tubule (PT), that were more abundant in warm-dissociated samples (aLOH 4.99% vs. 2.52% in cold, PT 71.36% vs. 63.34% in cold)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Cell types more abundant in snRNA-seq libraries included loop of Henle and mesangial cells.
“Cell types more abundant in snRNA-seq libraries included loop of Henle and mesangial cells”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Warm tissue dissociation induces stress-response-related changes, including induction of stress response genes, in adult mouse kidney single-cell suspensions.
“Our data confirms prior reports that digestion on ice avoids the stress response observed with 37 °C dissociation.”
- Also stated in: § Comparison of tissue dissociation protocols · plain
“Bulk RNA-seq profiling of single-cell suspensions revealed induction of stress response genes in warm-dissociated samples.”
- Also stated in: § Discussion · plain
“Our findings corroborate this bias and show induction of heat shock proteins and immediate-early response genes in warm-dissociated libraries when compared to cold-dissociated libraries.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Adam et al. [18] Adam M, Potter AS, Potter SS. Psychrophilic proteases dramatically reduce single-cell RNA-seq artifacts: a molecular atlas of kidney development. Development. 2017;144:3625–32. source
Not checked in the free run.
- Also stated in: § Comparison of tissue dissociation protocols · plain
- Findingown data
The number of high-quality cells obtained from cryopreserved samples after quality control and filtering was substantially lower (~ 30%) than that of fresh and methanol-fixed samples.
“Despite loading similar numbers of cells, the number of high-quality cells obtained from the cryopreserved samples after quality control and filtering (“Methods”) was substantially lower (~ 30%) than that of the fresh and methanol-fixed samples.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
- Findingown data
Differential expression analysis identified 71 genes with higher expression in warm-dissociated kidneys and 5 genes with higher expression in cold-dissociated kidneys (logFC > 2, FDR < 0.05, edgeR exact test).
“Differential expression analysis identified 71 genes with higher expression in warm-dissociated kidneys and 5 genes with higher expression in cold-dissociated kidneys (logFC > 2, FDR < 0.05, edgeR exact test [27], Additional file 1).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [27] Robinson MD, McCarthy DJ, Smyth GK. edgeR: a Bioconductor package for differential expression analysis of digital gene expression data. Bioinformatics. 2010;26:139–40. source
Not checked in the free run.
- Findingown data
In methanol-fixed cells, genes overexpressed were those highly expressed in tubular cells and hemoglobin genes.
“In contrast, genes overexpressed in methanol-fixed cells were those highly expressed in tubular cells and hemoglobin genes”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The numbers of differentially expressed genes varied among cell types.
“Notably, the numbers of differentially expressed genes varied among cell types (Fig. 2b)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Immune cells were detected at lower rates in snRNA-seq (average 0.73%) than in scRNA-seq (average 6.03%) across all experiments performed.
“Immune cells were detected at lower rates in snRNA-seq (average of 0.73%) than in scRNA-seq (average of 6.03%) across all experiments performed”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Eight cell populations were less abundant in warm-dissociated samples compared to cold-dissociated ones, including podocytes, mesangial cells, and endothelial cells (chi-square p < 0.001).
“our analyses identified eight cell populations that were less abundant in warm-dissociated samples in comparison to cold-dissociated ones, including podocytes, mesangial cells, and endothelial cells (Fig. 2e left, chi-square test p value < 0.001).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Only three podocytes were detected in warm-dissociated samples (0.03% of total cell count), compared to 330 (2.78%) in cold-dissociated samples.
“Notably, only three podocytes were detected in warm-dissociated samples (0.03% of the total cell count), compared to 330 (2.78%) in the cold-dissociated samples.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
These depleted populations also showed significantly high expression of the stress-response-related gene set.
“These depleted populations also showed significantly high expression of the stress-response-related gene set as described above (Fig. 2c).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
In a repeated experiment, there was significant depletion of PT cells, with them making up 55.55% of freshly profiled cells but only 7.65% of cryopreserved cells.
“Again, there was a significant depletion of PT cells, with them making up 55.55% of the freshly profiled cells but only 7.65% of the cryopreserved cells”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Significantly high stress scores were detected only in warm-dissociated samples in eight out of 14 cell types.
“Figure 2c shows that significantly high stress scores were detected only in warm-dissociated samples in eight out of 14 cell types.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Podocytes composed only 0.7% in snRNA-seq libraries as opposed to 3.28% in scRNA-seq.
“Similarly, podocytes composed only 0.7% in snRNA-seq libraries as opposed to 3.28% in scRNA-seq”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Gene ontology analysis again reported "regulation of cell death" as one of the top significantly enriched terms for genes more highly expressed in warm-dissociated libraries (23 genes, FDR = 3.9E−7).
“gene ontology analysis again reported “regulation of cell death” as one of the top significantly enriched terms (an overlap of 23 genes, FDR = 3.9E−7, Additional file 4).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Genes with the highest logFC values (> 4) in warm-dissociated kidneys included immediate-early genes Fosb, Fos, Jun, Junb, Atf3, and Egr1 and heat shock proteins Hspa1a and Hspa1b.
“Genes with the highest logFC values (> 4) included immediate-early genes Fosb, Fos, Jun, Junb, Atf3, and Egr1 and heat shock proteins Hspa1a and Hspa1b (Fig. 2a).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingreasoning
Bulk RNA-seq-based proportions estimated from intact kidneys largely contradicted the anatomical estimates.
“Bulk RNA-seq-based proportions estimated from intact kidneys largely contradicted the anatomical estimates”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
In cryopreserved samples, stress-response-related genes were induced, including multiple immediate-early response genes and heat shock proteins.
“In cryopreserved samples, stress-response-related genes were induced, including multiple immediate-early response genes and heat shock proteins”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Gene ontology analysis reported "regulation of cell death" as the top significantly enriched biological process for genes more highly expressed in warm-dissociated kidneys (22 genes, FDR = 1.7E−7).
“Gene ontology analysis with ToppGene [28] reported “regulation of cell death” as the top significantly enriched biological process for the genes more highly expressed in warm-dissociated kidneys (an overlap of 22 genes, FDR = 1.7E−7, see Additional file 1).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [28] Chen J, Bardes EE, Aronow BJ, Jegga AG. ToppGene Suite for gene list enrichment analysis and candidate gene prioritization. Nucleic Acids Res. 2009;37:W305–11. source
Not checked in the free run.
- Findingown data
Detection rates of non-epithelial kidney cell types were markedly different between scRNA-seq and snRNA-seq libraries.
“Detection rates of non-epithelial kidney cell types were markedly different between scRNA-seq and snRNA-seq libraries”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Seurat predicted a higher fraction of G1 phase cells and lower fraction of S phase cells in scRNA-seq libraries when compared to snRNA-seq libraries for virtually all cell types.
“Notably, Seurat predicted a higher fraction of G1 phase cells and lower fraction of S phase cells in scRNA-seq libraries when compared to snRNA-seq libraries for virtually all cell types”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Single-nuclei sequencing detected more genes per nuclei than single-cell sequencing per cell, with median numbers of 1819 and 981 genes, respectively.
“Single-nuclei sequencing detected more genes per nuclei than single-cell sequencing per cell, with the median numbers of 1819 and 981 genes, respectively”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
In cold-dissociated samples, 31 and 27 genes were overexpressed in at least one cell type in cryopreserved and methanol-fixed cells, respectively, when compared to freshly profiled suspensions.
“In cold-dissociated samples, 31 and 27 genes were overexpressed in at least one cell type in cryopreserved and methanol-fixed cells, respectively, when compared to freshly profiled suspensions”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
One of the most notable differences between single-cell and single-nuclei experiments was the low detection rate of immune cells, in particular the failure to detect T, B, or NK cells in any of the snRNA-seq libraries.
“one of the most notable differences between single-cell and single-nuclei experiments was the low detection rate of immune cells, in particular the failure to detect T, B, or NK cells in any of the snRNA-seq libraries.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Cell composition of methanol-fixed suspensions resembled that of freshly profiled libraries.
“cell composition of methanol-fixed suspensions resembled that of freshly profiled libraries.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingcitation
Candidate CNT cells were identified as a cluster overexpressing Calb1 and Klk1 genes.
“Candidate CNT cells were identified as a cluster overexpressing Calb1 and Klk1 genes [34, 56].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [34] Clark JZ, Chen L, Chou CL, Jung HJ, Lee JW, Knepper MA. Representation and relative abundance of cell-type selective markers in whole-kidney RNA-Seq data. Kidney Int. 2019;95:787–96. source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [56] Rohrwasser A, Ishigami T, Gociman B, Lantelme P, Morgan T, Cheng T, et al. Renin and kallikrein in connecting tubule of mouse. Kidney Int. 2003;64:2155–62. source
Not checked in the free run.
- Findingown data
The cryopreservation-induced depletion artifact was reproducible across two mouse strains, both sexes, and two 10x chemistry versions.
“This artifact was reproducible across two mouse strains, both sexes, and two 10x chemistry versions.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Cryopreservation of single-cell suspensions of dissociated mouse kidneys resulted in depletion of epithelial cell types.
“cryopreservation of single-cell suspensions of dissociated mouse kidneys resulted in depletion of epithelial cell types.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingreasoning
Cold-dissociated samples showed higher contamination with hemoglobin transcripts than warm-dissociated ones.
“Cold-dissociated samples showed higher contamination with hemoglobin transcripts than warm-dissociated ones.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingnone given
There are identified warm dissociation-related biases.
“In the first series of experiments, marker genes for the deconvolution were calculated from scRNA-seq data, using only cold-dissociated samples to avoid the influence of the identified warm dissociation-related biases.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
In dissociated mouse kidneys, methanol fixation better preserved cell type composition than cryopreservation.
“in the case of dissociated mouse kidneys, methanol fixation better preserved cell type composition than cryopreservation”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
The cryopreservation and subsequent thawing protocol failed to efficiently recover kidney epithelial cell populations.
“Together with the loss of PT cells, this indicates that the cryopreservation and subsequent thawing protocol failed to efficiently recover kidney epithelial cell populations.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
Immune cells are underrepresented in the snRNA-seq data.
“This suggests an underrepresentation of immune cells in the snRNA-seq data.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: BSEQ-sc deconvolution of bulk RNA-seq accurately estimates cell type proportions in intact kidney.
- Interpretationown data
Cryopreservation of dissociated cells using 50% FBS, 40% RPMI, and 10% DMSO can induce substantial deleterious changes in cell composition, at least in mouse kidneys.
“From this, we conclude that, at least in the case of mouse kidneys, cryopreservation of dissociated cells using 50% FBS, 40% RPMI, and 10% DMSO can induce substantial deleterious changes in cell composition.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
Certain cell types, such as immune and endothelial cells, are particularly sensitive to warm tissue dissociation.
“Taken together, these results highlight that certain cell types, such as immune and endothelial cells, are particularly sensitive to warm tissue dissociation.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
Cell types respond differently to warm tissue dissociation.
“suggesting that cell types respond differently to warm tissue dissociation.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
Levels of hemoglobin transcripts suggest contamination from erythrocytes is higher in samples dissociated on ice.
“We note the levels of hemoglobin transcripts suggest contamination from erythrocytes is higher in the samples dissociated on ice.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationown data
The higher abundance of aLOH and PT in warm-dissociated samples potentially indicates their less efficient dissociation by cold-active protease.
“potentially indicating their less efficient dissociation by cold-active protease”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationown data
There are underlying biases in cell cycle phase distributions in snRNA-seq data in comparison to scRNA-seq data.
“This suggests that there are indeed underlying biases in cell cycle phase distributions in snRNA-seq data in comparison to scRNA-seq data”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
The stress-response artifact stems from the dissociation protocol rather than from microfluidic separation, single-cell sequencing, or data processing.
“Overexpression of stress-response-related genes was also detected by bulk RNA-seq analysis of dissociated tissues, confirming that this artifact stems from the dissociation protocol rather than from microfluidic separation, single-cell sequencing, or data processing.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationnone given
Cell type composition of single-cell or single-nucleus data differs from that of the original tissue.
“It is important to remember that cell type composition of single-cell or single-nucleus data differs from that of the original tissue”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationcitation
Ambient RNA contamination with highly abundant transcripts suggests cell damage by methanol fixation.
“we observed ambient RNA contamination with highly abundant transcripts suggesting cell damage by methanol fixation [22].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [22] Wohnhaas CT, Leparc GG, Fernandez-Albert F, Kind D, Gantner F, Viollet C, et al. DMSO cryopreservation is the method of choice to preserve cells for droplet-based single-cell RNA sequencing. Sci Rep. 2019;9:10699. source
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning
Reduced contamination of other cells with highly expressed PT transcripts indicates that PT cells might be lost in the thawing and resuspension.
“we observed reduced contamination of other cells with highly expressed PT transcripts, which indicates that PT cells might be lost in the thawing and resuspension.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
- May combine two claims. 19
- Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 8
- The quote only partly states this claim. 1
May combine two claims.
FindingcitationUsing bulk RNA-seq from intact kidneys and BSEQ-sc, approximately 1.51% of cells were estimated to be immune cells in Balb/c female mice and 4.84% in Balb/c male mice.
“we estimated that approximately 1.51% should correspond to immune cells in Balb/c female mice and 4.84% in Balb/c male mice.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [35] Baron M, Veres A, Wolock SL, Faust AL, Gaujoux R, Vetere A, et al. A single-cell transcriptomic map of the human and mouse pancreas reveals inter- and intra-cell population structure. Cell Syst. 2016;3:346–60.e4. source
Not checked in the free run.
- Rests on an assumption: BSEQ-sc deconvolution of bulk RNA-seq accurately estimates cell type proportions in intact kidney.
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataMacrophages were the only type of immune cells recovered in snRNA-seq libraries, whereas in scRNA-seq libraries T cells (1.38% on average), B cells (0.77%), and NK cells (0.65%) were also detected.
“Furthermore, macrophages were the only type of immune cells recovered in snRNA-seq libraries, whereas in scRNA-seq libraries we also detected T cells (1.38% on average), B cells (0.77%), and NK cells (0.65%).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataIn freshly profiled suspensions, PT composed 63.12% and 70.86% of all cells in cold- and warm-dissociated samples, respectively; in cryopreserved samples, PT were scarcely detected at 0.31% and 0.57%, respectively.
“In freshly profiled suspensions, PT composed 63.12% and 70.86% of all cells in cold- and warm-dissociated samples, respectively. In contrast, PT were scarcely detected in cryopreserved samples, at 0.31% and 0.57%, respectively”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataOnly ~ 33% and ~ 32% of cells were recovered after cryostorage in the first and repeated experiment, respectively; average viability estimated by Countess was 86% and 75%, respectively.
“Notably, only ~ 33% and ~ 32% of cells were recovered after cryostorage in the first and the repeated experiment, respectively; the average viability estimated by the Countess was 86% and 75%, respectively.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataOnly 20 genes had higher expression in cold-dissociated cell populations, and only five of them (Hbb-bs, Hba-a1, Hba-a2, mt-Co1, Malat1) were identified in at least two cell types.
“In contrast to the 64 genes with higher expression in the warm dissociation, only 20 genes had higher expression in the cold-dissociated cell populations, and only five of them (Hbb-bs, Hba-a1, Hba-a2, mt-Co1, Malat1) were identified in at least two cell types (Fig. 2b, Additional file 5).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataCertain cell types were moderately underrepresented in methanol-fixed samples compared to freshly profiled samples, with macrophages showing the largest reduction from 5.36 to 3.2% in cold-dissociated samples and from 4.28 to 2.54% in warm-dissociated samples.
“Nevertheless, certain cell types were moderately underrepresented in the methanol-fixed samples in comparison to freshly profiled samples, with macrophages showing the largest reduction from 5.36 to 3.2% in cold-dissociated samples and from 4.28 to 2.54% in warm-dissociated samples.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThere was significant underrepresentation (chi-square p < 0.001) of five kidney cell types in cryopreserved samples prepared with the cold dissociation protocol, three of which were also underrepresented in cryopreserved warm dissociation samples.
“This comparison revealed significant underrepresentation (chi-square test p value < 0.001) of five kidney cell types in cryopreserved samples prepared with the cold dissociation protocol, three of which were also underrepresented in the cryopreserved warm dissociation samples”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe three nuclei isolation protocols yielded comparable results, with the most notable difference being a higher contamination with mitochondrial genes in SN_FANS_1x2000g.
“The three nuclei isolation protocols yielded comparable results, with the most notable difference being a higher contamination with mitochondrial genes in SN_FANS_1x2000g”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataDifferential expression analysis comparing individual cell types profiled by snRNA-seq and scRNA-seq suggested higher expression of long noncoding RNAs in snRNA-seq libraries and higher expression of genes related to mitochondrial and ribosomal functions in scRNA-seq.
“Differential expression analysis comparing individual cell types profiled by snRNA-seq and scRNA-seq suggested higher expression of long noncoding RNAs in snRNA-seq libraries and higher expression of genes related to mitochondrial and ribosomal functions in scRNA-seq, in agreement with previous reports [24, 26]”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [24] Bakken TE, Hodge RD, Miller JA, Yao Z, Nguyen TN, Aevermann B, et al. Single-nucleus and single-cell transcriptomes compared in matched cortical cell types. PLoS One. 2018;13:e0209648. source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [26] Wu H, Kirita Y, Donnelly EL, Humphreys BD. Advantages of single-nucleus over single-cell RNA sequencing of adult kidney: rare cell types and novel cell states revealed in fibrosis. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2019;30:23–32. source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe fresh scRNA-seq dataset comprised 23,108 cells, including 11,851 cells from cold- and 11,257 cells from warm-dissociated kidneys.
“This dataset comprised 23,108 cells, including 11,851 cells from cold- and 11,257 cells from warm-dissociated kidneys (“Methods”).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe genes most commonly overexpressed across cell populations in warm-dissociated libraries include Junb and Jund (differentially expressed in seven cell types) and Jun and Fos (differentially expressed in five cell types).
“The genes most commonly overexpressed across cell populations are shown in Fig. 2d and include immediate-early response genes such as Junb and Jund (differentially expressed in seven cell types) and Jun and Fos (differentially expressed in five cell types).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
FindingreasoningMethanol-fixed samples loaded at 0.125x SSC had an approximate cell capture of 4000-5000 cells.
“Due to the reverse transcription inhibition of 3x SSC, the sample had to be loaded at a concentration of 0.125x SSC, resulting in an approximate cell capture of 4000–5000 cells.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: 3x SSC inhibits reverse transcription.
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe reference-based annotation approach failed to identify connecting tubule (CNT) cells and instead matched them to other similar cell types.
“This approach failed to identify cells of connecting tubule (CNT) and, instead, matched them to other similar cell types.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimThe quote only partly states this claim.
Findingown dataWarm-dissociated samples have genes induced relative to other conditions.
“To select genes for the stress response score, we looked at all genes induced in the warm-dissociated samples, and from that list, we manually selected genes which have been reported in the literature as stress-response-related genes.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataThese populations are sensitive to warm dissociation and consequently underrepresented.
“These findings suggest that these populations are sensitive to warm dissociation and consequently underrepresented.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningThe same set of transcripts contaminated most cell types, suggesting methanol fixation damages cells and leads to ambient RNA contamination of droplets.
“The same set of transcripts contaminated most cell types suggesting methanol fixation damages cells and leads to ambient RNA contamination of droplets”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataFor some cell types, such as podocytes, scRNA-seq yields proportions most similar to quantitative renal anatomy estimates, whereas for other cell types, such as loop of Henle cells, snRNA-seq better captures cell composition.
“Figure 4b and Additional file 2: Figure S8 show that for some cell types, such as podocytes, scRNA-seq yields proportions most similar to the quantitative renal anatomy estimates, whereas for other cell types, such as loop of Henle cells, snRNA-seq better captures cell composition.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataProportions of aLOH cells in cell suspensions were higher before they were loaded on the Chromium Controller and they are underrepresented in scRNA-seq.
“Our results suggest that proportions of aLOH cells in cell suspensions were higher before they were loaded on the Chromium Controller and that they are somehow underrepresented.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationcitationBased on quantitative renal anatomy estimates, some cell types, such as podocytes, appear to be better represented in scRNA-seq, whereas others, such as loop of Henle cells, were captured more effectively by snRNA-seq.
“Based on these estimates, some cell types, such as podocytes, appear to be better represented in scRNA-seq, whereas others, such as loop of Henle cells, were captured more effectively by snRNA-seq.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductown dataComplete tissue dissociation was checked by examining under the microscope and confirming the absence of visible tissue chunks.
“Complete tissue dissociation was also checked by examining under the microscope and confirming the absence of visible tissue chunks.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductnone givenAll single-cell libraries were constructed in biological triplicate.
“All single-cell libraries were constructed in biological triplicate using the 10x Chromium 3′ workflow as per the manufacturers’ directions.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Study design and conductown dataAll libraries were quantified with qPCR and checked for fragment size.
“All libraries were quantified with qPCR using the NEBnext Library Quant Kit for Illumina and checked for fragment size using the TapeStation D1000 kit (Agilent).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
InterpretationreasoningThe higher hemoglobin contamination in cold-dissociated samples likely stems from a higher rate of hemoglobin transcript degradation in warm tissue dissociation conditions.
“the observation likely stems from a higher rate of hemoglobin transcript degradation in warm tissue dissociation conditions.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Interpretationnone givenCell abundance estimates from bulk data would be influenced by both cell number and relative mRNA content of each cell.
“In addition, cell abundance estimates from bulk data would be influenced by both cell number and relative mRNA content of each cell.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationnone givenComputational deconvolution of bulk RNA-seq of intact kidneys is sensitive to the input marker gene list used and may overlook rare and novel cell types.
“However, the approach is sensitive to the input marker gene list used and may overlook rare and novel cell types.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductown dataAll RNA used for bulk RNA-seq had a RIN greater than 8.
“RNA was assessed for quantity and quality using the TapeStation 4200 RNA ScreenTape kit [Agilent; 5067-5576], which showed all RNA used had a RIN of > 8.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
The paper relies on this without support.
The biases observed in adult mouse kidney workflows generalize to other tissues and to human disease biology.
“From our experiments, we have confirmed several observations by others in the field that have direct relevance to designing single-cell experiments studying human disease biology.”
“Specifically, the depletion of epithelial cell types in cryopreserved samples is concerning given the majority of human cancers are epithelial in origin.”
The paper relies on this without support.
BSEQ-sc deconvolution of bulk RNA-seq accurately estimates cell type proportions in intact kidney.
“Using the bulk RNA-seq from intact kidneys (Fig. 1f) and BSEQ-sc [35] to predict the proportions of each cell type present, we estimated that approximately 1.51% should correspond to immune cells in Balb/c female mice and 4.84% in Balb/c male mice.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The reference expression profiles from previous mouse kidney studies accurately represent the cell types in the studied samples.
“Cells were classified into 15 cell types using scMatch [31] by comparing their expression to reference expression profiles from three previous mouse kidney studies [26, 32, 33], followed by gene signature-based refinement”
The paper relies on this without support.
3x SSC inhibits reverse transcription.
“Due to the reverse transcription inhibition of 3x SSC, the sample had to be loaded at a concentration of 0.125x SSC”
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The inhibitor-based protocol offers greater experimental and tissue-/cell-type flexibility than previously developed experimental and computational solutions.
“Our inhibitor-based protocol offers much greater experimental and tissue-/cell-type flexibility than previously developed experimental and computational solutions for this pervasive issue (see additional discussion of some alternative methods in Supplementary Note 7)33,34,45,65,67,68.”
From Dissection of artifactual and confounding glial signatures by single-cell sequencing of mouse and human brain (2022) · cites this paper as [45]
Emerging results from other tissues and cell types have begun to characterize dissociation artifacts following enzymatic digestion.
“However, emerging results from other tissues/cell types have begun to characterize dissociation artifacts following enzymatic digestion43–45,65,66.”
From Dissection of artifactual and confounding glial signatures by single-cell sequencing of mouse and human brain (2022) · cites this paper as [45]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.
Conflicting initial centrifugation speeds for the sucrose nuclei protocol
MajorThe results describe the initial spin in SN_sucrose as 500g, whereas the protocol specifies 2000g for the homogenate before the sucrose-cushion step.
“In the third protocol, nuclei were initially washed using a 500g spin and then cleaned using a sucrose cushion”
“The homogenate was then filtered through a 30-μm MACS Smart Strainer into a new 15-mL centrifuge tube. Subsequently, the homogenate was centrifuged at 2000g for 5 min at 4 °C.”
Cryopreserved samples thawed from a different stated storage temperature
MinorThe freezing protocol says the cells were transferred to liquid nitrogen for storage after one night at −80 °C, but the thawing protocol says the samples were removed from −80 °C.
“The following day, the cells were transferred to liquid nitrogen storage.”
“The samples were removed from − 80 °C and immediately placed into a 37 °C waterbath for 2–3 min to rapidly thaw.”
Conflicting proximal-tubule percentages for fresh samples
MinorThe two passages give different proximal-tubule proportions for the freshly profiled cold-dissociated samples (63.34% versus 63.12%) and warm-dissociated samples (71.36% versus 70.86%).
“PT 71.36% vs. 63.34% in cold”
“In freshly profiled suspensions, PT composed 63.12% and 70.86% of all cells in cold- and warm-dissociated samples, respectively.”
Cites
Controlling the False Discovery Rate: A Practical and Powerful Approach to Multiple Testing
Benjamini, Y., & Hochberg, Y. (1995) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology · doi:10.1111/j.2517-6161.1995.tb02031.x · Cited by 109,482 · see citing works
STAR: ultrafast universal RNA-seq aligner
Dobin, A., Davis, C. A., Schlesinger, F., Drenkow, J., Zaleski, C., Jha, S., Batut, P., Chaisson, M., & Gingeras, T. R. (2013) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/bts635 · Cited by 51,709 · see citing works
Robinson, M. D., McCarthy, D. J., & Smyth, G. K. (2010) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btp616 · Cited by 41,364 · see citing works
featureCounts: an efficient general purpose program for assigning sequence reads to genomic features
Liao, Y., Smyth, G. K., & Shi, W. (2014) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btt656 · Cited by 27,219 · see citing works
Integrating single-cell transcriptomic data across different conditions, technologies, and species
Butler, A., Hoffman, P., Smibert, P., Papalexi, E., & Satija, R. (2018) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/nbt.4096 · Cited by 13,174 · see citing works
Fast, sensitive and accurate integration of single-cell data with Harmony
Korsunsky, I., Millard, N., Fan, J., Slowikowski, K., Zhang, F., Wei, K., Baglaenko, Y., Brenner, M., Loh, P.-R., & Raychaudhuri, S. (2019) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/s41592-019-0619-0 · Cited by 10,488 · see citing works
Massively parallel digital transcriptional profiling of single cells
Zheng, G. X. Y., Terry, J. M., Belgrader, P., Ryvkin, P., Bent, Z. W., Wilson, R., Ziraldo, S. B., Wheeler, T. D., McDermott, G. P., Zhu, J., et al. (2017) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/ncomms14049 · Cited by 7,353 · see citing works
Highly parallel genome-wide expression profiling of individual cells using nanoliter droplets.
Macosko, E. Z., Basu, A., Satija, R., Nemesh, J., Shekhar, K., Goldman, M., Tirosh, I., Bialas, A. R., Kamitaki, N., Martersteck, E. M., et al. (2015) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2015.05.002 · Cited by 7,110 · see citing works
Dissecting the multicellular ecosystem of metastatic melanoma by single-cell RNA-seq
Tirosh, I., Izar, B., Prakadan, S. M., Wadsworth, M. H., Treacy, D., Trombetta, J. J., Rotem, A., Rodman, C., Lian, C., Murphy, G., et al. (2016) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aad0501 · Cited by 4,944 · see citing works
The single-cell transcriptional landscape of mammalian organogenesis
Cao, J., Spielmann, M., Qiu, X., Huang, X., Ibrahim, D. M., Hill, A. J., Zhang, F., Mundlos, S., Christiansen, L., Steemers, F. J., et al. (2019) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-019-0969-x · Cited by 4,490 · see citing works
Droplet barcoding for single-cell transcriptomics applied to embryonic stem cells
Klein, A. M., Mazutis, L., Akartuna, I., Tallapragada, N., Veres, A., Li, V., Peshkin, L., Weitz, D. A., & Kirschner, M. W. (2015) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2015.04.044 · Cited by 3,356 · see citing works
Single-cell transcriptomics of 20 mouse organs creates a Tabula Muris
The Tabula Muris Consortium, coordination, O., coordination, L., processing, O. C. A., sequencing, L. P. A., analysis, C. D., annotation, C. T., Writing group, Supplemental text writing group, & Principal investigators (2018) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-018-0590-4 · Cited by 3,326 · see citing works
ToppGene Suite for gene list enrichment analysis and candidate gene prioritization
Chen, J., Bardes, E. E., Aronow, B. J., & Jegga, A. G. (2009) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkp427 · Cited by 2,952 · see citing works
Puram, S. V., Tirosh, I., Parikh, A. S., Patel, A. P., Yizhak, K., Gillespie, S., Rodman, C., Luo, C. L., Mroz, E. A., Emerick, K. S., et al. (2017) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2017.10.044 · Cited by 2,557 · see citing works
McCarthy, D. J., Campbell, K. R., Lun, A. T. L., & Wills, Q. F. (2017) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btw777 · Cited by 1,852 · see citing works
SoupX removes ambient RNA contamination from droplet based single-cell RNA sequencing data
Young, M. D., & Behjati, S. (2018) · doi:10.1101/303727 · Cited by 1,648 · see citing works
SoupX removes ambient RNA contamination from droplet-based single-cell RNA sequencing data
Young, M. D., & Behjati, S. (2020) · GigaScience · doi:10.1093/gigascience/giaa151 · Cited by 1,619 · cited 2× · see citing works
“These include tools for decontamination such as DecontX [38] or SoupX [39], tools for batch-effect removal such as Seurat [30] and Harmony [40], and many others.”
MethodBaron, M., Veres, A., Wolock, S. L., Faust, A. L., Gaujoux, R., Vetere, A., Ryu, J. H., Wagner, B. K., Shen-Orr, S. S., Klein, A. M., et al. (2016) · Cell Systems · doi:10.1016/j.cels.2016.08.011 · Cited by 1,508 · see citing works
A human liver cell atlas reveals heterogeneity and epithelial progenitors
Aizarani, N., Saviano, A., Sagar, Mailly, L., Durand, S., Herman, J. S., Pessaux, P., Baumert, T. F., & Grün, D. (2019) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-019-1373-2 · Cited by 1,147 · see citing works
Li, H., Courtois, E. T., Sengupta, D., Tan, Y., Chen, K. H., Goh, J. J. L., Kong, S. L., Chua, C., Hon, L. K., Tan, W. S., et al. (2017) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/ng.3818 · Cited by 1,080 · see citing works
Single-cell sequencing reveals dissociation-induced gene expression in tissue subpopulations
van den Brink, S. C., Sage, F., Vértesy, Á., Spanjaard, B., Peterson-Maduro, J., Baron, C. S., Robin, C., & van Oudenaarden, A. (2017) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/nmeth.4437 · Cited by 1,072 · see citing works
Single-cell transcriptomics of the mouse kidney reveals potential cellular targets of kidney disease
Park, J., Shrestha, R., Qiu, C., Kondo, A., Huang, S., Werth, M., Li, M., Barasch, J., & Suszták, K. (2018) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aar2131 · Cited by 1,065 · see citing works
Lun, A. T. L., Riesenfeld, S. J., Andrews, T. S., Dao, T. P., Gomes, T., Jamboree, P. I. T. 1. H. C. A., & Marioni, J. C. (2019) · Genome biology · doi:10.1186/s13059-019-1662-y · Cited by 1,044 · see citing works
Neuronal subtypes and diversity revealed by single-nucleus RNA sequencing of the human brain
Lake, B. B., Ai, R., Kaeser, G. E., Salathia, N. S., Yung, Y. C., Liu, R., Wildberg, A., Gao, D., Fung, H.-L., Chen, S., et al. (2016) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aaf1204 · Cited by 957 · see citing works
Martin, J. P. D., Chang, C., Boschetti, G., Ungaro, R. C., Giri, M., Grout, J. A., Gettler, K., Chuang, L.-S. F., Nayar, S., Greenstein, A. J., et al. (2019) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2019.08.008 · Cited by 866 · see citing works
Wu, H., Kirita, Y., Donnelly, E. L., & Humphreys, B. D. (2019) · Journal of the American Society of Nephrology · doi:10.1681/asn.2018090912 · Cited by 752 · see citing works
A single-cell and single-nucleus RNA-Seq toolbox for fresh and frozen human tumors
Slyper, M., Porter, C. B. M., Ashenberg, O., Waldman, J., Drokhlyansky, E., Wakiro, I., Smillie, C. S., Smith-Rosario, G., Wu, J., Dionne, D. A., et al. (2020) · Nature Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41591-020-0844-1 · Cited by 739 · see citing works
Decontamination of ambient RNA in single-cell RNA-seq with DecontX
Yang, S., Corbett, S. E., Koga, Y., Wang, Z., Johnson, W. E., Yajima, M., & Campbell, J. D. (2020) · Genome Biology · doi:10.1186/s13059-020-1950-6 · Cited by 635 · see citing works
Single-cell RNA sequencing for the study of development, physiology and disease
Potter, S. S. (2018) · Nature Reviews Nephrology · doi:10.1038/s41581-018-0021-7 · Cited by 621 · see citing works
Single-nucleus and single-cell transcriptomes compared in matched cortical cell types
Bakken, T. E., Hodge, R. D., Miller, J. A., Yao, Z., Nguyen, T. N., Aevermann, B., Barkan, E., Bertagnolli, D., Casper, T., Dee, N., et al. (2018) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0209648 · Cited by 608 · see citing works
Using single nuclei for RNA-seq to capture the transcriptome of postmortem neurons
Krishnaswami, S. R., Grindberg, R. V., Novotny, M., Venepally, P., Lacar, B., Bhutani, K., Linker, S. B., Pham, S., Erwin, J. A., Miller, J. A., et al. (2016) · Nature Protocols · doi:10.1038/nprot.2016.015 · Cited by 445 · see citing works
A Note on the Calculation of Empirical P Values from Monte Carlo Procedures
North, B. V., Curtis, D., & Sham, P. C. (2002) · The American Journal of Human Genetics · doi:10.1086/341527 · Cited by 426 · see citing works
A single‐cell transcriptome atlas of the adult human retina
Lukowski, S. W., Lo, C. Y.-W., Sharov, A. A., Nguyen, Q. H., Fang, L., Hung, S. S. C., Zhu, L., Zhang, T., Grünert, U., Nguyen, T., et al. (2019) · The EMBO Journal · doi:10.15252/embj.2018100811 · Cited by 347 · see citing works
Adam, M., Potter, A. S., & Potter, S. S. (2017) · Development · doi:10.1242/dev.151142 · Cited by 343 · see citing works
Lake, B. B., Codeluppi, S., Yung, Y. C., Gao, D., Chun, J., Kharchenko, P. V., Linnarsson, S., & Zhang, K. (2017) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-017-04426-w · Cited by 271 · see citing works
Cell fixation and preservation for droplet-based single-cell transcriptomics
Alles, J., Karaiskos, N., Praktiknjo, S. D., Grosswendt, S., Wahle, P., Ruffault, P.-L., Ayoub, S., Schreyer, L., Boltengagen, A., Birchmeier, C., et al. (2017) · BMC Biology · doi:10.1186/s12915-017-0383-5 · Cited by 218 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Some of the artifacts have been investigated in recent studies comparing single-cell profiles of methanol-fixed and live cells [21, 22], cryopreserved and live cells [22, 23], single-cell and single-nucleus protocols [24–26], or tissue dissociation using cold-active protease and traditional digestion at 37 °C [18].”
Backgroundon behalf of the MATCH study group, Smid, M., van den Braak, R. R. J. C., van de Werken, H. J. G., van Riet, J., van Galen, A., de Weerd, V., van der Vlugt‐Daane, M., Bril, S. I., Lalmahomed, Z. S., et al. (2018) · BMC Bioinformatics · doi:10.1186/s12859-018-2246-7 · Cited by 208 · see citing works
Kim, K.-T., Lee, H. W., Lee, H.-O., Song, H. J., Jeong, D. E., Shin, S., Kim, H., Shin, Y., Nam, D.-H., Jeong, B. C., et al. (2016) · Genome Biology · doi:10.1186/s13059-016-0945-9 · Cited by 198 · see citing works
Combes, A. N., Phipson, B., Lawlor, K. T., Dorison, A., Patrick, R., Zappia, L., Harvey, R. P., Oshlack, A., & Little, M. H. (2019) · Development · doi:10.1242/dev.178673 · Cited by 172 · see citing works
A Single-Cell Transcriptome Atlas of the Mouse Glomerulus
Karaiskos, N., Rahmatollahi, M., Boltengagen, A., Liu, H., Hoehne, M., Rinschen, M. M., Schermer, B., Benzing, T. R., Rajewsky, N., Kocks, C., et al. (2018) · Journal of the American Society of Nephrology · doi:10.1681/asn.2018030238 · Cited by 166 · see citing works
Single-cell transcriptomics reveals gene expression dynamics of human fetal kidney development
Hochane, M., van den Berg, P. R., Fan, X., Bérenger-Currias, N. M. L. P., Adegeest, E., Bialecka, M., Nieveen, M. C., Menschaart, M., Lopes, S. M. C. D. S., & Semrau, S. (2019) · PLoS Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.3000152 · Cited by 160 · see citing works
Single-cell transcriptome conservation in cryopreserved cells and tissues
Guillaumet-Adkins, A., Rodríguez-Esteban, G., Mereu, E., Méndez-Lago, M., Jaitin, D. A., Villanueva, A., Vidal, A., Martínez‐Martí, A., Felip, E., Vivancos, A. P., et al. (2017) · Genome biology · doi:10.1186/s13059-017-1171-9 · Cited by 158 · see citing works
Single-cell transcriptional dynamics of flavivirus infection
Zanini, F., Pu, S., Bekerman, E., Einav, S., & Quake, S. R. (2018) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.32942 · Cited by 157 · see citing works
PBMC fixation and processing for Chromium single-cell RNA sequencing
Chen, J., Cheung, F., Shi, R., Zhou, H., Lu, W., Candia, J., Kotliarov, Y., Stagliano, K. R., & Tsang, J. S. (2018) · Journal of Translational Medicine · doi:10.1186/s12967-018-1578-4 · Cited by 157 · see citing works
Representation and relative abundance of cell-type selective markers in whole-kidney RNA-Seq data
Clark, J. Z., Chen, L., Chou, C.-L., Jung, H. J., Lee, J. W., & Knepper, M. A. (2019) · Kidney International · doi:10.1016/j.kint.2018.11.028 · Cited by 136 · see citing works
scMatch: a single-cell gene expression profile annotation tool using reference datasets
Hou, R., Denisenko, E., & Forrest, A. R. R. (2019) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btz292 · Cited by 130 · see citing works
Self-citationWohnhaas, C. T., Leparc, G. G., Fernandez-Albert, F., Kind, D., Gantner, F., Viollet, C., Hildebrandt, T., & Baum, P. (2019) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-019-46932-z · Cited by 105 · see citing works
A single-cell and single-nucleus RNA-seq toolbox for fresh and frozen human tumorsPreprint
Slyper, M., Porter, C. B. M., Ashenberg, O., Waldman, J., Drokhlyansky, E., Wakiro, I., Smillie, C. S., Smith-Rosario, G., Wu, J., Dionne, D. A., et al. (2019) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/761429 · Cited by 66 · see citing works
Renin and kallikrein in connecting tubule of mouse
Rohrwasser, A., Ishigami, T., Gociman, B., Lantelme, P., Morgan, T., Cheng, T., Hillas, E., Zhang, S., Ward, K., Bloch-Faure, M. A. Y., et al. (2003) · Kidney International · doi:10.1046/j.1523-1755.2003.00302.x · Cited by 64 · see citing works
TagDust2: a generic method to extract reads from sequencing data
Lassmann, T. (2015) · BMC Bioinformatics · doi:10.1186/s12859-015-0454-y · Cited by 60 · see citing works
Self-citationComplementary Roles for Single-Nucleus and Single-Cell RNA Sequencing in Kidney Disease Research
O'Sullivan, E. D., Mylonas, K. J., Hughes, J., & Ferenbach, D. A. (2019) · Journal of the American Society of Nephrology · doi:10.1681/asn.2019020112 · Cited by 27 · see citing works
Combes, A. N., Phipson, B., Lawlor, K. T., Dorison, A., Patrick, R., Zappia, L., Harvey, R. P., Oshlack, A., & Little, M. H. (2019) · Development · doi:10.1242/dev.182162 · Cited by 26 · see citing works
‘Frankenstein’ protocol for nuclei isolation from fresh and frozen tissue for snRNAseq v2Preprint
Martelotto, L. G. (2019) · doi:10.17504/protocols.io.3fkgjkw · Cited by 19 · see citing works
‘Frankenstein’ protocol for nuclei isolation from fresh and frozen tissue for snRNAseq v1Preprint
Martelotto, L. G. (2019) · doi:10.17504/protocols.io.3eqgjdw · Cited by 5 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- Mus musculus ribosomal DNA, complete repeating unit. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nuccore/BK000964. Accessed 24 Jan 2019.
- Denisenko E, Guo B, Jones M, Hou R, de Kock L, Lassmann T, et al. Systematic assessment of tissue dissociation and storage biases in single-cell and single-nucleus RNA-seq workflows. Datasets. Gene Expression Omnibus. 2020. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/query/acc.cgi?acc=GSE141115. Accessed 11 May 2020.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Diversity and biology of cancer-associated fibroblasts
Biffi, G., & Tuveson, D. A. (2021) · Physiological Reviews · doi:10.1152/physrev.00048.2019 · Cited by 1,265 · see citing works
Confronting false discoveries in single-cell differential expression
Squair, J. W., Gautier, M., Kathe, C., Anderson, M. A., James, N. D., Hutson, T. H., Hudelle, R., Qaiser, T., Matson, K. J. E., Barraud, Q., et al. (2021) · doi:10.1101/2021.03.12.435024 · Cited by 1,017 · see citing works
An integrated cell atlas of the lung in health and disease
Sikkema, L., Ramírez-Suástegui, C., Strobl, D. C., Gillett, T. E., Zappia, L., Madissoon, E., Markov, N. S., Zaragosi, L., Ji, Y., Ansari, M., et al. (2023) · Nature Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41591-023-02327-2 · Cited by 857 · see citing works
Chu, T., Wang, Z., Pe’er, D., & Danko, C. G. (2022) · Nature Cancer · doi:10.1038/s43018-022-00356-3 · Cited by 612 · see citing works
Progressive immune dysfunction with advancing disease stage in renal cell carcinoma
Braun, D. A., Street, K., Burke, K. P., Cookmeyer, D. L., Denize, T., Pedersen, C. B., Gohil, S. H., Schindler, N. R., Pomerance, L., Hirsch, L., et al. (2021) · Cancer Cell · doi:10.1016/j.ccell.2021.02.013 · Cited by 502 · see citing works
Marsh, S. E., Walker, A. J., Kamath, T., Dissing-Olesen, L., Hammond, T. R., de Soysa, T. Y., Young, A. M. H., Murphy, S., Abdulraouf, A., Nadaf, N., et al. (2022) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/s41593-022-01022-8 · Cited by 432 · see citing works
Macrophages and microglia in glioblastoma: heterogeneity, plasticity, and therapy
Khan, F., Pang, L., Dunterman, M., Lesniak, M. S., Heimberger, A. B., & Chen, P. (2023) · Journal of Clinical Investigation · doi:10.1172/jci163446 · Cited by 417 · see citing works
Single-nucleus cross-tissue molecular reference maps toward understanding disease gene function
Eraslan, G., Drokhlyansky, E., Anand, S. K., Fiškin, E., Subramanian, A., Slyper, M., Wang, J., Wittenberghe, N. V., Rouhana, J. M., Waldman, J., et al. (2022) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.abl4290 · Cited by 396 · see citing works
Spatial-CUT&Tag: Spatially resolved chromatin modification profiling at the cellular level
Deng, Y., Bartosovic, M., Kukanja, P., Zhang, D., Liu, Y., Su, G., Enninful, A., Bai, Z., Castelo-Branco, G., & Fan, R. (2022) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.abg7216 · Cited by 393 · see citing works
Aged skeletal stem cells generate an inflammatory degenerative niche
Ambrosi, T. H., Marecic, O., McArdle, A., Sinha, R., Gulati, G. S., Tong, X., Wang, Y., Steininger, H. M., Hoover, M. Y., Koepke, L. S., et al. (2021) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-021-03795-7 · Cited by 392 · see citing works
Sárvári, A. K., Hauwaert, E. L. V., Markussen, L. K., Gammelmark, E., Marcher, A.-B., Ebbesen, M. F., Nielsen, R., Brewer, J. R., Madsen, J. G. S., & Mandrup, S. (2020) · Cell Metabolism · doi:10.1016/j.cmet.2020.12.004 · Cited by 368 · see citing works
Mapping the immune environment in clear cell renal carcinoma by single-cell genomics
Borcherding, N. C., Vishwakarma, A., Voigt, A. P., Bellizzi, A. M., Kaplan, J., Nepple, K. G., Salem, A. K., Jenkins, R. W., Zakharia, Y., & Zhang, W. (2021) · Communications Biology · doi:10.1038/s42003-020-01625-6 · Cited by 359 · see citing works
Moragues, T., Mendoza, D. A., Beneyton, T., Modavi, C., Simutis, K., Abate, A. R., Baret, J., deMello, A. J., Densmore, D. M., & Griffiths, A. D. (2023) · Nature Reviews Methods Primers · doi:10.1038/s43586-023-00212-3 · Cited by 340 · see citing works
Profiling cell identity and tissue architecture with single-cell and spatial transcriptomics
Gulati, G. S., D'Silva, J. P., Liu, Y., Wang, L., & Newman, A. M. (2024) · Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology · doi:10.1038/s41580-024-00768-2 · Cited by 328 · see citing works
Hirz, T., Mei, S., Sarkar, H., Kfoury, Y. S., Wu, S., Verhoeven, B. M., Subtelny, A. O., Zlatev, D. V., Wszolek, M. W., Salari, K., et al. (2023) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-023-36325-2 · Cited by 281 · see citing works
Open-ST: High-resolution spatial transcriptomics in 3D
Schott, M., León-Periñán, D., Splendiani, E., Strenger, L., Licha, J. R., Pentimalli, T. M., Schallenberg, S., Alles, J., Tagliaferro, S. S., Boltengagen, A., et al. (2024) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2024.05.055 · Cited by 239 · see citing works
Herring, C. A., Simmons, R. K., Freytag, S., Poppe, D., Moffet, J. J. D., Pflueger, J., Buckberry, S., Vargas-Landín, D. B., Clément, O., Goñi, E., et al. (2022) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2022.09.039 · Cited by 226 · see citing works
Self-citationAdipose tissue at single-cell resolution
Maniyadath, B., Zhang, Q., Gupta, R. K., & Mandrup, S. (2023) · Cell Metabolism · doi:10.1016/j.cmet.2023.02.002 · Cited by 207 · see citing works
An integrated single cell and spatial transcriptomic map of human white adipose tissue
Massier, L., Jalkanen, J., Elmastas, M., Zhong, J., Wang, T., Nono Nankam, P. A., Frendo-Cumbo, S., Bäckdahl, J., Subramanian, N., Sekine, T., et al. (2023) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-023-36983-2 · Cited by 195 · see citing works
Targeting transcriptional regulation of SARS-CoV-2 entry factors ACE2 and TMPRSS2
Qiao, Y., Wang, X., Mannan, R., Pitchiaya, S., Zhang, Y., Wotring, J. W., Xiao, L., Robinson, D. R., Wu, Y., Tien, J. C.-Y., et al. (2020) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.2021450118 · Cited by 166 · see citing works
Janosevic, D., Myslinski, J., McCarthy, T. W., Zollman, A., Syed, F., Xuei, X., Gao, H., Liu, Y., Collins, K. S., Cheng, Y., et al. (2021) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.62270 · Cited by 149 · see citing works
Single Cell RNA Sequencing in Atherosclerosis Research
Williams, J. W., Winkels, H., Durant, C. P., Zaitsev, K., Ghosheh, Y., & Ley, K. F. (2020) · Circulation Research · doi:10.1161/circresaha.119.315940 · Cited by 139 · see citing works
An organotypic atlas of human vascular cells
Barnett, S. N., Cujba, A.-M., Yang, L., Maceiras, A. R., Li, S., Kedlian, V. R., Pett, J. P., Polański, K., Miranda, A. M. A., Xu, C., et al. (2024) · Nature Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41591-024-03376-x · Cited by 132 · see citing works
Tools for the analysis of high-dimensional single-cell RNA sequencing data
Wu, Y., & Zhang, K. (2020) · Nature Reviews Nephrology · doi:10.1038/s41581-020-0262-0 · Cited by 122 · see citing works
From bench to bedside: Single-cell analysis for cancer immunotherapy
Davis-Marcisak, E. F., Deshpande, A. M., Stein-O’Brien, G., Ho, W. J., Laheru, D. A., Jaffee, E. M., Fertig, E. J., & Kagohara, L. T. (2021) · Cancer Cell · doi:10.1016/j.ccell.2021.07.004 · Cited by 120 · see citing works
Single-cell technologies: From research to application
Wen, L., Li, G., Huang, T., Geng, W., Pei, H., Yang, J., Zhu, M., Zhang, P., Hou, R., Tian, G., et al. (2022) · The Innovation · doi:10.1016/j.xinn.2022.100342 · Cited by 118 · see citing works
Self-citationSingle-cell transcriptomics for the assessment of cardiac disease
Miranda, A. M. A., Janbandhu, V., Maatz, H., Kanemaru, K., Cranley, J., Teichmann, S. A., Hübner, N., Schneider, M. D., Harvey, R. P., & Noseda, M. (2023) · Nature Reviews Cardiology · doi:10.1038/s41569-022-00805-7 · Cited by 117 · see citing works
A single-cell atlas enables mapping of homeostatic cellular shifts in the adult human breast
Reed, A. D., Pensa, S., Steif, A., Stenning, J., Kunz, D. J., Porter, L. J., Hua, K., He, P., Twigger, A., Siu, A. J. Q., et al. (2024) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/s41588-024-01688-9 · Cited by 117 · see citing works
Semisupervised adversarial neural networks for single-cell classificationPreprint
Kimmel, J. C., & Kelley, D. R. (2021) · Genome Research · doi:10.1101/gr.268581.120 · Cited by 112 · see citing works
Single-cell transcriptomes of developing and adult olfactory receptor neurons in Drosophila
McLaughlin, C. N., Brbić, M., Xie, Q., Li, T., Horns, F., Kolluru, S. S., Kebschull, J. M., Vacek, D., Xie, A., Li, J., et al. (2021) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.63856 · Cited by 111 · see citing works
Multi-Omics Approaches to Define Calcific Aortic Valve Disease Pathogenesis
Blaser, M. C., Kraler, S., Lüscher, T. F., & Aikawa, E. (2021) · Circulation Research · doi:10.1161/circresaha.120.317979 · Cited by 109 · see citing works
ACME dissociation: a versatile cell fixation-dissociation method for single-cell transcriptomics
García-Castro, H., Kenny, N. J., Iglesias, M., Álvarez‐Campos, P., Mason, V., Elek, A., Schönauer, A., Sleight, V. A., Neiro, J., Aboobaker, A. A., et al. (2021) · Genome biology · doi:10.1186/s13059-021-02302-5 · Cited by 108 · see citing works
Zhang, W., Li, I., Reticker-Flynn, N. E., Good, Z., Chang, S., Samusik, N., Saumyaa, S., Li, Y., Zhou, X., Liang, R., et al. (2022) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/s41592-022-01498-z · Cited by 108 · see citing works
Le, J., Dian, Y., Zhao, D., Guo, Z., Luo, Z., Chen, X., Zeng, F., & Deng, G. (2025) · Molecular Cancer · doi:10.1186/s12943-025-02426-3 · Cited by 109 · see citing works
miQC: An adaptive probabilistic framework for quality control of single-cell RNA-sequencing data
Hippen, A. A., Falco, M. M., Weber, L. M., Erkan, E. P., Zhang, K., Doherty, J. A., Vähärautio, A., Greene, C. S., & Hicks, S. C. (2021) · PLoS Computational Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1009290 · Cited by 106 · see citing works
Concordance of MERFISH spatial transcriptomics with bulk and single-cell RNA sequencing
Liu, J., Tran, V., Vemuri, V. N. P., Byrne, A., Borja, M., Kim, Y. J., Agarwal, S., Wang, R., Awayan, K., Murti, A., et al. (2022) · Life Science Alliance · doi:10.26508/lsa.202201701 · Cited by 105 · see citing works
Tissue morphology influences the temporal program of human brain organoid development
Chiaradia, I., Imaz-Rosshandler, I., Nilges, B. S., Boulanger, J., Pellegrini, L., Das, R., Kashikar, N. D., & Lancaster, M. A. (2023) · Cell stem cell · doi:10.1016/j.stem.2023.09.003 · Cited by 103 · see citing works
Xu, Z., Zhang, T., Chen, H., Zhu, Y., Lv, Y., Zhang, S., Chen, J., Chen, H., Yang, L., Jiang, W., et al. (2023) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-023-38409-5 · Cited by 99 · see citing works
Perspectives on single-nucleus RNA sequencing in different cell types and tissues
Kim, N., Kang, H., Jo, A., Yoo, S.-A., & Lee, H.-O. (2023) · Journal of Pathology and Translational Medicine · doi:10.4132/jptm.2022.12.19 · Cited by 97 · see citing works
Translational opportunities of single-cell biology in atherosclerosis
de Winther, M. P. J., Bäck, M., Evans, P. C., Gomez, D. A., Gonçalves, I., Jørgensen, H. F., Koenen, R. R., Lutgens, E., Norata, G. D., Osto, E., et al. (2022) · European Heart Journal · doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehac686 · Cited by 96 · see citing works
Hawley, J. E., Obradović, A., Dallos, M. C., Lim, E. A., Runcie, K. D., Ager, C. R., McKiernan, J., Anderson, C. B., DeCastro, G. J., Weintraub, J. L., et al. (2023) · Cancer Cell · doi:10.1016/j.ccell.2023.10.006 · Cited by 92 · see citing works
Alvarez, M., Benhammou, J. N., Darci-Maher, N., French, S. W., Han, S. B., Sinsheimer, J. S., Agopian, V. G., Pisegna, J. R., & Pajukanta, P. (2022) · Genome Medicine · doi:10.1186/s13073-022-01055-5 · Cited by 90 · see citing works
Nguyen, H., Nguyen, H., Tran, D., Drăghici, S., & Nguyen, T. (2024) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkae267 · Cited by 86 · see citing works
Català, P., Gröen, N., Dehnen, J. A., Soares, E., van Velthoven, A. J. H., Nuijts, R. M. M. A., Dickman, M. M., & LaPointe, V. L. S. (2021) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-021-01015-w · Cited by 84 · see citing works
Vandenbon, A., & Díez, D. (2020) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-020-17900-3 · Cited by 82 · see citing works
Ximerakis, M., Holton, K. M., Giadone, R. M., Ozek, C., Saxena, M., Santiago, S., Adiconis, X., Dionne, D. A., Nguyễn, L., Shah, K. M., et al. (2023) · Nature Aging · doi:10.1038/s43587-023-00373-6 · Cited by 82 · see citing works
Guo, X., Huang, Z., Ju, F., Zhao, C., & Yu, L. (2023) · Advanced Science · doi:10.1002/advs.202306329 · Cited by 82 · see citing works
Polonsky, M., Gerhardt, L. M. S., Yun, J., Koppitch, K. A., Colón, K. L., Amrhein, H., Wold, B. J., Zheng, S., Yuan, G., Thomson, M. W., et al. (2024) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-024-51186-z · Cited by 82 · see citing works
Sampling time-dependent artifacts in single-cell genomics studies
Massoni-Badosa, R., Iacono, G., Moutinho, C., Kulis, M., Palau, N., Marchese, D., Rodríguez‐Ubreva, J., Ballestar, E., Rodríguez-Esteban, G., Marsal, S., et al. (2020) · Genome biology · doi:10.1186/s13059-020-02032-0 · Cited by 82 · see citing works
Ke, M. S., Elshenawy, B., Sheldon, H., Arora, A., & Buffa, F. M. (2022) · BioEssays · doi:10.1002/bies.202200084 · Cited by 81 · see citing works
Campbell, K. A., Colacino, J. A., Puttabyatappa, M., Dou, J., Elkin, E. R., Hammoud, S. S., Domino, S. E., Dolinoy, D. C., Goodrich, J. M., Loch-Caruso, R. K., et al. (2023) · Communications Biology · doi:10.1038/s42003-023-04623-6 · Cited by 81 · see citing works
Microglia transcriptional states and their functional significance: Context drives diversity
Depp, C., Doman, J. L., Hingerl, M., Xia, J., & Stevens, B. (2025) · Immunity · doi:10.1016/j.immuni.2025.04.009 · Cited by 81 · see citing works
Applying genetic technologies to combat infectious diseases in aquaculture
Robinson, N. A., Robledo, D., Sveen, L. R., Daniels, R. R., Krasnov, A., Coates, A., Jin, Y. H., Barrett, L. T., Lillehammer, M., Kettunen, A., et al. (2022) · Reviews in Aquaculture · doi:10.1111/raq.12733 · Cited by 80 · see citing works
Single-nucleus RNA-seq2 reveals functional crosstalk between liver zonation and ploidy
Richter, M. L., Deligiannis, I. K., Yin, K., Danese, A., Lleshi, E., Coupland, P., Vallejos, C. A., Matchett, K. P., Henderson, N. C., Colome-Tatche, M., et al. (2021) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-021-24543-5 · Cited by 75 · see citing works
Evolutionary cell type mapping with single-cell genomics
Tanay, A., & Sebé-Pedrós, A. (2021) · Trends in Genetics · doi:10.1016/j.tig.2021.04.008 · Cited by 75 · see citing works
A guide to systems-level immunomics
Bonaguro, L., Schulte-Schrepping, J., Ulas, T., Aschenbrenner, A. C., Beyer, M., & Schultze, J. L. (2022) · Nature Immunology · doi:10.1038/s41590-022-01309-9 · Cited by 74 · see citing works
Single nucleus multi-omics regulatory landscape of the murine pituitary
Ruf-Zamojski, F. M., Zhang, Z., Zamojski, M., Smith, G. R., Mendelev, N., Liu, H., Nudelman, G., Moriwaki, M., Pinças, H., Castanon, R., et al. (2021) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-021-22859-w · Cited by 73 · see citing works
Characterization of human FDCs reveals regulation of T cells and antigen presentation to B cells
Heesters, B. A., van Megesen, K., Tomris, I., de Vries, R. P., Magri, G., & Spits, H. (2021) · The Journal of Experimental Medicine · doi:10.1084/jem.20210790 · Cited by 72 · see citing works
Transitioning single-cell genomics into the clinic
Lim, J. W. Y., Chin, V. T., Fairfax, K. A., Moutinho, C., Suan, D., Ji, H. P., & Powell, J. E. (2023) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/s41576-023-00613-w · Cited by 72 · see citing works
Deterministic scRNA-seq captures variation in intestinal crypt and organoid composition
Bues, J., Biočanin, M., Pezoldt, J., Dainese, R., Chrisnandy, A., Rezakhani, S., Saelens, W., Gardeux, V., Gupta, R., Sarkis, R., et al. (2022) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/s41592-021-01391-1 · Cited by 71 · see citing works
A Comprehensive Overview of RNA Deconvolution Methods and Their Application
Im, Y., & Kim, Y. (2023) · Molecules and Cells · doi:10.14348/molcells.2023.2178 · Cited by 71 · see citing works
Spatially resolved transcriptomics of high-grade serous ovarian carcinoma
Stur, E., Corvigno, S., Xu, M., Chen, K., Tan, Y., Lee, S., Liu, J., Ricco, E., Kraushaar, D. C., Castro, P. D., et al. (2022) · iScience · doi:10.1016/j.isci.2022.103923 · Cited by 70 · see citing works
Stress relief: emerging methods to mitigate dissociation-induced artefacts
Machado, L., Relaix, F., & Mourikis, P. (2021) · Trends in Cell Biology · doi:10.1016/j.tcb.2021.05.004 · Cited by 70 · see citing works
Holmes, G., Gonzalez-Reiche, A. S., Lü, N., Zhou, X., Rivera, J., Kriti, D., Sebra, R., Williams, A. A., Donovan, M. J., Potter, S. S., et al. (2020) · Cell Reports · doi:10.1016/j.celrep.2020.107871 · Cited by 69 · see citing works
Feleke, R., Reynolds, R. H., Smith, A. M., Tilley, B. S., Taliun, S. A. G., Hardy, J., Matthews, P. M., Gentleman, S., Owen, D. R., Johnson, M. R., et al. (2021) · Acta Neuropathologica · doi:10.1007/s00401-021-02343-x · Cited by 68 · see citing works
Considerations for building and using integrated single-cell atlases
Hrovatin, K., Sikkema, L., Shitov, V. A., Heimberg, G., Shulman, M., Oliver, A. J., Mueller, M. F., Ibarra, I. L., Wang, H., Ramírez-Suástegui, C., et al. (2024) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/s41592-024-02532-y · Cited by 67 · see citing works
Building a high-quality Human Cell Atlas
Human Cell Atlas Standards and Technology Working Group, Rozenblatt–Rosen, O., Shin, J. W., Rood, J., Hupalowska, A., Regev, A., & Heyn, H. (2021) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/s41587-020-00812-4 · Cited by 65 · see citing works
Effective methods for bulk RNA-seq deconvolution using scnRNA-seq transcriptomes
Cobos, F. A., Panah, M. J. N., Epps, J. L., Long, X., Man, T., Chiu, H., Chomsky, E., Kiner, E., Krueger, M., di Bernardo, D., et al. (2023) · Genome biology · doi:10.1186/s13059-023-03016-6 · Cited by 66 · see citing works
Challenges and perspectives in computational deconvolution of genomics data
Garmire, L. X., Li, Y., Huang, Q., Xu, C., Teichmann, S. A., Kaminski, N., Pellegrini, M. A., Nguyen, Q. H., & Teschendorff, A. E. (2024) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/s41592-023-02166-6 · Cited by 66 · see citing works
Multimodal profiling reveals tissue-directed signatures of human immune cells altered with age
Wells, S. B., Rainbow, D. B., Mark, M., Szabo, P. A., Ergen, C., Caron, D. P., Maceiras, A. R., Rahmani, E., Benuck, E., Amiri, V. V. P., et al. (2025) · Nature Immunology · doi:10.1038/s41590-025-02241-4 · Cited by 66 · see citing works
Durán, R. C., González-Orozco, J. C., Velasco, I., & Wu, J. Q. (2022) · Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology · doi:10.3389/fcell.2022.884748 · Cited by 64 · see citing works
Cui, Y., & Franz, A. W. E. (2020) · Insect Biochemistry and Molecular Biology · doi:10.1016/j.ibmb.2020.103496 · Cited by 64 · see citing works
The effect of background noise and its removal on the analysis of single-cell expression data
Janssen, P., Kliesmete, Z., Vieth, B., Adiconis, X., Simmons, S., Marshall, J. L., Aubin, C., Heyn, H., Levin, J. Z., Enard, W., et al. (2023) · Genome biology · doi:10.1186/s13059-023-02978-x · Cited by 64 · see citing works
Wu, S. Z., Roden, D. L., Al‐Eryani, G., Bartoniček, N., Harvey, K., Cazet, A., Chan, C., Junankar, S. R., Hui, M. N., Millar, E. A., et al. (2021) · Genome Medicine · doi:10.1186/s13073-021-00885-z · Cited by 63 · see citing works
Pettas, S., Karagianni, K., Kanata, Ε., Chatziefstathiou, A., Christoudia, N., Xanthopoulos, K., Sklaviadis, T., & Dafou, D. (2022) · Cells · doi:10.3390/cells11152383 · Cited by 63 · see citing works
spinDrop: a droplet microfluidic platform to maximise single-cell sequencing information content
Jonghe, J. D., Kamiński, T. S., Morse, D. B., Tabaka, M., Ellermann, A. L., Kohler, T. N., Amadei, G., Handford, C. E., Findlay, G. M., Zernicka‐Goetz, M., et al. (2023) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-023-40322-w · Cited by 61 · see citing works
Single‐cell <scp>RNA</scp> sequencing in osteoarthritis
Gu, Y., Hu, Y., Zhang, H., Wang, S., Xu, K., & Su, J. (2023) · Cell Proliferation · doi:10.1111/cpr.13517 · Cited by 59 · see citing works
A topographic atlas defines developmental origins of cell heterogeneity in the human embryonic lung
Sountoulidis, A., Salas, S. M., Braun, E., Avenel, C., Bergenstråhle, J., Theelke, J., Vicari, M., Czarnewski, P., Liontos, A., Abalo, X. M., et al. (2023) · Nature Cell Biology · doi:10.1038/s41556-022-01064-x · Cited by 59 · see citing works
Community assessment of methods to deconvolve cellular composition from bulk gene expression
White, B. S., de Reyniès, A., Newman, A. M., Waterfall, J. J., Lamb, A. E., Petitprez, F., Lin, Y., Yu, R., Guerrero-Gimenez, M. E., Domanskyi, S., et al. (2024) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-024-50618-0 · Cited by 60 · see citing works
Defining the Teratoma as a Model for Multi-lineage Human Development
McDonald, D., Wu, Y., Dailamy, A., Tat, J., Parekh, U., Zhao, D., Hu, M. Y., Tipps, A. M. P., Zhang, K., & Mali, P. (2020) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2020.10.018 · Cited by 58 · see citing works
Maden, S. K., Kwon, S. H., Huuki-Myers, L. A., Collado‐Torres, L., Hicks, S. C., & Maynard, K. R. (2023) · Genome biology · doi:10.1186/s13059-023-03123-4 · Cited by 58 · see citing works
Tsai, Y., Kuo, M., Huang, J.-C., Chang, W., Wu, L., Huang, Y., Chang, C., Lee, S., & Hsu, Y. (2023) · Cell Death and Disease · doi:10.1038/s41419-023-05947-1 · Cited by 58 · see citing works
Orchard, P., Manickam, N., Varshney, A., Vadlamudi, S., Burant, C., Parker, S. C. J., Kaplan, J., Lalancette, C., Mohlke, K. L., Gallagher, K., et al. (2021) · Genome Research · doi:10.1101/gr.268482.120 · Cited by 58 · see citing works
Nadel, B. B., Lopez, D., Montoya, D. J., Ma, F., Waddel, H. B., Khan, M. M., Mangul, S., & Pellegrini, M. A. (2021) · GigaScience · doi:10.1093/gigascience/giab002 · Cited by 57 · see citing works
Conde, D., Triozzi, P. M., Balmant, K. M., Doty, A. L., Miranda, M. A., Boullosa, A., Schmidt, H. W., Pereira, W. J., Dervinis, C., & Kirst, M. (2021) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0251149 · Cited by 55 · see citing works
Opportunities and challenges in the application of single-cell and spatial transcriptomics in plants
Chen, C., Ge, Y., & Lu, L. (2023) · Frontiers in Plant Science · doi:10.3389/fpls.2023.1185377 · Cited by 55 · see citing works
Žvirblytė, J., Nainys, J., Juzėnas, S., Goda, K., Kubiliūtė, R., Dasevičius, D., Kinčius, M., Ulys, A., Jarmalaitė, S., & Mažutis, L. (2024) · Communications Biology · doi:10.1038/s42003-024-06478-x · Cited by 55 · see citing works
Venema, W. T. U., Ramírez-Sánchez, A. D., Bigaeva, E., Withoff, S., Jonkers, I. H., McIntyre, R. E., Ghouraba, M., Raine, T., Weersma, R. K., Franke, L., et al. (2022) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-022-13812-y · Cited by 54 · see citing works
Vistain, L. F., Phan, H. V., Keisham, B., Jordi, C., Chen, M., Reddy, S. T., & Tay, S. (2022) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/s41592-022-01684-z · Cited by 53 · see citing works
Methods and Insights from Single-Cell Expression Quantitative Trait Loci
Kang, J. B., Raveane, A., Nathan, A., Soranzo, N., & Raychaudhuri, S. (2023) · Annual Review of Genomics and Human Genetics · doi:10.1146/annurev-genom-101422-100437 · Cited by 53 · see citing works
The transcriptional profile of keloidal Schwann cells
Direder, M., Wielscher, M., Weiss, T., Laggner, M., Copic, D., Klas, K., Bormann, D., Vorstandlechner, V., Tschachler, E., Ankersmit, H. J., et al. (2022) · Experimental & Molecular Medicine · doi:10.1038/s12276-022-00874-1 · Cited by 52 · see citing works
Hugaboom, M. B., Wirth, L. V., Street, K., Ruthen, N. G., Jegede, O. A., Schindler, N. R., Shah, V., Zaemes, J. P., Ahmar, N. E., Matar, S., et al. (2025) · Cancer Discovery · doi:10.1158/2159-8290.cd-24-0991 · Cited by 53 · see citing works
An optimized protocol for retina single-cell RNA sequencing.
Fadl, B. R., Brodie, S. A., Malasky, M., Boland, J. F., Kelly, M. C., Kelley, M. W., Boger, E. T., Fariss, R., Swaroop, A., & Campello, L. (2020) · PubMed Central · Cited by 51 · see citing works
A bird’s eye view of fibroblast heterogeneity: A pan‐disease, pan‐cancer perspective
Pradhan, R., Krishnamurty, A. T., Fletcher, A. L., Turley, S. J., & Müller, S. (2021) · Immunological Reviews · doi:10.1111/imr.12990 · Cited by 51 · see citing works
Case-control analysis of single-cell RNA-seq studiesPreprint
Petukhov, V., Igolkina, A. A., Rydbirk, R., Mei, S., Christoffersen, L., Khodosevich, K., & Kharchenko, P. V. (2022) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/2022.03.15.484475 · Cited by 51 · see citing works
The Acute Stress Response in the Multiomic Era
Floriou-Servou, A., von Ziegler, L., Waag, R., Schläppi, C., Germain, P.-L., & Bohacek, J. (2021) · Biological Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/j.biopsych.2020.12.031 · Cited by 51 · see citing works
Recovery of missing single-cell RNA-sequencing data with optimized transcriptomic references
Pool, A., Poldsam, H., Chen, S., Thomson, M. W., & Oka, Y. (2023) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/s41592-023-02003-w · Cited by 50 · see citing works
Zemek, R. M., Chin, W. L., Fear, V. S., Wylie, B., Casey, T. H., Forbes, C., Tilsed, C. M., Boon, L., Guo, B. B., Bosco, A., et al. (2022) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-022-32567-8 · Cited by 48 · see citing works
Self-citationMoore, P. K., Anderson, K. C., McManus, S. A., Tu, T.-H. C., King, E. M., Mould, K. J., Redente, E. F., Henson, P. M., Janssen, W. J., & McCubbrey, A. L. (2023) · American Journal of Physiology-Lung Cellular and Molecular Physiology · doi:10.1152/ajplung.00223.2022 · Cited by 48 · see citing works
Carlessi, R., Denisenko, E., Boslem, E., Köhn‐Gaone, J., Main, N., Bakar, N. D. B. A., Shirolkar, G. D., Jones, M., Beasley, A. B., Poppe, D., et al. (2023) · Cell Genomics · doi:10.1016/j.xgen.2023.100301 · Cited by 48 · see citing works
Self-citation
- Authors
- Denisenko, E., Guo, B. B., Jones, M., Hou, R., de Kock, L., Lassmann, T., Poppe, D., Clément, O., Simmons, R. K., Lister, R., & Forrest, A. R. R.
- Affiliations
- The University of Western Australia (AU)
- The Kids Research Institute Australia (AU)
- Corresponding author
- Forrest, Alistair R. R.
- ORCID
- Venue
- Genome Biology
- Published
- 2020-06-02
- Volume
- 21
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 130-130
- ISSN
- 1465-6906 (ISSN-L)
- 1474-760X
- PMC
- PMC7265231
- OpenAlex
- W3030739213
- Semantic Scholar
- c1ec88ccea70a4d53e919faf8a30b50e74271c2b
- Cited by
- 686
- References
- 54
- Citations by year
- 2026: 138 · 2025: 96 · 2024: 118 · 2023: 118 · 2022: 100 · 2021: 83 · 2020: 33
- FWCI
- 27.50
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Locations
- Genome biology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nd)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- UWA Profiles and Research Repository (UWA) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Adelaide Research & Scholarship (AR&S) (University of Adelaide) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Funders
- National Health and Medical Research Council (APP1154524)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Single-cell and spatial transcriptomics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology Techniques and Applications
- Keywords
- tissue dissociation, single-cell RNA sequencing, single-nucleus RNA sequencing, cryopreservation, methanol fixation, kidney, cell type composition
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Cell Separation, Kidney, Male, Mice, Inbred C57BL, Stress, Physiological, Cryopreservation, Sequence Analysis, RNA, Single-Cell Analysis
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-10.
Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-10.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review