The DOI matches its Crossref record.
A genetic analysis of the determination of cuticular polarity during development in Drosophila melanogaster
Abstract
The polarity mutants pk, sple, mwh, fz and in alter the orientations of cuticular processes in several regions of the body. The mutant polarity patterns are constant and do not result from alterations in cell lineage. Polarity patterns are locus specific rather than allele specific (new alleles express the same polarity patterns as the original alleles). In the wing, polarity formation is largely cell autonomous and is independent of the anteroposterior compartment boundary. By genetic and physiological manipulation it is shown that the mutant polarity patterns are unaffected by the size of the wing blade or the number of cells that form it. Mutants which remove parts of the wing margin or alter the distribution pattern of wing veins do not alter the mutant polarity patterns. Thus, neither the wing margins nor the pattern of vein tissue act as spatial references for polarity formation. The determination of mutant polarity patterns is not dependent on the overall topology of the wing blade but is region-specific. The mutants affect several independent functions. The possible wild-type function of the loci in polarity formation is discussed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Winter, C. G., Wang, B., Ballew, A., Royou, A., Karess, R., Axelrod, J. D., & Luo, L. (2001) · Cell · doi:10.1016/s0092-8674(01)00298-7 · Cited by 555
Frizzled/PCP signalling: a conserved mechanism regulating cell polarity and directed motility
Seifert, J. R. K., & Mlodzik, M. (2007) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/nrg2042 · Cited by 513
Wang, Y., Guo, N., & Nathans, J. (2006) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.4698-05.2005 · Cited by 503
Tissue/planar cell polarity in vertebrates: new insights and new questions
Wang, Y., & Nathans, J. (2007) · Development · doi:10.1242/dev.02772 · Cited by 442
The planar cell-polarity gene stbm regulates cell behaviour and cell fate in vertebrate embryos
Park, M., & Moon, R. T. (2002) · Nature Cell Biology · doi:10.1038/ncb716 · Cited by 381
Rotation of photoreceptor clusters in the developing drosophila eye requires the nemo gene
Choi, K.-W., & Benzer, S. (1994) · Cell · doi:10.1016/0092-8674(94)90579-7 · Cited by 339
Asymmetric Localization of Frizzled and the Establishment of Cell Polarity in the Drosophila Wing
Strutt, D. I. (2001) · Molecular Cell · doi:10.1016/s1097-2765(01)00184-8 · Cited by 334
Essential role of non-canonical Wnt signalling in neural crest migration
De Calisto, J., Araya, C., Marchant, L., Riaz, C. F., & Mayor, R. (2005) · Development · doi:10.1242/dev.01857 · Cited by 304
Development and dynamics of cell polarity at a glance
Campanale, J. P., Sun, T. Y., & Montell, D. J. (2017) · Journal of Cell Science · doi:10.1242/jcs.188599 · Cited by 198
Jenkins, B. A., & Lumpkin, E. A. (2017) · Development · doi:10.1242/dev.120402 · Cited by 79
From Planar Cell Polarity to Ciliogenesis and Back: The Curious Tale of the PPE and CPLANE proteins
Adler, P. N., & Wallingford, J. B. (2017) · Trends in Cell Biology · doi:10.1016/j.tcb.2016.12.001 · Cited by 68
Mob Family Proteins: Regulatory Partners in Hippo and Hippo-Like Intracellular Signaling Pathways
Duhart, J. C., & Raftery, L. A. (2020) · Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology · doi:10.3389/fcell.2020.00161 · Cited by 33
Metadata
- Authors
- Gubb, D., & García-Bellido, A.
- Venue
- Development
- Publisher
- The Company of Biologists
- Published
- 1982-04-01
- Volume
- 68
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 37-57
- ISSN
- 0950-1991 (ISSN-L)
- 1477-9129
- OpenAlex
- W2103668136
- Cited by
- 369
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.