Cited by 212Autophagy in Disease and TherapyMicrotubule and mitosis dynamicsCalcium signaling and nucleotide metabolism

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 110 of the 110 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Autophagy and microtubules - new story, old players

Abstract

Summary: Both at a basal level and after induction (especially in response to nutrient starvation), the function of autophagy is to allow cells to degrade and recycle damaged organelles, proteins and other biological constituents. Here, we focus on the role microtubules have in autophagosome formation, autophagosome transport across the cytoplasm and in the formation of autolysosomes. Recent insights into the exact relationship between autophagy and microtubules now point to the importance of microtubule dynamics, tubulin post-translational modifications and microtubule motors in the autophagy process. Such factors regulate signaling pathways that converge to stimulate autophagosome formation. They also orchestrate the movements of pre-autophagosomal structures and autophagosomes or more globally organize and localize immature and mature autophagosomes and lysosomes. Most of the factors that now appear to link microtubules to autophagosome formation or to autophagosome dynamics and fate were identified initially without the notion that sequestration, recruitment and/or interaction with microtubules contribute to their function. Spatial and temporal coordination of many stages in the life of autophagosomes thus underlines the integrative role of microtubules and progressively reveals hidden parts of the autophagy machinery.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1242/jcs.115626

Cites

110 of 110 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

1 retracted

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 110 references

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Mackeh, R., Perdiz, D., Lorin, S., Codogno, P., & Poüs, C.
Affiliations
  • Université Paris-Sud (FR)
  • Inserm (FR)
Corresponding author
Codogno, Patrice
Venue
Journal of Cell Science
Published
2013-03-01
Volume
126
Issue
5
Pages
1071-1080
ISSN
  • 0021-9533 (ISSN-L)
  • 1477-9137
OpenAlex
W2098921256
Cited by
212
References
110
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 20 · 2019: 21 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 20 · 2016: 16 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 18 · 2013: 3
FWCI
11.44
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Cell Science (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Autophagy in Disease and Therapy
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Microtubule and mitosis dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Physiology › Calcium signaling and nucleotide metabolism
Keywords
autophagy, microtubules, autophagosome formation, autophagosome transport, autolysosomes, microtubule dynamics, tubulin post-translational modifications, microtubule motor proteins, nutrient deprivation, organelle degradation
MeSH terms
Animals, Autophagy, Humans, Lysosomes, Microtubules, Models, Biological, Phagocytosis, Protein Processing, Post-Translational, Tubulin

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review