The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Going wild: what a global small-animal tracking system could do for experimental biologists
Abstract
SUMMARY: Tracking animals over large temporal and spatial scales has revealed invaluable and spectacular biological information, particularly when the paths and fates of individuals can be monitored on a global scale. However, only large animals (greater than ∼300 g) currently can be followed globally because of power and size constraints on the tracking devices. And yet the vast majority of animals is small. Tracking small animals is important because they are often part of evolutionary and ecological experiments, they provide important ecosystem services and they are of conservation concern or pose harm to human health. Here, we propose a small-animal satellite tracking system that would enable the global monitoring of animals down to the size of the smallest birds, mammals (bats), marine life and eventually large insects. To create the scientific framework necessary for such a global project, we formed the ICARUS initiative(www.IcarusInitiative.org),the International Cooperation for Animal Research Using Space. ICARUS also highlights how small-animal tracking could address some of the `Grand Challenges in Environmental Sciences' identified by the US National Academy of Sciences, such as the spread of infectious diseases or the relationship between biological diversity and ecosystem functioning. Small-animal tracking would allow the quantitative assessment of dispersal and migration in natural populations and thus help solve enigmas regarding population dynamics,extinctions and invasions. Experimental biologists may find a global small-animal tracking system helpful in testing, validating and expanding laboratory-derived discoveries in wild, natural populations. We suggest that the relatively modest investment into a global small-animal tracking system will pay off by providing unprecedented insights into both basic and applied nature. Tracking small animals over large spatial and temporal scales could prove to be one of the most powerful techniques of the early 21st century, offering potential solutions to a wide range of biological and societal questions that date back two millennia to the Greek philosopher Aristotle's enigma about songbird migration. Several of the more recent Grand Challenges in Environmental Sciences, such as the regulation and functional consequences of biological diversity or the surveillance of the population ecology of zoonotic hosts, pathogens or vectors, could also be addressed by a global small-animal tracking system. Our discussion is intended to contribute to an emerging groundswell of scientific support to make such a new technological system happen.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Regional Forest Fragmentation and the Nesting Success of Migratory Birds
Robinson, S. K., Thompson, F. R., Donovan, T. M., Whitehead, D. R., & Faaborg, J. (1995) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.267.5206.1987 · Cited by 1,442
Electronic tagging and population structure of Atlantic bluefin tuna
Block, B. A., Teo, S. L. H., Walli, A., Boustany, A., Stokesbury, M. J. W., Farwell, C. J., Weng, K. C., Dewar, H., & Williams, T. D. (2005) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature03463 · Cited by 781 · cited 2×
“…could not be received in space when animals are below the surface, but a satellite system could work for surfacing animals or with the help of pop-up archival tags M. Wikelski and others THE JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL BIOLOGY 185A global tracking system for small animals (Block et al., 2005).”
Background
Cited by
Perspectives in machine learning for wildlife conservation
Tuia, D., Kellenberger, B., Beery, S., Costelloe, B. R., Zuffi, S., Risse, B., Mathis, A., Mathis, M. W., van Langevelde, F., Burghardt, T., et al. (2022) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-022-27980-y · Cited by 740
Self-citationOptimizing the use of biologgers for movement ecology research
Williams, H. J., Taylor, L. A., Benhamou, S., Bijleveld, A. I., Clay, T. A., de Grissac, S., Demšar, U., English, H. M., Franconi, N., Gómez‐Laich, A., et al. (2020) · Journal of Animal Ecology · doi:10.1111/1365-2656.13094 · Cited by 333
Animal behavior, cost-based corridor models, and real corridors
LaPoint, S., Gallery, P., Wikelski, M., & Kays, R. (2013) · Landscape Ecology · doi:10.1007/s10980-013-9910-0 · Cited by 203
Self-citationAnalysis and visualisation of movement: an interdisciplinary review
Demšar, U., Buchin, K., Cagnacci, F., Safi, K., Speckmann, B., Van de Weghe, N., Weiskopf, D., & Weibel, R. (2015) · Movement Ecology · doi:10.1186/s40462-015-0032-y · Cited by 128
SmallSats: a new technological frontier in ecology and conservation?
Curnick, D. J., Davies, A. J., Duncan, C., Freeman, R., Jacoby, D. M. P., Shelley, H. T. E., Rossi, C., Wearn, O. R., Williamson, M. J., & Pettorelli, N. (2022) · Remote Sensing in Ecology and Conservation · doi:10.1002/rse2.239 · Cited by 34
Metadata
- Authors
- Wikelski, M., Kays, R. W., Kasdin, N. J., Thorup, K., Smith, J. A., & Swenson, G. W.
- Venue
- Journal of Experimental Biology
- Publisher
- The Company of Biologists
- Published
- 2007-01-15
- Volume
- 210
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 181-186
- ISSN
- 0022-0949 (ISSN-L)
- 1477-9145
- OpenAlex
- W2103346548
- Cited by
- 333
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 16.21
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Going wild: what a global small-animal tracking system could do for experimental biologists. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1242/jeb.02629
- The paper
- Wikelski, M., Kays, R. W., Kasdin, N. J., Thorup, K., Smith, J. A., & Swenson, G. W. (2007). Going wild: what a global small-animal tracking system could do for experimental biologists. Journal of Experimental Biology. https://doi.org/10.1242/jeb.02629
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.