Cited by 10Occupational Health and PerformanceCardiovascular and exercise physiologySports Performance and Training

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 35 of the 35 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Complex Terrain Load Carriage Energy Expenditure Estimation Using Global Positioning System Devices

POTTER, ADAM W., SANTEE, WILLIAM R., MULLEN, STEPHEN P., KARIS, ANTHONY J., BLANCHARD, LAURIE A., ROME, MAXWELL N., PITTS, KENNETH P., LOONEY, DAVID P.·2018·Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise

Abstract

Introduction: Military load carriage can cause extreme energy expenditure (EE) that is difficult to estimate due to complex terrain grades and surfaces. Global Positioning System (GPS) devices capture rapid changes in walking speed and terrain but the delayed respiratory response to movement is problematic. We investigated the accuracy using GPS data in three different equations to estimate EE during complex terrain load carriage. Methods: Twelve active duty military personnel (age, 20 ± 3 yr; height, 174 ± 8 cm; body mass, 85 ± 13 kg) hiked a complex terrain trail on multiple visits under different external load conditions. Energy expenditure was estimated by inputting GPS data into three different equations: the Pandolf–Santee equation, a recent GPS-based equation from de Müllenheim et al.; and the Minimum Mechanics model. Minute-by-minute EE estimates were exponentially smoothed using smoothing factors between 0.05 and 0.95 and compared with mobile metabolic sensor EE measurements. Results: The Pandolf–Santee equation had no significant estimation bias (−2 ± 12 W; P = 0.89). Significant biases were detected for the de Müllenheim equation (38 ± 13 W; P = 0.004) and the Minimum Mechanics model (−101 ± 7 W; P < 0.001). Conclusions: Energy expenditure can be accurately estimated from GPS data using the Pandolf–Santee equation. Applying a basic exponential smoothing factor of 0.5 to GPS data enables more precise tracking of EE during non–steady-state exercise.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1249/mss.0000000000001669

Cites

35 of 35 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. 1984, Metabolic bases of excess post-exercise oxygen consumption: a review, Med Sci Sports Exerc, 16, 29

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
POTTER, A. W., SANTEE, W. R., MULLEN, S. P., KARIS, A. J., BLANCHARD, L. A., ROME, M. N., PITTS, K. P., & LOONEY, D. P.
Affiliations
  • United States Army Research Institute of Environmental Medicine, Natick, MA;
  • U.S. Army Research Institute of Environmental Medicine (US)
Venue
Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise
Published
2018-10
Volume
50
Issue
10
Pages
2145-2149
ISSN
  • 0195-9131 (ISSN-L)
  • 1530-0315
OpenAlex
W2810636502
Cited by
10
References
35
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1
FWCI
1.63
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Occupational Health and Performance
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology (medical) › Cardiovascular and exercise physiology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Orthopedics and Sports Medicine › Sports Performance and Training
Keywords
energy expenditure estimation, GPS devices, military load carriage, complex terrain, exponential smoothing, metabolic rate, military personnel
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Energy Metabolism, Female, Humans, Male, Military Personnel, Walking, Weight-Bearing, Geographic Information Systems, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review