Cited by 66Sports Performance and TrainingMenstrual Health and DisordersCardiovascular and exercise physiology

Muscle performance during the menstrual cycle correlates with psychological well-being, but not fluctuations in sex hormones

Open access
DAM, TINE VRIST, DALGAARD, LINE BARNER, SEVDALIS, VASSILIS, BIBBY, BO MARTIN, JANSE DE JONGE, XANNE, GRAVHOLT, CLAUS H., HANSEN, METTE·2022·Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise

Abstract

PURPOSE: We aimed to study variations in strength and power performance during the menstrual cycle (MC) in eumenorrheic young women and during the pill cycle in oral contraceptives (OC) users. METHODS: Forty healthy, normal-weight women between 18 and 35 yr (n = 30 eumenorrheic women; n = 10 OC users) completed this prospective cohort study. Seven to nine times during the MC/pill-cycle, the participants completed a physical performance test series, a questionnaire about psychological well-being, blood sampling, and determination of body mass. The physical tests included isometric handgrip strength, elbow flexor strength, countermovement jump (CMJ) height, and a 10-s Wingate bike test. RESULTS: No direct correlation was observed between the variations in sex hormones and physical performance parameters. However, positive correlations were observed between physical performance outcomes and self-reported motivation, perception of own physical performance level, pleasure level, and arousal level. CMJ was 6% lower in the late luteal phase (LL) compared with the midluteal phase (ML) (P = 0.04). Wingate peak power was 3% lower in early follicular (EF) compared with the ML (P = 0.04). Furthermore, Wingate average power was 2%-5% lower in LL compared with all other MC phases. In line with these observations, physical pain was higher in EF and LL, and the pleasure level was lower in EF compared with the other MC phases. In OC users, we observed no variation in performance and self-reported parameters between the placebo-pill phase and the OC-pill phase. CONCLUSIONS: Impairments in CMJ and Wingate performance were observed at the end and start of MC compared with other MC phases, which were associated with lower psychological well-being, but not the sex hormone fluctuations.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1249/mss.0000000000002961

Cites

52 of 52 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • More detailed data from healthy adult women confirmed E2 values of 100-181-730 pmol L−1 (27-49-199 pg mL−1) for early-mid-late-follicular phase and 386-599-395 pmol L−1 (105-163-108 pg mL−1) for early-mid-late-luteal phase, with wide variability and some women showing values as high as 2500 pmol L−1.

    “More detailed data coming from healthy adult women confirmed it as well: 100-181-730 pmol L−1 (27-49-199 pg mL−1) for early-mid-late-follicular phase and 386-599-395 pmol L−1 (105-163-108 pg mL−1) for early-mid-late- luteal phase, respectively314 but with wide variability with some women showing values as high as 2500 pmol L−1.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 53 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
DAM, T. V., DALGAARD, L. B., SEVDALIS, V., BIBBY, B. M., JANSE DE JONGE, X., GRAVHOLT, C. H., & HANSEN, M.
Affiliations
  • Aarhus University (DK)
  • Faculty of Science, University of Newcastle, Ourimbah, AUSTRALIA
  • Aarhus University Hospital (DK)
Venue
Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise
Published
2022-10
Volume
54
Issue
10
Pages
1678-1689
ISSN
  • 0195-9131 (ISSN-L)
  • 1530-0315
OpenAlex
W4295898657
Cited by
66
References
53
Citations by year
2026: 18 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 1
FWCI
12.41
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Griffith Research Online (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • NOVA (University of Newcastle Australia) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Aarhus Universitet
  • Aarhus Universitets Forskningsfond
  • Novo Nordisk Fonden (NNF18SA0055896)
  • Region Midtjylland
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Orthopedics and Sports Medicine › Sports Performance and Training
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Menstrual Health and Disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Complementary and alternative medicine › Cardiovascular and exercise physiology
Keywords
menstrual cycle, muscle strength, muscle power, psychological well-being, sex hormones, oral contraceptives, countermovement jump, Wingate test, grip strength, luteal phase, follicular phase, motivation, bodily pain, pleasure, arousal
MeSH terms
Contraceptives, Oral, Female, Humans, Menstrual Cycle, Muscles, Prospective Studies, Gonadal Steroid Hormones, Hand Strength

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review