The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Inequality and Growth: Why Differential Fertility Matters
Abstract
We develop a new theoretical link between inequality and growth. In our model, fertility and education decisions are interdependent. Poor parents decide to have many children and invest little in education. A mean-preserving spread in the income distribution increases the fertility differential between the rich and the poor, which implies that more weight gets placed on families who provide little education. Consequently, an increase in inequality lowers average education and, therefore, growth. We find that this fertility-differential effect accounts for most of the empirical relationship between inequality and growth.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Inequality and Growth in a Panel of Countries
Barro, R. J. (2000) · Journal of Economic Growth · doi:10.1023/a:1009850119329 · Cited by 2,676
Cited by
Galor, O., & Weil, D. N. (2000) · American Economic Review · doi:10.1257/aer.90.4.806 · Cited by 2,319
Child mortality and fertility decline: Does the Barro-Becker model fit the facts?
Doepke, M. (2005) · Journal of Population Economics · doi:10.1007/s00148-004-0208-z · Cited by 293
Self-citationThe End of Economic Growth? Unintended Consequences of a Declining Population
Jones, C. I. (2022) · American Economic Review · doi:10.1257/aer.20201605 · Cited by 196
The past and future of knowledge-based growth
Strulik, H., Prettner, K., & Prskawetz, A. (2013) · Journal of Economic Growth · doi:10.1007/s10887-013-9098-9 · Cited by 163
To Segregate or to Integrate: Education Politics and Democracy
DE LA CROIX, D., & DOEPKE, M. (2009) · Review of Economic Studies · doi:10.1111/j.1467-937x.2008.00529.x · Cited by 135
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- de la Croix, D., & Doepke, M.
- Venue
- American Economic Review
- Publisher
- American Economic Association
- Published
- 2003-08-01
- Volume
- 93
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 1091-1113
- ISSN
- 0002-8282 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2087229412
- Cited by
- 766
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 61.68
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
