Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 1,281

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Why is There so Little Money in U.S. Politics?

Open access
Ansolabehere, Stephen, de Figueiredo, John M, Snyder, James M·2003·Journal of Economic Perspectives

Abstract

The authors begin by offering an overview of the sources and amounts of campaign contributions in the U.S. In the light of these facts, they explore the assumption that the amount of money in U.S. campaigns mainly reflects political investment. They then offer their perspective that campaign contributions should be viewed primarily as a type of consumption good, rather than as a market for buying political benefits. Although this perspective helps to explain the levels of campaign contributions by individuals and organizations, it opens up new research questions of its own.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1257/089533003321164976

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 1,281

Metadata

Authors
Ansolabehere, S., de Figueiredo, J. M., & Snyder, J. M.
Venue
Journal of Economic Perspectives
Published
2003-02-01
Volume
17
Issue
1
Pages
105-130
ISSN
0895-3309 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3123931404
Cited by
1,281
References
0
FWCI
136.96
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Why is There so Little Money in U.S. Politics? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1257/089533003321164976
The paper
Ansolabehere, S., de Figueiredo, J. M., & Snyder, J. M. (2003). Why is There so Little Money in U.S. Politics? Journal of Economic Perspectives. https://doi.org/10.1257/089533003321164976

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.