CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 889Psychological Well-being and Life SatisfactionQuality of Life MeasurementIncome, Poverty, and Inequality

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 100 of the 169 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Some Uses of Happiness Data in Economics

Open access
Tella, Rafael Di, MacCulloch, Robert·2006·Journal of Economic Perspectives
DOI 10.1257/089533006776526111
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

Happiness research is based on the idea that it is fruitful to study empirical measures of individual welfare. The most common is the answer to a simple well-being question such as “Are you Happy?” Hundreds of thousands of individuals have been asked this question, in many countries and over many years. Researchers have begun to use these data to tackle a variety of important questions in economics. Some require strong assumptions concerning interpersonal comparisons of utility, but others make only mild assumptions in this regard. They range from microeconomic questions, such as the way income and utility are connected, to macroeconomic questions such as the tradeoff between inflation and unemployment, including large areas in political economy. Public policy is another area where progress using happiness data is taking place. Given the central role of utility notions in economic theory, we argue that the use of happiness data in empirical research should be given serious consideration.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1257/089533006776526111

Cites

100 of 169 references verified0 citation errors · 69 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

1 retracted

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. Alesina Alberto, 2002, Brookings Papers on Economic Activity., 2, 187
  2. 10.1016/S0047-2727(02)00168-8 · DOI
  3. Krugman Paul, 1994, Foreign Affairs., 2
  4. 10.1037/0003-066X.48.11.1117 · DOI
  5. 1997, Journal of Research in Personality., 31, 240

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 889

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Tella, R. D., & MacCulloch, R.
Affiliations
  • Harvard University (US)
  • Imperial College London (GB)
ORCID
MacCulloch, Robert
Venue
Journal of Economic Perspectives
Publisher
American Economic Association
Published
2006-02-01
Volume
20
Issue
1
Pages
25-46
ISSN
0895-3309 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1257/089533006776526111
OpenAlex
W1977288176
Cited by
889
References
101
Citations by year
2026: 17 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 24 · 2023: 24 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 24 · 2020: 47 · 2019: 40 · 2018: 26 · 2017: 39 · 2016: 49 · 2015: 64 · 2014: 70 · 2013: 70 · 2012: 58
FWCI
79.51
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Journal of Economic Perspectives (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • ResearchSpace (University of Auckland) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Quality of Life Measurement
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Income, Poverty, and Inequality
Keywords
subjective well-being, interpersonal utility comparison, Phillips curve, political economy, public policy evaluation, happiness surveys

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review