The DOI matches its Crossref record; 39 of the 39 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Trade Wars and Trade Talks with Data
Open accessAbstract
How large are optimal tariffs? What tariffs would prevail in a worldwide trade war? How costly would a breakdown of international trade policy cooperation be? And what is the scope for future multilateral trade negotiations? I address these and other questions using a unified framework which nests traditional, new trade, and political economy motives for protection. I find that optimal tariffs average 62 percent, world trade war tariffs average 63 percent, the government welfare losses from a breakdown of international trade policy cooperation average 2.9 percent, and the possible government welfare gains from future multilateral trade negotiations average 0.5 percent. (JEL F12, F13, O19)
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
(2012) · American Economic Review · doi:10.1257/aer.102.7.i · Cited by 6,810
Technology, Geography, and Trade
Eaton, J., & Kortum, S. (2002) · Econometrica · doi:10.1111/1468-0262.00352 · Cited by 4,485
Scale Economies, Product Differentiation, and the Pattern of Trade
(1990) · Rethinking International Trade · doi:10.7551/mitpress/5933.003.0005 · Cited by 4,464
On the Principles of Political Economy, and Taxation
Ricardo, D. (2014) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9781107589421 · Cited by 4,149
Grossman, G. M., & Helpman, E. (2008) · 40 Years of Research on Rent Seeking 2 · doi:10.1007/978-3-540-79247-5_7 · Cited by 3,302
Globalization and the Gains From Variety
Broda, C., & Weinstein, D. E. (2006) · The Quarterly Journal of Economics · doi:10.1162/qjec.2006.121.2.541 · Cited by 2,478
Estimates of the Trade and Welfare Effects of NAFTA
Caliendo, L., & Parro, F. (2015) · The Review of Economic Studies · doi:10.1093/restud/rdu035 · Cited by 1,518
Climate Clubs: Overcoming Free-riding in International Climate Policy
Nordhaus, W. (2015) · American Economic Review · doi:10.1257/aer.15000001 · Cited by 1,362
New product varieties and the measurement of international prices
Feenstra, R. C. (1994) · American Economic Review · Cited by 1,246
Bagwell, K., & Staiger, R. W. (1999) · American Economic Review · doi:10.1257/aer.89.1.215 · Cited by 1,022
Cited by
Estimates of the Trade and Welfare Effects of NAFTA
Caliendo, L., & Parro, F. (2015) · The Review of Economic Studies · doi:10.1093/restud/rdu035 · Cited by 1,518
Climate Clubs: Overcoming Free-riding in International Climate Policy
Nordhaus, W. (2015) · American Economic Review · doi:10.1257/aer.15000001 · Cited by 1,362
Fajgelbaum, P. D., Goldberg, P. K., Kennedy, P. J., & Khandelwal, A. K. (2020) · The Quarterly Journal of Economics · doi:10.1093/qje/qjz036 · Cited by 1,030
Policy Uncertainty, Trade, and Welfare: Theory and Evidence for China and the United States
Handley, K., & Limão, N. (2017) · American Economic Review · doi:10.1257/aer.20141419 · Cited by 988
Terms of trade and global efficiency effects of free trade agreements, 1990–2002
Anderson, J. E., & Yotov, Y. V. (2016) · Journal of International Economics · doi:10.1016/j.jinteco.2015.10.006 · Cited by 397
Metadata
- Authors
- Ossa, R.
- Venue
- American Economic Review
- Publisher
- American Economic Association
- Published
- 2014-12-01
- Volume
- 104
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 4104-4146
- ISSN
- 0002-8282 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2128275355
- Cited by
- 340
- References
- 39
- FWCI
- 52.20
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Trade Wars and Trade Talks with Data. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1257/aer.104.12.4104
- The paper
- Ossa, R. (2014). Trade Wars and Trade Talks with Data. American Economic Review. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.104.12.4104
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.