The DOI matches its Crossref record; 85 of the 87 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Who Is (More) Rational?
Open accessAbstract
Revealed preference theory offers a criterion for decision-making quality: if decisions are high quality then there exists a utility function the choices maximize. We conduct a large-scale experiment to test for consistency with utility maximization. Consistency scores vary markedly within and across socioeconomic groups. In particular, consistency is strongly related to wealth: A standard deviation increase in consistency is associated with 15–19 percent more household wealth. This association is quantitatively robust to conditioning on correlates of unobserved constraints, preferences, and beliefs. Consistency with utility maximization under laboratory conditions thus captures decision-making ability that applies across domains and influences important real-world outcomes. (JEL D12, D14, D81, D83, D91, G11)
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“These are in contrast to results of our human experiment (SI Appendix, Tables S5 and S6) and prior studies where rationality score and preference have been shown to differ across demographic groups (22, 28, 61).”
From The emergence of economic rationality of GPT (2023) · cites this paper as [22]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Sample Selection Bias as a Specification Error
Heckman, J. J. (1979) · Econometrica · doi:10.2307/1912352 · Cited by 28,779
THE BIG FIVE PERSONALITY DIMENSIONS AND JOB PERFORMANCE: A META‐ANALYSIS
BARRICK, M. R., & MOUNT, M. K. (1991) · Personnel Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.1991.tb00688.x · Cited by 8,689
Grit: perseverance and passion for long-term goals
Duckworth, A. L., Peterson, C., Matthews, M. D., & Kelly, D. R. (2007) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.92.6.1087 · Cited by 6,911
Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1984) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.39.4.341 · Cited by 6,544
Risk Aversion and Incentive Effects
Holt, C. A., & Laury, S. K. (2002) · American Economic Review · doi:10.1257/000282802762024700 · Cited by 5,893
Cognitive Reflection and Decision Making
Frederick, S. (2005) · Journal of Economic Perspectives · doi:10.1257/089533005775196732 · Cited by 5,256
Selection on observed and unobserved variables: Assessing the effectiveness of Catholic schools
Altonji, J. G., Elder, T. E., & Taber, C. R. (2005) · Journal of Political Economy · doi:10.1086/426036 · Cited by 3,706
Tests for Specification Errors in Classical Linear Least-Squares Regression Analysis
Ramsey, J. B. (1969) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B (Statistical Methodology) · doi:10.1111/j.2517-6161.1969.tb00796.x · Cited by 3,388
A Model of Reference-Dependent Preferences
Koszegi, B., & Rabin, M. (2006) · The Quarterly Journal of Economics · doi:10.1093/qje/121.4.1133 · Cited by 2,728
Baby Boomer Retirement Security: The Roles of Planning, Financial Literacy, and Housing Wealth
Lusardi, A., & Mitchell, O. S. (2006) · Journal of Monetary Economics · doi:10.1016/j.jmoneco.2006.12.001 · Cited by 2,366
Research works printed but not linked: 3
- 10.2307/3312889 · DOI
- Choi Syngjoo, 2014, American Economic Review. http://dx.doi.org/10.1257/aer., 104, 1518, 10.1257/aer.104.6.1518 · DOI
- 10.1162/qjec.121.4.1133 · DOI · Paper page
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 101–200 of 275
Tear Down This Wall Street: The Effect of Anti-Market Ideology on Investment DecisionsPreprint
D’Acunto, F. (2015) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.2705545 · Cited by 15
Tear Down this Wall Street: Anti-finance Rhetoric, Subjective Beliefs, and InvestmentPreprint
D’Acunto, F. (2018) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.3213904 · Cited by 16
The effects of acute and chronic stress on choice consistency
Nitsch, F. J., Sellitto, M., & Tobias Kalenscher, A. (2021) · Psychoneuroendocrinology · doi:10.1016/j.psyneuen.2021.105289 · Cited by 14
Revealing Risky Mistakes through Revisions
Breig, Z., & Feldman, P. (2021) · Journal of Risk and Uncertainty · doi:10.1007/s11166-024-09429-3 · Cited by 19
Group Consumption with Caring Individuals
Cherchye, L., Cosaert, S., Demuynck, T., & Bram De Rock, Z. (2019) · The Economic Journal · doi:10.1093/ej/uez052 · Cited by 13
Cognitive load and economic decision making of smallholder farmers in China: an experimental study
Lei, H., Li, F., Liu, C., & Liu, Y. (2023) · Current Psychology · doi:10.1007/s12144-023-04288-8 · Cited by 13
A multifaceted poverty reduction program has economic and behavioral consequences
Li, W., Leng, Z., Yi, J., & Zhong, S. (2023) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.2219078120 · Cited by 13
Relaxed Optimization: How Close Is a Consumer to Satisfying First-Order Conditions?
de Clippel, G., & Rozen, K. (2021) · The Review of Economics and Statistics · doi:10.1162/rest_a_01088 · Cited by 15
Social preferences or sacred values? Theory and evidence of deontological motivations
Chen, D. L., & Schonger, M. (2022) · Science Advances · doi:10.1126/sciadv.abb3925 · Cited by 24
The distributional preferences of Americans, 2013–2016
Fisman, R. J., Jakiela, P., Kariv, S., & Vannutelli, S. (2023) · Experimental Economics · doi:10.1007/s10683-023-09792-z · Cited by 12
Self-citationPashaei, A., Hassani, M., Mohajeran, B., & Shahbazi, K. (2024) · Open Education Studies · doi:10.1515/edu-2022-0222 · Cited by 25
Recovering Preferences From Finite Data
Chambers, C. P., Echenique, F., & Lambert, N. S. (2021) · Econometrica · doi:10.3982/ecta17845 · Cited by 11
Revealed Preference Analysis with Framing EffectsPreprint
Goldin, J. S., & Reck, D. (2014) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.2417709 · Cited by 11
All Over the Map: Heterogeneity of Risk Preferences across Individuals, Prospects, and CountriesPreprint
L’Haridon, O., & Vieider, F. M. (2016) · RePEc: Research Papers in Economics · Cited by 11
Stango, V., & Zinman, J. (2019) · National Bureau of Economic Research · doi:10.3386/w25540 · Cited by 11
Xi, N., Bampouni, E., & Hamari, J. (2022) · Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS) · doi:10.24251/hicss.2022.222 · Cited by 10
Intertemporal Consumption with Risk: A Revealed Preference Analysis
Lanier, J., Miao, B., Quah, J. K.-H., & Zhong, S. (2022) · The Review of Economics and Statistics · doi:10.1162/rest_a_01220 · Cited by 10
Game form recognition in preference elicitation, cognitive abilities, and cognitive load
Drichoutis, A. C., & Nayga, R. M. (2021) · Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization · doi:10.1016/j.jebo.2021.11.006 · Cited by 10
Long-run expectations of households
Breunig, C., Grabova, I., Haan, P., Weinhardt, F., & Weizsäcker, G. (2021) · Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance · doi:10.1016/j.jbef.2021.100535 · Cited by 11
Castillo, M. E., & Freer, M. (2017) · Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization · doi:10.1016/j.jebo.2017.10.017 · Cited by 10
Telecracy: Testing for Channels of PersuasionPreprint
Barone, G., D'Acunto, F., & Narciso, G. (2012) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.2192970 · Cited by 85
Hunger Games: Does Hunger Affect Time Preferences?Preprint
Ashton, L. (2015) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.2538740 · Cited by 15
Keeping a cool head at all times. What determines choice consistency?Preprint
Nitsch, F. J., & Tobias Kalenscher, A. (2020) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/etyhx · Cited by 10
Approximate Expected Utility Rationalization
Echenique, F., Imai, T., & Saito, K. (2023) · Journal of the European Economic Association · doi:10.1093/jeea/jvad028 · Cited by 9
Kim, H. B., Kim, S., & Kim, T. T. (2019) · The Review of Economics and Statistics · doi:10.1162/rest_a_00854 · Cited by 9
Elkind, E., Grandi, U., Rossi, F., & Slinko, A. M. (2015) · Toulouse 1 Capitole Publications (Université Toulouse I Capitole) · Cited by 9
Consistency in simple vs. complex choices by younger and older adults
Brocas, I., Carrillo, J. D., Combs, T. D., & Kodaverdian, N. (2018) · Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization · doi:10.1016/j.jebo.2018.10.019 · Cited by 15
The Standard Portfolio Choice Problem in GermanyPreprint
Huck, S., Schmidt, T., & Weizsäcker, G. (2014) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.2432045 · Cited by 9
Quicksand or Bedrock for Behavioral Economics? Assessing Foundational Empirical Questions
Stango, V., Yoong, J., & Zinman, J. (2017) · National Bureau of Economic Research · doi:10.3386/w23625 · Cited by 9
The Impact of Violence on Individual Risk Preferences: Evidence from a Natural Experiment
Jakiela, P., & Ozier, O. W. (2015) · World Bank, Washington, DC eBooks · doi:10.1596/1813-9450-7440 · Cited by 10
Kline, P., & Tartari, M. (2015) · National Bureau of Economic Research · doi:10.3386/w20838 · Cited by 9
The development gap in economic rationality of future elites
Cappelen, A. W., Kariv, S., Sørensen, E. Ø., & Tungodden, B. (2023) · Games and Economic Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.geb.2023.10.005 · Cited by 9
Self-citationPredictive Power in Behavioral Welfare Economics
Bouacida, E., & Martin, D. (2017) · Journal of the European Economic Association · doi:10.1093/jeea/jvaa037 · Cited by 8
Are the Smart Kids More Rational?Preprint
Bruyneel, S. D., Cherchye, L., Cosaert, S., Bram De Rock, Z., & Dewitte, S. (2013) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.2208412 · Cited by 8
The Co-holding Puzzle: New Evidence from Transaction-Level DataPreprint
Gathergood, J., & Olafsson, A. (2020) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.3607560 · Cited by 8
The predictive power of risk elicitation tasks
Garagnani, M. (2023) · Journal of Risk and Uncertainty · doi:10.1007/s11166-023-09408-0 · Cited by 8
Allais for the poor: Relations to ability, information processing, and risk attitudes
Herrmann, T., Hübler, O., Menkhoff, L., & Schmidt, U. (2017) · Journal of Risk and Uncertainty · doi:10.1007/s11166-017-9258-y · Cited by 7
Understanding periviable birth: A microeconomic alternative to the dysregulation narrative
Catalano, R. A., Bruckner, T. A., Avalos, L. A., Stewart, H. C., Karasek, D. A., Kariv, S., Gemmill, A., Saxton, K. B., & Casey, J. A. (2017) · Social Science & Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2017.12.014 · Cited by 7
Self-citationThe Quest for Parsimony in Behavioral Economics: New Methods and Evidence on Three FrontsPreprint
Stango, V., Yoong, J., & Zinman, J. (2017) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.2910574 · Cited by 7
Decision-Making Approaches and the Propensity to Default: Evidence and ImplicationsPreprint
Brown, J. R., Farrell, A. M., & Weisbenner, S. J. (2015) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.2559871 · Cited by 7
Sákovics, J. (2013) · Economic Theory Bulletin · doi:10.1007/s40505-013-0006-4 · Cited by 6
Revealed preference and revealed preference cycles: A survey
Dziewulski, P., Lanier, J., & Quah, J. K.-H. (2024) · Journal of Mathematical Economics · doi:10.1016/j.jmateco.2024.103016 · Cited by 6
Reproductive suppression, birth defects, and periviable birth
Catalano, R. A., Bruckner, T. A., Karasek, D. A., Yang, W., & Shaw, G. M. (2017) · Evolutionary Applications · doi:10.1111/eva.12585 · Cited by 5
Financial Decisions Based on Zero-Sum Games: New Conceptual and Mathematical Outcomes
Angelini, P. (2024) · International Journal of Financial Studies · doi:10.3390/ijfs12020056 · Cited by 7
Class, genes, and rationality: A gene–environment interaction approach to ideology
Ahlskog, R. (2024) · Political Psychology · doi:10.1111/pops.13023 · Cited by 6
Measuring rationality: percentages vs expenditures
Allen, R., & Rehbeck, J. (2021) · Theory and Decision · doi:10.1007/s11238-020-09791-z · Cited by 7
Is There a Development Gap in Rationality?Preprint
Cappelen, A. W., Kariv, S., Sørensen, E. Ø., & Tungodden, B. (2014) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.2432909 · Cited by 6
Self-citationDo donors really care about impact information? A dual process accountPreprint
Verkaik, D. (2016) · OSF Preprints (OSF Preprints) · Cited by 6
Approximate Expected Utility RationalizationPreprint
Echenique, F., Imai, T., & Saito, K. (2018) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.5282/ubm/epub.58115 · Cited by 6
Revealing Risky Mistakes through RevisionsPreprint
Breig, Z., & Feldman, P. (2021) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.3975829 · Cited by 6
Rationalizability, cost-rationalizability, and Afriat’s efficiency index
Polisson, M., & Quah, J. K.-H. (2022) · doi:10.1920/wp.ifs.2022.0422 · Cited by 6
What You Eat is What You Are:Risk Attitudes, Time Preferences, and Diet QualityPreprint
Nebout, A., Berlin, N., Vieux, F., Péneau, S., Darmon, N., Kemel, E., & Paroissien, E. (2023) · Social Science Research Network · doi:10.2139/ssrn.4474126 · Cited by 4
Choice Set Misspecification in Reward Inference
Freedman, R., Shah, R., & Dragan, A. (2021) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2101.07691 · Cited by 6
The Gender Psychology of Mental Accounting Financial Decision Making
Zijia, L. (2021) · doi:10.1145/3483794.3483804 · Cited by 5
A field study of donor behaviour in the Iranian kidney market
Kelishomi, A. M., & Sgroi, D. (2024) · European Economic Review · doi:10.1016/j.euroecorev.2024.104887 · Cited by 5
Robust Inference in Risk Elicitation Tasks
Andersson, O., Holm, H. J., Tyran, J., & Wengström, E. (2018) · Journal of Risk and Uncertainty · doi:10.1007/s11166-020-09341-6 · Cited by 5
Intra-individual stability of two survey measures on forward-looking attitude
Preuss, M. (2021) · Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization · doi:10.1016/j.jebo.2021.06.049 · Cited by 6
Influence of memory processes on choice-consistency
Nitsch, F., & Kalenscher, T. (2021) · Royal Society Open Science · doi:10.1098/rsos.200308 · Cited by 3
Bruggen, P. V., & Heufer, J. (2017) · Journal of Economic Theory · doi:10.1016/j.jet.2017.03.007 · Cited by 5
Testing for Rationality with Consumption Data: Demographics and HeterogeneityPreprint
Dean, M. R. W., & Martin, D. (2011) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.1894785 · Cited by 5
Measurement Error in Subjective Expectations and the Empirical Content of Economic ModelsPreprint
Drerup, T. H., Enke, B., & von Gaudecker, H. (2014) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.2526707 · Cited by 5
The Long-Term Labor Market Effects of Parental Unemployment
Schmidpeter, B. (2020) · doi:10.17848/wp20-322 · Cited by 5
Who can predict their own Demise? Accuracy of Longevity Expectations by Education and Cognition
d’Uva, T. B., Erdogan-Ciftci, E., O’Donnell, O., & van Doorslaer, E. K. A. (2015) · RePub (Erasmus University Rotterdam) · Cited by 5
You Can't Always Get What You Want: An Experiment on Finance Professionals' Decisions for OthersPreprint
Stefan, M., Holmén, M., Holzmeister, F., Kirchler, M., & Wengström, E. (2022) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.4018654 · Cited by 5
Taming Behavioral Biases in Consumer Decision-Making: The Role of Robo-AdvisorsPreprint
D’Acunto, F., & Rossi, A. G. P. (2023) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.4666240 · Cited by 5
The unsophisticated “sophisticated”: Old age and the accredited investors definition
Finke, M. S., Guo, T., & Huston, S. J. (2021) · Financial Planning Review · doi:10.1002/cfp2.1114 · Cited by 4
(Non-)Parametric Recoverability of Preferences and Choice Prediction
Zrill, L. (2021) · The Review of Economics and Statistics · doi:10.1162/rest_a_01143 · Cited by 4
Standard rationality versus inclusive rationality: a critical assessment
Fumagalli, R. (2025) · Behavioural Public Policy · doi:10.1017/bpp.2024.53 · Cited by 4
Computing revealed preference goodness-of-fit measures with integer programming
Demuynck, T., & Rehbeck, J. (2023) · Economic Theory · doi:10.1007/s00199-023-01489-x · Cited by 4
Elucidating the Role of the Ventrolateral Prefrontal Cortex in Economic Decision-Making
Wearne, T. A. (2018) · Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.0330-18.2018 · Cited by 4
Credit Card Behavior, Financial Styles, and HeuristicsPreprint
Shefrin, H., & Nicols, C. M. (2011) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.1749573 · Cited by 4
Heterogeneity in response to incentives: Evidence from field data
Czibor, E. (2015) · UvA-DARE (University of Amsterdam) · Cited by 4
Decision-Making Approaches and the Propensity to Default: Evidence and Implications
Brown, J. R., Farrell, A., & Weisbenner, S. J. (2015) · National Bureau of Economic Research · doi:10.3386/w20949 · Cited by 4
Inconsistently consistent: Rationality is not reliablePreprint
Nitsch, F. J., Lüpken, L. M., Lüschow, N., & Tobias Kalenscher, A. (2021) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/gd9zs · Cited by 4
Cognitive ability and risk preferences in a developing nation: Findings from the field
Kelishomi, A. M., & Sgroi, D. (2022) · Economics Letters · doi:10.1016/j.econlet.2022.110576 · Cited by 3
Efficiency-Wage Competition: What Happens as the Number of Players Increases?
Guerrazzi, M. (2019) · Italian Economic Journal · doi:10.1007/s40797-019-00113-z · Cited by 3
Revealed Preference Analysis with Normal Goods: Application to Cost-of-Living Indices
Cherchye, L., Demuynck, T., Bram De Rock, Z., & Surana, K. (2020) · American Economic Journal Microeconomics · doi:10.1257/mic.20180133 · Cited by 3
Consistency in Simple vs. Complex Choices over the Life CyclePreprint
Brocas, I., Carrillo, J. D., Combs, T. D., & Kodaverdian, N. (2015) · SSRN Electronic Journal · Cited by 3
Goodness of Fit Measures for Revealed Preference Tests: Complexity Results and AlgorithmsPreprint
Smeulders, B., Cherchye, L., Bram De Rock, Z., & Spieksma, F. C. R. (2012) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.2165766 · Cited by 3
Quicksand or Bedrock for Behavioral Economics? Assessing Foundational Empirical QuestionsPreprint
Stango, V., Yoong, J., & Zinman, J. (2018) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.3195232 · Cited by 3
IQ, Expectations, and ChoicePreprint
D’Acunto, F., Hoang, D., Paloviita, M., & Weber, M. (2019) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.3326123 · Cited by 3
Aguiar, V. H., & Kashaev, N. (2017) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.3050889 · Cited by 3
You Can't Always Get What You Want---An Experiment on Finance Professionals' Decisions for OthersPreprint
Stefan, M., Holmén, M., Holzmeister, F., Kirchler, M., & Wengström, E. (2023) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.4342023 · Cited by 3
Revealed preference tests for linear probability-prize tradeoffs
Breig, Z., & Feldman, P. (2025) · Theory and Decision · doi:10.1007/s11238-025-10089-1 · Cited by 2
Wong, H. L., & Kahsay, H. B. (2022) · Review of Development Economics · doi:10.1111/rode.12960 · Cited by 2
Ding, Z., Fan, X., & Zhang, J. (2024) · SAGE Open · doi:10.1177/21582440241239807 · Cited by 2
Carollo, G., Quinci, R., Mingolla, G. P., Sandri, A., Tinazzi, M., & Antelmi, E. (2025) · Movement Disorders Clinical Practice · doi:10.1002/mdc3.70040 · Cited by 2
Dembo, A., Kariv, S., Polisson, M., & Quah, J. K.-H. (2025) · Journal of Political Economy · doi:10.1086/739829 · Cited by 3
Self-citationBeyond Gibbard and Satterthwaite: Voting Manipulation Games
Slinko, A. M. (2019) · Studies in economic design · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-18050-8_19 · Cited by 2
Making sense of monkey business: Re-examining tests of animal rationality
Allen, R. G. D., Dziewulski, P., & Rehbeck, J. (2022) · Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization · doi:10.1016/j.jebo.2022.02.004 · Cited by 2
Poverty, Irrationality, and the Value of Cash Transfers
Acland, D. J. (2021) · Journal of Benefit-Cost Analysis · doi:10.1017/bca.2020.22 · Cited by 2
Saelens, D. (2021) · Empirical Economics · doi:10.1007/s00181-021-02033-3 · Cited by 2
Scherm, A., Hirsch, B., Sohn, M., & Maske, M. K. (2022) · Journal of Applied Accounting Research · doi:10.1108/jaar-01-2021-0005 · Cited by 2
Non-rationalizable individuals and stochastic rationalizability
Im, C., & Rehbeck, J. (2022) · Economics Letters · doi:10.1016/j.econlet.2022.110786 · Cited by 2
Measuring tastes for equity and aggregate wealth behind the veil of ignorance
Heufer, J., Shachat, J. M., & Xu, Y. (2025) · Games and Economic Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.geb.2025.06.005 · Cited by 2
Are millennial students better equipped to overcome choice bias?
Etgar, R., & Tamir, E. (2019) · International Journal of Adolescence and Youth · doi:10.1080/02673843.2019.1657026 · Cited by 2
Who can predict their Own Demise? Accuracy of Longevity Expectations by Education and CognitionPreprint
d'Uva, T. B., Erdogan-Ciftci, E., O'Donnell, O., & van Doorslaer, E. V. (2015) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.2604021 · Cited by 7
How Time Flies!Preprint
Chen, X., & Zhao, X. (2018) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.3285834 · Cited by 2
Stango, V., & Zinman, J. (2019) · Working paper · doi:10.21799/frbp.wp.2019.14 · Cited by 2
Revealed Social PreferencesPreprint
Dolgopolov, A., & Freer, M. (2018) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.3111494 · Cited by 2
Metadata
- Authors
- Choi, S., Kariv, S., Müller, W., & Silverman, D.
- Affiliations
- University College London (GB)
- University of California, Berkeley (US)
- University of Vienna (AT)
- Arizona State University (US)
- Venue
- American Economic Review
- Publisher
- American Economic Association
- Published
- 2014-06-01
- Volume
- 104
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1518-1550
- ISSN
- 0002-8282 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1601160662
- Cited by
- 277
- References
- 87
- Citations by year
- 2026: 10 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 20 · 2022: 28 · 2021: 29 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 19 · 2018: 23 · 2017: 26 · 2016: 15 · 2015: 24 · 2014: 18
- FWCI
- 5.99
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- doi.org
- Locations
- American Economic Review (publishedVersion)
- National Bureau of Economic Research (publishedVersion)
- Research portal (Tilburg University) (publishedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
- Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
- SSRN Electronic Journal (submittedVersion)
- UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
- Seoul National University Open Repository (Seoul National University) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Network for Studies on Pensions, Aging and Retirement
- Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek
- Universiteit van Tilburg
- Economic and Social Research Council
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › General Decision Sciences › Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Economic and Environmental Valuation
- Keywords
- revealed preference, utility maximization, decision consistency, rationality, socioeconomic heterogeneity, income, gender differences, age, wealth, personality, risk tolerance, field experiments
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
