Cited by 334Labor market dynamics and wage inequalityEducation and Labor RelationsEducation Systems and Policy

Subsidizing Vocational Training for Disadvantaged Youth in Colombia: Evidence from a Randomized Trial

Attanasio, Orazio, Kugler, Adriana, Meghir, Costas·2011·American Economic Journal: Applied Economics

Abstract

This paper evaluates the impact of a randomized training program for disadvantaged youth introduced in Colombia in 2005. This randomized trial offers a unique opportunity to examine the impact of training in a middle income country. We use originally collected data on individuals randomly offered and not offered training. The program raises earnings and employment for women. Women offered training earn 19.6 percent more and have a 0.068 higher probability of paid employment than those not offered training, mainly in formal-sector jobs. Cost-benefit analysis of these results suggests that the program generates much larger net gains than those found in developed countries. (JEL I28, J13, J24, O15)

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1257/app.3.3.188

Cites

46 of 46 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The impact of Attanasio et al. [2011] is slightly larger than the ELA intervention's impact, but the ELA program is significantly cheaper and designed to be scalable in Sub-Saharan Africa.

    “This impact is slightly larger than those we …nd for the ELA intervention, although as we discuss later, the ELA program is signi…cantly cheaper, and designed to be scalable in the context of Sub-Saharan Africa.”

    From Women's Empowerment in Action: Evidence from a Randomized Control Trial in Africa (2020) · cites this paper as Attanasio et al. [2011]

  • Attanasio et al. [2011] find that for the Jovenes program in Colombia, among women, the likelihood to be employed increases by 6.1 pp.

    “For example, Attanasio et al. [2011] …nd that for the Jovenes program in Colombia, among women, the likelihood to be employed increases by 6  1 pp”

    From Women's Empowerment in Action: Evidence from a Randomized Control Trial in Africa (2020) · cites this paper as Attanasio et al. [2011]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 48 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Attanasio, O., Kugler, A., & Meghir, C.
Affiliations
  • National Bureau of Economic Research (US)
  • Georgetown University (US)
  • Yale University (US)
Venue
American Economic Journal: Applied Economics
Published
2011-07-01
Volume
3
Issue
3
Pages
188-220
ISSN
  • 1945-7782 (ISSN-L)
  • 1945-7790
OpenAlex
W2154351737
Cited by
332
References
48
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 26 · 2023: 26 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 25 · 2020: 24 · 2019: 26 · 2018: 24 · 2017: 27 · 2016: 29 · 2015: 20 · 2014: 26 · 2013: 20 · 2012: 24
FWCI
60.91
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • American Economic Journal Applied Economics (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Economic and Social Research Council (ES/E021220/1)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Labor market dynamics and wage inequality
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Education and Labor Relations
  • Social Sciences › Education › Education Systems and Policy
Keywords
vocational education, disadvantaged youth, youth employment, women's wages, women's employment, formal employment, cost-benefit analysis, middle-income countries, Colombia

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review