The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Effects of Privatization and Ownership in Transition Economies
Abstract
In this paper, we evaluate what we have learned to date about the effects of privatization from the experiences during the last fifteen to twenty years in the postcommunist (transition) economies and, where relevant, China. We distinguish separately the impact of privatization on efficiency, profitability, revenues, and other indicators and distinguish between studies on the basis of their econometric methodology in order to focus attention on more credible results. The effect of privatization is mostly positive in Central Europe, but quantitatively smaller than that to foreign owners and greater in the later than earlier transition period. In the Commonwealth of Independent States, privatization to foreign owners yields a positive or insignificant effect while privatization to domestic owners generates a negative or insignificant effect. The available papers on China find diverse results, with the effect of nonstate ownership on total factor productivity being mostly positive but sometimes insignificant or negative.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A Survey of Corporate Governance
Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. W. (1997) · The Journal of Finance · doi:10.1111/j.1540-6261.1997.tb04820.x · Cited by 16,243
The colonial origins of comparative development: An empirical investigation
Acemoglu, D., Johnson, S., & Robinson, J. A. (2001) · American Economic Review · doi:10.1257/aer.91.5.1369 · Cited by 8,517
The great reversals: the politics of financial development in the twentieth century
Rajan, R. G., & Zingales, L. (2003) · Journal of Financial Economics · doi:10.1016/s0304-405x(03)00125-9 · Cited by 3,327
Equity markets and growth: Cross-country evidence on timing and outcomes, 1980–1995
Rousseau, P. L., & Wachtel, P. (2000) · Journal of Banking & Finance · doi:10.1016/s0378-4266(99)00123-5 · Cited by 772
Cited by
Empathy: Gender effects in brain and behavior
Christov-Moore, L., Simpson, E. A., Coudé, G., Grigaityte, K., Iacoboni, M., & Ferrari, P. F. (2014) · Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2014.09.001 · Cited by 1,137
Gender and the labor market: What have we learned from field and lab experiments?
Azmat, G., & Petrongolo, B. (2014) · Labour Economics · doi:10.1016/j.labeco.2014.06.005 · Cited by 314
Corporate ownership and managerial turnover in China and Eastern Europe: A comparative meta-analysis
Iwasaki, I., Ma, X., & Mizobata, S. (2020) · Journal of Economics and Business · doi:10.1016/j.jeconbus.2020.105928 · Cited by 51
Risk preferences and development revisited
Vieider, F. M., Martinsson, P., Nam, P. K., & Truong, N. (2019) · Theory and Decision · doi:10.1007/s11238-018-9674-8 · Cited by 47
Former Communist party membership and present-day entrepreneurship
Ivlevs, A., Nikolova, M., & Popova, O. (2021) · Small Business Economics · doi:10.1007/s11187-020-00364-6 · Cited by 29
Metadata
- Authors
- Estrin, S., Hanousek, J., Kočenda, E., & Svejnar, J.
- Venue
- Journal of Economic Literature
- Publisher
- American Economic Association
- Published
- 2009-09-01
- Volume
- 47
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 699-728
- ISSN
- 0022-0515 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2105133241
- Cited by
- 926
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 376.87
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Effects of Privatization and Ownership in Transition Economies. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1257/jel.47.3.699
- The paper
- Estrin, S., Hanousek, J., Kočenda, E., & Svejnar, J. (2009). The Effects of Privatization and Ownership in Transition Economies. Journal of Economic Literature. https://doi.org/10.1257/jel.47.3.699
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.