The DOI matches its Crossref record; 21 of the 21 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Mechanics of Motivated Reasoning
Abstract
Whenever we see voters explain away their preferred candidate's weaknesses, dieters assert that a couple scoops of ice cream won't really hurt their weight loss goals, or parents maintain that their children are unusually gifted, we are reminded that people's preferences can affect their beliefs. This idea is captured in the common saying, “People believe what they want to believe.” But people don't simply believe what they want to believe. Psychological research makes it clear that “motivated beliefs” are guided by motivated reasoning—reasoning in the service of some self-interest, to be sure, but reasoning nonetheless. People generally reason their way to conclusions they favor, with their preferences influencing the way evidence is gathered, arguments are processed, and memories of past experience are recalled. Each of these processes can be affected in subtle ways by people's motivations, leading to biased beliefs that feel objective. In this symposium introduction, we set the stage for discussion of motivated beliefs in the papers that follow by providing more detail about the underlying psychological processes that guide motivated reasoning.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“many motivationally biased beliefs aren't yet fully insulated from counterevidence but depend on what has been called an”
From Are Attributions of Consciousness to AI Chatbots Epistemically Innocent? (2026) · cites this paper as Epley & Gilovich, 2016
Citations
Cites
A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance
Morvan, C., & O’Connor, A. (2017) · Macat Library eBooks · doi:10.4324/9781912282432 · Cited by 18,284
The case for motivated reasoning.
Kunda, Z. (1990) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.108.3.480 · Cited by 9,022
Rational choice and the structure of the environment.
Simon, H. A. (1956) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/h0042769 · Cited by 5,919
Kahneman, D. J., & Tversky, A. (2013) · World Scientific handbook in financial economic series · doi:10.1142/9789814417358_0016 · Cited by 5,379
Micromotives and Macrobehavior
Eaton, B. C., & Schelling, T. C. (1981) · Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue canadienne d économique · doi:10.2307/134812 · Cited by 3,801
What do people think they're doing? Action identification and human behavior.
Vallacher, R. R., & Wegner, D. M. (1987) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.94.1.3 · Cited by 1,802
The Effects of Financial Incentives in Experiments: A Review and Capital-Labor-Production Framework
Camerer, C. F., Hogarth, R. M., Budescu, D. V., & Eckel, C. C. (1999) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-94-017-1406-8_2 · Cited by 1,545
Ditto, P. H., & Lopez, D. F. (1992) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.63.4.568 · Cited by 1,329
Informal social communication.
Festinger, L. (1950) · Research Center for Dynamics Institute for Social Research eBooks · doi:10.1037/10646-001 · Cited by 1,317
Explaining Bargaining Impasse: The Role of Self-Serving Biases
Babcock, L., & Loewenstein, G. (1997) · Journal of Economic Perspectives · doi:10.1257/jep.11.1.109 · Cited by 1,071
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The Dynamics of Motivated Beliefs
Zimmermann, F. (2020) · American Economic Review · doi:10.1257/aer.20180728 · Cited by 338
Facts and Myths about Misperceptions
Nyhan, B. J. (2020) · The Journal of Economic Perspectives · doi:10.1257/jep.34.3.220 · Cited by 263
Defending humankind: Anthropocentric bias in the appreciation of AI art
Millet, K., Buehler, F., Du, G., & Kokkoris, M. D. (2023) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2023.107707 · Cited by 215
The Bias That Divides Us: The Science and Politics of Myside Thinking
Stanovich, K. E. (2021) · doi:10.7551/mitpress/13367.001.0001 · Cited by 152
Belief-Dependent Motivations and Psychological Game Theory
Battigalli, P., & Dufwenberg, M. A. (2020) · Journal of Economic Literature · doi:10.1257/jel.20201378 · Cited by 143
The Consequences of Participating in the Sharing Economy: A Transparency-Based Sharing Framework
C. Köbis, N., Soraperra, I., & Shalvi, S. (2021) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/0149206320967740 · Cited by 129
Trust in State and Nonstate Actors: Evidence from Dispute Resolution in Pakistan
Acemoğlu, D. (2020) · DSpace@MIT (Massachusetts Institute of Technology) · Cited by 125
When and How Different Motives Can Drive Motivated Political Reasoning
Bayes, R., Druckman, J. N., Goods, A., & Molden, D. C. (2020) · Political Psychology · doi:10.1111/pops.12663 · Cited by 119
Consumption orientations may support (or hinder) transitions to more plant-based diets
Graça, J., Trüninger, M., Junqueira, L. O. L., & Schmidt, L. (2019) · Appetite · doi:10.1016/j.appet.2019.04.027 · Cited by 111
The Portfolio of Economic Policies Needed to Fight Climate Change
Blanchard, O. J., Gollier, C., & Jean Tirole, Z. (2022) · Annual Review of Economics · doi:10.1146/annurev-economics-051520-015113 · Cited by 138
Diffusion of Being Pivotal and Immoral Outcomes
Falk, A., Neuber, T., & Szech, N. (2020) · The Review of Economic Studies · doi:10.1093/restud/rdz064 · Cited by 103
The pandemic exposes human nature: 10 evolutionary insights
Seitz, B. M., Aktipis, A., Buss, D. M., Alcock, J., Bloom, P. A., Gelfand, M. J., Harris, S., Lieberman, D., Natterson-Horowitz, B., Pinker, S. A., et al. (2020) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.2009787117 · Cited by 101
Hoekstra, R. (2019) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108608558 · Cited by 112
Two sides of the same coin: Monetary incentives concurrently improve and bias confidence judgments
Lebreton, M. P., Langdon, S., Slieker, M. J., Nooitgedacht, J. S., Goudriaan, A. E., Denys, D. A. J. P., van Holst, R. J., & Luigjes, J. (2018) · Science Advances · doi:10.1126/sciadv.aaq0668 · Cited by 90
Grassini, S., & Koivisto, M. (2024) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-024-54294-4 · Cited by 98
All We Need Is Trust: How the COVID-19 Outbreak Reconfigured Trust in Italian Public Institutions
Falcone, R., Colí, E., Felletti, S., Sapienza, A., Castelfranchi, C., & Fabio Paglieri, A. (2020) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2020.561747 · Cited by 89
We Ran 9 Billion Regressions: Eliminating False Positives through Computational Model Robustness
Muñoz, J., & Young, C. (2018) · Sociological Methodology · doi:10.1177/0081175018777988 · Cited by 76
Peer Influence on Managerial Honesty: The Role of Transparency and Expectations
Brunner, M., & Ostermaier, A. (2017) · Journal of Business Ethics · doi:10.1007/s10551-017-3459-9 · Cited by 75
Uri Gneezy, B., Saccardo, S., Serra-García, M., & van Veldhuizen, R. (2020) · Games and Economic Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.geb.2019.12.010 · Cited by 74
Bicchieri, C., Dimant, E., & Sonderegger, S. (2023) · Games and Economic Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.geb.2023.01.005 · Cited by 72
How do voters perceive changes to the rules of the game? Evidence from the 2014 Hungarian elections
Ahlquist, J. S., Ichino, N., Wittenberg, J., & Ziblatt, D. F. (2018) · Journal of Comparative Economics · doi:10.1016/j.jce.2018.01.001 · Cited by 65
Mirror, Mirror on the Wall: Algorithmic Assessments, Transparency, and Self-Fulfilling Prophecies
Bauer, K., & Gill, A. (2023) · Information Systems Research · doi:10.1287/isre.2023.1217 · Cited by 79
Porumbescu, G. A., Meijer, A. J., & Grimmelikhuijsen, S. (2022) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108678568 · Cited by 77
Mass Atrocities and Their Prevention
Anderton, C. H., & Bräuer, J. (2021) · Journal of Economic Literature · doi:10.1257/jel.20201458 · Cited by 63
Alstyne, J. M. V., Nowak, G. J., & Aikin, A. L. (2017) · Vaccine · doi:10.1016/j.vaccine.2017.09.007 · Cited by 60
Trust in State and Non-State Actors: Evidence from Dispute Resolution in Pakistan
Acemoğlu, D., Cheema, A., Khwaja, A. I., & Robinson, J. A. (2018) · Journal of Political Economy · doi:10.1086/707765 · Cited by 144
The relationship between political affiliation and beliefs about sources of “fake news”
Michael, R. B., & Breaux, B. O. (2021) · Cognitive Research Principles and Implications · doi:10.1186/s41235-021-00278-1 · Cited by 60
Tragic Choices and the Virtue of Techno-Responsibility Gaps
Danaher, J. (2022) · Philosophy & Technology · doi:10.1007/s13347-022-00519-1 · Cited by 53
Anglin, S. M. (2019) · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2019.02.004 · Cited by 61
A preregistered replication of motivated numeracy
Persson, E., Andersson, D., Koppel, L., Västfjäll, D., & Tinghög, G. (2021) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2021.104768 · Cited by 61
Ársælsson, K. M., & Gastil, J. (2019) · Political Psychology · doi:10.1111/pops.12591 · Cited by 56
Artificial Intelligence for chemical risk assessment
Wittwehr, C., Blomstedt, P., Gosling, J. P., Peltola, T., Raffael, B., Richarz, A.-N., Sienkiewicz, M., Whaley, P., Worth, A. P., & Whelan, M. P. (2019) · Computational Toxicology · doi:10.1016/j.comtox.2019.100114 · Cited by 52
Hartmann, M., McConnell, M. A., Bekker, L., Celum, C., Bennie, T., Zuma, J., & van der Straten, A. (2018) · AIDS and Behavior · doi:10.1007/s10461-018-2044-2 · Cited by 49
Enabling or Limiting Cognitive Flexibility? Evidence of Demand for Moral Commitment
Saccardo, S., & Serra-García, M. (2023) · American Economic Review · doi:10.1257/aer.20201333 · Cited by 47
The case for partisan motivated reasoning
Williams, D. (2023) · Synthese · doi:10.1007/s11229-023-04223-1 · Cited by 57
Lay beliefs about the controllability of everyday mental states.
Cusimano, C., & Goodwin, G. P. (2019) · Journal of Experimental Psychology General · doi:10.1037/xge0000547 · Cited by 44
People judge others to have more voluntary control over beliefs than they themselves do.
Cusimano, C., & Goodwin, G. P. (2020) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/pspa0000198 · Cited by 47
A little good is good enough: Ethical consumption, cheap excuses, and moral self-licensing
Engel, J., & Szech, N. (2020) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0227036 · Cited by 43
Mazarr, M. J., Bauer, R., Casey, A., Heintz, S., & Matthews, L. J. (2019) · RAND Corporation eBooks · doi:10.7249/rr2714 · Cited by 47
Kaeppel, K. (2021) · Thinking Skills and Creativity · doi:10.1016/j.tsc.2021.100809 · Cited by 42
Injustice Without Evidence: The Unique Role of Conspiracy Theories in Social Justice Research
van Prooijen, J. (2021) · Social Justice Research · doi:10.1007/s11211-021-00376-x · Cited by 48
Sommer, J., Musolino, J., & Hemmer, P. (2023) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/rev0000444 · Cited by 49
Thoughts and Players: An Introduction to Old and New Economic Perspectives on Beliefs
Molnár, A., & Loewenstein, G. F. (2021) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781009001021.023 · Cited by 39
Policy accommodation versus electoral turnover: policy representation in Britain, 1945–2015
Bartle, J., Avellaneda, S. D., & McGann, A. J. (2018) · Journal of Public Policy · doi:10.1017/s0143814x18000090 · Cited by 35
Choosing to Disagree in Financial Markets
Banerjee, S., Davis, J., & Gondhi, N. R. (2019) · The Journal of Finance · doi:10.1111/jofi.13311 · Cited by 44
Usable climate science is adaptation science
Sobel, A. H. (2021) · Climatic Change · doi:10.1007/s10584-021-03108-x · Cited by 38
Biases in Information Selection and Processing: Survey Evidence from the Pandemic
Faia, E., Fuster, A., Pezone, V., & Zafar, B. (2022) · The Review of Economics and Statistics · doi:10.1162/rest_a_01187 · Cited by 39
Ganuthula, V. R. R., & Sinha, S. (2019) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02857 · Cited by 40
Morality justifies motivated reasoning in the folk ethics of belief
Cusimano, C., & Lombrozo, T. (2021) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2020.104513 · Cited by 37
Pensar la Historia con el Deseo: Metacognición, Motivación y Comprensión Histórica
Martínez, C. D. G. (2019) · Revista Colombiana de Psicología · doi:10.15446/rcp.v28n1.70763 · Cited by 34
Trusting COVID-19 vaccines as individual and social goal
Falcone, R., Ansani, A., Colí, E., Marini, M., Sapienza, A., Castelfranchi, C., & Fabio Paglieri, A. (2022) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-022-13675-3 · Cited by 33
Jachimowicz, J., & Weisman, H. (2022) · Research in Organizational Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.riob.2022.100167 · Cited by 28
It’s Not A Lie If You Believe It: Lying and Belief Distortion Under Norm-UncertaintyPreprint
Bicchieri, C., Dimant, E., & Sonderegger, S. (2019) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.3326146 · Cited by 33
Persistent beliefs: Political extremism predicts ideological stability over time
Zwicker, M. V., van Prooijen, J., & Krouwel, A. P. M. (2020) · Group Processes & Intergroup Relations · doi:10.1177/1368430220917753 · Cited by 37
Perceived risk, political polarization, and the willingness to follow COVID-19 mitigation guidelines
Block, R., Burnham, M., Kahn, K., Peng, R. X., Seeman, J., & Seto, C. H.-F. (2022) · Social Science & Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2022.115091 · Cited by 29
Actively open-minded thinking is key to combating fake news: A multimethod study
Mirhoseini, M., Early, S., Shamy, N. E., & Hassanein, K. (2023) · Information & Management · doi:10.1016/j.im.2023.103761 · Cited by 44
How to Distinguish Motivated Reasoning from Bayesian Updating
Little, A. T. (2025) · Political Behavior · doi:10.1007/s11109-024-09999-7 · Cited by 33
Luccasen, R. A., Thomas, M. K., & Grossman, P. J. (2017) · Social Choice and Welfare · doi:10.1007/s00355-017-1070-8 · Cited by 28
Mental Time Travel as Self-Affirmation
Stephan, E., & Sedikides, C. (2023) · Personality and Social Psychology Review · doi:10.1177/10888683231203143 · Cited by 30
Misinformation in Virtual Reality
Brown, J., Bailenson, J. N., & Hancock, J. T. (2023) · Journal of Online Trust and Safety · doi:10.54501/jots.v1i5.120 · Cited by 32
Biases in Information Selection and Processing: Survey Evidence from the Pandemic
Faia, E., Fuster, A., Pezone, V., & Zafar, B. (2021) · National Bureau of Economic Research · doi:10.3386/w28484 · Cited by 24
Urbig, D., Reif, K., Lengsfeld, S., & Procher, V. (2021) · Technological Forecasting and Social Change · doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2021.121032 · Cited by 23
Motivated reasoning, fast and slow
Strömbäck, C., Andersson, D., Västfjäll, D., & Tinghög, G. (2021) · Behavioural Public Policy · doi:10.1017/bpp.2021.34 · Cited by 23
Lewis, N. A. (2021) · Psychological Inquiry · doi:10.1080/1047840x.2021.1971441 · Cited by 21
The asymmetric effect of narratives on prosocial behavior
Hillenbrand, A., & Verrina, E. (2022) · Games and Economic Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.geb.2022.06.008 · Cited by 30
How Identity Impacts Bystander Responses to Workplace Mistreatment
Gloor, J. L. P., Okimoto, T. G., Li, X., Gazdag, B. A., & Ryan, M. K. (2023) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/01492063231177976 · Cited by 24
A representative survey experiment of motivated climate change denial
Stötzer, L. S., & Zimmermann, F. (2024) · Nature Climate Change · doi:10.1038/s41558-023-01910-2 · Cited by 20
Stone, D. F., & Wood, D. H. (2016) · Edward Elgar Publishing eBooks · doi:10.2139/ssrn.2834072 · Cited by 24
Engel, C., Kube, S., & Kurschilgen, M. J. (2021) · Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization · doi:10.1016/j.jebo.2021.04.029 · Cited by 21
Does fake news lead to more engaging effects on social media? Evidence from Romania
Corbu, N., Bârgăoanu, A., Buturoiu, R., & Ștefăniță, O. (2020) · Communications · doi:10.1515/commun-2019-0152 · Cited by 23
Turning back the clock: Beliefs about gender roles during lockdown
Boring, A., & Moroni, G. (2023) · Labour Economics · doi:10.1016/j.labeco.2023.102363 · Cited by 19
The self-presentational consequences of upholding one’s stance in spite of the evidence
John, L. K., Jeong, M., Francesca Gino, B., & Huang, L. (2019) · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes · doi:10.1016/j.obhdp.2019.07.001 · Cited by 19
Cognitive Flexibility or Moral Commitment? Evidence of Anticipated Belief DistortionPreprint
Saccardo, S., & Serra-García, M. (2020) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.3676711 · Cited by 19
Moral thin-slicing: Forming moral impressions from a brief glance
Freitas, J. D., & Hafri, A. (2024) · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2023.104588 · Cited by 22
Reconciling scientific and commonsense values to improve reasoning
Cusimano, C., & Lombrozo, T. (2021) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2021.06.004 · Cited by 21
The Role of Predictions, Their Confirmation, and Reward in Maintaining the Self-Concept
Mokady, A., & Reggev, N. (2022) · Frontiers in Human Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnhum.2022.824085 · Cited by 19
Acceptable Discourse: Social Norms of Beliefs and Opinions
Golman, R. (2022) · European Economic Review · doi:10.1016/j.euroecorev.2023.104588 · Cited by 20
Baker, S., Patel, N. P., Gunten, C. D. V., Valentine, K. D., & Scherer, L. D. (2020) · Judgment and Decision Making · doi:10.1017/s193029750000735x · Cited by 17
Taxed fairly? How differences in perception shape attitudes towards progressive taxation
Kalleitner, F., & Bobzien, L. (2023) · European Sociological Review · doi:10.1093/esr/jcad060 · Cited by 18
Mongrain, P. (2021) · Electoral Studies · doi:10.1016/j.electstud.2021.102317 · Cited by 17
Why Do We Discriminate? Directional Beliefs and Biased Information ProcessingPreprint
Eyting, M. (2022) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.4210315 · Cited by 17
Odermatt, R., & Stutzer, A. (2020) · Journal of Happiness Studies · doi:10.1007/s10902-022-00571-w · Cited by 22
RETRACTED ARTICLE: The skeptical import of motivated reasoning: A closer look at the evidence
van Doorn, M. (2023) · Thinking & Reasoning · doi:10.1080/13546783.2023.2276975 · Cited by 20
RetractedPause artificial intelligence research? Understanding AI policy challenges
Avi Goldfarb, B. (2024) · Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue canadienne d économique · doi:10.1111/caje.12705 · Cited by 21
The Motivational Processes of Sense-Making
Wojtowicz, Z., Nick Chater, A., & Loewenstein, G. F. (2021) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781009026949.002 · Cited by 15
How aggregated opinions shape beliefs
Oktar, K., & Lombrozo, T. (2025) · Nature Reviews Psychology · doi:10.1038/s44159-024-00398-7 · Cited by 17
Agentic preferences: a foundation for nudging when preferences are endogenous
Fabian, M., & Dold, M. (2022) · Behavioural Public Policy · doi:10.1017/bpp.2022.17 · Cited by 14
Smith, L. K. M., Lynes, J. K., & Wolfe, S. E. (2019) · Social Marketing Quarterly · doi:10.1177/1524500419883288 · Cited by 14
Martin, J. D., & Sharma, K. (2022) · Political Psychology · doi:10.1111/pops.12834 · Cited by 11
Delusional belief about location (“reduplicative paramnesia”)
Coltheart, M., & Davies, M. (2024) · Cognitive Neuropsychiatry · doi:10.1080/13546805.2024.2443057 · Cited by 13
Strategic information avoidance, belief manipulation and the effectiveness of green nudges
D’Adda, G., Gao, Y., Golman, R., & Tavoni, M. (2024) · Ecological Economics · doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2024.108191 · Cited by 13
The complementarity of mindshaping and mindreading
Peters, U. (2018) · Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1007/s11097-018-9584-9 · Cited by 13
Expectations, network centrality, and public good contributions: Experimental evidence from India
Caria, S. A., & Marcel Fafchamps, A. (2017) · Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization · doi:10.1016/j.jebo.2017.07.024 · Cited by 13
The policy mood in Spain: the thermostat in a warm climate, 1978–2017
Bartle, J., Bosch, A., & Orriols, L. (2020) · European Political Science Review · doi:10.1017/s175577392000003x · Cited by 13
Violato, E. M., King, S., & Bulut, O. (2020) · BMC Medical Education · doi:10.1186/s12909-020-02265-4 · Cited by 15
An offer you can’t refuse? Incentives change how we inform ourselves and what we believe
Ambuehl, S. (2017) · Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich) · doi:10.5167/uzh-182670 · Cited by 14
Cognitive Flexibility or Moral Commitment? Evidence of Anticipated Belief DistortionPreprint
Saccardo, S., & Serra-García, M. (2020) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.3692918 · Cited by 12
Transformative Experimentation, Perspectival Diversity, and the Polycentric Liberal Order
Manor, A. R. (2021) · Res Publica · doi:10.1007/s11158-021-09528-x · Cited by 13
Locus of control and the preference for agency
Caliendo, M., Cobb‐Clark, D. A., Silva‐Goncalves, J., & Uhlendorff, A. (2024) · European Economic Review · doi:10.1016/j.euroecorev.2024.104737 · Cited by 12
Cadario, R., Li, Y., & Klesse, A.-K. (2025) · Appetite · doi:10.1016/j.appet.2025.107910 · Cited by 14
Metadata
- Authors
- Epley, N., & Gilovich, T.
- Affiliations
- Nicholas Epley is the John T. Keller Professor of Behavioral Science, University of Chicago, Booth School of Business, Chicago, Illinois.
- Cornell University (US)
- ORCID
- Gilovich, Thomas
- Venue
- Journal of Economic Perspectives
- Publisher
- American Economic Association
- Published
- 2016-08-01
- Volume
- 30
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 133-140
- ISSN
- 0895-3309 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2479768508
- Cited by
- 360
- References
- 21
- Citations by year
- 2026: 41 · 2025: 46 · 2024: 46 · 2023: 48 · 2022: 49 · 2021: 36 · 2020: 34 · 2019: 36 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 1
- FWCI
- 17.02
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- The Journal of Economic Perspectives (publishedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › General Decision Sciences › Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies
- Keywords
- motivated reasoning, motivated beliefs, belief formation, cognitive biases, evidence collection, memory retrieval, self-interest, confirmation bias
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review