Cited by 119Social and Intergroup PsychologyClimate Change Communication and PerceptionElectoral Systems and Political Participation

When and How Different Motives Can Drive Motivated Political Reasoning

Bayes, Robin, Druckman, James N., Goods, Avery, Molden, Daniel C.·2020·Political Psychology

Abstract

It is commonly assumed that the effectiveness of political messages depends on people's motivations. Yet, studies of politically motivated reasoning typically only consider what partisans generally might want to believe and do not separately examine the different types of motives that likely underlie these wants. The present research explores the roles of distinct types of motives in politically motivated thinking and identifies the conditions under which motivated reasoners are persuaded by political messages. Results of an experiment with a large, representative sample of Republicans show that manipulations inducing motivations for either (1) forming accurate impressions, (2) affirming moral values, or (3) affirming group identity each increased beliefs in and intentions to combat human‐induced climate change, but only when also paired with political messages that are congruent with the induced motivation. We also find no evidence of a backlash effect even when individuals are provided with clearly uncongenial information and a motivation to reject it. Overall, our findings make clear that understanding when and why motivated political reasoning occurs requires a more complete understanding of both which motivations might be active among a group of partisans and how these motivations resonate with the messaging they receive.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/pops.12663

Cites

66 of 66 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • It is often unclear what to target: identity, values, norms, etc.

    “More generally, it is often unclear what to target: identity, values, norms, etc. (Bayes et al., 2020).”

    From How to study democratic backsliding (2024) · cites this paper as Bayes et al., 2020

  • Partisans' antidemocratic attitudes and their support for partisan violence are correlated with their perceptions of how members of the other party would act.

    “Partisans' antidemocratic attitudes and their support for partisan violence are correlated with their perceptions of how members of the other party would act.26”

    From How to study democratic backsliding (2024) · cites this paper as [26]

  • In one experiment, Republicans who received a message indicating that a clear majority of fellow Republicans agreed that the climate is changing and are taking action to combat climate change were more likely to report believing in climate change and to have climate-friendly intentions than those who did not receive this message.

    “In one experiment, Republicans received a message indicating that a clear majority of fellow Republicans agreed that the climate is changing and are taking action to combat climate change. These individuals — relative to those who did not receive this message — were more likely to report believing in climate change and to have climate-friendly intentions323,324.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bayes, R., Druckman, J. N., Goods, A., & Molden, D. C.
Affiliations
Northwestern University (US)
Corresponding author
  • Druckman, James N.
  • Molden, Daniel C.
Venue
Political Psychology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2020-04-24
Volume
41
Issue
5
Pages
1031-1052
ISSN
  • 0162-895X (ISSN-L)
  • 1467-9221
OpenAlex
W3018387282
Cited by
119
References
66
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 20 · 2024: 19 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 29 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 7
FWCI
22.41
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Political Psychology (publishedVersion)
Funders
Northwestern University
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Climate Change Communication and Perception
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Electoral Systems and Political Participation
Keywords
motivated reasoning, political messages, message persuasion, partisanship, Republicans, climate change beliefs, moral values, group identity, backlash

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review