Cited by 133Family Dynamics and RelationshipsSocial Policies and FamilyGender, Labor, and Family Dynamics

Fertility and Family Policies in Central and Eastern Europe after 1990

Open access
Frejka, Tomas, Gietel-Basten, Stuart·2016·Comparative Population Studies

Abstract

This paper examines fertility and family policies in 15 Central and East European (CEE) countries to establish firstly, likely directions of cohort fertility trends for the coming decade; and secondly, to provide an overview and analysis of family policies in CEE countries, and to assess their impact on cohort fertility trends. Demographic analysis suggests that the cohort fertility decline of the 1960s cohorts is likely to continue at least among the 1970s birth cohorts; stagnation cannot be ruled out. Births that were postponed by women born in the 1970s were not being replaced in sufficient numbers for cohort fertility to increase in the foreseeable future, and shares of low parity women (childless and one child) were larger than shares of high parity women among the late 1960s cohorts than in older cohorts. Also, childbearing postponement which started in the 1990s is reflected in dramatic changes of childbearing age patterns. As period fertility rates have been increasing in the late 2000s throughout the region an impression of a fertility recovery has been created, however the findings of this project indicate that no such widespread childbearing recovery is underway.For the first time ever an overview and analysis of CEE family policies is conceptualized in this paper. It demonstrates that fertility trends and family policies are a matter of serious concern throughout the region. The following family policy types have been identified: comprehensive family policy model; pro-natalist policies model; temporary male bread-winner model; and conventional family policies model. The majority of family policies in CEE countries suffer from a variety of shortcomings that impede them from generating enhanced family welfare and from providing conditions for cohort fertility to increase. The likely further decline of cohort fertility, or its stagnation, may entail long-term demographic as well as other societal consequences, such as continuous declines in total population numbers, changes in age structures, as well as implications for health and social security costs.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.12765/cpos-2016-03

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In some countries and periods, family policies have pursued pronatalist objectives, that is, the promotion of larger families.

    “In some countries, and at various periods of time, family policies have also pursued pronatalist objectives, that is, the promotion of larger families.”

    From Family Policies in Low Fertility Countries: Evidence and Reflections (2025) · cites this paper as Frejka and Gietel-Basten 2016

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 21

  1. Albanese, Patrizia 2006: Mothers of the Nation: Women, Families, and Nationalism in Twentieth-Century Europe. Toronto: University of Toronto Press Inc.
  2. Basten, Stuart; Frejka, Tomas 2015: Fertility and Family Policies in Central and Eastern Europe. Barnett Papers in Social Research 15-01, Department of Social Policy and Intervention: University of Oxford.
  3. Berelson, Bernard (Ed.) 1974: Population Policy in Developed Countries. New York: McGraw-Hill.
  4. Billingsley, Sunnee 2010: The Post-communist Fertility Puzzle. In: Population Research and Policy Review 29,2: 193-231 [doi: 10.1007/s11113-009-9136-7]. · DOI
  5. Bongaarts, John 1978: A Framework for Analyzing the Proximate Determinants of Fertil- ity. In: Population and Development Review 4,1: 105-132.
  6. David, Henry P. (Ed.) 1999: From Abortion to Contraception: A Resource to Public Poli- cies and Reproductive Behaviour in Central and Eastern Europe from 1917 to Present. Westport, Connecticut: Greenwood Press.
  7. David, Henry P.; McIntyre, Robert J. 1981: Reproductive Behavior: Central and Eastern European Experience. New York: Springer Publishing Company
  8. Ekiert, Grzegorz; Hanson, Stephen E. (Eds.) 2003: Capitalism and Democracy in Central and Eastern Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  9. Ekiert, Grzegorz; Kubik, Jan; Vachudova, Milada Anna 2007: Democracy in the Post- Communist World: An Unending Quest? In: East European Politics and Society 21,1:7- 30 [doi: 10.1177/0888325406297170]. · DOI
  10. Washington, D.C. Frejka, Tomas 2008: Determinants of Family Formation and Childbearing during the So- cietal Transition in Central and Eastern Europe. In: Demographic Research 19,7: 139- 170 [doi: 10.4054/DemRes.2008.19.7. · DOI
  11. Frejka, Tomas; Zakharov, Sergei 2013: The Apparent Failure of Russia's Pronatalist Fam- ily Policies. In: Population and Development Review 39,4: 635-647 [doi: 10.1111/j.1728- 4457.2013.00631.x]. · DOI · Paper page
  12. Kohler, Hans-Peter; Billari, Francesco C.; Ortega, José Antonio 2002: The Emergence of Lowest-low Fertility in Europe during the 1990s. In: Population and Development Review 28,4: 641-680 [10.1111/j.1728-4457.2002.00641.x]. · DOI · Paper page
  13. Macura, Miloslav 2000: Fertility Decline in the Transition Economies, 1989-1998: Eco- nomic and social factors revisited. In: Economic Survey of Europe 2000,1: 189-205. New York/Geneva: Economic Commission for Europe, United Nations.
  14. Myrskylä, Mikko; Goldstein, Joshua R.; Cheng, Yen-hsin Alice 2013: New Cohort Fertil- ity Forecasts for the Developed World. In: Population and Development Review 39,1: 31-56 [doi: 10.1111/j.1728-4457.2013.00572.x]. · DOI · Paper page
  15. Rybakovsky, Leonid L. 2012 Demografi cheskiye vyzovi: Chto ozhidayet Rossiyu? (De- mographic Challenges: What can Russia Expect?), Sotsiologicheskiye Issledo- vaniya 2012,8: 49-60. [http://www.isras.ru/fi les/File/Socis/2012_8/Rybakovskiy.pdf, 25.05.2012].
  16. Sobotka, Tomáš 2004: Postponement of Childbearing and Low Fertility in Europe. {PhD Thesis}. University of Groningen. Amsterdam: Dutch University Press.
  17. Sobotka, Tomáš et al. 2011: Postponement and Recuperation in Cohort Fertility: Aus- tria, Germany and Switzerland in a European Context. In: Comparative Population Studies -Zeitschrift für Bevölkerungswissenschaft 36,2-3: 417-452 [doi: 10.4232/10. CPoS-2011-10en]. · DOI
  18. Spéder, Zsolt; Kamarás, Ferenc 2008: Hungary: Secular fertility Decline with Distinct Period Fluctuations. In: Demographic Research 19,18: 599-664 [doi: 10.4054/Dem- Res.2008.19.18. Stock, Günter et al. [Eds.] 2013: Zukunft mit Kindern -Fertilität und Gesellschaftliche Entwicklung in Deutschland, Österreich und der Schweiz [A Future with Children: Fer- tility and Development of Society in Germany, Austria, and Switzerland]. Frankfurt/ New York: Campus Verlag. · DOI
  19. Stropnik, Nada; Šircelj, Milivoja 2008: Slovenia: Generous Family Policy without Evi- dence of any Fertility Impact. In: Demographic Research 19,26: 1019-1058 [doi: 10.4054/DemRes.2008.19.26. Thévenon, Olivier 2011: Family Policies in OECD Countries: A Comparative Analy- sis. In: Population and Development Review 37,1: 57-87 [doi: 10.1111/j.1728- 4457.2011.00390.x]. · DOI
  20. Toulemon, Laurent; Pailhé, Ariane; Rossier, Clémentine 2008: France: High and Stable Fertility. In: Demographic Research 19,16: 503-555 [doi: 10.4054/DemRes.2008.19. · DOI
  21. Zakharov, Sergei 1999: Fertility, Nuptiality, and Family Planning in Russia: Problems and Prospects. In: Demko, George J.; Ioffe, Grigory; Zaionchkovskaya, Zhanna [Eds.]: Pop- ulation under Duress: the Geodemography of post-Soviet Russia. Boulder-Oxford: Westview Press: 41-58. Date of submission: 21.10.2015 Date of acceptance: 29.03.2016

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Frejka, T., & Gietel-Basten, S.
Venue
Comparative Population Studies
Published
2016-06-30
Volume
41
Issue
1
Pages
3-56
ISSN
  • 1869-8980 (ISSN-L)
  • 1869-8999
OpenAlex
W4255398125
Cited by
133
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 22 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 2 · 2013: 1
FWCI
31.85
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Comparative Population Studies (publishedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • ePubWU Institutional Repository (Vienna University of Economics and Business) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Electronic Kyiv-Mohyla Academy Institutional Repository (National University of Kyiv-Mohyla Academy) (submittedVersion)
  • Rare & Special e-Zone (The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology) (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Social Science Open Access Repository (GESIS – Leibniz Institute for the Social Sciences) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Bundesinstitut für Bevolkerungsforschung (CPoS) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • St Andrews Research Repository (St Andrews Research Repository) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Vytautas Magnus University (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Bundesinstitut für Bevolkerungsforschung (CPoS)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Demography › Family Dynamics and Relationships
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social Policies and Family
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics
Keywords
fertility trends, family policy, Central and Eastern Europe, delayed childbearing, reproductive age, pronatalist policy, male breadwinner model, fertility restoration, low parity, population decline, age structure, social security costs, post-communist transition

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review