Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 406

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Deploying Common Systems Globally: The Dynamics of Control

Kirsch, Laurie J.·2004·Information Systems Research

Abstract

In today's competitive environment, an increasing number of firms are building common information systems, which will be deployed globally, to support their strategic globalization initiatives. These systems are designed to meet the requirements of a diverse set of stakeholders with different business needs, priorities, and objectives. One managerial tool for addressing and reconciling such differences is control, which encompasses all attempts to motivate individuals to act in a manner that is consistent with organizational objectives. This paper examines two research questions. How do stakeholders exercise control during different phases of large IS projects? Why do control choices change across project phases? Results of two case studies suggest control is exercised differently for each phase. During the initial phase of a project, control is exercised as “collective sensemaking,” in which both IS and business stakeholders utilize mostly informal mechanisms of control. During development, “technical winnowing” of mechanisms occurs such that control is vested primarily in IS managers, who structure hierarchical relationships with subordinates and who rely extensively on formal control mechanisms. Both IS and business stakeholders employ formal and informal mechanisms during implementation to exercise control as “collaborative coordinating.” The results also suggest that changes in control choices from one project phase to another are triggered by factors in the project, stakeholder, and global contexts. As factors change across phases, so too do control choices. Further, problems that surface in one project phase trigger changes to controls in subsequent phases. These findings are integrated into a model of the dynamics of control. Implications of these results are drawn, and directions for future research are suggested.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1287/isre.1040.0036

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 37

  1. Ambrosio J., 1996, Information Technology in a Global Business Environment, 303
  2. 10.1016/0361-3682(88)90016-5 · DOI
  3. 10.1287/orsc.12.1.19.10119 · DOI
  4. Carmel E., 1999, Global Software Teams: Collaborating Across Borders and Time Zones
  5. 10.1287/isre.14.3.291.16563 · DOI · Paper page
  6. 10.2307/249722 · DOI
  7. Collins R. W., 1999, Crossing Boundaries: The Deployment of Global IT Solutions
  8. Crisp C. B., 2002, Acad. Management Annual Meeting
  9. 10.2307/259291 · DOI · Paper page
  10. 10.1287/mnsc.31.2.134 · DOI
  11. 10.1287/mnsc.40.4.440 · DOI · Paper page
  12. 10.1287/mnsc.38.6.757 · DOI · Paper page
  13. 10.2307/249433 · DOI
  14. 10.1177/002224298805200303 · DOI · Paper page
  15. 10.1080/07421222.1991.11517901 · DOI
  16. 10.1016/S0378-7206(00)00050-1 · DOI
  17. 10.1287/orsc.7.1.1 · DOI
  18. 10.1287/isre.8.3.215 · DOI · Paper page
  19. 10.1287/mnsc.48.4.484.204 · DOI · Paper page
  20. 10.1016/S0963-8687(98)00031-6 · DOI
  21. 10.1016/S0378-7206(00)00070-7 · DOI
  22. 10.2307/259349 · DOI · Paper page
  23. Mähring M. IT project governance. (2002) . Ph.D. dissertation, Stockholm School of Economics, Sweden
  24. 10.2307/249561 · DOI
  25. Miles M. B., 1994, Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook
  26. 10.1080/07421222.2003.11045774 · DOI
  27. O'Brien J. A., Management Information Systems: Managing Information Technology in the Business Enterprise
  28. 10.2307/255753 · DOI
  29. 10.1287/mnsc.25.9.833 · DOI · Paper page
  30. 10.2307/2392231 · DOI · Paper page
  31. 10.5465/amr.1978.4294895 · DOI · Paper page
  32. 10.1287/mnsc.35.10.1172 · DOI · Paper page
  33. 10.1111/j.1540-5915.2000.tb01628.x · DOI
  34. 10.2307/256375 · DOI · Paper page
  35. Strauss A., 1990, Basics of Qualitative Research: Grounded Theory Procedures and Techniques
  36. 10.2307/249631 · DOI
  37. 10.1016/S0361-3682(97)00030-5 · DOI

Cited by

See all 406

Metadata

Authors
Kirsch, L. J.
Venue
Information Systems Research
Published
2004-12
Volume
15
Issue
4
Pages
374-395
ISSN
  • 1047-7047 (ISSN-L)
  • 1526-5536
OpenAlex
W2084256530
Cited by
406
References
4
FWCI
39.26
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.