The DOI matches its Crossref record; 9 of the 9 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
IS Application Capabilities and Relational Value in Interfirm Partnerships
Abstract
This study examines how capabilities of information systems (IS) applications deployed in the context of interfirm relationships contribute to business performance. We propose that these capabilities augment the relational value that a firm derives from its business partners—channel partners and customer enterprises—in the context of the distribution channel. Two cospecialized relational assets are considered as key to realization of relational value—knowledge sharing and process coupling. Hypotheses linking two IS capabilities (IS flexibility and IS integration) to the relational asset dimensions, and ultimately to firm performance, are proposed. The research model is tested based on data collected through a survey of business units of enterprises embedded in customer and channel partner ties in the high-tech and financial services industries. We find that IS integration with channel partners and customers contributes to both knowledge sharing and process coupling with both types of enterprise partners, whereas IS flexibility is a foundational capability that indirectly contributes to value creation in interfirm relationships by enabling greater IS integration with partner firms. We find that two types of relational assets are significantly associated with business performance—knowledge sharing with channel partners and process coupling with customers—pointing to underlying mechanisms that differentially leverage resources of different types of channel partners. Implications for theory development and practice based on these findings are proposed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Self-Reports in Organizational Research: Problems and Prospects
Podsakoff, P. M., & Organ, D. W. (1986) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/014920638601200408 · Cited by 17,102
Modern Methods for Business Research
(1998) · doi:10.4324/9781410604385 · Cited by 6,534
Grant, R. M. (1996) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.7.4.375 · Cited by 5,649
Bharadwaj, A. S. (2000) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/3250983 · Cited by 5,042
Dyadic Business Relationships within a Business Network Context
Anderson, J. C., Håkansson, H., & Johanson, J. (1994) · Journal of Marketing · doi:10.2307/1251912 · Cited by 2,370
Determinants of Coordination Modes within Organizations
Ven, A. H. V. D., Delbecq, A. L., & Koenig, R. (1976) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.2307/2094477 · Cited by 1,979
Malhotra, A., Gosain, S., & El Sawy, O. A. (2005) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/25148671 · Cited by 994
Self-citationSiggelkow, N., & Levinthal, D. A. (2003) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.14.6.650.24870 · Cited by 953
Balancing Search and Stability: Interdependencies Among Elements of Organizational Design
Rivkin, J. W., & Siggelkow, N. (2003) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.49.3.290.12740 · Cited by 900
Cited by
Digital Business Strategy: Toward a Next Generation of Insights
Bharadwaj, A., El Sawy, O. A., Pavlou, P. A., & Venkatraman, N. (2013) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.25300/misq/2013/37:2.3 · Cited by 4,392
Benitez, J., Henseler, J., Castillo, A., & Schuberth, F. (2020) · Information & Management · doi:10.1016/j.im.2019.05.003 · Cited by 1,788
Mikalef, P., & Pateli, A. (2017) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2016.09.004 · Cited by 1,038
Assessing business value of big data analytics in European firms
Côrte-Real, N., Oliveira, T., & Ruivo, P. (2017) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2016.08.011 · Cited by 538
Côrte-Real, N., Ruivo, P., & Oliveira, T. (2020) · Information & Management · doi:10.1016/j.im.2019.01.003 · Cited by 306
Metadata
- Authors
- Saraf, N., Langdon, C. S., & Gosain, S.
- Venue
- Information Systems Research
- Published
- 2007-09
- Volume
- 18
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 320-339
- ISSN
- 1047-7047 (ISSN-L)
- 1526-5536
- OpenAlex
- W2142333951
- Cited by
- 422
- References
- 9
- FWCI
- 16.62
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.