The DOI matches its Crossref record; 19 of the 19 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Research Report: Richness Versus Parsimony in Modeling Technology Adoption Decisions—Understanding Merchant Adoption of a Smart Card-Based Payment System
Abstract
The Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) has received considerable research attention in the IS field over the past decade, placing an emphasis on the roles played by perceived ease-of-use and perceived usefulness in influencing technology adoption decisions. Meanwhile, alternative sets of antecedents to adoption have received less attention. In this paper, sets of antecedent constructs drawn from both TAM and the Perceived Characteristics of Innovating (PCI) inventory are tested and subsequently compared with one another. The comparison is done in the context of a large-scale market trial of a smart card-based electronic payment system being evaluated by a group of retailers and merchants. The PCI set of antecedents explains substantially more variance than does TAM, while also providing managers with more detailed information regarding the antecedents driving technology innovation adoption.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Evaluating Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error
Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.2307/3151312 · Cited by 109,314
Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error
Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.1177/002224378101800104 · Cited by 109,190
The theory of planned behavior
Ajzen, I. (1991) · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes · doi:10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-t · Cited by 90,587
Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology
Davis, F. D. (1989) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/249008 · Cited by 68,483
Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change
Bandura, A. (1977) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.84.2.191 · Cited by 43,925
Self-efficacy mechanism in human agency
Bandura, A. (1982) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.37.2.122 · Cited by 15,975
Estimating Nonresponse Bias in Mail Surveys
Armstrong, J. S., & Overton, T. S. (1977) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.2307/3150783 · Cited by 12,222
Estimating nonresponse bias in mail surveys
Armstrong, J. S., & Overton, T. S. (1977) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.1177/002224377701400320 · Cited by 10,390
Moore, G. C., & Benbasat, I. (1991) · Information Systems Research · doi:10.1287/isre.2.3.192 · Cited by 9,150
Understanding information technology usage: a test of competing models
Taylor, S., & Todd, P. A. (1995) · Information Systems Research · doi:10.1287/isre.6.2.144 · Cited by 8,815
Cited by
User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward A Unified View1
Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., & Davis, F. D. (2003) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/30036540 · Cited by 45,035
A meta-analysis of the technology acceptance model
King, W. R., & He, J. (2006) · Information & Management · doi:10.1016/j.im.2006.05.003 · Cited by 2,906
A Theoretical Integration of User Satisfaction and Technology Acceptance
Wixom, B. H., & Todd, P. A. (2005) · Information Systems Research · doi:10.1287/isre.1050.0042 · Cited by 2,835
The Technology Acceptance Model: Past, Present, and Future
Lee, Y., Kozar, K. A., & Larsen, K. R. T. (2003) · Communications of the Association for Information Systems · doi:10.17705/1cais.01250 · Cited by 2,572
Technology acceptance model: a literature review from 1986 to 2013
Marangunić, N., & Granić, A. (2015) · Universal Access in the Information Society · doi:10.1007/s10209-014-0348-1 · Cited by 2,458
Wu, J.-H., & Wang, S.-C. (2005) · Information & Management · doi:10.1016/j.im.2004.07.001 · Cited by 2,284
The utilization of e-government services: citizen trust, innovation and acceptance factors
Carter, L., & Bélanger, F. (2005) · Information Systems Journal · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2575.2005.00183.x · Cited by 2,207
A Review of the Predictors, Linkages, and Biases in IT Innovation Adoption Research
Jeyaraj, A., Rottman, J. W., & Lacity, M. C. (2006) · Journal of Information Technology · doi:10.1057/palgrave.jit.2000056 · Cited by 1,136
Developing and validating a service robot integration willingness scale
Lu, L., Cai, R., & Gursoy, D. (2019) · International Journal of Hospitality Management · doi:10.1016/j.ijhm.2019.01.005 · Cited by 1,013
Dead Or Alive? The Development, Trajectory And Future Of Technology Adoption Research.
University of Arkansas, Venkatesh, V., Davis, F., University of Arkansas, Morris, M., & University of Virginia (2007) · Journal of the Association for Information Systems · doi:10.17705/1jais.00120 · Cited by 789
Technology acceptance: a meta‐analysis of the TAM: Part 1
Yousafzai, S. Y., Foxall, G. R., & Pallister, J. G. (2007) · Journal of Modelling in Management · doi:10.1108/17465660710834453 · Cited by 624
An empirical validation of a unified model of electronic government adoption (UMEGA)
Dwivedi, Y. K., Rana, N. P., Janssen, M., Lal, B., Williams, M. D., & Clement, M. (2017) · Government Information Quarterly · doi:10.1016/j.giq.2017.03.001 · Cited by 622
A Framework and Guidelines for Context-Specific Theorizing in Information Systems Research
Hong, W., Chan, F. K. Y., Thong, J. Y. L., Chasalow, L. C., & Dhillon, G. (2014) · Information Systems Research · doi:10.1287/isre.2013.0501 · Cited by 609
Mobile computing acceptance factors in the healthcare industry: a structural equation model
Wu, J.-H., Wang, S.-C., & Lin, L.-M. (2007) · International Journal of Medical Informatics · doi:10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2006.06.006 · Cited by 603
Using Social Network Sites: The Effects of Playfulness, Critical Mass and Trust in a Hedonic Context
Sledgianowski, D., & Kulviwat, S. (2009) · Journal of Computer Information Systems · doi:10.1080/08874417.2009.11645342 · Cited by 568
Consumer behavior in online game communities: A motivational factor perspective
Hsu, C.-L., & Lu, H.-P. (2007) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2005.09.001 · Cited by 494
Toward a unified theory of consumer acceptance technology
Kulviwat, S., Bruner II, G. C., Kumar, A., Nasco, S. A., & Clark, T. (2007) · Psychology & Marketing · doi:10.1002/mar.20196 · Cited by 486
A conceptual model for the process of IT innovation adoption in organizations
Hameed, M. A., Counsell, S., & Swift, S. (2012) · Journal of Engineering and Technology Management · doi:10.1016/j.jengtecman.2012.03.007 · Cited by 442
Citizens' adoption of an electronic government system: towards a unified view
Rana, N. P., Dwivedi, Y. K., Lal, B., Williams, M. D., & Clement, M. (2017) · Information Systems Frontiers · doi:10.1007/s10796-015-9613-y · Cited by 373
Senior citizens’ acceptance of information systems: A study in the context of e-government services
Phang, C. W., Sutanto, J., Kankanhalli, A., Li, Y., Tan, B. C. Y., & Teo, H.-H. (2006) · IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management · doi:10.1109/tem.2006.883710 · Cited by 331
Pham, T.-T. T., & Ho, J. C. (2015) · Technology in Society · doi:10.1016/j.techsoc.2015.05.004 · Cited by 278
Adoption of online public grievance redressal system in India: toward developing a unified view
Rana, N. P., Dwivedi, Y. K., Williams, M. D., & Weerakkody, V. (2016) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2016.02.019 · Cited by 274
Wu, J.-H., Shen, W.-S., Lin, L.-M., Greenes, R. A., & Bates, D. W. (2007) · International Journal for Quality in Health Care · doi:10.1093/intqhc/mzm074 · Cited by 235
E-government diffusion: a comparison of adoption constructs
Carter, L. (2008) · Transforming Government: People, Process and Policy · doi:10.1108/17506160810902167 · Cited by 112
Customization and real time information access in integrated eBusiness supply chain relationships
Klein, R. (2007) · Journal of Operations Management · doi:10.1016/j.jom.2007.03.001 · Cited by 108
Yeow, P. H. P., & Loo, W. H. (2009) · International Journal of Electronic Government Research · doi:10.4018/jegr.2009040103 · Cited by 53
Metadata
- Authors
- Plouffe, C. R., Hulland, J. S., & Vandenbosch, M.
- Venue
- Information Systems Research
- Published
- 2001-06
- Volume
- 12
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 208-222
- ISSN
- 1047-7047 (ISSN-L)
- 1526-5536
- OpenAlex
- W2085666545
- Cited by
- 632
- References
- 19
- FWCI
- 33.79
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
