Cited by 53Technology Adoption and User BehaviourE-Government and Public ServicesHealth, Technology, Consumer Behavior

Acceptability of ATM and Transit Applications Embedded in Multipurpose Smart Identity Card: An Exploratory Study in Malaysia

Yeow, Paul H.P., Loo, W.H.·2009·International Journal of Electronic Government Research

Abstract

The study investigates the acceptance of automated teller machine (ATM) and transit applications (Touch ‘n Go) embedded in Malaysian multipurpose smart identity card named as MyKad. A research framework was developed based on UTAUT model. Five hundred questionnaires were distributed. The data were analyzed using descriptive and inferential statistics. The results show that Malaysians do not have strong intentions of using the two applications due lack of understanding of the benefits and the efforts needed to use the applications. In addition, they have the misconception that there are insufficient facilities to support the usage of the applications. Consequently, there is no social support to use the applications. Moreover, they perceive that the applications do not have credibility. Besides, they are unsure if they use of the applications would cause anxieties. Recommendations were given to increase the acceptance and to resolve the issues.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4018/jegr.2009040103

Cites

41 of 41 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Yeow, P. H. P., & Loo, W. H.
Affiliations
Multimedia University (MY)
Venue
International Journal of Electronic Government Research
Published
2009-04-01
Volume
5
Issue
2
Pages
37-56
ISSN
  • 1548-3886 (ISSN-L)
  • 1548-3894
OpenAlex
W2063031218
Cited by
53
References
41
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 10
FWCI
11.52
Type
journal article
Language
ng
Open access
closed
Locations
  • International Journal of Electronic Government Research (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Technology Adoption and User Behaviour
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › E-Government and Public Services
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Health, Technology, Consumer Behavior
Keywords
technology acceptance, UTAUT, user intention, perceived effort, perceived social support, perceived credibility, perceived anxiety

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review