Cited by 1,230Decision-Making and Behavioral EconomicsForecasting Techniques and ApplicationsHuman-Automation Interaction and Safety

The DOI matches its Crossref record, with a small difference in title or year; 27 of the 27 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Overcoming Algorithm Aversion: People Will Use Imperfect Algorithms If They Can (Even Slightly) Modify Them

Open access

Dietvorst, Berkeley J., Simmons, Joseph P., Massey, Cade·2018·Management Science

DOI 10.1287/mnsc.2016.2643

Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Although evidence-based algorithms consistently outperform human forecasters, people often fail to use them after learning that they are imperfect, a phenomenon known as algorithm aversion. In this paper, we present three studies investigating how to reduce algorithm aversion. In incentivized forecasting tasks, participants chose between using their own forecasts or those of an algorithm that was built by experts. Participants were considerably more likely to choose to use an imperfect algorithm when they could modify its forecasts, and they performed better as a result. Notably, the preference for modifiable algorithms held even when participants were severely restricted in the modifications they could make (Studies 1–3). In fact, our results suggest that participants’ preference for modifiable algorithms was indicative of a desire for some control over the forecasting outcome, and not for a desire for greater control over the forecasting outcome, as participants’ preference for modifiable algorithms was relatively insensitive to the magnitude of the modifications they were able to make (Study 2). Additionally, we found that giving participants the freedom to modify an imperfect algorithm made them feel more satisfied with the forecasting process, more likely to believe that the algorithm was superior, and more likely to choose to use an algorithm to make subsequent forecasts (Study 3). This research suggests that one can reduce algorithm aversion by giving people some contr…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1287/mnsc.2016.2643

Cites

27 of 27 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models
Preacher, K. J., & Hayes, A. F. (2008) · Behavior Research Methods · doi:10.3758/brm.40.3.879 · Cited by 34,117 · cited 1×
“We then used Preacher and Hayes’s (2008) bootstrapping procedure”
Method
Algorithm aversion: People erroneously avoid algorithms after seeing them err.
Dietvorst, B. J., Simmons, J. P., & Massey, C. (2015) · Journal of Experimental Psychology: General · doi:10.1037/xge0000033 · Cited by 3,232 · cited 6×
“Dietvorst, Simmons, and Massey (2015) gave participants the choice of either exclusively using an algorithm’s forecasts or exclusively using their own forecasts during an incentivized forecasting task, and manipulated whether participants had experience with the algorithm prior to making this…”
BackgroundResultInfluentialSelf-citation
“Clinical versus Actuarial Judgment.”
Dawes, R. M., Faust, D., & Meehl, P. E. (1989) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.2648573 · Cited by 2,298
Clinical versus statistical prediction: A theoretical analysis and a review of the evidence.
Meehl, P. E. (1954) · University of Minnesota Press eBooks · doi:10.1037/11281-000 · Cited by 2,227
The robust beauty of improper linear models in decision making.
Dawes, R. M. (1979) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.34.7.571 · Cited by 2,046
Clinical versus mechanical prediction: a meta-analysis
Grove, W. M., Zald, D. H., Lebow, B. S., Snitz, B. E., & Nelson, C. (2000) · Psychological Assessment · doi:10.1037/1040-3590.12.1.19 · Cited by 1,640 · cited 2×
“…of recidivism (Thompson, 1952; Wormith & Goldstone, 1984), medical diagnoses (Adams et al., 1986; Beck et al., 2011; Dawes, Faust, & Meehl, 1989; Grove et al., 2000), demand for products (Schweitzer & Cachon, 2000), and so on (for reviews see Dawes et al., 1989; Grove et al., 2000; Meehl, 1954).”
Background
Decision Bias in the Newsvendor Problem with a Known Demand Distribution: Experimental Evidence
Schweitzer, M. E., & Cachon, G. P. (2000) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.46.3.404.12070 · Cited by 1,073 · cited 2×
“…of recidivism (Thompson, 1952; Wormith & Goldstone, 1984), medical diagnoses (Adams et al., 1986; Beck et al., 2011; Dawes, Faust, & Meehl, 1989; Grove et al., 2000), demand for products (Schweitzer & Cachon, 2000), and so on (for reviews see Dawes et al., 1989; Grove et al., 2000; Meehl, 1954).”
Background
Advice taking and decision-making: An integrative literature review, and implications for the organizational sciences
Bonaccio, S., & Dalal, R. S. (2006) · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes · doi:10.1016/j.obhdp.2006.07.001 · Cited by 1,011 · cited 1×
“For example, people often give less weight to other people’s advice than they should when left to their own devices (see Bonaccio & Dalal, 2006); however, it is possible that people will commit to using another person’s advice in a constrained manner.”
Background
Systematic Analysis of Breast Cancer Morphology Uncovers Stromal Features Associated with Survival
Beck, A. H., Sangoi, A. R., Leung, S. C. Y., Marinelli, R. J., Nielsen, T. O., van de Vijver, M. J., West, R. B., van de Rijn, M., & Koller, D. (2011) · Science Translational Medicine · doi:10.1126/scitranslmed.3002564 · Cited by 780 · cited 1×
“…(Dawes, 1971; Dawes, 1979), prisoners’ likelihood of recidivism (Thompson, 1952; Wormith & Goldstone, 1984), medical diagnoses (Adams et al., 1986; Beck et al., 2011; Dawes, Faust, & Meehl, 1989; Grove et al., 2000), demand for products (Schweitzer & Cachon, 2000), and so on (for reviews see…”
Forecasting and Planning: An Evaluation
Hogarth, R. M., & Makridakis, S. (1981) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.27.2.115 · Cited by 614 · cited 2×
“…people’s attempts to adjust algorithmic forecasts often make them worse (e.g. Carbone, Andersen, Corriveau, & Corson, 1983; Goodwin & Fildes, 1999; Hogarth & Makridakis, 1981; Lim & O'Connor, 1995; Willemain, 1991), the benefits associated with getting people to use the algorithm may outweigh the…”
Background

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 27 references

Sorted by citations

Items 401–500 of 1,002

People Perceive Algorithmic Assessments as Less Fair and Trustworthy Than Identical Human Assessments
Mok, L., Nanda, S., & Anderson, A. (2023) · Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1145/3610100 · Cited by 22
Crowdsourcing – A Step Towards Advanced Machine Learning
Abhigna, B. S., Soni, N., & Dixit, S. (2018) · Procedia Computer Science · doi:10.1016/j.procs.2018.05.062 · Cited by 22
Are You Willing to Pay for Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI) Products? Disentangling the Disclosure Effects and the Mediating Role of Psychological Value
Sikhondze, B., Ye, H. J., Wang, W., Zhan, X., & Santhanam, R. (2025) · Journal of Management Information Systems · doi:10.1080/07421222.2025.2487314 · Cited by 18
Integrating artificial intelligence into team decision‐making: Toward a theory of AI–human team effectiveness
Carter, W., & Wynne, K. T. (2024) · European Management Review · doi:10.1111/emre.12685 · Cited by 31
AI trust divide: How recruiter-candidate roles shape tourism personnel decision-making
Hu, J., Huang, G. I., Wong, I. A., & Wan, L. C. (2024) · Annals of Tourism Research · doi:10.1016/j.annals.2024.103860 · Cited by 18
Algorithmic pricing: Implications for marketing strategy and regulation
Spann, M., Bertini, M., Koenigsberg, O., Zeithammer, R., Aparicio, D., Chen, Y., Fantini, F., Jin, G. Z., Morwitz, V. G., Leszczyc, P. T. L. P., et al. (2025) · International Journal of Research in Marketing · doi:10.1016/j.ijresmar.2025.05.001 · Cited by 18
(Generative) AI in Financial Economics
Mo, H., & Ouyang, S. (2025) · Journal of Chinese Economic and Business Studies · doi:10.1080/14765284.2025.2569006 · Cited by 32
Algorithmic discrimination causes less desire for moral punishment than human discrimination
Xu, L., Yu, F., & Peng, K. (2022) · Acta Psychologica Sinica · doi:10.3724/sp.j.1041.2022.01076 · Cited by 18
Humanizing Chatbots for Interactive Marketing
Tsai, W. S., & Chuan, C. (2023) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-14961-0_12 · Cited by 17
Incorporating experts’ judgment into machine learning models
Park, H., Megahed, A., Yin, P., Ong, Y. J., Mahajan, P., & Pei, G. (2023) · Expert Systems with Applications · doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2023.120118 · Cited by 19
Overcoming the blockchain technology credibility gap
Mazzù, M. F., Pozharliev, R., Andria, A., & Baccelloni, A. (2023) · Psychology and Marketing · doi:10.1002/mar.21855 · Cited by 19
Interfaces, Interactions, Time, and the Frontline Nexus: Foundational Constructs and Focus for the Field of Organizational Frontlines
Singh, J., & Bridge, R. (2023) · Journal of services research · doi:10.1177/10946705231177385 · Cited by 22
Deposit AI as the “invisible hand” to make the resale easier: A moderated mediation model
Peng, L., Luo, M., & Guo, Y. (2023) · Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services · doi:10.1016/j.jretconser.2023.103480 · Cited by 19
Reducing Kidney Discard With Artificial Intelligence Decision Support: the Need for a Transdisciplinary Systems Approach
Threlkeld, R., Ashiku, L., Canfield, C., Shank, D. B., Schnitzler, M., Lentine, K., Axelrod, D., Battineni, A. C. R., Randall, H., & Dagli, C. (2021) · Current Transplantation Reports · doi:10.1007/s40472-021-00351-0 · Cited by 12
Public’s views of risk assessment algorithms and pretrial decision making
Scurich, N., & Krauss, D. A. (2020) · Psychology, Public Policy, and Law · doi:10.1037/law0000219 · Cited by 17
Algorithm aversion is too often presented as though it were non-compensatory: A reply to Longoni et al. (2020)
Pezzo, M. V., & Beckstead, J. W. (2020) · Judgment and Decision Making · doi:10.1017/s1930297500007245 · Cited by 17
Augmenting Investment Decisions with Robo-AdvicePreprint
Milo Bianchi, Y., & Brière, M. (2021) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.3751620 · Cited by 17
It just would not work for me: perceived preference heterogeneity and consumer response to AI-driven product recommendations
Sun, L., Tang, Y., & Ma, X. (2025) · European Journal of Marketing · doi:10.1108/ejm-02-2023-0082 · Cited by 22
Design principles for text-to-image generative artificial intelligence creativity support tools for visual design
Herath, S., Bashardoust, A., Bole, Y., & Shrestha, Y. R. (2026) · European Journal of Information Systems · doi:10.1080/0960085x.2026.2616042 · Cited by 16
Bridging awareness and resistance: Using algorithmic knowledge against controversial content
Obreja, D. M. (2024) · Big Data & Society · doi:10.1177/20539517241296046 · Cited by 19
An interdisciplinary perspective on AI-supported decision making in medicine
Ammeling, J., Aubreville, M., Fritz, A., Kießig, A., Krügel, S., & Uhl, M. (2024) · Technology in Society · doi:10.1016/j.techsoc.2024.102791 · Cited by 20
Human-Algorithm Collaboration in Gig Work: The Role of Experience, Skill Level, and Task Complexity
Knight, B., Mitrofanov, D., & Netessine, S. (2026) · Information Systems Research · doi:10.1287/isre.2024.1664 · Cited by 19
The Evaluation of the Black Box Problem for AI-Based Recommendations: An Interview-Based Study
Ochmann, J., Zilker, S., & Laumer, S. (2021) · Lecture notes in information systems and organisation · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-86797-3_16 · Cited by 18
Do Robo-Advisors Make Us Better Investors?Preprint
Back, C., Morana, S., & Spann, M. (2021) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.3777387 · Cited by 16
Find the Good. Seek the Unity: A Hidden Markov Model of Human-AI Delegation Dynamics
Liu, J., Yue, W. T., Leung, A. C. M., & Zhang, X. (2022) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.25300/misq/2024/18232 · Cited by 16
A Survey of AI Reliance
Eckhardt, S., Kühl, N., Dolata, M., & Schwabe, G. (2025) · ACM Computing Surveys · doi:10.1145/3776528 · Cited by 38
OM Forum—Supply Chain Management in the AI Era: A Vision Statement from the Operations Management Community
Cohen, M. C., Dai, T., Perakis, G., Agrawal, N., Allon, G., Boute, R. N., Cachon, G. P., Chen, Z., Cohen, M., Cristian, R., et al. (2026) · Manufacturing & Service Operations Management · doi:10.1287/msom.2025.1065 · Cited by 19
The autonomy‐validity dilemma in mechanical prediction procedures: The quest for a compromise
Neumann, M., Niessen, A. S. M., Tendeiro, J. N., & Meijer, R. R. (2021) · Journal of Behavioral Decision Making · doi:10.1002/bdm.2270 · Cited by 16
Mind the gap between research and practice in operations management
Chen, X., Deng, T., Shen, Z. M., & Yu, Y. F. (2022) · IISE Transactions · doi:10.1080/24725854.2022.2046893 · Cited by 17
Human-algorithm interaction: Algorithmic pricing in hybrid laboratory markets
Normann, H., & Sternberg, M. (2022) · European Economic Review · doi:10.1016/j.euroecorev.2022.104347 · Cited by 17
Human control redressed: Comparing AI and human predictability in a real-effort task
Kandul, S., Micheli, V., Beck, J., Burri, T., Fleuret, F., Kneer, M., & Christen, M. (2023) · Computers in Human Behavior Reports · doi:10.1016/j.chbr.2023.100290 · Cited by 19
Saleshat: A LLM-Based Social Robot for Human-Like Sales Conversations
Hanschmann, L., Gnewuch, U., & Maedche, A. (2024) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-54975-5_4 · Cited by 18
Lie detection algorithms disrupt the social dynamics of accusation behavior
von Schenk, A., Klockmann, V., Bonnefon, J., Rahwan, I., & Köbis, N. (2024) · iScience · doi:10.1016/j.isci.2024.110201 · Cited by 26
Advice in the presence of external cues: The impact of conflicting judgments on perceptions of expertise
Palmeira, M. M. (2019) · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes · doi:10.1016/j.obhdp.2019.11.009 · Cited by 16
Human Experts Outperform Technology in Creative Markets
Weingarten, E., Meyer, M. W., Ashkenazi, A., & Amir, O. (2020) · She ji · doi:10.1016/j.sheji.2020.07.004 · Cited by 15
Understanding User Attitudes Towards Negative Side Effects of AI Systems
Saisubramanian, S., Roberts, S. C., & Zilberstein, S. (2021) · CHI Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA) · doi:10.1145/3411763.3451654 · Cited by 15
Breaking Taboos in Fair Machine Learning: An Experimental Study
Nyarko, J., Goel, S., & Sommers, R. (2021) · ACM Conference on Equity and Access in Algorithms, Mechanisms, and Optimization (EAAMO) · doi:10.1145/3465416.3483291 · Cited by 15
Learning Best Practices: Can Machine Learning Improve Human Decision-Making?
Bastani, H., Bastani, O., & Sinchaisri, W. P. (2021) · Academy of Management Proceedings · doi:10.5465/ambpp.2021.14006abstract · Cited by 16
To reveal or conceal: AI identity disclosure strategies for merchants
Ding, Z., Zhang, Y., Sun, J., Goh, M., & Yang, Z. (2025) · International Journal of Production Economics · doi:10.1016/j.ijpe.2025.109564 · Cited by 14
When AI fails, who gets the blame? Citizens’ attribution patterns in AI-induced public service failures
Liang, Z., Li, Y., & Chen, T. (2025) · Journal of Chinese Governance · doi:10.1080/23812346.2025.2528005 · Cited by 16
Artificial intelligence in international business: IB theory under augmented decision-making
Lindner, T., Puck, J. F., & Puhr, H. (2025) · Journal of World Business · doi:10.1016/j.jwb.2025.101676 · Cited by 21
Dynamische Preisgestaltung in der digitalisierten Welt
Spann, M., & Skiera, B. (2020) · Schmalenbach Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1007/s41471-020-00095-0 · Cited by 14
Increasing Reliance on Financial Advice with Avatars: The Effects of Competence and Complexity on Algorithm Aversion
Ganbold, O., Rose, A. M., Rose, J. M., & Rotaru, K. (2021) · Journal of Information Systems · doi:10.2308/isys-2021-002 · Cited by 16
Speaker identification in courtroom contexts – Part I: Individual listeners compared to forensic voice comparison based on automatic-speaker-recognition technology
Basu, N., Bali, A. S., Weber, P., Aguilar, C. R., Edmond, G., Martire, K. A., & Morrison, G. S. (2022) · Forensic Science International · doi:10.1016/j.forsciint.2022.111499 · Cited by 21
The complex relationship of AI ethics and trust in human–AI teaming: insights from advanced real-world subject matter experts
Lopez, J., Textor, C., Lancaster, C., Schelble, B. G., Freeman, G., Zhang, R., McNeese, N. J., & Pak, R. (2023) · AI and Ethics · doi:10.1007/s43681-023-00303-7 · Cited by 18
Towards a Practice-Led Research Agenda for User Interface Design of Recommender Systems
Smits, A., & van Turnhout, K. (2023) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-42286-7_10 · Cited by 14
The Best Decisions Are Not the Best Advice: Making Adherence-Aware Recommendations
Grand-Clément, J., & Pauphilet, J. (2024) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.2023.01851 · Cited by 15
XAI is in trouble
Weber, R. O., Johs, A. J., Goel, P., & Marques-Silva, J. P. (2024) · AI Magazine · doi:10.1002/aaai.12184 · Cited by 23
Algorithm Reliance: Fast and Slow
Snyder, C., Keppler, S. M., & Leider, S. (2025) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.2023.01989 · Cited by 24
Improving Human Sequential Decision Making with Reinforcement Learning
Bastani, H., Bastani, O., & Sinchaisri, W. P. (2025) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.2022.02455 · Cited by 35
Behavioral Externalities of Process Automation
Beer, R., Qi, A., & Ríos, I. (2022) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.2024.05408 · Cited by 14
The corruptive force of AI-generated advicePreprint
Leib, M., Köbis, N., Rilke, R. M., Hagens, M., & Irlenbusch, B. (2021) · Kölner Universitäts PublikationsServer (Universität zu Köln) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2102.07536 · Cited by 27
When misunderstanding meets artificial intelligence: the critical role of trust in human–AI and human–human team communication and performance
Chen, N., & Zhang, X. (2025) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1637339 · Cited by 15
Predicting decision-makers’ algorithm use
Neumann, M., Niessen, A. S. M., & Meijer, R. R. (2023) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2023.107759 · Cited by 17
A data-driven newsvendor problem: A high-dimensional and mixed-frequency method
Cheng-hu, Y., Wang, H., Ma, X., et al. (2023) · International Journal of Production Economics · doi:10.1016/j.ijpe.2023.109042 · Cited by 13
Guided By AI: Navigating Trust, Bias, and Data Exploration in AI‐Guided Visual Analytics
Ha, S., Monadjemi, S., & Ottley, A. (2024) · Computer Graphics Forum · doi:10.1111/cgf.15108 · Cited by 19
Who are you talking to? How chatbot identity disclosure affects service satisfaction
Yu, R., Feng, J., Wang, K., Yang, L., & Feng, J. (2024) · Journal of Travel & Tourism Marketing · doi:10.1080/10548408.2024.2369755 · Cited by 17
The Effects of Real-Time Feedback on Effort and Performance: Evidence from a Natural Quasi-Experiment
Margolin, M., Reimer, M., & Schaupp, D. (2021) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.2022.02084 · Cited by 13
Adoption of HR analytics for future-proof decision making: role of attitude toward artificial intelligence as a moderator
Arora, S., Chaudhary, P., & Singh, R. K. (2024) · The International Journal of Organizational Analysis · doi:10.1108/ijoa-03-2024-4392 · Cited by 13
Are Recommendation Systems Annoying? An Empirical Study of Assessing the Impacts of AI Characteristics on Technology Well‐Being
Wang, Z., Yuan, R., & Li, B. (2024) · Journal of Consumer Behaviour · doi:10.1002/cb.2408 · Cited by 16
Decoding decision delegation to artificial intelligence: A mixed-methods study on the preferences of decision-makers and decision-affected in surrogate decision contexts
Freisinger, E., & Schneider, S. (2024) · European Management Journal · doi:10.1016/j.emj.2024.10.004 · Cited by 16
Explainability increases trust resilience in intelligent agents
Xu, M., & Wang, Y. (2024) · British Journal of Psychology · doi:10.1111/bjop.12740 · Cited by 13
On the consequences of AI bias: when moral values supersede algorithm bias
Asante, K., Sarpong, D., & Boakye, D. (2024) · Journal of Managerial Psychology · doi:10.1108/jmp-05-2024-0379 · Cited by 20
Algorithms and dehumanization: a definition and avoidance model
Schultz, M. D., Clegg, M., Hofstetter, R., & Seele, P. (2024) · AI & Society · doi:10.1007/s00146-024-02123-7 · Cited by 26
Applicants’ Fairness Perception of Human and AI Collaboration in Resume Screening
Ling, B., Dong, B., & Cai, F. (2024) · International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1080/10447318.2024.2437235 · Cited by 23
Investigating perceived fairness of AI prediction system for math learning: A mixed-methods study with college students
Song, Y., Li, C., Xing, W., Lyu, B., & Zhu, W. (2025) · The Internet and Higher Education · doi:10.1016/j.iheduc.2025.101000 · Cited by 18
Embracing AI advisors for making (complex) financial decisions: an experimental investigation of the role of a maximizing decision-making style
Silber, D., Hoffmann, A. O. I., & Belli, A. (2025) · International Journal of Bank Marketing · doi:10.1108/ijbm-10-2024-0647 · Cited by 22
Good Performance Isn't Enough to Trust AI: Lessons from Logistics Experts on their Long-Term Collaboration with an AI Planning System
Kahr, P. K., Rooks, G., Snijders, C. C. P., & Willemsen, M. C. (2025) · CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3706598.3713099 · Cited by 19
Cognitive challenges in human-AI collaboration: Investigating the path towards productive delegationPreprint
Fügener, A., Grahl, J., Gupta, A., & Ketter, W. (2019) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.3368813 · Cited by 17
Does Artificial Intelligence Help or Hurt Gender Diversity? Evidence from Two Field Experiments on Recruitment in TechPreprint
Avery, M., Leibbrandt, A., & Vecci, J. (2024) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.4764343 · Cited by 15
Behavioral challenges to professional skepticism in auditors’ data analytics journey
Li, X. (2022) · Maandblad voor Accountancy en Bedrijfseconomie · doi:10.5117/mab.96.78525 · Cited by 11
“The auditing literature has identified some possible solutions to increase auditors’ reliance on audit technologies in general or audit evidence from ADA, such as increasing transparency of those audit technologies (Holmstrom 2020), and increasing auditors’ control over and hence perceived ownership of those tools (Di…”
Background
AI @ Work: Human Empowerment or Disempowerment?
Koeszegi, S. T. (2023) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-45304-5_12 · Cited by 17
Investigating the effects of nudges to promote knowledge-sharing behaviours on MOOC forums: a mixed method design
Shi, Y., Armin Haller, A., Reeson, A. F., Li, X., & Li, C. (2024) · Behaviour and Information Technology · doi:10.1080/0144929x.2024.2316287 · Cited by 15
Do We Trust Artificially Intelligent Assistants at Work? An Experimental Study
Cvetkovic, A., Savela, N., Latikka, R., & Oksanen, A. (2024) · Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies · doi:10.1155/2024/1602237 · Cited by 14
Digital Lyrebirds: Experimental Evidence That Voice-Based Deep Fakes Influence Trust
Schanke, S., Burtch, G., & Ray, G. (2024) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.2022.03316 · Cited by 14
The Effects of Situational and Individual Factors on Algorithm Acceptance in COVID-19-Related Decision-Making: A Preregistered Online Experiment
Utz, S., Wolfers, L. N., & Göritz, A. S. (2021) · Human-Machine Communication · doi:10.30658/hmc.3.3 · Cited by 12
Unpacking the cognitive processes of the boundedly rational newsvendor
Niranjan, T. T., Ghosalya, N. K., Menon, R. R., Rotaru, K., & Gavirneni, S. (2023) · Production and Operations Management · doi:10.1111/poms.14027 · Cited by 12
The best option illusion in self and social assessment
Dunning, D. A. (2018) · Self and Identity · doi:10.1080/15298868.2018.1465460 · Cited by 14
Expl(Ai)Ned: The Impact of Explainable Artificial Intelligence on Cognitive ProcessesPreprint
Bauer, K., von Zahn, M., & Hinz, O. F. (2021) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.3872711 · Cited by 13
Effective Generative AI: The Human-Algorithm CentaurPreprint
Saghafian, S. (2023) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.4594780 · Cited by 25
AI or human: How the type of information to be disclosed alters customer service agent preferences
Dai, X., Zhang, L., Huang, Z., & Wang, L. (2025) · Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services · doi:10.1016/j.jretconser.2025.104621 · Cited by 12
Knowing (Not) to Know: Explainable Artificial Intelligence and Human Metacognition
von Zahn, M., Liebich, L., Jussupow, E., Hinz, O. F., & Bauer, K. (2025) · Information Systems Research · doi:10.1287/isre.2024.1431 · Cited by 21
Convincing the Expert: Reducing Algorithm Aversion in Administrative Higher Education Decision-making
Xu, L., Pardos, Z. A., & Pai, A. (2023) · ACM Conference on Learning @ Scale (L@S) · doi:10.1145/3573051.3593378 · Cited by 11
Explainable subgradient tree boosting for prescriptive analytics in operations management
Notz, P. M., & Pibernik, R. (2023) · European Journal of Operational Research · doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2023.08.037 · Cited by 14
“Adding an egg” in algorithmic decision making: improving stakeholder and user perceptions, and predictive validity by enhancing autonomy
Neumann, M., Niessen, A. S. M., Linde, M., Tendeiro, J. N., & Meijer, R. R. (2023) · European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology · doi:10.1080/1359432x.2023.2260540 · Cited by 18
Correct Me If I Am Wrong: Exploring How AI Outputs Affect User Perception and Trust
Jeung, J. L., & Huang, Y. (2023) · ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW) · doi:10.1145/3584931.3606997 · Cited by 17
Are engineers more likely to avoid algorithms after they see them err? A longitudinal study
Chacon, A., Reyes, T. H., & Kausel, E. E. (2024) · Behaviour and Information Technology · doi:10.1080/0144929x.2024.2344092 · Cited by 11
The existence of manual mode increases human blame for AI mistakes
Arnestad, M. N., Meyers, S., Gray, K. J., & Bigman, Y. (2024) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2024.105931 · Cited by 11
Why Do Swiss HR Departments Dislike Algorithms in Their Recruitment Process? An Empirical Analysis
Revillod, G. (2024) · Administrative Sciences · doi:10.3390/admsci14100253 · Cited by 17
Trade-offs in AI assistant choice: Do consumers prioritize transparency and sustainability over AI assistant performance?
Ioku, T., Song, J., & Watamura, E. (2024) · Big Data & Society · doi:10.1177/20539517241290217 · Cited by 18
Mind the Gap! Choice Independence in Using Multilingual LLMs for Persuasive Co-Writing Tasks in Different Languages
Biswas, S., Erlei, A., & Gadiraju, U. (2025) · CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3706598.3713201 · Cited by 17
Does it pay to be honest? The effect of retailer-provided negative feedback on consumers’ product choice and shopping experience
Merle, A., St-Onge, A., & Sénécal, S. (2022) · Journal of business research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.03.031 · Cited by 11
Forecasting with Judgment
Goodwin, P., & Fildes, R. A. (2022) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-96935-6_16 · Cited by 11
Auditor Judgment Bias Research: A 50-Year Trend Analysis and Emerging Technology Use
Lombardi, D. R., Sipior, J. C., & Dannemiller, S. (2022) · Journal of Information Systems · doi:10.2308/isys-2020-079 · Cited by 16
Taking Advice from (Dis)Similar Machines: The Impact of Human-Machine Similarity on Machine-Assisted Decision-Making
Grgić-Hlača, N., Castelluccia, C., & Gummadi, K. P. (2022) · Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Human Computation and Crowdsourcing · doi:10.1609/hcomp.v10i1.21989 · Cited by 13
Framing the approval to test self-driving cars on public roads. The effect of safety and competitiveness on citizens' agreement
Hemesath, S., & Tepe, M. (2022) · Technology in Society · doi:10.1016/j.techsoc.2022.102177 · Cited by 11
Voice-Based AI in Call Center Customer Service: Evidence from a Field ExperimentPreprint
Wang, L., Huang, N., Hong, Y., Liu, L., Guo, X., & Chen, G. (2020) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.3633100 · Cited by 11
Human and Machine: The Impact of Machine Input on Decision-Making Under Cognitive LimitationsPreprint
Boyacı, T., Canyakmaz, C., & de Véricourt, F. (2020) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.3740508 · Cited by 11
Improving Human Decision-Making with Machine Learning
Bastani, H., Bastani, O., & Sinchaisri, W. P. (2022) · Academy of Management Proceedings · doi:10.5465/ambpp.2022.17725abstract · Cited by 15
Understanding Decision Subjects' Fairness Perceptions and Retention in Repeated Interactions with AI-Based Decision Systems
Gemalmaz, M. A., & Yin, M. (2022) · Proceedings of the 2022 AAAI/ACM Conference on AI, Ethics, and Society · doi:10.1145/3514094.3534201 · Cited by 10

Authors: Dietvorst, B. J., Simmons, J. P., & Massey, C.
Affiliations: University of Chicago (US)
University of Pennsylvania (US)
ORCID: Dietvorst, Berkeley J.
Simmons, Joseph P.
Venue: Management Science
Publisher: Institute for Operations Research and the Management Sciences (INFORMS)
Published: 2018-03
Volume: 64
Issue: 3
Pages: 1155-1170
ISSN: 0025-1909 (ISSN-L)
1526-5501
DOI: 10.1287/mnsc.2016.2643
OpenAlex: W3121705224
Semantic Scholar: e1706933e9e1d15515c3a444454c15890e6d134f
Cited by: 1,230
References: 27
Citations by year: 2026: 260 · 2025: 218 · 2024: 203 · 2023: 179 · 2022: 138 · 2021: 104 · 2020: 58 · 2019: 46 · 2018: 16
FWCI: 20.17
Type: journal article
Language: en
Open access: green
doi.org
Locations: Management Science (publishedVersion)
SSRN Electronic Journal (acceptedVersion)
ScholarlyCommons (University of Pennsylvania) (submittedVersion)
Topics: Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › General Decision Sciences › Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Forecasting Techniques and Applications
Social Sciences › Human Factors and Ergonomics › Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
Keywords: algorithm aversion, forecasting, trust in algorithms

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Overcoming Algorithm Aversion: People Will Use Imperfect Algorithms If They Can (Even Slightly) Modify Them

Abstract

Overview

Integrity signals

Verification

Claims the paper makes

Claims other papers make about this one

Citations

Cites

Cited by

Related

Metadata

Record

About these checks