The DOI matches its Crossref record; 26 of the 26 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Algorithmic Bias? An Empirical Study of Apparent Gender-Based Discrimination in the Display of STEM Career Ads
Open accessAbstract
We explore data from a field test of how an algorithm delivered ads promoting job opportunities in the science, technology, engineering and math fields. This ad was explicitly intended to be gender neutral in its delivery. Empirically, however, fewer women saw the ad than men. This happened because younger women are a prized demographic and are more expensive to show ads to. An algorithm that simply optimizes cost-effectiveness in ad delivery will deliver ads that were intended to be gender neutral in an apparently discriminatory way, because of crowding out. We show that this empirical regularity extends to other major digital platforms. This paper was accepted by Joshua Gans, business strategy.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Researchers have also shown that gender bias can occur without any conscious (or unconscious) attempt to produce a biased outcome -using only an unbiased algorithm (Lambrecht and Tucker 2019).”
From A strategic framework for artificial intelligence in marketing (2021) · cites this paper as Lambrecht and Tucker 2019
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“However, this approach can be problematic in terms of fairness and privacy [13-15, 18, 19].”
From A Deep Dive into Fairness, Bias, Threats, and Privacy in Recommender Systems: Insights and Future Research (2024) · cites this paper as [19]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Even after eliminating all bias from the data, an algorithm's results may still vary across different data groups due to algorithmic bias [19, 82].”
From A Deep Dive into Fairness, Bias, Threats, and Privacy in Recommender Systems: Insights and Future Research (2024) · cites this paper as [19]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Lambrecht and Tucker (2019), for example, discovered fewer women than men were shown ads about STEM careers even though the ads were gender neutral by design.”
From Algorithmic management in a work context (2021) · cites this paper as Lambrecht and Tucker, 2019
In the citing paper
“Bias has also been reported in algorithmic advertisement, with opportunities for higherpaying jobs and jobs within the field of science and technology advertised to men more often than to women (Datta et al. 2015;Lambrecht and Tucker 2019).”
From The ethics of algorithms: key problems and solutions (2022) · cites this paper as Lambrecht and Tucker 2019
In the citing paper
“Increasing amounts of empirical evidence confirm this risk (Obermeyer et al. 2019;Datta et al. 2015;Lambrecht and Tucker 2019).”
From Artificial intelligence and work: a critical review of recent research from the social sciences (2024) · cites this paper as Lambrecht and Tucker 2019
In the citing paper
“An additional system that incorporated post-hoc explainability was designed by Lamy et al. [123] and provided local explanations of the preference model using rainbow boxes [56].”
From Current Challenges and Future Opportunities for XAI in Machine Learning-Based Clinical Decision Support Systems: A Systematic Review (2021) · cites this paper as [56]
In the citing paper
“Some identities (and not others) are recognized as a pedestrian,44 or fit for an STEM career,69 or in need of medical care.1 Some are ignored and made invisible altogether.”
From Algorithmic injustice: A relational ethics approach (2021) · cites this paper as [69]
In the citing paper
“an advertisement model that underpromoted ads for Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) careers to young women (Lambrecht & Tucker, 2019).”
From Diminished diversity-of-thought in a standard large language model (2024) · cites this paper as Lambrecht & Tucker, 2019
In the citing paper
“Proposition 6e. The greater the algorithm bias , the lower the probability of building trust in AI algorithms over time.”
From Why do users trust algorithms? A review and conceptualization of initial trust and trust over time (2022) · cites this paper as Lambrecht & Tucker, 2019
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Male-female wage differentials in urban labor markets
Oaxaca, R. (1973) · International Economic Review · doi:10.2307/2525981 · Cited by 8,463
Weapons of Math Destruction: How Big Data Increases Inequality and Threatens Democracy
Doyle, T. (2017) · The Information Society · doi:10.1080/01972243.2017.1354593 · Cited by 3,111
A Grand Gender Convergence: Its Last Chapter
Goldin, C. D. (2014) · American Economic Review · doi:10.1257/aer.104.4.1091 · Cited by 2,659
Machine Learning: An Applied Econometric Approach
Mullainathan, S., & Spiess, J. (2017) · Journal of Economic Perspectives · doi:10.1257/jep.31.2.87 · Cited by 1,989
Nobel Lecture: The Economic Way of Looking at Behavior
Becker, G. S. (1993) · Journal of Political Economy · doi:10.1086/261880 · Cited by 1,619
Racial Discrimination in the Sharing Economy: Evidence from a Field Experiment
Edelman, B. G., Luca, M., & Svirsky, D. (2015) · American Economic Journal Applied Economics · doi:10.1257/app.20160213 · Cited by 1,042
Field Experiments on Discrimination
Bertrand, M., & Duflo, E. (2016) · Handbook of economic field experiments · doi:10.1016/bs.hefe.2016.08.004 · Cited by 981
Diekman, A. B., Brown, E. R., Johnston, A. M., & Clark, E. K. (2010) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/0956797610377342 · Cited by 878
Social Networks, Personalized Advertising, and Privacy Controls
Tucker, C. E. (2014) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.1509/jmr.10.0355 · Cited by 829
Self-citationAutomated Experiments on Ad Privacy Settings: A Tale of Opacity, Choice, and Discrimination
Datta, A., Tschantz, M. C., & Datta, A. (2015) · Proceedings on Privacy Enhancing Technologies · doi:10.1515/popets-2015-0007 · Cited by 676
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 6
- Arrow K, 1973, Discrimination Labor Markets, 3, 3
- Ghosh A, 2009, WINE, 208
- Gunderson M, 1989, J. Econom. Lit., 27, 46
- 10.1353/jhr.2011.0025 · DOI
- Silverstein MJ, 2009, Harvard Bus. Rev., 87, 46
- Tucker C, 2014, Social Advertising: How Advertising That Explicitly Promotes Social Influence Can Backfire
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 201–300 of 892
Wang, Y. (2025) · Organization Management Journal · doi:10.1108/omj-11-2024-2342 · Cited by 32
Cuéllar, M.-F., Larsen, B. C., Lee, Y. S., & Webb, M. (2022) · The Journal of Law Economics and Organization · doi:10.1093/jleo/ewac004 · Cited by 31
The Effects of AI on the Working Lives of Women
OECD, & Bank, I.-A. D. (2022) · OECD eBooks · doi:10.1787/14e9b92c-en · Cited by 30
Population-Level Evidence of the Gender Gap in Technology Entrepreneurship
Miric, M., Yin, P.-L., & Fehder, D. C. (2022) · Strategy Science · doi:10.1287/stsc.2022.0170 · Cited by 30
Explanatory Interactive Machine Learning
Pfeuffer, N., Baum, L., Stammer, W., Abdel-Karim, B. M., Schramowski, P., Bucher, A. M., Hügel, C., Rohde, G. G. U., Kersting, K., & Hinz, O. F. (2023) · Business & Information Systems Engineering · doi:10.1007/s12599-023-00806-x · Cited by 38
A large‐scale field experiment on occupational gender segregation and hiring discrimination
Adamovic, M., & Leibbrandt, A. (2023) · Industrial Relations: A Journal of Economy and Society · doi:10.1111/irel.12318 · Cited by 35
Too concise to decide? The impact of AI-generated review summaries on tourist decision satisfaction
Wang, Y., Zhang, Z., Wang, C., Li, Z., Law, R., & Zhang, Z. (2026) · Tourism Management · doi:10.1016/j.tourman.2026.105415 · Cited by 32
Conducting Qualitative Interviews with AI
Chopra, F., & Haaland, I. (2026) · CESifo · doi:10.65864/ch6grwpore · Cited by 38
Assessing Algorithmic Fairness with Unobserved Protected Class Using Data Combination
Kallus, N., Mao, X., & Zhou, A. (2019) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1906.00285 · Cited by 28
Bias and Unfairness of Collaborative Filtering Based Recommender Systems in MovieLens Dataset
González, Á., Ortega, F., López, D. P., & Alonso, S. (2022) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2022.3186719 · Cited by 28
Sourcing algorithms: Rethinking fairness in hiring in the era of algorithmic recruitment
Alexander, L., Song, Q. C., Hickman, L., & Shin, H. J. (2024) · International Journal of Selection and Assessment · doi:10.1111/ijsa.12499 · Cited by 28
FairDgcl: Fairness-Aware Recommendation With Dynamic Graph Contrastive Learning
Chen, W., Yuan, M., Zhang, Z., Xie, R., Zhuang, F., Wang, D., & Liu, R. (2025) · IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering · doi:10.1109/tkde.2025.3580087 · Cited by 28
What Happens When Employers Can No Longer Discriminate in Job Ads?
Kuhn, P., & Shen, K. (2023) · American Economic Review · doi:10.1257/aer.20211127 · Cited by 28
Multi-category fairness in sponsored search auctions
Ilvento, C., Jagadeesan, M., & Chawla, S. (2020) · ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency (FAccT) · doi:10.1145/3351095.3372848 · Cited by 28
Johnson, M. P., & Chichirau, G. R. (2020) · doi:10.1287/educ.2020.0214 · Cited by 27
Artificial Intelligence in Retail: Benefits and Risks Associated With Mobile Shopping Applications
Stanciu, V., & Rîndașu, S.-M. (2021) · Amfiteatru Economic · doi:10.24818/ea/2021/56/46 · Cited by 32
How Does the Adoption of Ad Blockers Affect News Consumption?
Yan, S., Miller, K. M., & Skiera, B. (2022) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.1177/00222437221076160 · Cited by 32
Fairness in Agreement With European Values
Colmenarejo, A. B., Nannini, L., Rieger, A., Scott, K. M., Zhao, X., Patro, G. K., Kasneci, G., & Kinder-Kurlanda, K. E. (2022) · Proceedings of the AAAI/ACM Conference on AI Ethics and Society · doi:10.1145/3514094.3534158 · Cited by 35
FairCF: fairness-aware collaborative filtering
Shao, P., Wu, L., Chen, L., Zhang, K., & Wang, M. (2022) · Science China Information Sciences · doi:10.1007/s11432-020-3404-y · Cited by 28
Conducting Qualitative Interviews with AIPreprint
Chopra, F., & Haaland, I. (2023) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.4572954 · Cited by 34
Digital sociology: origin, development, and prospects from a global perspective
Zhao, Y., & Wang, M. (2023) · The Journal of Chinese Sociology · doi:10.1186/s40711-023-00198-1 · Cited by 37
Corsbie-Massay, C. L., & Wheatly, M. G. (2022) · Frontiers in Communication · doi:10.3389/fcomm.2022.1027502 · Cited by 26
Liefgreen, A., Weinstein, N., Wachter, S., & Mittelstadt, B. (2023) · AI & Society · doi:10.1007/s00146-023-01684-3 · Cited by 31
Apparent Algorithmic Bias and Algorithmic Learning
Lambrecht, A., & Tucker, C. E. (2020) · Quantitative Marketing and Economics · doi:10.1007/s11129-024-09286-z · Cited by 28
Self-citationDual constraints and adversarial learning for fair recommenders
Liu, H., Zhao, N., Zhang, X., Lin, H., Yang, L., Xu, B., Lin, Y., & Fan, W. (2022) · Knowledge-Based Systems · doi:10.1016/j.knosys.2021.108058 · Cited by 26
Automating Automaticity: How the Context of Human Choice Affects the Extent of Algorithmic Bias
Agan, A., Davenport, D., Ludwig, J., & Mullainathan, S. (2023) · doi:10.3386/w30981 · Cited by 25
Boegershausen, J., Cornil, Y., Yi, S., & Hardisty, D. J. (2025) · International Journal of Research in Marketing · doi:10.1016/j.ijresmar.2024.12.004 · Cited by 25
ALGORITHMIC BIAS IN AI-ENHANCED EDUCATION: CULTURAL DIMENSIONS AND PEDAGOGICAL IMPACT
Fadil, H. O. C. A., & Nuredin, A. (2025) · Symposium Proceedings · doi:10.55843/isl2025symp163h · Cited by 25
ALGORITHMIC ACCOUNTABILITY IN THE MAKING
Johnson, D. G. (2021) · Social Philosophy and Policy · doi:10.1017/s0265052522000073 · Cited by 25
Shank, D. B., & Gott, A. (2020) · International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1080/10447318.2020.1768674 · Cited by 25
Information Design in Operations
Candogan, O. (2020) · doi:10.1287/educ.2020.0217 · Cited by 25
Algorithmic bias: Social science research integration through the 3-D Dependable AI Framework
Ukanwa, K. (2024) · Current Opinion in Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.copsyc.2024.101836 · Cited by 24
The Glass Wall and the Gendered Evaluation of Role Expansion in Freelancing Careers
Lee, Y. G., Koval, C. Z., & Lee, S. S. (2022) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.5465/amj.2020.1176 · Cited by 24
Making AI Ethical by Design: The UNESCO Perspective
Ramos, G., Squicciarini, M., & Lamm, E. (2024) · Computer · doi:10.1109/mc.2023.3325949 · Cited by 24
Individual Fairness in PipelinesPreprint
Dwork, C., Ilvento, C., & Jagadeesan, M. (2020) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.4230/lipics.forc.2020.7 · Cited by 34
Choi, J., & Chao, M. M. (2024) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/01461672241288338 · Cited by 25
How ensembling AI and public managers improves decision-making
Keppeler, F., Borchert, J., Pedersen, M. J., & Nielsen, V. L. (2025) · Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory · doi:10.1093/jopart/muaf009 · Cited by 24
How Artificial Intelligence (AI) is Transforming the User Experience in Digital Marketing
Kaperonis, S. (2023) · Advances in marketing, customer relationship management, and e-services book series · doi:10.4018/978-1-6684-9324-3.ch005 · Cited by 28
Artificial intelligence and algorithmic bias? Field tests on social network with teens
Cecere, G., Jean, C., Guel, F. L., & Manant, M. (2024) · Technological Forecasting and Social Change · doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2023.123204 · Cited by 23
Pricing Power in Advertising Markets: Theory and Evidence
Gentzkow, M. A., Shapiro, J. M., Yang, F., & Yürükoğlu, A. (2024) · American Economic Review · doi:10.1257/aer.20220943 · Cited by 23
MIMIC-IF: Interpretability and Fairness Evaluation of Deep Learning Models on MIMIC-IV Dataset
Meng, C., Trinh, L., Xu, N., & Liu, Y. (2021) · doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-402058/v1 · Cited by 21
Hina, M., Azad, N., & Islam, A. K. M. N. (2025) · Information Technology and People · doi:10.1108/itp-06-2024-0808 · Cited by 22
The Cost of Ethical AI Development for AI Startups
Bessen, J., Impink, S. M., & Seamans, R. (2022) · Proceedings of the AAAI/ACM Conference on AI Ethics and Society · doi:10.1145/3514094.3534195 · Cited by 29
Johnson, D. G., & Verdicchio, M. (2023) · Communications of the ACM · doi:10.1145/3576932 · Cited by 22
Accurate Fairness: Improving Individual Fairness without Trading Accuracy
Li, X., Wu, P., & Su, J. (2023) · Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1609/aaai.v37i12.26674 · Cited by 26
The effect of flatter hierarchy on applicant pool gender diversity: Evidence from experiments
Hurst, R., Lee, S., & Frake, J. (2024) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.3590 · Cited by 22
Does Online Fundraising Increase Charitable Giving? A Nationwide Field Experiment on Facebook
Adena, M., & Hager, A. (2024) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.2020.00596 · Cited by 22
Online Advertisement Allocation Under Customer Choices and Algorithmic Fairness
Li, X. P., Rong, Y., Zhang, R., & Zheng, H. (2024) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.2021.04091 · Cited by 22
Two-sided fairness in rankings via Lorenz dominancePreprint
Do, V., Corbett‐Davies, S., Jamal Atif, C., & Usunier, N. (2021) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2110.15781 · Cited by 22
Reducing prejudice with counter‐stereotypical AI
Hermann, E., De Freitas, J., & Puntoni, S. (2025) · Consumer Psychology Review · doi:10.1002/arcp.1102 · Cited by 21
Rudiyanto, T., Kunda, H., Dunn, A., Shenderovskiy, S. A., & Gibson, R. (2023) · Lex Publica · doi:10.58829/lp.10.1.2023.84-100 · Cited by 21
Algorithmic gender bias: investigating perceptions of discrimination in automated decision-making
Kim, S., Oh, P., & Lee, J. (2024) · Behaviour and Information Technology · doi:10.1080/0144929x.2024.2306484 · Cited by 23
The widening gender wage gap in the gig economy in China: the impact of digitalisation
Han, J., Li, M., Li, S., & Hu, Y. (2024) · Humanities and Social Sciences Communications · doi:10.1057/s41599-024-04172-1 · Cited by 21
Assessing Gender Bias in Predictive Algorithms using eXplainable AI
Manresa-Yee, C., & Ramis, S. (2021) · International Conference on Human Computer Interaction (Interacción) · doi:10.1145/3471391.3471420 · Cited by 21
BEAT Unintended Bias in Personalized Policies
Ascarza, E., & Israeli, A. (2021) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.2115293119 · Cited by 21
Risk scores, label bias, and everything but the kitchen sink
Zanger-Tishler, M., Nyarko, J., & Goel, S. (2024) · Science Advances · doi:10.1126/sciadv.adi8411 · Cited by 29
AI-based prediction of academic success: Support for many, disadvantage for some?
Herrmann, L., & Weigert, J. (2024) · Computers and Education Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1016/j.caeai.2024.100303 · Cited by 21
Selection Problems in the Presence of Implicit Bias
Raghavan, M. (2023) · ACM eBooks · doi:10.1145/3603195.3603209 · Cited by 21
Gender Bias in AI: Implications for Managerial Practices
Nadeem, A., Marjanovic, O., & Abedin, B. (2021) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-85447-8_23 · Cited by 21
Māori Algorithmic Sovereignty: Idea, Principles, and Use
Brown, P. T., Wilson, D., West, K., Escott, K.-R., Basabas, K., Ritchie, B., Lucas, D., Taia, I., Kusabs, N., & Keegan, T. T. (2024) · Data Science Journal · doi:10.5334/dsj-2024-015 · Cited by 30
Algorithmic agencing in platform markets
Wei, R., & Geiger, S. (2024) · Marketing Theory · doi:10.1177/14705931241275558 · Cited by 20
The Externalities of Exploration and How Data Diversity Helps Exploitation
Raghavan, M. (2023) · ACM eBooks · doi:10.1145/3603195.3603208 · Cited by 20
Lin, C., Gao, Y., Ta, N., Li, K., & Fu, H. (2023) · Telematics and Informatics · doi:10.1016/j.tele.2023.102068 · Cited by 20
People see more of their biases in algorithms
Celiktutan, B., Cadario, R., & Morewedge, C. K. (2024) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.2317602121 · Cited by 21
Towards Trustworthy AI-Empowered Real-Time Bidding for Online Advertisement Auctioning
Tang, X., & Yu, H. (2025) · ACM Computing Surveys · doi:10.1145/3701741 · Cited by 20
Fu, X., Ghauri, P. N., & Lu, J. (2025) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/j.respol.2025.105173 · Cited by 19
Cracking the AI recruitment code: Striving for transparency in finding the right person–job fit
Chen, A., Han, F., Zhang, X., & Lu, Y. (2025) · Information & Management · doi:10.1016/j.im.2025.104156 · Cited by 19
Pan, Y., Froese, F. J., & Xue, S. (2025) · Human Resource Management · doi:10.1002/hrm.70049 · Cited by 20
Bias in, Bias Out – the Similarity-Attraction Effect Between Chatbot Designers and Users
Zabel, S., & Otto, S. (2021) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-78468-3_13 · Cited by 19
Imana, B., Korolova, A., & Heidemann, J. (2023) · Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1145/3579610 · Cited by 19
Auditing GPT's Content Moderation Guardrails: Can ChatGPT Write Your Favorite TV Show?
Mahomed, Y., Crawford, C. M., Gautam, S., Friedler, S. A., & Metaxa, D. (2024) · ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency (FAccT) · doi:10.1145/3630106.3658932 · Cited by 24
Contrastive learning for fair graph representations via counterfactual graph augmentation
Li, C., Cheng, D., Zhang, G., & Zhang, S. (2024) · Knowledge-Based Systems · doi:10.1016/j.knosys.2024.112635 · Cited by 19
The Past, Present, and Future of Customer Management
Oblander, S., Гупта, С., Mela, C. F., Winer, R. S., & Lehmann, D. R. (2019) · Marketing Letters · doi:10.1007/s11002-020-09525-9 · Cited by 19
Ahmed, S., & Gil‐López, T. (2022) · Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly · doi:10.1177/10776990221110113 · Cited by 21
ProportionNet: Balancing Fairness and Revenue for Auction Design with Deep LearningPreprint
Kuo, K., Ostuni, A., Horishny, E., Curry, M. J., Dooley, S. W., Chiang, P.-Y., Goldstein, T., & Dickerson, J. P. (2020) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2010.06398 · Cited by 32
Social Media, Content Moderation, and TechnologyPreprint
Liu, Y., Yıldırım, P., & Zhang, Z. (2021) · RePEc: Research Papers in Economics · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2101.04618 · Cited by 19
Artificial intelligence in international business: IB theory under augmented decision-making
Lindner, T., Puck, J. F., & Puhr, H. (2025) · Journal of World Business · doi:10.1016/j.jwb.2025.101676 · Cited by 21
Does the gig economy discriminate against women? Evidence from physicians in China
Chen, Y. (2024) · Journal of Development Economics · doi:10.1016/j.jdeveco.2024.103275 · Cited by 18
Generative Artificial Intelligence in Marketing: The Invisible Danger of AI Hallucinations
Yaprak, B. (2024) · Journal of Economy Business and Management · doi:10.7596/jebm.1588897 · Cited by 19
On the Use of Operations Research and Management in Public Education Systems
Smilowitz, K. R., & Keppler, S. M. (2020) · doi:10.1287/educ.2020.0216 · Cited by 18
A Framework for Managing Innovation
Kavadias, S., & Hutchison‐Krupat, J. (2020) · doi:10.1287/educ.2020.0219 · Cited by 18
AI is Changing the World: Achieving the Promise, Minimizing the Peril
Grewal, D., Guha, A., & Becker, M. (2024) · Journal of Macromarketing · doi:10.1177/02761467241289573 · Cited by 17
Jasim, M., Collins, C. M., Sarvghad, A., & Mahyar, N. (2022) · CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3491102.3517649 · Cited by 21
Algorithmic discrimination causes less desire for moral punishment than human discrimination
Xu, L., Yu, F., & Peng, K. (2022) · Acta Psychologica Sinica · doi:10.3724/sp.j.1041.2022.01076 · Cited by 18
Authentication by Keystroke Dynamics: The Influence of Typing Language
Altwaijry, Ν. (2023) · Applied Sciences · doi:10.3390/app132011478 · Cited by 17
Hilbert, M., Thakur, A., Flores, P. M., Zhang, X., Bhan, J. Y., Bernhard, P., & Ji, F. (2023) · International Journal of Information Management · doi:10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2023.102743 · Cited by 20
Data Deserts and Black Boxes: The Impact of Socio-Economic Status on Consumer Profiling
Neumann, N., Tucker, C. E., Kaplan, L., Mislove, A. E., & Sapieżyński, P. (2024) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.2023.4979 · Cited by 17
Self-citationChallenging Fairness: A Comprehensive Exploration of Bias in LLM-Based Recommendations
Sakib, S. K., & Das, A. B. (2024) · IEEE International Conference on Big Data (BigData) · doi:10.1109/bigdata62323.2024.10825082 · Cited by 20
Fast online ranking with fairness of exposure
Usunier, N., Do, V., & Dohmatob, E. (2022) · ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency (FAccT) · doi:10.1145/3531146.3534633 · Cited by 17
Vertical integration of platforms and product prominence
Cure, M., Hunold, M., Kesler, R., Laitenberger, U., & Larrieu, T. (2022) · Quantitative Marketing and Economics · doi:10.1007/s11129-022-09255-4 · Cited by 17
Political ideology shapes support for the use of AI in policy-making
Gur, T., Hameiri, B., & Maaravi, Y. (2024) · Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.3389/frai.2024.1447171 · Cited by 20
The Transformative Role of AI in Advertising and Marketing
Ramachandran, R., Pillai, S., & Dahal, R. K. (2025) · Interdisciplinary Journal of Innovation in Nepalese Academia · doi:10.32674/2q7y1a35 · Cited by 16
Sampson, P., Encarnación, R., & Metaxa, D. (2023) · ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency (FAccT) · doi:10.1145/3593013.3594110 · Cited by 16
Technology assisted research assessment: algorithmic bias and transparency issues
Thelwall, M. A., & Kousha, K. (2023) · Aslib Journal of Information Management · doi:10.1108/ajim-04-2023-0119 · Cited by 18
Vaishampayan, S., Farzanehpour, S., & Brown, C. (2023) · IEEE Symposium on Visual Languages and Human-Centric Computing (VL/HCC) · doi:10.1109/vl-hcc57772.2023.00019 · Cited by 17
Segmenting across places: The need for fair transfer learning with satellite imagery
Zhang, M., Singh, H., Chok, L., & Chunara, R. (2022) · IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshops (CVPRW) · doi:10.1109/cvprw56347.2022.00329 · Cited by 16
The Economics of Artificial Intelligence: A Marketing Perspective
Ding, M., & Avi Goldfarb, B. (2023) · Emerald Group Publishing Limited eBooks · doi:10.1108/s1548-643520230000020002 · Cited by 16
Auditing Digital Platforms for Discrimination in Economic Opportunity AdvertisingPreprint
Kingsley, S., Wang, C., Mikhalenko, A., Sinha, P., & Kulkarni, C. E. (2020) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2008.09656 · Cited by 16
Artificial Intelligence and Intellectual Property: An Economic PerspectivePreprint
Cuntz, A. N., Fink, C., & Stamm, H. (2024) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.4858320 · Cited by 16
A bibliometric analysis of AI bias in marketing: field evolution and future research agenda
Bacalhau, L. M., Pereira, M. C., & Neves, J. R. (2025) · Journal of Marketing Analytics · doi:10.1057/s41270-025-00379-6 · Cited by 15
Metadata
- Authors
- Lambrecht, A., & Tucker, C.
- Affiliations
- Boston College (US)
- Venue
- Management Science
- Published
- 2019-07
- Volume
- 65
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 2966-2981
- ISSN
- 0025-1909 (ISSN-L)
- 1526-5501
- OpenAlex
- W2550925836
- Cited by
- 854
- References
- 26
- Citations by year
- 2026: 108 · 2025: 128 · 2024: 139 · 2023: 163 · 2022: 109 · 2021: 120 · 2020: 73 · 2019: 12
- FWCI
- 137.66
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- Locations
- Management Science (publishedVersion)
- London Business School Research Online (London Business School) (submittedVersion)
- DSpace@MIT (Massachusetts Institute of Technology) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Names, Identity, and Discrimination Research
- Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Media, Gender, and Advertising
- Keywords
- algorithmic bias, gender discrimination, online advertising, STEM careers, crowding out, demographic targeting, digital platforms, women in STEM
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
