The DOI matches its Crossref record; 26 of the 26 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Algorithmic Bias? An Empirical Study of Apparent Gender-Based Discrimination in the Display of STEM Career Ads
Open accessAbstract
We explore data from a field test of how an algorithm delivered ads promoting job opportunities in the science, technology, engineering and math fields. This ad was explicitly intended to be gender neutral in its delivery. Empirically, however, fewer women saw the ad than men. This happened because younger women are a prized demographic and are more expensive to show ads to. An algorithm that simply optimizes cost-effectiveness in ad delivery will deliver ads that were intended to be gender neutral in an apparently discriminatory way, because of crowding out. We show that this empirical regularity extends to other major digital platforms. This paper was accepted by Joshua Gans, business strategy.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Researchers have also shown that gender bias can occur without any conscious (or unconscious) attempt to produce a biased outcome -using only an unbiased algorithm (Lambrecht and Tucker 2019).”
From A strategic framework for artificial intelligence in marketing (2021) · cites this paper as Lambrecht and Tucker 2019
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“However, this approach can be problematic in terms of fairness and privacy [13-15, 18, 19].”
From A Deep Dive into Fairness, Bias, Threats, and Privacy in Recommender Systems: Insights and Future Research (2024) · cites this paper as [19]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Even after eliminating all bias from the data, an algorithm's results may still vary across different data groups due to algorithmic bias [19, 82].”
From A Deep Dive into Fairness, Bias, Threats, and Privacy in Recommender Systems: Insights and Future Research (2024) · cites this paper as [19]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Lambrecht and Tucker (2019), for example, discovered fewer women than men were shown ads about STEM careers even though the ads were gender neutral by design.”
From Algorithmic management in a work context (2021) · cites this paper as Lambrecht and Tucker, 2019
In the citing paper
“Bias has also been reported in algorithmic advertisement, with opportunities for higherpaying jobs and jobs within the field of science and technology advertised to men more often than to women (Datta et al. 2015;Lambrecht and Tucker 2019).”
From The ethics of algorithms: key problems and solutions (2022) · cites this paper as Lambrecht and Tucker 2019
In the citing paper
“Increasing amounts of empirical evidence confirm this risk (Obermeyer et al. 2019;Datta et al. 2015;Lambrecht and Tucker 2019).”
From Artificial intelligence and work: a critical review of recent research from the social sciences (2024) · cites this paper as Lambrecht and Tucker 2019
In the citing paper
“An additional system that incorporated post-hoc explainability was designed by Lamy et al. [123] and provided local explanations of the preference model using rainbow boxes [56].”
From Current Challenges and Future Opportunities for XAI in Machine Learning-Based Clinical Decision Support Systems: A Systematic Review (2021) · cites this paper as [56]
In the citing paper
“Some identities (and not others) are recognized as a pedestrian,44 or fit for an STEM career,69 or in need of medical care.1 Some are ignored and made invisible altogether.”
From Algorithmic injustice: A relational ethics approach (2021) · cites this paper as [69]
In the citing paper
“an advertisement model that underpromoted ads for Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) careers to young women (Lambrecht & Tucker, 2019).”
From Diminished diversity-of-thought in a standard large language model (2024) · cites this paper as Lambrecht & Tucker, 2019
In the citing paper
“Proposition 6e. The greater the algorithm bias , the lower the probability of building trust in AI algorithms over time.”
From Why do users trust algorithms? A review and conceptualization of initial trust and trust over time (2022) · cites this paper as Lambrecht & Tucker, 2019
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Male-female wage differentials in urban labor markets
Oaxaca, R. (1973) · International Economic Review · doi:10.2307/2525981 · Cited by 8,463
Weapons of Math Destruction: How Big Data Increases Inequality and Threatens Democracy
Doyle, T. (2017) · The Information Society · doi:10.1080/01972243.2017.1354593 · Cited by 3,111
A Grand Gender Convergence: Its Last Chapter
Goldin, C. D. (2014) · American Economic Review · doi:10.1257/aer.104.4.1091 · Cited by 2,659
Machine Learning: An Applied Econometric Approach
Mullainathan, S., & Spiess, J. (2017) · Journal of Economic Perspectives · doi:10.1257/jep.31.2.87 · Cited by 1,989
Nobel Lecture: The Economic Way of Looking at Behavior
Becker, G. S. (1993) · Journal of Political Economy · doi:10.1086/261880 · Cited by 1,619
Racial Discrimination in the Sharing Economy: Evidence from a Field Experiment
Edelman, B. G., Luca, M., & Svirsky, D. (2015) · American Economic Journal Applied Economics · doi:10.1257/app.20160213 · Cited by 1,042
Field Experiments on Discrimination
Bertrand, M., & Duflo, E. (2016) · Handbook of economic field experiments · doi:10.1016/bs.hefe.2016.08.004 · Cited by 981
Diekman, A. B., Brown, E. R., Johnston, A. M., & Clark, E. K. (2010) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/0956797610377342 · Cited by 878
Social Networks, Personalized Advertising, and Privacy Controls
Tucker, C. E. (2014) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.1509/jmr.10.0355 · Cited by 829
Self-citationAutomated Experiments on Ad Privacy Settings: A Tale of Opacity, Choice, and Discrimination
Datta, A., Tschantz, M. C., & Datta, A. (2015) · Proceedings on Privacy Enhancing Technologies · doi:10.1515/popets-2015-0007 · Cited by 676
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 6
- Arrow K, 1973, Discrimination Labor Markets, 3, 3
- Ghosh A, 2009, WINE, 208
- Gunderson M, 1989, J. Econom. Lit., 27, 46
- 10.1353/jhr.2011.0025 · DOI
- Silverstein MJ, 2009, Harvard Bus. Rev., 87, 46
- Tucker C, 2014, Social Advertising: How Advertising That Explicitly Promotes Social Influence Can Backfire
Cited by
Sorted by citations
A Survey on Bias and Fairness in Machine Learning
Mehrabi, N., Morstatter, F., Saxena, N., Lerman, K., & Galstyan, A. (2022) · ACM Computing Surveys · doi:10.1145/3457607 · Cited by 5,812
A strategic framework for artificial intelligence in marketing
Huang, M.-H., & Rust, R. T. (2021) · Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science · doi:10.1007/s11747-020-00749-9 · Cited by 2,059
“Researchers have also shown that gender bias can occur without any conscious (or unconscious) attempt to produce a biased outcome — using only an unbiased algorithm (Lambrecht and Tucker 2019).”
BackgroundAdoption and use of AI tools: a research agenda grounded in UTAUT
Venkatesh, V. (2021) · Annals of Operations Research · doi:10.1007/s10479-020-03918-9 · Cited by 783
Algorithmic bias: review, synthesis, and future research directions
Kordzadeh, N., & Ghasemaghaei, M. (2022) · European Journal of Information Systems · doi:10.1080/0960085x.2021.1927212 · Cited by 770
Bias and Debias in Recommender System: A Survey and Future Directions
Chen, J., Dong, H., Wang, X., Feng, F., Wang, M., & He, X. (2023) · ACM Transactions on Information Systems · doi:10.1145/3564284 · Cited by 741
Algorithmic injustice: A relational ethics approach
Birhane, A. (2021) · Patterns · doi:10.1016/j.patter.2021.100205 · Cited by 707
Antoniadi, A. M., Du, Y., Guendouz, Y., Wei, L., Mazo, C., Becker, B. A., & Mooney, C. (2021) · Applied Sciences · doi:10.3390/app11115088 · Cited by 629
The Ethics of Artificial Intelligence
Floridi, L. (2023) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198883098.001.0001 · Cited by 682
Artificial Intelligence and Marketing: Pitfalls and Opportunities
Bruyn, A. D., Viswanathan, V., Beh, Y. S., Brock, J. K., & von Wangenheim, F. (2020) · Journal of Interactive Marketing · doi:10.1016/j.intmar.2020.04.007 · Cited by 647
The Role of Artificial Intelligence and Data Network Effects for Creating User Value
Gregory, R. W., Henfridsson, O., Kaganer, E., & Kyriakou, H. (2021) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.2019.0178 · Cited by 540
Algorithmic management in a work context
Jarrahi, M. H., Newlands, G., Lee, M. K., Wolf, C. T., Kinder, E., & Sutherland, W. (2021) · Big Data & Society · doi:10.1177/20539517211020332 · Cited by 532
“Lambrecht and Tucker (2019), for example, discovered fewer women than men were shown ads about STEM careers even though the ads were gender neutral by design.”
BackgroundKöchling, A., & Wehner, M. C. (2020) · Business Research · doi:10.1007/s40685-020-00134-w · Cited by 511
Six Human-Centered Artificial Intelligence Grand Challenges
Ozmen Garibay, O., Winslow, B., Andolina, S., Antona, M., Bodenschatz, A., Coursaris, C., Falco, G., Fiore, S. M., Garibay, I., Grieman, K., et al. (2023) · International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction · doi:10.1080/10447318.2022.2153320 · Cited by 501
Ethical framework for Artificial Intelligence and Digital technologies
Ashok, M., Madan, R., Joha, A., & Sivarajah, U. (2022) · International Journal of Information Management · doi:10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2021.102433 · Cited by 469
Leveraging Artificial Intelligence in Marketing for Social Good—An Ethical Perspective
Hermann, E. (2021) · Journal of Business Ethics · doi:10.1007/s10551-021-04843-y · Cited by 504
Rana, N. P., Chatterjee, S., Dwivedi, Y. K., & Akter, S. (2021) · European Journal of Information Systems · doi:10.1080/0960085x.2021.1955628 · Cited by 500
The adoption of artificial intelligence in employee recruitment: The influence of contextual factors
Pan, Y., Froese, F. J., Liu, N., Hu, Y., & Ye, M. (2021) · The International Journal of Human Resource Management · doi:10.1080/09585192.2021.1879206 · Cited by 416
The ethics of algorithms: key problems and solutions
Tsamados, A., Aggarwal, N., Cowls, J., Morley, J., Roberts, H., Taddeo, M., & Floridi, L. (2022) · AI & SOCIETY · doi:10.1007/s00146-021-01154-8 · Cited by 384
A Comprehensive Survey on Deep Graph Representation Learning
Ju, W., Fang, Z., Gu, Y., Liu, Z., Long, Q., Qiao, Z., Qin, Y., Shen, J., Sun, F., Xiao, Z., et al. (2024) · Neural Networks · doi:10.1016/j.neunet.2024.106207 · Cited by 395
Inherent Tradeoffs in the Fair Determination of Risk Scores
Raghavan, M. (2023) · ACM eBooks · doi:10.1145/3603195.3603197 · Cited by 350
Kopalle, P. K., Gangwar, M., Kaplan, A., Ramachandran, D., Reinartz, W., & Rindfleisch, A. (2021) · International Journal of Research in Marketing · doi:10.1016/j.ijresmar.2021.11.002 · Cited by 361
Artificial intelligence and consumer behavior: From predictive to generative AI
Hermann, E., & Puntoni, S. (2024) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2024.114720 · Cited by 316
Digital Analytics: Modeling for Insights and New Methods
Gupta, S., Leszkiewicz, A., Kumar, V., Bijmolt, T. H. A., & Potapov, D. B. (2020) · Journal of Interactive Marketing · doi:10.1016/j.intmar.2020.04.003 · Cited by 302
Discrimination through Optimization
Ali, M., Sapiezynski, P., Bogen, M., Korolova, A., Mislove, A., & Rieke, A. (2019) · Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1145/3359301 · Cited by 268
An interdisciplinary review of AI and HRM: Challenges and future directions
Pan, Y., & Froese, F. J. (2022) · Human Resource Management Review · doi:10.1016/j.hrmr.2022.100924 · Cited by 292
Socially Responsible AI Algorithms: Issues, Purposes, and Challenges
Cheng, L., Varshney, K. R., & Liu, H. (2021) · Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research · doi:10.1613/jair.1.12814 · Cited by 261
Trustworthy ai: A computational perspective
Liu, H., Wang, Y., Fan, W., Liu, X., Li, Y., Jain, S., Liu, Y., Jain, A., & Tang, J. (2023) · ACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology · doi:10.1145/3546872 · Cited by 261
Algorithmic bias in machine learning-based marketing models
Akter, S., Dwivedi, Y. K., Sajib, S., Biswas, K., Bandara, R. J., & Michael, K. (2022) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.01.083 · Cited by 242
How can we manage biases in artificial intelligence systems – A systematic literature review
P．S．, D. V. (2023) · International Journal of Information Management Data Insights · doi:10.1016/j.jjimei.2023.100165 · Cited by 239
Keding, C. (2021) · Management Review Quarterly · doi:10.1007/s11301-020-00181-x · Cited by 231
van Giffen, B., Herhausen, D., & Fahse, T. (2022) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.01.076 · Cited by 230
Generative AI in innovation and marketing processes: A roadmap of research opportunities
Cillo, P., & Rubera, G. (2024) · Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science · doi:10.1007/s11747-024-01044-7 · Cited by 256
Woods, S. A., Ahmed, S., Nikolaou, I., Costa, A. C., & Anderson, N. R. (2020) · European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology · doi:10.1080/1359432x.2019.1681401 · Cited by 218
Artificial intelligence, firms and consumer behavior: A survey
Abrardi, L., Cambini, C., & Rondi, L. (2019) · Journal of Economic Surveys · doi:10.1111/joes.12455 · Cited by 229
Chatbots and mental health: Insights into the safety of generative AI
De Freitas, J., Uğuralp, A. K., Oğuz‐Uğuralp, Z., & Puntoni, S. (2024) · Journal of Consumer Psychology · doi:10.1002/jcpy.1393 · Cited by 211
Interpretability and fairness evaluation of deep learning models on MIMIC-IV dataset
Meng, C., Trinh, L., Xu, N., Enouen, J., & Liu, Y. (2022) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-022-11012-2 · Cited by 213
Algorithmic discrimination causes less moral outrage than human discrimination
Bigman, Y. E., Wilson, D., Arnestad, M. N., Waytz, A., & Gray, K. (2023) · Journal of Experimental Psychology: General · doi:10.1037/xge0001250 · Cited by 198
Problematic Machine Behavior: A Systematic Literature Review of Algorithm Audits
Bandy, J. (2021) · Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1145/3449148 · Cited by 193
Managing with Artificial Intelligence: An Integrative Framework
Hillebrand, L., Raisch, S., & Schad, J. (2025) · Academy of Management Annals · doi:10.5465/annals.2022.0072 · Cited by 209
Addressing algorithmic bias and the perpetuation of health inequities: An AI bias aware framework
Agarwal, R., Bjarnadottir, M., Rhue, L., Dugas, M., Crowley, K., Clark, J., & Gao, G. (2023) · Health Policy and Technology · doi:10.1016/j.hlpt.2022.100702 · Cited by 170
Keding, C., & Meissner, P. (2021) · Technological Forecasting and Social Change · doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2021.120970 · Cited by 168
Ohme, J., Araujo, T., Boeschoten, L., Freelon, D., Ram, N., Reeves, B. B., & Robinson, T. N. (2024) · Communication Methods and Measures · doi:10.1080/19312458.2023.2181319 · Cited by 208
Figueroa-Armijos, M., Clark, B. B., & da Motta Veiga, S. P. (2023) · Journal of Business Ethics · doi:10.1007/s10551-022-05166-2 · Cited by 164
Attributions of ethical responsibility by Artificial Intelligence practitioners
Orr, W., & Davis, J. L. (2020) · Information Communication & Society · doi:10.1080/1369118x.2020.1713842 · Cited by 180
A global perspective on the marketing mix across time and space
Wichmann, J. R. K., Uppal, A., Sharma, A., & Dekimpe, M. G. (2021) · International Journal of Research in Marketing · doi:10.1016/j.ijresmar.2021.09.001 · Cited by 190
Investigating gender fairness of recommendation algorithms in the music domain
Melchiorre, A. B., Rekabsaz, N., Parada‐Cabaleiro, E., Brandl, S., Lesota, O., & Schedl, M. (2021) · Information Processing & Management · doi:10.1016/j.ipm.2021.102666 · Cited by 166
Sun, L., Wei, M., Sun, Y., Suh, Y. J., Shen, L., & Yang, S. (2023) · Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication · doi:10.1093/jcmc/zmad045 · Cited by 146
Fairness in Graph Mining: A Survey
Dong, Y., Ma, J., Wang, S., Chen, C., & Li, J. (2023) · IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering · doi:10.1109/tkde.2023.3265598 · Cited by 161
Building Human Values into Recommender Systems: An Interdisciplinary Synthesis
Stray, J., Halevy, A. Y., Assar, P., Hadfield-Menell, D., Boutilier, C. E., Ashar, A., Bakalar, C., Beattie, L., Ekstrand, M. D., Leibowicz, C., et al. (2023) · ACM Transactions on Recommender Systems · doi:10.1145/3632297 · Cited by 183
Learning Fair Representations for Recommendation: A Graph-based Perspective
Wu, L., Chen, L., Shao, P., Hong, R., Wang, X., & Wang, M. (2021) · International World Wide Web Conference (WWW) · doi:10.1145/3442381.3450015 · Cited by 148
Gupta, M., Parra, C. M., & Dennehy, D. (2021) · Information Systems Frontiers · doi:10.1007/s10796-021-10156-2 · Cited by 154
Why do users trust algorithms? A review and conceptualization of initial trust and trust over time
Cabiddu, F., Moi, L., Patriotta, G., & Allen, D. G. (2022) · European Management Journal · doi:10.1016/j.emj.2022.06.001 · Cited by 138
From Reality to World. A Critical Perspective on AI Fairness
John-Mathews, J.-M., Cardon, D., & Balagué, C. (2022) · Journal of Business Ethics · doi:10.1007/s10551-022-05055-8 · Cited by 144
Metahuman systems = humans + machines that learn
Lyytinen, K., Nickerson, J. V., & King, J. L. (2020) · Journal of Information Technology · doi:10.1177/0268396220915917 · Cited by 151
Birhane, A., & van Dijk, J. (2020) · Proceedings of the AAAI/ACM Conference on AI Ethics and Society · doi:10.1145/3375627.3375855 · Cited by 138
The future of digital technologies in marketing: A conceptual framework and an overview
Plangger, K. A., Grewal, D., de Ruyter, K., & Tucker, C. E. (2022) · Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science · doi:10.1007/s11747-022-00906-2 · Cited by 123
Self-citationWalkowiak, E. (2021) · Technological forecasting & social change · doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2021.120739 · Cited by 93
The Ethics of Algorithms: Key Problems and Solutions
Tsamados, A., Aggarwal, N., Cowls, J., Morley, J., Roberts, H., Taddeo, M., & Floridi, L. (2021) · Philosophical Studies Series · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-81907-1_8 · Cited by 121
Capturing Marketing Information to Fuel Growth
Du, R. Y., Netzer, O., Schweidel, D. A., & Mitra, D. (2020) · Journal of Marketing · doi:10.1177/0022242920969198 · Cited by 141
AI and Algorithmic Bias: Source, Detection, Mitigation and Implications
Fu, R., Huang, Y. H., & Singh, P. V. (2020) · doi:10.1287/educ.2020.0215 · Cited by 130
Artificial intelligence and work: a critical review of recent research from the social sciences
Deranty, J.-P., & Corbin, T. (2024) · AI & SOCIETY · doi:10.1007/s00146-022-01496-x · Cited by 118
“Increasing amounts of empirical evidence confirm this risk (Ober-meyer et al. 2019; Datta et al. 2015; Lambrecht and Tucker 2019).”
Fairness and Bias in Algorithmic Hiring: A Multidisciplinary Survey
Fabris, A., Baranowska, N., Dennis, M. J., Graus, D., Hacker, P., Saldivar, J., Zuiderveen Borgesius, F., & Biega, A. J. (2025) · ACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology · doi:10.1145/3696457 · Cited by 117
Evolution and impact of bias in human and machine learning algorithm interaction
Sun, W., Nasraoui, O., & Shafto, P. (2020) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0235502 · Cited by 116
A Human-Centered Review of Algorithms used within the U.S. Child Welfare System
Saxena, D., Badillo-Urquiola, K., Wisniewski, P. J., & Guha, S. (2020) · Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3313831.3376229 · Cited by 116
Advancing algorithmic bias management capabilities in AI-driven marketing analytics research
Akter, S., Sultana, S., Mariani, M. M., Wamba, S. F., Spanaki, K., & Dwivedi, Y. K. (2023) · Industrial Marketing Management · doi:10.1016/j.indmarman.2023.08.013 · Cited by 127
Discrimination through Optimization: How Facebook's Ad Delivery Can Lead to Biased OutcomesPreprint
Ali, M., Sapieżyński, P., Bogen, M., Korolova, A., Mislove, A. E., & Rieke, A. (2019) · arXiv (Cornell University) · Cited by 116
A little bird told me your gender: Gender inferences in social media
Fosch‐Villaronga, E., Poulsen, A., Søraa, R. A., & Custers, B. H. M. (2021) · Information Processing & Management · doi:10.1016/j.ipm.2021.102541 · Cited by 115
The Impact of Artificial Intelligence Marketing on E-Commerce Sales
Madanchian, M. (2024) · Systems · doi:10.3390/systems12100429 · Cited by 114
Auditing for Discrimination in Algorithms Delivering Job Ads
Imana, B., Korolova, A., & Heidemann, J. (2021) · International World Wide Web Conference (WWW) · doi:10.1145/3442381.3450077 · Cited by 109
Online Reviews: Star Ratings, Position Effects and Purchase Likelihood
Vana, P., & Lambrecht, A. (2018) · Marketing Science · doi:10.1287/mksc.2020.1278 · Cited by 115
Self-citationAlgorithmic inclusion: Shaping the predictive algorithms of artificial intelligence in hiring
Kelan, E. K. (2024) · Human Resource Management Journal · doi:10.1111/1748-8583.12511 · Cited by 106
Begby, E. (2021) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198852834.001.0001 · Cited by 107
Exploring gender biases in ML and AI academic research through systematic literature review
Shrestha, S., & Das, S. (2022) · Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.3389/frai.2022.976838 · Cited by 105
Behavioral biases in marketing
Dowling, K., Guhl, D., Klapper, D., Spann, M., Stich, L., & Yegoryan, N. (2019) · Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science · doi:10.1007/s11747-019-00699-x · Cited by 113
Machine learning in marketing: Recent progress and future research directions
Herhausen, D., Bernritter, S. F., Ngai, E. W. T., Kumar, A., & Delen, D. (2023) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2023.114254 · Cited by 110
Bai, B., Dai, H., Zhang, D., Zhang, F., & Hu, H. (2020) · Manufacturing & Service Operations Management · doi:10.1287/msom.2022.1120 · Cited by 103
Training with AI: Evidence from chess computers
Gaessler, F., & Piezunka, H. (2023) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.3512 · Cited by 83
Biased Humans, (Un)Biased Algorithms?
Pethig, F., & Kroenung, J. (2022) · Journal of Business Ethics · doi:10.1007/s10551-022-05071-8 · Cited by 118
Data, Power and Bias in Artificial IntelligencePreprint
Leavy, S., O’Sullivan, B., & Σιαπέρα, Ε. (2020) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2008.07341 · Cited by 97
Assessing Algorithmic Fairness with Unobserved Protected Class Using Data Combination
Kallus, N., Mao, X., & Zhou, A. (2022) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.2020.3850 · Cited by 93
Miyake, E. (2022) · Journal of Consumer Culture · doi:10.1177/14695405221117195 · Cited by 103
Algorithmic fairness in business analytics: Directions for research and practice
De‐Arteaga, M., Feuerriegel, S., & Saar‐Tsechansky, M. (2022) · Production and Operations Management · doi:10.1111/poms.13839 · Cited by 98
Implications of Revenue Models and Technology for Content Moderation Strategies
Liu, Y., Yıldırım, P., & Zhang, Z. J. (2021) · Marketing Science · doi:10.1287/mksc.2022.1361 · Cited by 89
Platform governance and the rural–urban divide: Sellers' responses to design change
Koo, W. W.-Y., & Eesley, C. E. (2020) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.3259 · Cited by 94
Reframing data ethics in research methods education: a pathway to critical data literacy
Atenas, J., Havemann, L., & Timmermann, C. (2023) · International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education · doi:10.1186/s41239-023-00380-y · Cited by 88
Recruitment in the gig economy: attraction and selection on digital platforms
Williams, P., McDonald, P. K., & Mayes, R. (2021) · The International Journal of Human Resource Management · doi:10.1080/09585192.2020.1867613 · Cited by 87
Shen, Q., Tao, W., Zhang, J., Wen, H., Chen, Z., & Lu, Q. (2021) · ACM International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management (CIKM) · doi:10.1145/3459637.3481948 · Cited by 85
Chhillar, D., & Aguilera, R. V. (2022) · Business & Society · doi:10.1177/00076503221080959 · Cited by 96
Digitalization and inclusiveness of HRM practices: The example of neurodiversity initiatives
Walkowiak, E. (2023) · Human Resource Management Journal · doi:10.1111/1748-8583.12499 · Cited by 101
On the role of social media platforms in the creator economy
Bleier, A., Fossen, B. L., & Shapira, M. (2024) · International Journal of Research in Marketing · doi:10.1016/j.ijresmar.2024.06.006 · Cited by 84
Diminished diversity-of-thought in a standard large language model
Park, P. S., Schoenegger, P., & Zhu, C. (2024) · Behavior Research Methods · doi:10.3758/s13428-023-02307-x · Cited by 83
Bridging Machine Learning and Mechanism Design towards Algorithmic Fairness
Finocchiaro, J., Maio, R., Monachou, F., Patro, G. K., Raghavan, M., Stoica, A.-A., & Tsirtsis, S. (2021) · ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency (FAccT) · doi:10.1145/3442188.3445912 · Cited by 89
On the Applicability of Machine Learning Fairness Notions
Makhlouf, K., Zhioua, S., & Catuscia Palamidessi, A. (2021) · ACM SIGKDD Explorations Newsletter · doi:10.1145/3468507.3468511 · Cited by 96
(2019) · AICS
Power negotiation on the tango dancefloor: The adoption of AI in B2B marketing
Keegan, B. J., Canhoto, A. I., & Yen, D. A.-W. (2021) · Industrial Marketing Management · doi:10.1016/j.indmarman.2021.11.001 · Cited by 81
Recommender systems under European AI regulations
Noia, T. D., Tintarev, N., Fatourou, P., & Schedl, M. (2022) · Communications of the ACM · doi:10.1145/3512728 · Cited by 80
A Multi-Objective Optimization Framework for Multi-Stakeholder Fairness-Aware Recommendation
Wu, H., Ma, C., Mitra, B., Díaz, F., & Liu, X. (2022) · ACM Transactions on Information Systems · doi:10.1145/3564285 · Cited by 79
Rafieian, O., & Yoganarasimhan, H. (2023) · Emerald Group Publishing Limited eBooks · doi:10.1108/s1548-643520230000020004 · Cited by 77
Analysis of the retention of women in higher education STEM programs
Ortiz‐Martínez, G., Vázquez‐Villegas, P., Ruiz-Cantisani, M. I., Delgado‐Fabián, M., Conejo-Márquez, D. A., & Membrillo‐Hernández, J. (2023) · Humanities and Social Sciences Communications · doi:10.1057/s41599-023-01588-z · Cited by 77
Intelligent financial system: How AI is transforming finance
Aldasoro, I., Gambacorta, L., Korinek, A., Shreeti, V., & Stein, M. (2025) · Journal of Financial Stability · doi:10.1016/j.jfs.2025.101472 · Cited by 76
Metadata
- Authors
- Lambrecht, A., & Tucker, C.
- Affiliations
- Boston College (US)
- Venue
- Management Science
- Published
- 2019-07
- Volume
- 65
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 2966-2981
- ISSN
- 0025-1909 (ISSN-L)
- 1526-5501
- OpenAlex
- W2550925836
- Cited by
- 854
- References
- 26
- Citations by year
- 2026: 108 · 2025: 128 · 2024: 139 · 2023: 163 · 2022: 109 · 2021: 120 · 2020: 73 · 2019: 12
- FWCI
- 137.66
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- Locations
- Management Science (publishedVersion)
- London Business School Research Online (London Business School) (submittedVersion)
- DSpace@MIT (Massachusetts Institute of Technology) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Names, Identity, and Discrimination Research
- Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Media, Gender, and Advertising
- Keywords
- algorithmic bias, gender discrimination, online advertising, STEM careers, crowding out, demographic targeting, digital platforms, women in STEM
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
