The DOI matches its Crossref record; 26 of the 26 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Algorithmic Bias? An Empirical Study of Apparent Gender-Based Discrimination in the Display of STEM Career Ads
Open accessAbstract
We explore data from a field test of how an algorithm delivered ads promoting job opportunities in the science, technology, engineering and math fields. This ad was explicitly intended to be gender neutral in its delivery. Empirically, however, fewer women saw the ad than men. This happened because younger women are a prized demographic and are more expensive to show ads to. An algorithm that simply optimizes cost-effectiveness in ad delivery will deliver ads that were intended to be gender neutral in an apparently discriminatory way, because of crowding out. We show that this empirical regularity extends to other major digital platforms. This paper was accepted by Joshua Gans, business strategy.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Researchers have also shown that gender bias can occur without any conscious (or unconscious) attempt to produce a biased outcome -using only an unbiased algorithm (Lambrecht and Tucker 2019).”
From A strategic framework for artificial intelligence in marketing (2021) · cites this paper as Lambrecht and Tucker 2019
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“However, this approach can be problematic in terms of fairness and privacy [13-15, 18, 19].”
From A Deep Dive into Fairness, Bias, Threats, and Privacy in Recommender Systems: Insights and Future Research (2024) · cites this paper as [19]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Even after eliminating all bias from the data, an algorithm's results may still vary across different data groups due to algorithmic bias [19, 82].”
From A Deep Dive into Fairness, Bias, Threats, and Privacy in Recommender Systems: Insights and Future Research (2024) · cites this paper as [19]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Increasing amounts of empirical evidence confirm this risk (Obermeyer et al. 2019;Datta et al. 2015;Lambrecht and Tucker 2019).”
From Artificial intelligence and work: a critical review of recent research from the social sciences (2024) · cites this paper as Lambrecht and Tucker 2019
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Lambrecht and Tucker (2019), for example, discovered fewer women than men were shown ads about STEM careers even though the ads were gender neutral by design.”
From Algorithmic management in a work context (2021) · cites this paper as Lambrecht and Tucker, 2019
The check wasn’t confident either way, so it gives no verdict — never disputed.
In the citing paper
“Proposition 6e. The greater the algorithm bias , the lower the probability of building trust in AI algorithms over time.”
From Why do users trust algorithms? A review and conceptualization of initial trust and trust over time (2022) · cites this paper as Lambrecht & Tucker, 2019
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredIn the citing paper
“Bias has also been reported in algorithmic advertisement, with opportunities for higherpaying jobs and jobs within the field of science and technology advertised to men more often than to women (Datta et al. 2015;Lambrecht and Tucker 2019).”
From The ethics of algorithms: key problems and solutions (2022) · cites this paper as Lambrecht and Tucker 2019
In the citing paper
“An additional system that incorporated post-hoc explainability was designed by Lamy et al. [123] and provided local explanations of the preference model using rainbow boxes [56].”
From Current Challenges and Future Opportunities for XAI in Machine Learning-Based Clinical Decision Support Systems: A Systematic Review (2021) · cites this paper as [56]
In the citing paper
“Some identities (and not others) are recognized as a pedestrian,44 or fit for an STEM career,69 or in need of medical care.1 Some are ignored and made invisible altogether.”
From Algorithmic injustice: A relational ethics approach (2021) · cites this paper as [69]
In the citing paper
“an advertisement model that underpromoted ads for Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) careers to young women (Lambrecht & Tucker, 2019).”
From Diminished diversity-of-thought in a standard large language model (2024) · cites this paper as Lambrecht & Tucker, 2019
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Male-female wage differentials in urban labor markets
Oaxaca, R. (1973) · International Economic Review · doi:10.2307/2525981 · Cited by 8,463
Weapons of Math Destruction: How Big Data Increases Inequality and Threatens Democracy
Doyle, T. (2017) · The Information Society · doi:10.1080/01972243.2017.1354593 · Cited by 3,111
A Grand Gender Convergence: Its Last Chapter
Goldin, C. D. (2014) · American Economic Review · doi:10.1257/aer.104.4.1091 · Cited by 2,659
Machine Learning: An Applied Econometric Approach
Mullainathan, S., & Spiess, J. (2017) · Journal of Economic Perspectives · doi:10.1257/jep.31.2.87 · Cited by 1,989
Nobel Lecture: The Economic Way of Looking at Behavior
Becker, G. S. (1993) · Journal of Political Economy · doi:10.1086/261880 · Cited by 1,619
Racial Discrimination in the Sharing Economy: Evidence from a Field Experiment
Edelman, B. G., Luca, M., & Svirsky, D. (2015) · American Economic Journal Applied Economics · doi:10.1257/app.20160213 · Cited by 1,042
Field Experiments on Discrimination
Bertrand, M., & Duflo, E. (2016) · Handbook of economic field experiments · doi:10.1016/bs.hefe.2016.08.004 · Cited by 981
Diekman, A. B., Brown, E. R., Johnston, A. M., & Clark, E. K. (2010) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/0956797610377342 · Cited by 878
Social Networks, Personalized Advertising, and Privacy Controls
Tucker, C. E. (2014) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.1509/jmr.10.0355 · Cited by 829
Self-citationAutomated Experiments on Ad Privacy Settings: A Tale of Opacity, Choice, and Discrimination
Datta, A., Tschantz, M. C., & Datta, A. (2015) · Proceedings on Privacy Enhancing Technologies · doi:10.1515/popets-2015-0007 · Cited by 676
Research works printed but not linked: 6
- Arrow K, 1973, Discrimination Labor Markets, 3, 3
- Ghosh A, 2009, WINE, 208
- Gunderson M, 1989, J. Econom. Lit., 27, 46
- 10.1353/jhr.2011.0025 · DOI
- Silverstein MJ, 2009, Harvard Bus. Rev., 87, 46
- Tucker C, 2014, Social Advertising: How Advertising That Explicitly Promotes Social Influence Can Backfire
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 601–700 of 892
Algorithmic Fairness in Multi-stakeholder Platforms
Patro, G. K. (2023) · Studies in computational intelligence · doi:10.1007/978-981-99-7184-8_5 · Cited by 1
Feng, W., Zhou, L., & Shi, Q. (2024) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-57850-2_30 · Cited by 1
The hard problem of the androcentric context of AI: challenges for EU policy agendas
González-Martín, J. A. (2024) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-443-18851-0.00013-5 · Cited by 1
Singhal, V., Sethi, S., & Pranjal, P. (2024) · Advances in business information systems and analytics book series · doi:10.4018/979-8-3693-3550-5.ch014 · Cited by 1
Michel, S., Bidan, M., & Gerbaix, S. (2024) · International Conference on Control, Decision and Information Technologies (CoDIT) · doi:10.1109/codit62066.2024.10708575 · Cited by 1
Benefits and Perils of SMEs’ Digital Transformation in Marketing
Niros, M. I., Peitzika, E., Niros, A., & Kelali, P. (2025) · Springer proceedings in business and economics · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-96930-0_10 · Cited by 1
A scoping review on gender bias in AI-based decision making systems
Waheed, A. (2025) · Integration of Mankind and Society · doi:10.56770/ims2025222 · Cited by 1
Improving Fairness in Doubly Imbalanced Datasets
Yalcin, A., Öztürk, A. U., Sever, Y., Pauw, V., Hachinger, S., Toroslu, İ. H., & Karagöz, P. (2026) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-026-54702-x · Cited by 2
Exploring trust in Artificial Intelligence (AI) systems: Insights from a repeated trust game
Jayasekara, D. N., Deng, R., Ho, J. Q., & Prissé, B. (2026) · Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics · doi:10.1016/j.socec.2026.102658 · Cited by 2
Digitale Tools für smarte Personalarbeit
Gärtner, C. (2020) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-658-29431-1_4 · Cited by 1
Ethische und gesetzliche Richtlinien für Smart HR
Gärtner, C. (2020) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-658-29431-1_6 · Cited by 1
Lewis, B., Purser, K., & Mackie, K. (2020) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-981-15-6735-3_5 · Cited by 1
Marketing mit neuen Technologien: Das ungeklärte Verhältnis zu Manipulation
Klarmann, M. (2020) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-658-31563-4_32 · Cited by 1
Prejudice from an Epistemological Point of View
Begby, E. (2021) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198852834.003.0002 · Cited by 1
The Hidden Assumptions Behind Counterfactual Explanations and Principal Reasons
Raghavan, M. (2023) · ACM eBooks · doi:10.1145/3603195.3603204 · Cited by 1
İnce, S. (2022) · Annales de la Faculté de Droit d’Istanbul · doi:10.26650/annales.2022.71.0002 · Cited by 1
Курченко, Л., Kolomiyets-Ludwig, E., & Ilnytskyy, D. (2022) · IGI Global eBooks · doi:10.4018/978-1-6684-4511-2.ch009 · Cited by 1
Aksoy, O. (2024) · Advances in human resources management and organizational development book series · doi:10.4018/979-8-3693-1766-2.ch013 · Cited by 1
Schedl, M., Anelli, V. W., & Lex, E. (2024) · The information retrieval series · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-69978-8_2 · Cited by 1
Inclusive Recommendations and User Engagement: Experimental Evidence from Pinterest
Kumar, M., Silva, P., Singh, A., & Varmaraja, A. (2024) · ACM Conference on Economics and Computation (EC) · doi:10.1145/3670865.3673635 · Cited by 1
Introduction to the Special Issue: “From The digital economy to the digitalization of the economy”
Cecere, G., & Pénard, T. (2020) · Revue d économie industrielle · doi:10.4000/rei.9389 · Cited by 1
Artificial Intelligence, Ethics, and PivotalityPreprint
Klockmann, V., von Schenk, A., & Villeval, M. C. (2022) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.4003065 · Cited by 1
Pricing Power in Advertising Markets: Theory and EvidencePreprint
Gentzkow, M. A., Shapiro, J. M., Yang, F., & Yürükoğlu, A. (2022) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.4171455 · Cited by 1
Understanding Algorithm Aversion: When Do People Abandon AI After Seeing It Err?Preprint
Zhang, Y., & Gosline, R. R. (2022) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.4299576 · Cited by 1
Inequalities Beyond the Average Man
Burnazoglu, M. (2023) · doi:10.33540/1388 · Cited by 1
An American Bias in a Local Music Streaming Market?Preprint
Moreau, F., Lumeau, M., Wikström, P., Haampland, O., & Johannessen, R. (2023) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.4499080 · Cited by 1
Floridi, L. (2023) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198883098.002.0003 · Cited by 1
When Systemic Biases Taint Algorithms: A Path to More Equitable Access in HealthcarePreprint
Aksoy, Ö., Ayvaci, M., Cezar, A., & Raghunathan, S. (2024) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.4774939 · Cited by 1
Algorithmic Bias and Historical Injustice: Race and Digital ProfilingPreprint
Matthew, A., Miller, A. R., & Tucker, C. E. (2024) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.4812943 · Cited by 1
Self-citationAlgorithmic Bias and Historical Injustice: Race and Digital Profiling
Matthew, A., Miller, A. R., & Tucker, C. E. (2024) · National Bureau of Economic Research · doi:10.3386/w32485 · Cited by 1
Self-citationRETRACTED: Algorithmic Bias: An Integrative Review and Scope for Future ResearchPreprint
Chaudhary, A. (2024) · Research Square · doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-4775268/v1 · Cited by 3
RetractedPersonalized Algorithms and the Virtue of Learning Things the Hard WayPreprint
Rafieian, O., & Zuo, S. (2024) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.5037671 · Cited by 1
The Tangled Web of Social Bias: Unraveling Human and Algorithmic Biases on Digital PlatformsPreprint
Fu, R. (2024) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.5008463 · Cited by 1
How Ensembling AI and Public Managers Improves Decision-MakingPreprint
Keppeler, F., Borchert, J., Pedersen, M. J., & Nielsen, V. L. (2025) · doi:10.31219/osf.io/2yf6r_v4 · Cited by 1
Demographic Parity-Aware Individualized Treatment RulesPreprint
Cui, W., Su, W., Yan, X., Zeng, D., & Zhao, X. (2025) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.5349148 · Cited by 1
Silenced by Code: Gendered Patterns of Algorithmic Oppression in Social Media PlatformsPreprint
Kesar, B. (2025) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.5850584 · Cited by 1
Fairness Testing for Algorithmic Pricing
Huang, F., & Hooker, G. (2026) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2605.11614 · Cited by 2
“Lambrecht and Tucker (2019) find that a gender-neutral ad delivery algorithm systematically showed STEM career ads to fewer women, because optimising for cost-effective ad delivery drew on the higher market price of female views driven by competing advertisers, a structural feature of the ad…”
Algorithmic monoculture and social welfare
(2023) · The Societal Impacts of Algorithmic Decision-Making · doi:10.1145/3603195.3603202
ROBINSON, R. L. (2020) · medRxiv · doi:10.1101/2020.02.22.20026740
Begby, E. (2021) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198852834.003.0008
Begby, E. (2021) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198852834.003.0011
Begby, E. (2021) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198852834.003.0004
The Epistemology of Prejudice Acquisition
Begby, E. (2021) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198852834.003.0005
Begby, E. (2021) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198852834.003.0010
The Epistemology of Prejudice Maintenance
Begby, E. (2021) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198852834.003.0006
Artificial Intelligence, Ethics, and Intergenerational ResponsibilityPreprint
Klockmann, V., von Schenk, A., & Villeval, M. C. (2021) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.3848485 · Cited by 1
Artificial Intelligence, Ethics, and Diffused PivotalityPreprint
Klockmann, V., von Schenk, A., & Villeval, M. C. (2021) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.3848495
ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE AND LABOR
Fornasier, M. D. O. (2021) · Revista da Faculdade Mineira de Direito · doi:10.5752/p.2318-7999.2021v24n47p396-421 · Cited by 1
Enhancing Fairness in Supervised Machine Learning
Omidi, B. (2021) · uO Research (University of Ottawa) · doi:10.20381/ruor-26258
Adversarial Examples Generation for Reducing Implicit Gender Bias in Pre-trained ModelsPreprint
Ye, W., Xu, F., Huang, Y., Huang, C., & Ji, A. (2021) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2110.01094
Stochastic Market Microstructure Models of Limit Order Books (abstract only)
Maglaras, C., & Rama Cont, A. (2020) · doi:10.1287/educ.2020.0222
On Symmetries in Multi-dimensional Mechanism Design
Essaidi, M., & Weinberg, S. M. (2022) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-94676-0_4
Artificial Intelligence, Ethics, and Diffused PivotalityPreprint
Series, G. W. P., Klockmann, V., von Schenk, A., & Villeval, M. C. (2021) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.3853829
Artificial Intelligence for Equitable Practices in Energy Infrastructure: Literature Review
Ruckman, A. J., & Kaminsky, J. (2022) · ASCE Construction Research Congress (CRC) · doi:10.1061/9780784483961.026
Pricing Power in Advertising Markets: Theory and EvidencePreprint
Gentzkow, M. A., Shapiro, J. M., Yang, F., & Yürükoğlu, A. (2021) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.3922084
Begby, E. (2021) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198852834.003.0001
Is Fair Advertising Good for Platforms?Preprint
Yuan, D., Aseri, M., & Mukhopadhyay, T. (2021) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.3913739
Why Firms Should Want Algorithmic AccountabilityPreprint
Ukanwa, K., Rand, W. M., & Zubcsek, P. P. (2022) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.4148214
The Impact of Algorithmic Components on Contributions in Charitable CrowdfundingPreprint
Vana, P., & Lambrecht, A. (2022) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.4132785
Self-citationUnderstanding Irresponsibility in Digital Advertising
Jin, B., Liu, M. J., Luo, J., & Yuan, R. (2022) · Responsible innovation in industry · doi:10.1007/978-981-19-4480-2_5
Kapoor, A. (2022) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.4191393
Beyond accuracy in machine learning.
Alvanpour, A. (2022) · doi:10.18297/etd/3804
6. Intelligence artificielle et réseaux face à la pandémie : fracture sociale et virtualisation
Cecere, G. (2022) · La Découverte eBooks · doi:10.3917/dec.senik.2022.01.0102
Ethics by Design for Intelligent and Sustainable Adaptive Systems
Squadrone, L., Croce, D., & Basili, R. (2023) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-27181-6_11
Junck, L. D. (2023) · Journal of the Digital Humanities Association of Southern Africa · doi:10.55492/dhasa.v4i02.4034
Gender Diversity on Cable News: An Analysis of On-Screen Talent and ViewershipPreprint
Goli, A., & Mummalaneni, S. (2023) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.4462592
The Hiring Dilemma: Efficiency, Equality, or Both?Preprint
Pisanelli, E. (2023) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.4488438
Floridi, L. (2023) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198883098.002.0009
Floridi, L. (2023) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198883098.003.0001
Floridi, L. (2023) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198883098.002.0004
Mapping the Ethics of Algorithms
Floridi, L. (2023) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198883098.003.0007
How to Deliver a Good AI Society
Floridi, L. (2023) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198883098.003.0010
Floridi, L. (2023) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198883098.002.0007
Floridi, L. (2023) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198883098.003.0008
List of Most Common Abbreviations and Acronyms
Floridi, L. (2023) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198883098.002.0011
Floridi, L. (2023) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198883098.003.0011
Floridi, L. (2023) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198883098.002.0010
Floridi, L. (2023) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198883098.003.0009
Floridi, L. (2023) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198883098.002.0005
Floridi, L. (2023) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198883098.003.0013
Breaking Down Information Inequality: Evidence from a Field Experiment in the Technology IndustryPreprint
Choi, J. H., Ierokomos, S., & Sterling, A. D. (2023) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.4552457
Raghavan, M. (2023) · ACM eBooks · doi:10.1145/3603195.3603213
Raghavan, M. (2023) · ACM eBooks · doi:10.1145/3603195.3603205
Raghavan, M. (2023) · ACM eBooks · doi:10.1145/3603195.3603196
How Do Classifiers Induce Agents to Behave Strategically?
Raghavan, M. (2023) · ACM eBooks · doi:10.1145/3603195.3603201
How Do Classifiers Induce Agents to Behave Strategically?
Raghavan, M. (2023) · ACM eBooks · doi:10.1145/3603195.3603210
Raghavan, M. (2023) · ACM eBooks · doi:10.1145/3603195.3603214
Chung, S., Lee, C. H., & Zheng, E. (2023) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.4548973
Talia, D. (2023) · ACM eBooks · doi:10.1145/3603178.3603186
Chandra, M., Ganguly, D., Saha, T., & Ounis, I. (2023) · ACM International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management (CIKM) · doi:10.1145/3583780.3615261
Metadata
- Authors
- Lambrecht, A., & Tucker, C.
- Affiliations
- Boston College (US)
- Venue
- Management Science
- Published
- 2019-07
- Volume
- 65
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 2966-2981
- ISSN
- 0025-1909 (ISSN-L)
- 1526-5501
- OpenAlex
- W2550925836
- Cited by
- 854
- References
- 26
- Citations by year
- 2026: 108 · 2025: 128 · 2024: 139 · 2023: 163 · 2022: 109 · 2021: 120 · 2020: 73 · 2019: 12
- FWCI
- 137.66
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- Locations
- Management Science (publishedVersion)
- London Business School Research Online (London Business School) (submittedVersion)
- DSpace@MIT (Massachusetts Institute of Technology) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Names, Identity, and Discrimination Research
- Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Media, Gender, and Advertising
- Keywords
- algorithmic bias, gender discrimination, online advertising, STEM careers, crowding out, demographic targeting, digital platforms, women in STEM
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
