The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Development of Measures to Assess the Extent to Which an Information Technology Application Provides Competitive Advantage
Abstract
In order to measures the extent to which information technology provides competitive advantages, the construct “Competitive Advantage Provided by an Information Application” (CAPITA) was operationalized. A field survey gathered data from 185 top information systems executives regarding information technology applications which had been developed to gain competitive advantage. A confirmatory analysis revealed that CAPITA may be conceptualized in terms of nine dimensions which satisfy key measurement criteria including unidimensionality and convergent validity, discriminant validity, predictive validity, and reliability. The nine dimensions from the basis of a preliminary multidimensional measure or index of competitive advantage which has practical uses for competitive assessment. These include justifying and evaluating applications and acting as dependent variables in empirical competitive advantage research. Extensions entail formulating alternative measures of CAPITA to clarify the theoretical foundations of the construct, validating the latent-structure model on another data set, use of multiple informants for data collection, and exploring complex factor structures for the construct.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A Paradigm for Developing Better Measures of Marketing Constructs
Churchill, G. A. (1979) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.1177/002224377901600110 · Cited by 16,549
Construct Validity: A Review of Basic Issues and Marketing Practices
Peter, J. P. (1981) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.2307/3150948 · Cited by 1,189
Cited by
Bharadwaj, A. S. (2000) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/3250983 · Cited by 5,042
Validation Guidelines for IS Positivist Research
Straub, D., & Gefen, D. (2004) · Communications of the Association for Information Systems · doi:10.17705/1cais.01324 · Cited by 2,797
Zhu, K., & Kraemer, K. L. (2005) · Information Systems Research · doi:10.1287/isre.1050.0045 · Cited by 1,723
Zhu, K., Kraemer, K. L., & Xu, S. (2006) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.1050.0487 · Cited by 1,440
Zhu, K., Kraemer, K., & Xu, S. (2003) · European Journal of Information Systems · doi:10.1057/palgrave.ejis.3000475 · Cited by 1,043
Chatterjee, D., Grewal, R., & Sambamurthy, V. (2002) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/4132321 · Cited by 945
Schryen, G. (2013) · European Journal of Information Systems · doi:10.1057/ejis.2012.45 · Cited by 420
Developing a multidimensional measure of system-use in an organizational context
Doll, W. J., & Torkzadeh, G. (1998) · Information & Management · doi:10.1016/s0378-7206(98)00028-7 · Cited by 334
Cenfetelli, R. T., Benbasat, I., & Al-Natour, S. (2008) · Information Systems Research · doi:10.1287/isre.1070.0163 · Cited by 272
Operational capabilities: the secret ingredient
Wu, S. J., Melnyk, S. A., & Flynn, B. B. (2010) · Decision Sciences · doi:10.1111/j.1540-5915.2010.00294.x · Cited by 263
Corporate Sustainable Development: Testing a New Scale Based on the Mainland Chinese Context
Chow, W. S., & Chen, Y. (2012) · Journal of Business Ethics · doi:10.1007/s10551-011-0983-x · Cited by 265
Adoption of business analytics and impact on performance: a qualitative study in retail
Ramanathan, R., Philpott, E., Duan, Y., & Cao, G. (2017) · Production Planning & Control · doi:10.1080/09537287.2017.1336800 · Cited by 155
Business analytics adoption process: An innovation diffusion perspective
Nam, D., Lee, J., & Lee, H. (2019) · International Journal of Information Management · doi:10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2019.07.017 · Cited by 115
Assimilation of tracking technology in the supply chain
Basole, R. C., & Nowak, M. (2018) · Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review · doi:10.1016/j.tre.2016.08.003 · Cited by 42
Liao, K., & Tu, Q. (2007) · Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management · doi:10.1108/17410380810843444 · Cited by 30
Metadata
- Authors
- Sethi, V., & King, W. R.
- Venue
- Management Science
- Published
- 1994-12
- Volume
- 40
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 1601-1627
- ISSN
- 0025-1909 (ISSN-L)
- 1526-5501
- OpenAlex
- W2123735014
- Cited by
- 550
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 6.63
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
