The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Empirical Evaluation of the Revised Technology Acceptance Model
Abstract
Davis et al. (Davis, F. D., R. P. Bagozzi, P. R. Warshaw. 1989. User acceptance of computer technology: A comparison of two theoretical models. Management Sci. 35(8) 982–1003.) proposed, tested, and revised the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM), which attempts to explain and predict why users sometimes accept and sometimes reject information systems (IS). The research reported here (1) provides a confirmatory, empirical test of the revised TAM and (2) introduces and objective measure of technology acceptance, actual usage rather than self-report usage. Subjects' beliefs about the usefulness and ease of use of an electronic mail system, their intentions to use the system, and their usage of it 15 weeks later were measured in a longitudinal study. The results confirmed that the TAM is a valuable tool for predicting intentions to use an IS. The findings here combined with results from other studies in this area suggest that the original TAM may be more appropriate than the two-version revised TAM. However, the addition of an experience component to the original TAM may be a significant enhancement. In addition, the results support that self-report usage may not be an appropriate surrogate measure for actual usage.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“The technology acceptance model, a well-known implementation science framework”
From Technology enabled clinical care (TECC): Protocol for a prospective longitudinal cohort study of smartphone-augmented mental health treatment (2021) · cites this paper as [54]
Citations
Cites
(1980) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 25,810
Perceived Usefulness, Ease of Use, and Usage of Information Technology: A Replication
Adams, D. A., Nelson, R. R., & Todd, P. A. (1992) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/249577 · Cited by 3,084
Ajzen, I. (1987) · Advances in Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/s0065-2601(08)60411-6 · Cited by 1,534
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 301–400 of 1,000
The implication of information technology on the audit profession in developing country
Tarek, M., Mohamed, E. K. A., Hussain, M. M., & Basuony, M. A. K. (2017) · International Journal of Accounting and Information Management · doi:10.1108/ijaim-03-2016-0022 · Cited by 98
Wang, G., & Song, J. (2016) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2016.12.002 · Cited by 98
Bonn, M. A., Kim, W. G., Kang, S., & Cho, M. (2015) · Journal of Hospitality Marketing & Management · doi:10.1080/19368623.2016.1115382 · Cited by 97
Exploring the role of workforce agility on digital transformation: a systematic literature review
Muduli, A., & Choudhury, A. (2024) · Benchmarking An International Journal · doi:10.1108/bij-02-2023-0108 · Cited by 97
Factors affecting e-collaboration technology use among management students
Meléndez, A. P., Garrido‐Moreno, A., & Obra, A. R. D. Á. (2007) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2007.06.013 · Cited by 97
Predicting customer behavior in the market-space: a study of Rayport and Sviokla’s framework
Lu, H., & Lin, J. C. (2002) · Information & Management · doi:10.1016/s0378-7206(01)00131-8 · Cited by 99
Cheng, J. M.-S., Sheen, G., & Lou, G.-C. (2005) · Technovation · doi:10.1016/j.technovation.2005.01.001 · Cited by 95
Gallivan, M. J. (2003) · Information & Management · doi:10.1016/s0378-7206(02)00039-3 · Cited by 98
Velicia-Martin, F., Cabrera-Sánchez, J.-P., Gil‐Cordero, E., & Palos‐Sánchez, P. R. (2021) · PeerJ Computer Science · doi:10.7717/peerj-cs.316 · Cited by 93
A model of user adoption of interface agents for email notification
Serenko, A. (2008) · Interacting with Computers · doi:10.1016/j.intcom.2008.04.004 · Cited by 92
Internet-Based Patient-Physician Electronic Communication Applications: Patient Acceptance and Trust
Klein (2007) · e-Service Journal · doi:10.2979/esj.2007.5.2.27 · Cited by 95
D’Ambra, J., & Wilson, C. S. (2004) · Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology · doi:10.1002/asi.20017 · Cited by 95
Koivumäki, T., Ristola, A., & Kesti, M. (2006) · International Journal of Mobile Communications · doi:10.1504/ijmc.2006.008950 · Cited by 94
Technology Acceptance Predictors among Student Teachers and Experienced Classroom Teachers
Smarkola, C. (2007) · Journal of Educational Computing Research · doi:10.2190/j3gm-3rk1-2907-7u03 · Cited by 92
Students' Perceptions of E-learning at the University of Jordan
Almarabeh, T. (2014) · International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (iJET) · doi:10.3991/ijet.v9i3.3347 · Cited by 93
Multihoming Users’ Preferences for Two-Sided Exchange Networks1
Koh, T. K., & Fichman, M. (2014) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.25300/misq/2014/38.4.02 · Cited by 91
Social usage of instant messaging by individuals outside the workplace in Kuwait
Rouibah, K. (2008) · Information Technology and People · doi:10.1108/09593840810860324 · Cited by 91
Profiting from Knowledge Management: The Impact of Time and Experience
Ko, D., & Dennis, A. R. (2009) · Information Systems Research · doi:10.1287/isre.1090.0247 · Cited by 92
Review of relationships among variables in TAM
Li, Y., Qi, J., & Shu, H. (2008) · Tsinghua Science & Technology · doi:10.1016/s1007-0214(08)70044-0 · Cited by 91
Determinants of customers' intentions to use hedonic networks: The case of Instagram
Bahri-Ammari, N., Hadhri, W., & Mezrani, M. (2018) · Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services · doi:10.1016/j.jretconser.2018.09.001 · Cited by 101
Intention does not always Matter: The Contingent Role of Habit in IT Usage Behaviour.
Limayem, M., Hirt, S. G., & Chin, W. W. (2001) · European Conference on Information Systems · Cited by 89
Iqbal, S., & Bhatti, Z. A. (2015) · The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning · doi:10.19173/irrodl.v16i4.2351 · Cited by 96
E‐learning and the University of Huelva: a study of WebCT and the technological acceptance model
Sánchez, R. A., Hueros, A. M. D., & Ordáz, M. G. (2013) · Campus-Wide Information Systems · doi:10.1108/10650741311306318 · Cited by 104
D’Ambra, J., & Wilson, C. S. (2004) · Internet Research · doi:10.1108/10662240410555315 · Cited by 96
Diffusion of ICT and SME Performance
Azam, M. S. (2015) · Emerald Group Publishing Limited eBooks · doi:10.1108/s1069-096420150000023005 · Cited by 100
Factors of the Technology Acceptance Model for Construction IT
Park, E. S., & Park, M. S. (2020) · Applied Sciences · doi:10.3390/app10228299 · Cited by 87
Predicting older adults’ perceptions about a computer system designed for seniors
Mitzner, T. L., Rogers, W. A., Fisk, A. D., Boot, W. R., Charness, N. H., Czaja, S. J., & Sharit, J. (2014) · Universal Access in the Information Society · doi:10.1007/s10209-014-0383-y · Cited by 86
Predicting System Usage from Intention and Past Use: Scale Issues in the Predictors
Kim, S. S., & Malhotra, N. K. (2005) · Decision Sciences · doi:10.1111/j.1540-5915.2005.00070.x · Cited by 86
AN INTEGRATED APPROACH TO MEASURE WEB SITE EFFECTIVENESS IN THE EUROPEAN HOTEL INDUSTRY
Scharl, A., Wöber, K. W., & Bauer, C. A. (2003) · Information Technology & Tourism · doi:10.3727/1098305032781157 · Cited by 86
How Relevant Are Risk Perceptions, Effort, and Performance Expectancy in Mobile Banking Adoption?
Shaikh, A. A., Glavee-Geo, R., & Karjaluoto, H. (2018) · International Journal of E-Business Research · doi:10.4018/ijebr.2018040103 · Cited by 86
Hong, J.-C., Hwang, M.-Y., Hsu, H.-F., Wong, W.-T., & Chen, M.-Y. (2011) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2011.04.011 · Cited by 85
Xu, J., & Quaddus, M. (2011) · Knowledge-Based Systems · doi:10.1016/j.knosys.2011.10.003 · Cited by 86
The determinants of intention to use electronic booking among young users in Thailand
Bhatiasevi, V., & Yoopetch, C. (2015) · Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Management · doi:10.1016/j.jhtm.2014.12.004 · Cited by 93
Mobile Banking Adoption among the Ghanaian Youth
Owusu, G. M. Y., Bekoe, R. A., Addo-Yobo, A. A., & Otieku, J. K. (2020) · Journal of African Business · doi:10.1080/15228916.2020.1753003 · Cited by 85
Web-Based Educational Information System for Enhanced Learning, EISEL: Student Assessment
Saadé, R. G. (2003) · Journal of Information Technology Education Research · doi:10.28945/327 · Cited by 85
Ahmed, S., Ernst, P., Bartlett, S. J., Valois, M., Zaihra, T., Paré, G., Grad, R. M., Eilayyan, O., Perreault, R. B., & Tamblyn, R. M. (2016) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/jmir.5866 · Cited by 85
Incorporating Network Externalities into the Technology Acceptance Model *
Song, M., Parry, M. E., & Kawakami, T. (2009) · Journal of Product Innovation Management · doi:10.1111/j.1540-5885.2009.00659.x · Cited by 84
Which Factors Form Older Adults’ Acceptance of Mobile Information and Communication Technologies?
Wilkowska, W., & Ziefle, M. (2009) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-10308-7_6 · Cited by 82
The determinants of customer interactions with internet-enabled e-banking services
Liao, Z., & Wong, W. (2007) · Journal of the Operational Research Society · doi:10.1057/palgrave.jors.2602429 · Cited by 82
Liaw, S.-S., Chang, W., Hung, W.-H., & Huang, H. (2004) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2004.09.003 · Cited by 82
Zhu, D., Lin, T. C.-T., & Hsu, Y.-C. (2012) · Total Quality Management & Business Excellence · doi:10.1080/14783363.2012.704269 · Cited by 81
User Acceptance of Voice Recognition Technology
Simon, S. J., & Paper, D. J. (2007) · Journal of Organizational and End User Computing · doi:10.4018/joeuc.2007010102 · Cited by 82
Xu, X., Su, Y., Zhang, Y., Wu, Y., & Xin-yu, X. (2024) · Heliyon · doi:10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e26239 · Cited by 86
The Effect of Personal and Virtual Word‐of‐Mouth on Technology Acceptance
Parry, M. E., Kawakami, T., & Kishiya, K. (2012) · Journal of Product Innovation Management · doi:10.1111/j.1540-5885.2012.00972.x · Cited by 80
User acceptance of wireless technology in organizations: A comparison of alternative models
Wu, C.-S., Cheng, F.-F., Yen, D. C., & Huang, Y. (2010) · Computer Standards & Interfaces · doi:10.1016/j.csi.2010.03.002 · Cited by 90
An investigation of user perceptions and attitudes towards learning objects
Lau, S. H., & Woods, P. C. (2007) · British Journal of Educational Technology · doi:10.1111/j.1467-8535.2007.00770.x · Cited by 90
Exploring the impact of online service quality on portal site usage
Lin, C.-K., & Wu, S. (2003) · Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS) · doi:10.1109/hicss.2002.994223 · Cited by 80
Tsourela, M., & Nerantzaki, D.-M. (2020) · Future Internet · doi:10.3390/fi12110191 · Cited by 79
Johnson, M. P., Zheng, K., & Padman, R. (2012) · Decision Support Systems · doi:10.1016/j.dss.2012.10.049 · Cited by 84
Dulčić, Ž., Pavlić, D., & Silić, I. (2012) · Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.09.1143 · Cited by 78
Model to Predict the Impact of a Technology on Construction Productivity
Goodrum, P. M., Haas, C. T., Caldas, C. H., Zhai, D., Yeiser, J., & Homm, D. (2010) · Journal of Construction Engineering and Management · doi:10.1061/(asce)co.1943-7862.0000328 · Cited by 77
Huang, E., & Chuang, M. H. (2004) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2004.10.010 · Cited by 78
Sek, Y.-W., Lau, S. H., Teoh, K.-K., Law, C.-Y., & Parumo, S. B. (2010) · Journal of Applied Sciences · doi:10.3923/jas.2010.2395.2402 · Cited by 79
Akyüz, N. C., & Theuvsen, L. (2020) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su12176875 · Cited by 75
Predicting user satisfaction, strain and system usage of employee self-services
Konradt, U., Christophersen, T., & Schäffer-Külz, U. G. (2006) · International Journal of Human-Computer Studies · doi:10.1016/j.ijhcs.2006.07.001 · Cited by 74
The role of ease of use, usefulness and attitude in the prediction of World Wide Web usage
Lederer, A. L., Maupin, D. J., Sena, M. P., & Zhuang, Y. (1998) · ACM SIGCPR Conference on Computer Personnel Research (SIGCPR) · doi:10.1145/279179.279211 · Cited by 78
Kim, K. J., Shin, D., & Park, E. (2015) · Cyberpsychology Behavior and Social Networking · doi:10.1089/cyber.2014.0675 · Cited by 77
ON THE MULTI-DIMENSIONAL NATURE OF COMPATIBILITY BELIEFS IN TECHNOLOGY ACCEPTANCE
Agarwal, R., & Karahanna, E. (1998) · Cited by 73
The moderating effect of culture on e-filing taxes: evidence from India
Zaidi, S. K. R., Henderson, C. D., & Gupta, G. (2017) · Journal of Accounting in Emerging Economies · doi:10.1108/jaee-05-2015-0038 · Cited by 72
Ali, F., Doğan, S., Chen, X., Çobanoğlu, C., & Limayem, M. (2022) · International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1080/10447318.2022.2041880 · Cited by 72
Extended TAM Model: Impacts of Convenience on Acceptance and Use of Moodle.
Hsu, H.-H., -, H., Yuying, & Chang (2013) · Cited by 72
Adoption of Open Source Software: The role of social identification
Gwebu, K. L., & Wang, J. (2011) · Decision Support Systems · doi:10.1016/j.dss.2010.12.010 · Cited by 70
An examination of digital game-based situated learning applied to Chinese language poetry education
Chen, H.-R., & Lin, Y.-S. (2015) · Technology Pedagogy and Education · doi:10.1080/1475939x.2015.1007077 · Cited by 74
Virtual Reality Experience of Mega Sports Events: A Technology Acceptance Study
Capasa, L., Zulauf, K., & Wagner, R. (2022) · Journal of theoretical and applied electronic commerce research · doi:10.3390/jtaer17020036 · Cited by 71
Larue, G. S., Rakotonirainy, A., Haworth, N. L., & Darvell, M. J. (2015) · Transportation Research Part F Traffic Psychology and Behaviour · doi:10.1016/j.trf.2015.02.003 · Cited by 76
Jeyaraj, A., & Sabherwal, R. (2008) · Information and Organization · doi:10.1016/j.infoandorg.2008.04.001 · Cited by 75
Encyclopedia of business analytics and optimization
(2014) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.52-0606 · Cited by 71
Wens, M., Mwangi, M. N., Loon, A. F. V., & Aerts, J. C. J. H. (2021) · International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction · doi:10.1016/j.ijdrr.2021.102435 · Cited by 76
Satisfaction and use of personal emergency response systems
Heinbüchner, B., Hautzinger, M., Becker, C., & Pfeiffer, K. (2010) · Zeitschrift für Gerontologie und Geriatrie · doi:10.1007/s00391-010-0127-4 · Cited by 70
Acceptance of online banking information systems: an empirical case in a developing economy
Chandio, F. H., Zahir Irani, A., Abbasi, M. S., & Nizamani, H. A. (2013) · Behaviour and Information Technology · doi:10.1080/0144929x.2013.806593 · Cited by 72
Exploring user acceptance of an e-hospital service: An empirical study in Taiwan
Chang, M.-Y., Pang, C., Tarn, J. M., Liu, T.-S., & Yen, D. C. (2014) · Computer Standards & Interfaces · doi:10.1016/j.csi.2014.08.004 · Cited by 69
Yu, P., & Qian, S. (2018) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0190749 · Cited by 76
MORRIS, M. G., & Turner, J. M. (2001) · International Journal of Human-Computer Studies · doi:10.1006/ijhc.2001.0460 · Cited by 71
RFID Technology: Implications for Healthcare Organizations
Carr, A. S., Zhang, M., Klopping, I. M., & Min, H. (2010) · American Journal of Business · doi:10.1108/19355181201000008 · Cited by 68
Exploring forecasting and project management characteristics of supply chain management
Smith, A. D., & Offodile, O. F. (2006) · International Journal of Logistics Systems and Management · doi:10.1504/ijlsm.2007.011821 · Cited by 68
Al‐Debei, M. M. (2014) · International Journal of Business Information Systems · doi:10.1504/ijbis.2014.059252 · Cited by 68
Green, G. C., Hevner, A. R., & Collins, R. W. (2004) · Information and Software Technology · doi:10.1016/j.infsof.2004.10.004 · Cited by 67
Using information-systems constructs to study online- and telephone-banking technologies
Sundarraj, R. P., & Wu, J. A. G. (2005) · Electronic Commerce Research and Applications · doi:10.1016/j.elerap.2004.12.001 · Cited by 67
Factors Influencing New Entrant Dairy Farmer's Decision-making Process around Technology Adoption
McDonald, R., Heanue, K., Pierce, K. M., & Horan, B. (2015) · The Journal of Agricultural Education and Extension · doi:10.1080/1389224x.2015.1026364 · Cited by 65
Kishore, A., & McLean, E. R. (2007) · IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management · doi:10.1109/tem.2007.906849 · Cited by 68
Pieterson, W. J., & van Dijk, J. A. G. M. (2007) · University of Twente Research Information · doi:10.5555/1248460.1248488 · Cited by 65
Lee, T. M., & Jun, J. (2007) · International Journal of Mobile Communications · doi:10.1504/ijmc.2007.012398 · Cited by 68
Jones, C. M., McCarthy, R. V., Halawi, L., & Mujtaba, B. (2010) · Issues in Information Systems · doi:10.48009/1_iis_2010_9-16 · Cited by 64
Evaluating the effectiveness of Didi ride-hailing security measures: An integration model
Jing, P., Chen, Y., Wang, X., Pan, K., & Yuan, D. (2020) · Transportation Research Part F Traffic Psychology and Behaviour · doi:10.1016/j.trf.2020.11.004 · Cited by 64
Kersten, G. E., Vetschera, R., & Koeszegi, S. T. (2004) · International Negotiation · doi:10.1163/1571806041262070 · Cited by 67
Marketing Department, U. O. F. –. M., NGUYEN, X. T., & LUU, Q. K. (2020) · The Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business · doi:10.13106/jafeb.2020.vol7.no6.255 · Cited by 63
THE WILLINGNESS TO ADOPT THE INTERNET OF THINGS (IOT) CONCEPTION IN TAIWAN’S CONSTRUCTION INDUSTRY
Chen, J., Ha, N. T. T., Tai, H.-W., & Chang, C.-A. (2020) · Journal of Civil Engineering and Management · doi:10.3846/jcem.2020.12639 · Cited by 63
Telepresence Robots for People with Special Needs: A Systematic Review
Zhang, G., & Hansen, J. P. (2022) · International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1080/10447318.2021.2009673 · Cited by 63
Application of the technology acceptance model to food delivery apps
Lee, W. S., Song, M., Moon, J., & Tang, R. (2022) · British Food Journal · doi:10.1108/bfj-05-2021-0574 · Cited by 63
Lorenzo‐Romero, C., Alarcón‐del‐Amo, M., & Borja, M. Á. G. (2011) · Cuadernos de Economía y Dirección de la Empresa · doi:10.1016/j.cede.2010.12.003 · Cited by 71
Sahay, A., & Riley, D. (2003) · Journal of Product Innovation Management · doi:10.1111/1540-5885.00033 · Cited by 63
A critical analysis of ten influential factors to energy technology acceptance and adoption
Billanes, J. D., & Enevoldsen, P. (2021) · Energy Reports · doi:10.1016/j.egyr.2021.09.118 · Cited by 74
Predictors of Engagement and Participation in an On-Line Course
Miller, M. D., Ranier, R., & Corley, J. K. (2003) · Online journal of distance learning administration · Cited by 62
Graduate students' usage of and attitudes towards e‐books: experiences from Taiwan
Wu, M., & Chen, S.-C. (2011) · Data Technologies and Applications · doi:10.1108/00330331111151601 · Cited by 62
Using a Technology Acceptance Model to Investigate Academic Acceptance of the Internet
Kripanont, N. (2006) · Journal of Business Systems Governance & Ethics · doi:10.15209/jbsge.v1i2.72 · Cited by 62
Scholtz, B. M., Mahmud, I., & Ramayah, T. (2016) · Interdisciplinary Journal of Information Knowledge and Management · doi:10.28945/3591 · Cited by 62
Jung, H. S., Kim, K. H., & Lee, C. H. (2014) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2014.04.027 · Cited by 61
Rana, N. P., Dwivedi, Y. K., Williams, M. D., & Lal, B. (2014) · Information Systems Management · doi:10.1080/10580530.2015.983019 · Cited by 61
How In-Home Technologies Mediate Caregiving Relationships in Later Life
Huber, L. L., Shankar, K., Caine, K. E., Connelly, K., Camp, L. J., Walker, B. A., & Borrero, L. (2012) · International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1080/10447318.2012.715990 · Cited by 66
Lok, C. K. (2015) · Emerald Group Publishing Limited eBooks · doi:10.1108/s1069-09642015000023b003 · Cited by 64
Metadata
- Authors
- Szajna, B.
- Affiliations
- Texas Christian University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Szajna, Bernadette
- Venue
- Management Science
- Published
- 1996-01
- Volume
- 42
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 85-92
- ISSN
- 0025-1909 (ISSN-L)
- 1526-5501
- OpenAlex
- W2117948235
- Cited by
- 1,656
- References
- 3
- Citations by year
- 2026: 18 · 2025: 23 · 2024: 34 · 2023: 47 · 2022: 58 · 2021: 72 · 2020: 69 · 2019: 53 · 2018: 50 · 2017: 51 · 2016: 58 · 2015: 80 · 2014: 86 · 2013: 72 · 2012: 104
- FWCI
- 38.52
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Management Science (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Technology Adoption and User Behaviour
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management Information Systems › Information Systems Theories and Implementation
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Innovative Human-Technology Interaction
- Keywords
- technology acceptance model, perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, intention to use, email systems, longitudinal study
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review