The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Empirical Evaluation of the Revised Technology Acceptance Model
Abstract
Davis et al. (Davis, F. D., R. P. Bagozzi, P. R. Warshaw. 1989. User acceptance of computer technology: A comparison of two theoretical models. Management Sci. 35(8) 982–1003.) proposed, tested, and revised the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM), which attempts to explain and predict why users sometimes accept and sometimes reject information systems (IS). The research reported here (1) provides a confirmatory, empirical test of the revised TAM and (2) introduces and objective measure of technology acceptance, actual usage rather than self-report usage. Subjects' beliefs about the usefulness and ease of use of an electronic mail system, their intentions to use the system, and their usage of it 15 weeks later were measured in a longitudinal study. The results confirmed that the TAM is a valuable tool for predicting intentions to use an IS. The findings here combined with results from other studies in this area suggest that the original TAM may be more appropriate than the two-version revised TAM. However, the addition of an experience component to the original TAM may be a significant enhancement. In addition, the results support that self-report usage may not be an appropriate surrogate measure for actual usage.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“The technology acceptance model, a well-known implementation science framework”
From Technology enabled clinical care (TECC): Protocol for a prospective longitudinal cohort study of smartphone-augmented mental health treatment (2021) · cites this paper as [54]
Citations
Cites
(1980) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 25,810
Perceived Usefulness, Ease of Use, and Usage of Information Technology: A Replication
Adams, D. A., Nelson, R. R., & Todd, P. A. (1992) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/249577 · Cited by 3,084
Ajzen, I. (1987) · Advances in Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/s0065-2601(08)60411-6 · Cited by 1,534
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward A Unified View1
Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., & Davis, F. D. (2003) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/30036540 · Cited by 45,035
Trust and TAM in Online Shopping: An Integrated Model1
Gefen, D., Karahanna, E., & Straub, D. W. (2003) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/30036519 · Cited by 8,635
Venkatesh, V. (2000) · Information Systems Research · doi:10.1287/isre.11.4.342.11872 · Cited by 6,664
Structural Equation Modeling and Regression: Guidelines for Research Practice
Gefen, D., Straub, D., & Boudreau, M.-C. (2000) · Communications of the Association for Information Systems · doi:10.17705/1cais.00407 · Cited by 6,416
(2003) · International Journal of Electronic Commerce · doi:10.1080/10864415.2003.11044275 · Cited by 5,715
Agarwal, R., & Karahanna, E. (2000) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/3250951 · Cited by 4,726
Venkatesh, V., & Morris, M. G. (2000) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/3250981 · Cited by 2,780
Why do people use information technology? A critical review of the technology acceptance model
Legris, P., Ingham, J., & Collerette, P. (2003) · Information & Management · doi:10.1016/s0378-7206(01)00143-4 · Cited by 4,250
Parasuraman (2005) · doi:10.1177/1094670504271156 · Cited by 3,967
Agarwal, R., & Prasad, J. (1998) · Information Systems Research · doi:10.1287/isre.9.2.204 · Cited by 3,575
Malhotra, N. K., Kim, S. S., & Patil, A. (2006) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.1060.0597 · Cited by 3,329
Applying the Technology Acceptance Model and Flow Theory to Online Consumer Behavior
Koufaris, M. (2002) · Information Systems Research · doi:10.1287/isre.13.2.205.83 · Cited by 3,240
A meta-analysis of the technology acceptance model
King, W. R., & He, J. (2006) · Information & Management · doi:10.1016/j.im.2006.05.003 · Cited by 2,906
A Theoretical Integration of User Satisfaction and Technology Acceptance
Wixom, B. H., & Todd, P. A. (2005) · Information Systems Research · doi:10.1287/isre.1050.0042 · Cited by 2,835
The Technology Acceptance Model: Its past and its future in health care
Holden, R. J., & Karsh, B.-T. (2010) · Journal of Biomedical Informatics · doi:10.1016/j.jbi.2009.07.002 · Cited by 2,669
The Technology Acceptance Model: Past, Present, and Future
Lee, Y., Kozar, K. A., & Larsen, K. R. T. (2003) · Communications of the Association for Information Systems · doi:10.17705/1cais.01250 · Cited by 2,572
Technology acceptance model: a literature review from 1986 to 2013
Marangunić, N., & Granić, A. (2015) · Universal Access in the Information Society · doi:10.1007/s10209-014-0348-1 · Cited by 2,458
How Habit Limits the Predictive Power of Intention: The Case of Information Systems Continuance1
Limayem, M., Hirt, S. G., & Cheung, C. M. K. (2007) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/25148817 · Cited by 2,450
Wu, J.-H., & Wang, S.-C. (2005) · Information & Management · doi:10.1016/j.im.2004.07.001 · Cited by 2,284
Are Individual Differences Germane to the Acceptance of New Information Technologies?
Agarwal, R., & Prasad, J. (1999) · Decision Sciences · doi:10.1111/j.1540-5915.1999.tb01614.x · Cited by 2,174
Value-based Adoption of Mobile Internet: An empirical investigation
Kim, H.-W., Chan, H. C., & Gupta, S. (2007) · Decision Support Systems · doi:10.1016/j.dss.2005.05.009 · Cited by 2,084
Examining the technology acceptance model using physician acceptance of telemedicine technology
Hu, P. J., Chau, P. Y. K., Sheng, O. R. L., & Tam, K. Y. (1999) · Journal of Management Information Systems · doi:10.1080/07421222.1999.11518247 · Cited by 1,951
The Relative Importance of Perceived Ease of Use in IS Adoption: A Study of E-Commerce Adoption
Drexel University, Gefen, D., Straub, D., & Georgia State University (2000) · Journal of the Association for Information Systems · doi:10.17705/1jais.00008 · Cited by 1,833
Bhattacherjee, A., & Premkumar, G. (2004) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/25148634 · Cited by 1,764
Schepers, J., & Wetzels, M. G. M. (2006) · Information & Management · doi:10.1016/j.im.2006.10.007 · Cited by 1,808
Personal Computing Acceptance Factors in Small Firms: A Structural Equation Model1
Igbaria, M., Zinatelli, N., Cragg, P. B., & Cavaye, A. (1997) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/249498 · Cited by 1,711
Information technology acceptance by individual professionals: a model comparison approach
Chau, P. Y. K., & Hu, P. J. (2001) · Decision Sciences · doi:10.1111/j.1540-5915.2001.tb00978.x · Cited by 1,409
Performance Impacts of Information Technology: Is Actual Usage the Missing Link?
Devaraj, S., & Kohli, R. (2003) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.49.3.273.12736 · Cited by 1,407
Venkatesh, V., & Brown, S. A. (2001) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/3250959 · Cited by 1,440
Creation of Favorable User Perceptions: Exploring the Role of Intrinsic Motivation1
Venkatesh, V. (1999) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/249753 · Cited by 1,428
Jasperson, J., Carter, & Zmud, R. W. (2005) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/25148694 · Cited by 1,433
The technology acceptance model and the World Wide Web
Lederer, A. L., Maupin, D. J., Sena, M. P., & Zhuang, Y. (2000) · Decision Support Systems · doi:10.1016/s0167-9236(00)00076-2 · Cited by 1,372
Yi, M. Y., & Hwang, Y. (2003) · International Journal of Human-Computer Studies · doi:10.1016/s1071-5819(03)00114-9 · Cited by 1,362
Investigating the determinants and age and gender differences in the acceptance of mobile learning
Wang, Y., Wu, M., & Wang, H. (2008) · British Journal of Educational Technology · doi:10.1111/j.1467-8535.2007.00809.x · Cited by 1,308
The role of e-learning, the advantages and disadvantages of its adoption in Higher Education.
Arkorful, V., & Abaidoo, N. (2014) · Cited by 1,222
The Role of Espoused National Cultural Values in Technology Acceptance1
Srite, M., & Karahanna, E. (2006) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/25148745 · Cited by 1,169
A Review of the Predictors, Linkages, and Biases in IT Innovation Adoption Research
Jeyaraj, A., Rottman, J. W., & Lacity, M. C. (2006) · Journal of Information Technology · doi:10.1057/palgrave.jit.2000056 · Cited by 1,136
The development of initial trust in an online company by new customers
Koufaris, M., & Hampton-Sosa, W. (2004) · Information & Management · doi:10.1016/j.im.2003.08.004 · Cited by 1,114
The psychological origins of perceived usefulness and ease-of-use
Karahanna, E., & Straub, D. W. (1999) · Information & Management · doi:10.1016/s0378-7206(98)00096-2 · Cited by 1,163
Chau, P. Y. K., & Hu, P. J. (2002) · Information & Management · doi:10.1016/s0378-7206(01)00098-2 · Cited by 1,144
Saadé, R. G., & Bahli, B. (2004) · Information & Management · doi:10.1016/j.im.2003.12.013 · Cited by 1,109
Determining Uses and Gratifications for the Internet
Stafford, T. F., Stafford, M. R., & Schkade, L. L. (2004) · Decision Sciences · doi:10.1111/j.00117315.2004.02524.x · Cited by 1,010
The role of moderating factors in user technology acceptance
Sun, H., & Zhang, P. (2005) · International Journal of Human-Computer Studies · doi:10.1016/j.ijhcs.2005.04.013 · Cited by 1,070
Understanding the Blockchain technology adoption in supply chains-Indian context
Kamble, S., Gunasekaran, A., & Arha, H. (2018) · International Journal of Production Research · doi:10.1080/00207543.2018.1518610 · Cited by 1,040
Kim, S. S., & Malhotra, N. K. (2005) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.1040.0326 · Cited by 1,047
Inexperience and experience with online stores: the importance of TAM and trust
Gefen, D., Karahanna, E., & Straub, D. W. (2003) · IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management · doi:10.1109/tem.2003.817277 · Cited by 965
Hong, S., Thong, J. Y. L., & Tam, K. Y. (2006) · Decision Support Systems · doi:10.1016/j.dss.2006.03.009 · Cited by 955
The acceptance and use of a virtual learning environment in China
van Raaij, E. M., & Schepers, J. J. L. (2008) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2006.09.001 · Cited by 940
Technology acceptance model (TAM) and social media usage: an empirical study on Facebook
Rauniar, R., Rawski, G., Yang, J., & Johnson, B. (2014) · Journal of Enterprise Information Management · doi:10.1108/jeim-04-2012-0011 · Cited by 937
Towards an understanding of the behavioural intention to use a web site
Lin, J. C., & Lu, H. (2000) · International Journal of Information Management · doi:10.1016/s0268-4012(00)00005-0 · Cited by 968
The influence of system characteristics on e-learning use
Pituch, K. A., & Lee, Y.-K. (2004) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2004.10.007 · Cited by 984
User Acceptance Enablers in Individual Decision Making About Technology: Toward an Integrated Model
Venkatesh, V., Speier, C., & Morris, M. G. (2002) · Decision Sciences · doi:10.1111/j.1540-5915.2002.tb01646.x · Cited by 948
Does the technology acceptance model predict actual use? A systematic literature review
Turner, M., Kitchenham, B., Brereton, P., Charters, S., & Budgen, D. (2010) · Information and Software Technology · doi:10.1016/j.infsof.2009.11.005 · Cited by 851
WebQual: An Instrument for Consumer Evaluation of Web Sites
Loiacono, E. T., Watson, R. T., & Goodhue, D. L. (2007) · International Journal of Electronic Commerce · doi:10.2753/jec1086-4415110302 · Cited by 812
Empirical examination of the adoption of WebCT using TAM
Ngai, E. W. T., Poon, J. K. L., & Chan, Y. H. C. (2007) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2004.11.007 · Cited by 813
Determinants of behavioral intention to mobile banking
Gu, J., Lee, S., & Suh, Y. (2009) · Expert Systems with Applications · doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2009.03.024 · Cited by 842
Surveying instructor and learner attitudes toward e-learning
Liaw, S.-S., Huang, H., & Chen, G. (2006) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2006.01.001 · Cited by 824
Do I really have to? User acceptance of mandated technology
Brown, S. A., Massey, A. P., Montoya‐Weiss, M. M., & Burkman, J. (2002) · European Journal of Information Systems · doi:10.1057/palgrave.ejis.3000438 · Cited by 798
An empirical test of the DeLone-McLean model of information system success
Iivari, J. (2005) · ACM SIGMIS Database the DATABASE for Advances in Information Systems · doi:10.1145/1066149.1066152 · Cited by 762
An empirical study on predicting user acceptance of e-shopping on the Web
Shih, H. (2003) · Information & Management · doi:10.1016/s0378-7206(03)00079-x · Cited by 756
Devaraj, S., Easley, R. F., & Crant, J. M. (2008) · Information Systems Research · doi:10.1287/isre.1070.0153 · Cited by 716
Chau, P. Y. K., & Hu, P. J. (2002) · Journal of Management Information Systems · doi:10.1080/07421222.2002.11045699 · Cited by 707
Reconceptualizing Compatibility Beliefs in Technology Acceptance Research1
Karahanna, E., Agarwal, R., & Angst, C. M. (2006) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/25148754 · Cited by 726
Adoption of Virtual Try-on technology for online apparel shopping
Kim, J., & Forsythe, S. M. (2008) · Journal of Interactive Marketing · doi:10.1002/dir.20113 · Cited by 690
Information System Success: Individual and Organizational Determinants
Sabherwal, R., Jeyaraj, A., & Chowa, C. (2006) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.1060.0583 · Cited by 685
Hsieh, J. J. P.-A., Rai, A., & Keil, M. (2008) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/25148830 · Cited by 700
Plouffe, C. R., Hulland, J. S., & Vandenbosch, M. (2001) · Information Systems Research · doi:10.1287/isre.12.2.208.9697 · Cited by 690
The Technology Acceptance Model: A Meta-Analysis of Empirical Findings
Ma, Q., & Liu, L. (2004) · Journal of Organizational and End User Computing · doi:10.4018/joeuc.2004010104 · Cited by 660
Organizational adoption and assimilation of complex technological innovations
Gallivan, M. J. (2001) · ACM SIGMIS Database the DATABASE for Advances in Information Systems · doi:10.1145/506724.506729 · Cited by 674
Mobile-banking adoption by Iranian bank clients
Hanafizadeh, P., Behboudi, M., Koshksaray, A. A., & Tabar, M. J. S. (2012) · Telematics and Informatics · doi:10.1016/j.tele.2012.11.001 · Cited by 696
Technology acceptance: a meta‐analysis of the TAM: Part 1
Yousafzai, S. Y., Foxall, G. R., & Pallister, J. G. (2007) · Journal of Modelling in Management · doi:10.1108/17465660710834453 · Cited by 624
Inman, J. J., & Nikolova, H. D. (2017) · Journal of Retailing · doi:10.1016/j.jretai.2016.12.006 · Cited by 612
Determinants of adoption of third generation mobile multimedia services
Pagani, M. (2004) · Journal of Interactive Marketing · doi:10.1002/dir.20011 · Cited by 602
Holden, H., & Rada, R. (2011) · Journal of Research on Technology in Education · doi:10.1080/15391523.2011.10782576 · Cited by 584
Davis, F. D., & Venkatesh, V. (2004) · IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management · doi:10.1109/tem.2003.822468 · Cited by 582
Adoption of ICT in a government organization in a developing country: An empirical study
Gupta, B., Dasgupta, S., & Gupta, A. (2008) · The Journal of Strategic Information Systems · doi:10.1016/j.jsis.2007.12.004 · Cited by 579
It's all about attitude: revisiting the technology acceptance model
Yang, H.-D., & Yoo, Y. (2004) · Decision Support Systems · doi:10.1016/s0167-9236(03)00062-9 · Cited by 578
Hansen, J. M., Saridakis, G., & Benson, V. (2017) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2017.11.010 · Cited by 629
User acceptance of YouTube for procedural learning: An extension of the Technology Acceptance Model
Lee, D. Y., & Lehto, M. R. (2013) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2012.10.001 · Cited by 565
Technology use and performance: A field study of broker workstations
Lucas, H. C., & Spitler, V. K. (1999) · Decision Sciences · doi:10.1111/j.1540-5915.1999.tb01611.x · Cited by 561
Rafique, H., Almagrabi, A. O., Shamim, A., Anwar, F., & Bashir, A. K. (2019) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103732 · Cited by 546
Hackbarth, G., Grover, V., & Yi, M. Y. (2002) · Information & Management · doi:10.1016/s0378-7206(02)00006-x · Cited by 543
Chowdhury, S., Budhwar, P., Dey, P. K., Joel-Edgar, S., & Abadie, A. (2022) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.01.069 · Cited by 531
Yousafzai, S., Foxall, G. R., & Pallister, J. (2010) · Journal of Applied Social Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.1559-1816.2010.00615.x · Cited by 559
Al-Gahtani, S. S., & King, M. (1999) · Behaviour & Information Technology · doi:10.1080/014492999119020 · Cited by 519
Consumer attitude and intention to adopt mobile wallet in India – An empirical study
Chawla, D., & Joshi, H. (2019) · International Journal of Bank Marketing · doi:10.1108/ijbm-09-2018-0256 · Cited by 518
Sharma, R., Yetton, P., & Crawford, J. (2009) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/20650305 · Cited by 496
Impact of Trust and Privacy Concerns on Technology Acceptance in Healthcare: An Indian Perspective
Dhagarra, D., Goswami, M., & Kumar, G. (2020) · International Journal of Medical Informatics · doi:10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2020.104164 · Cited by 517
Kim, J., & Park, H.-A. (2012) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/jmir.2143 · Cited by 475
The mediation of external variables in the technology acceptance model
Burton‐Jones, A., & Hubona, G. S. (2006) · Information & Management · doi:10.1016/j.im.2006.03.007 · Cited by 509
Meléndez, A. P., Obra, A. R. D. Á., & Garrido‐Moreno, A. (2012) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2012.12.014 · Cited by 484
Extended technology acceptance model of Internet utilization behavior
Shih, H. (2003) · Information & Management · doi:10.1016/j.im.2003.08.009 · Cited by 463
Extending the TAM for a t-commerce
Yu, J., Ha, I., Choi, M., & Rho, J. J. (2005) · Information & Management · doi:10.1016/j.im.2004.11.001 · Cited by 446
Sullivan, Y. W., & Kim, D. J. (2018) · International Journal of Information Management · doi:10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2017.12.008 · Cited by 443
Adoption of the mobile Internet: An empirical study of multimedia message service (MMS)
Hsu, C., Lu, H., & Hsu, H.-H. (2006) · Omega · doi:10.1016/j.omega.2006.03.005 · Cited by 429
Computer Technology Training in the Workplace: A Longitudinal Investigation of the Effect of Mood
Venkatesh, V., & Speier, C. (1999) · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes · doi:10.1006/obhd.1999.2837 · Cited by 429
An empirical investigation of student acceptance of course websites
Selim, H. M. (2003) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/s0360-1315(02)00142-2 · Cited by 431
An empirical study of instructor adoption of web-based learning systems
Wang, W., & Wang, C. (2009) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2009.02.021 · Cited by 424
Pavlou, P. A., & Chai, L. (2002) · Journal of electronic commerce research · Cited by 398
A Model of Business School Students' Acceptance of a Web-Based Course Management System
Martins, L. L., & Kellermanns, F. W. (2004) · Academy of Management Learning and Education · doi:10.5465/amle.2004.12436815 · Cited by 393
Metadata
- Authors
- Szajna, B.
- Affiliations
- Texas Christian University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Szajna, Bernadette
- Venue
- Management Science
- Published
- 1996-01
- Volume
- 42
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 85-92
- ISSN
- 0025-1909 (ISSN-L)
- 1526-5501
- OpenAlex
- W2117948235
- Cited by
- 1,656
- References
- 3
- Citations by year
- 2026: 18 · 2025: 23 · 2024: 34 · 2023: 47 · 2022: 58 · 2021: 72 · 2020: 69 · 2019: 53 · 2018: 50 · 2017: 51 · 2016: 58 · 2015: 80 · 2014: 86 · 2013: 72 · 2012: 104
- FWCI
- 38.52
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Management Science (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Technology Adoption and User Behaviour
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management Information Systems › Information Systems Theories and Implementation
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Innovative Human-Technology Interaction
- Keywords
- technology acceptance model, perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, intention to use, email systems, longitudinal study
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review